مہنگائی آسمان پر، لٹیرے آزاد، عدالتیں خاموش

[Masud Rajaa]

 

[Dr Adam]

مورخ جب بھی ہماری تاریخ لکھے، تو الفاظ ضائع نہ کرے بس اتنا لکھ دے، گھر جل رہا تھا اور عدالتیں مجرمان کو بچانے کیلیے ضمانت ضمانت کھیل رہی تھیں​

 

[Okara]

Our superior court spent over two years to make decision that no one can investigate judge on any crime. This means a criminal can't punish a criminal.

 

[Saboo]

مورخ جب بھی ہماری تاریخ لکھے، تو الفاظ ضائع نہ کرے بس اتنا لکھ دے، گھر جل رہا تھا اور عدالتیں مجرمان کو بچانے کیلیے ضمانت ضمانت کھیل رہی تھیں​

ہاہاہا ڈاکٹر صاحب کیا آپ سمجھتے ہیں ہماری تاریخ میں کوئی ایسا قابل ذکر کارنامہ ہوگا کہ مورخ
لکھنے کا تکلف بھی گوارا کرے گا؟…... ?

 

[Dr Adam]

ہاہاہا ڈاکٹر صاحب کیا آپ سمجھتے ہیں ہماری تاریخ میں کوئی ایسا قابل ذکر کارنامہ ہوگا کہ مورخ
لکھنے کا تکلف بھی گوارا کرے گا؟…... ?

اسی لیے تو مورخ صاحب کو ایڈوانس میں ہی پیغام دے دیا ہے کہ بھائی زیادہ تکلّف نہ کرنا بس یہ ایک لائن لکھ دینا آپکی بیسٹ سیلر کتاب مکمل​

? ​

 

[arifkarim]

مورخ جب بھی ہماری تاریخ لکھے، تو الفاظ ضائع نہ کرے بس اتنا لکھ دے، گھر جل رہا تھا اور عدالتیں مجرمان کو بچانے کیلیے ضمانت ضمانت کھیل رہی تھیں​

ہماری تاریخ اتنی بھیانک ہے کہ مورخ لکھنے کی زحمت بھی نہیں کرے گا

 

[Okara]

ہاہاہا ڈاکٹر صاحب کیا آپ سمجھتے ہیں ہماری تاریخ میں کوئی ایسا قابل ذکر کارنامہ ہوگا کہ مورخ
لکھنے کا تکلف بھی گوارا کرے گا؟…... ?

What about time travel and parallel universe?
A grandfather transferred property two years after his death is a prime example of time travel.
Three scientists of Pakistan were working in two countries and were paid from both places is a prime example of parallel universe exist.

 

[Siberite]

When was the Naseem Feroogh Ideologist ? He is a lota , gets on lease every 5 years .

 

[Okara]

When was the Naseem Feroogh Ideologist ? He is a lota , gets on lease every 5 years .

What is ur opinion regarding Nawaz? He switched parties on what basis?

 

[Siberite]

What is ur opinion regarding Nawaz? He switched parties on what basis?

Nawaz Never kept Naseem Geroogh as Law minister .

 

[Okara]

Nawaz Never kept Naseem Geroogh as Law minister .

My dear Bhateejee we are talking about switching parties and no one can beat Nawaz in it.

 

[Siberite]

My dear Bhateejee we are talking about switching parties and no one can beat Nawaz in it.

Ik kicked out the founders of the party. Can you tell me where Fozia Kasoori, Waji Hudin and others are right now. Nawaz Made his party, IK high jacked the party of some ideologists and turn in to a lota party.

 

[i_syed2000]

Dollars should be used for essentials we cannot produce but not forbananas and branded cloths, and fancy cars.

 

[israr0333]

Pakistan ki tabahi ka zimmedaar hi Insaaf ka nizam aur adalatei he. Ye sab se bare chor aur corrupt he.

 

[Worldtronic]

ہماری تاریخ اتنی بھیانک ہے کہ مورخ لکھنے کی زحمت بھی نہیں کرے گا

Yes, 22 years struggle, but zero team , zero result, more than 50 U-turn.
But lambi lambi chooro.

 

[rasheikh]

Sirf Bad Chooodiyaaan aur Stories 2021 kay AFLAAAATOOON

 

[sangeen]

Paid Patwaris are again active on this forum... daily kitne NAAN kama lete ho??

 

[Ontarianpakistani]

ہاہاہا ڈاکٹر صاحب کیا آپ سمجھتے ہیں ہماری تاریخ میں کوئی ایسا قابل ذکر کارنامہ ہوگا کہ مورخ
لکھنے کا تکلف بھی گوارا کرے گا؟…... ?

kaya nawaz sharif ko 3 baar wazir-e-azam bana dena koi mamuli karnama hai? kaya koi aur mulk aise kunjer chor ko yeh uhda de ga?

 

[Ontarianpakistani]

Ik kicked out the founders of the party. Can you tell me where Fozia Kasoori, Waji Hudin and others are right now. Nawaz Made his party, IK high jacked the party of some ideologists and turn in to a lota party.

How many founders of people's party were with Z.A.Bhutto just 5 years after the formation of party? There is no political party in the world history which have all those people at inception still there after some time. many idialists leave parties because they refuse to accept that fact that no ideology can be practiced without pragmatism and pure ideologist are not pragmatist. Ground realities can't be ignored in politics. A good example is the difference between Russian and Chinese communism. Success of China is because of their pragmatism and acknowledging ground realities rather than ideologies alone. Gang of Four is a well known example. If those founders of PTI were the real force of PTI who stopped them to form another party based on ideology only and up stage IK's PTI?

 

[Siberite]

How many founders of people's party were with Z.A.Bhutto just 5 years after the formation of party? There is no political party in the world history which have all those people at inception still there after some time. many idialists leave parties because they refuse to accept that fact that no ideology can be practiced without pragmatism and pure ideologist are not pragmatist. Ground realities can't be ignored in politics. A good example is the difference between Russian and Chinese communism. Success of China is because of their pragmatism and acknowledging ground realities rather than ideologies alone. Gang of Four is a well known example. If those founders of PTI were the real force of PTI who stopped them to form another party based on ideology only and up stage IK's PTI?

If you take away the principle and ideology which drove the founders to form another political party , then there is no reason to believe that the party was really a different party then the traditional political vested parties in to any system .
The fact that there were some reasons and some ground to form a party based on certain principles , indicates that the normal " Pragmatic" approach is killing the ideology of a country and the needs arises from the facts that a party needs to be form which call themselves different ..

What you are basically saying that there is no need to adhere to the principles after the party is formed and well established and in order to grab the power, there is always a need for 'pragmatism" or another words compromises .
I can even buy that to a degree if it holds true only till you able to get the power ( Even though it will still be unethical and immoral) and start to implement your ideology and principles.
But unfortunately ,IK has changed and changed for worst not good. Kicking out Wji Ud Din only because he rightly raised his voice and concern regarding internal politics in party election and IK preferred the same snake who bit him from behind once saw an opportunity. Which proves that compromising on principles under the greed of power is going to destroy the party and smear the principles which were considered once very sacred.