Cricketism and Indian Terrorism

abdulruff

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)


786
Muslim blood is cheap...


Happy Holy Ramadan.
Humanity has a right to know truth. __________







Cricketism and Indian Terrorism
-DR. ABDUL RUFF
-----------



[After a convincing win in Test-1, the English masters, like Indian state terrorists pouncing upon innocent Kashmiri Muslims, were on another slaughter of innocent looking Indians in London under the Bridge and drowned India possibly without leaving any semblance of proof. UK cannot be caught. USA enjoys the cricket attack of its other half of terror twins on an aspiring India.]




At long last Sania Mirza, upon her "disputed marriage" with a Pakistani cricketer who has since then failed to make anything on the field, has won a double title in USA with a female partner from Moscow. The dispute arose as a result of an almost street level quarrel at Hyderabad Banjara Hills with one of her friendly fans who had been focused on Sania and wanted to marry her and enjoy tennis as well. In spite shuffling her male partners, Sania could not win any other title so far obviously because there are better players in the field and India could not promote her by bribing and influencing all concerned.Indians win tennis matches at some levels only when strong players do not participate or withdraw.


India is deadly interested only in cricketism and makes all efforts even immorally to get some wins... while Indian terror premier Manmohan keeps his blue head turban, maybe because he believes blue color show is being pampered in India by corporate world.....


Cricket has been India's main problem. Efforts to employ terrorism gimmicks to advance its cricketism interests have drawn a total blank in London, the origin land of cricket.

At long last, Indian cricket lords and commentators have now openly admitted the primary role the bowlers play in cricket match outcomes. They admit that absence of the most effective bowler in the Indian team has cost them very dearly in both tests. So long, Indian cricket specialists, including those who played cricket as batboys claimed the primacy of batboys and their "form" responsible for match outcomes, effectively, as they do on the field in performing "give and take" gimmicks as per the "fixing" guidelines.



However, they are yet to admit the practice of boosting the image of select cricketers for special state purposes, awards and more cash, inclusive.


In stead of realizing the fact that India cricket successes are by and a large stage managed, the cricket commentator nuts just blame Indian rout in England ( two more defeats have yet to take place) on some vague issues. . .



When the junior cricketers thrashed the Team Indian in "practice" match it was indicative of the future course of cricket between India and England that could be disastrous for India. In the first 2 tests England has drowned India almost entirely.



After a convincing win in Test-1, the English masters, like Indian state terrorists pouncing upon innocent Kashmiri Muslims, were on another slaughter of innocent looking Indians in London under the Bridge and drowned India possibly without leaving any semblance of proof. UK cannot be caught. USA enjoys the cricket attack of its other half of terror twins on an aspiring India.





It was not just the greatest defeat of Indian in London with 2 tests have been lost, also losing its bogus "ranking" as well, but Team India has been totally marginalized, made irrelevant in sport or entertainment. This is the first time that India have lost two consecutive Tests in England since 1974. Rahul Dravid scored two consecutive centuries in two matches and India have lost both. Sachuin Tendulkar is also totally irrelevant now both as a cricketer playing or as a member of the team to evoke a "spectacular" win.


Time is fast changing. English boys have made a few records thanks to Indian bankruptcy and fixing, so far considered by India as a merit. England are now in a great position to clinch this series in Edgbaston and further to clinch T-series 4-0.



India has made En-bowler Swann irrelevant too, but Swann's bating helped England reach 221 in first disastrous innings. India role in making England strong team cannot be underestimated. It looked England would go 500 plus lead that should be just enough for England in the Test-2 which the hosts were poised to clinch, but it can go even go as far as 600. It seemed India would now even allow English hosts to reach 600 plus.But England could not reach 500 lead though they have crossed 500 plus in 2-innings total .







When England completes it 4-0 sweep which is almost certain now, it also would be the top "ranking" team. So India has gone all the way on the fixing by the ICC to London to get fully trapped in its own net. English boys are glad to go 2-0 up and look for ward to hit hard to complete the Indian rout. India is as weak as any other team like Pakistan and Bangladesh. .


Do u think by always predicting a sure win only for India, media;s Indian team would win? Or, by denying any frank comment, you will make India win? Too much of fanaticism is too bad. World Cup was a joint cricket gimmick and all teams played for India as a gift to send of Sachuin Tendulakra. And that is jut one time favor by cricket teams and mafias for India. Test-2 is already in the basket of London boys. Now let us look forward to Test-3 and T4.


It is not surprise that bulks of cray Indians ask: Can Indian goddesses and gods save Indian team at least in T-3 or T4 with a draw?


England is now proving with distinction that it is not like Australia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Pakistan,West Indies, New Zealand or any other team in the world and Indy cannot not bully their British masters!


In India, cricketism, like colonial interests of New Delhi in occupied JK, is a major cause for reoccurring terror attacks in towns and in mosques.


Zero tolerance to criticism of Indian fanaticism, officially and unofficially followed in India, is too bad too.


Indians must , before it is too late, learn the art of fairness and neutrality in false cricket commentaries as well as in real life. Yes, India must change their fundamental attitude.





But why India failed to "fix" England as it does with other teams?

The hidden nexus between politics and cricketism, between under world and cricket matches, has been discussed.

Is there any link between wicket and wicked?

Or, between cricketism and terrorism?
--------
د. عبد راف
Dr. Abdul Ruff, Specialist on State Terrorism;Chancellor-Founder of Centor for International Affairs(CIA); Independent Columnist-Analyst;Chronicler of Foreign occupations& Freedom movements(Palestine,Kashmir, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Xinjiang, Chechnya, etc);Former university Teacher;
Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islamic agencies.Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Fake democracies like USA and India have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices.Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism".Anti-Islamic forces & terrorists are using criminal elements for terrorizing the world and they in disguise are harming genuine interests of ordinary Muslims. /abdulruff.wordpress.com//91-9961868309/91-9961868309


 
Last edited:

abdulruff

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
At long last Sania Mirza, upon her "disputed marriage" with a Pakistani cricketer who has since then failed to make anything on the field, has won a double title in USA with a female partner from Moscow. The dispute arose as a result of an almost street level quarrel at Hyderabad Banjara Hills with one of her friendly fans who had been focused on Sania and wanted to marry her and enjoy tennis as well. In spite shuffling her male partners, Sania could not win any other title so far obviously because there are better players in the field and India could not promote her by bribing and influencing all concerned.Indians win tennis matches at some levels only when strong players do not participate or withdraw.
 
Sponsored Link