There is nothing wrong with the Mododi Quran translation. I support that translation.
See, Islam allows an underage girl to be married off. But the marriage consummation will take place once she becomes an adult.
Hazrat Ayesha married Prophet Muhammad PBUH when she was 6 , not an adult. This is the reason Prophet Muhammad held off consummating the marriage till she becomes an adult. So Quran is saying a girl who hasn't had a period yet, (and her husband dies) She has to go through that specific time of waiting (Iddat).
Quran is not saying that an under age can have sex with her husband.
If I an adult girl married an adult man, and suppose her husband lived in a different country and they never had sex, he dies, that woman still has to go through the same Iddat period though she never had sex with her husband. Iddat does not mean sex. So your criticism on Mododi translation is baseless. I strongly support his translation and I just defended it.
BUT BUT BUT
Mododi never said that it is ok to have sex with an underage girl. I just proved the translation of his, which also doesn't prove that.
But
Your Imam Khumanai told his Shia followers that it is OK to touch a new born baby's private parts to get sexual pleasure.
Now you tell me,
Is there any sect, any religion (besides the one which Imam Khumani represents) which allows touching a newborn baby's private parts to get sexual pleasure?