If an ‘Incompetent’ PM Can be Removed, then why Not Army Chief or CJP?

shumayun

Minister (2k+ posts)
Premium Member
A Prime Minister is the highest officer of the Government of Pakistan. He runs the country and makes policies in the best interest of the citizens. He is empowered to implement legislation, develop, and implement policies, direct and co-ordinate the work of the government, prepare and initiate legislation, etc.

Let there be no illusion that anyone in the army or judiciary is as high, or higher, than the Prime Minister.

It is a separate debate whether Imran Khan was competent or not, and who was involved in the political engineering to de-seat him. But there is no misgiving about what happened after the Imran Khan was removed.

Imran Khan has said repeatedly that Generals have lied to him on many occasions and have played double games. Besides the cynical statement of DGISPR, no General has come out and refuted Imran Khan’s claims.

So that many don't get bogged down in the meaning of English words, before an intervention in anyone's affairs a plot is hatched which is called a conspiracy.

The President of Pakistan asked the Supreme court to look into Imran Khan's claim of foreign conspiracy/intervention but so far there is no outcome of that request.

Why? Is it because an inquiry would expose many characters of the game?

In all this, the role of the Supreme Court has been nothing but dubious. The court was concerned about the rights of the people who were kept hostage in the Sindh house but was least bothered to find out the cause of the public uproar. Indeed, there are serious questions about the judgment of the people at the highest court of the nation.

In the Supreme Court, there should NOT be any other business more important than issues that affect the nation. Instead of hiding behind legal mumbo jumbo, why the Supreme court didn’t do a hearing on a daily basis to look at all the petitions submitted related to the current political upheaval in the country. It is pretty naïve for the Supreme Court to say it doesn’t interfere in the political affairs of the country whereas it was a decision of this very court that started the current political turmoil.

And what is the point of the Supreme court’s verdict when it is not going to be accepted in letter & spirit by lower courts? A glaring example of that is the drama in Punjab where the CJ of LHC has made a mockery of the system. Why the Supreme court wouldn’t put its foot down and summon the CJ of LHC to explain his delaying tactics to implement SC's judgments.

Another character is the Chief Election commissioner. Why is that man not summoned to the court to explain his decisions? That man is full of controversies and has shown through his decisions time after time his affiliations for a particular political party. Why hasn’t Supreme Court summoned the man and ask him to explain the rationale of his decisions?

There is a legal maxim, “Justice delayed is justice denied”. And that is evident in the world ranking of the Pakistani judiciary.

WJP Index, in 2021 placed Pakistan 130th out of 139 countries. Pakistan’s score places it at 5 out of 6 countries in the South Asia region (only ahead of Afghanistan). And 30th out of 35 among lower-middle-income countries.

There is no shortage of incompetence at every level of the government. But if a Prime Minister can be removed because of his incompetence’ then why not the army chief and CJP?
 
Advertisement
Last edited:

Dr Adam

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
A Prime Minister is the highest officer of the Government of Pakistan. He runs the country and makes policies in the best interest of the citizens. He is empowered to implement legislation, develop, and implement policies, direct and co-ordinate the work of the government, prepare and initiate legislation, etc.

Let there be no illusion that anyone in the army or judiciary is as high, or higher, than the Prime Minister.

It is a separate debate whether Imran Khan was competent or not, and who was involved in the political engineering to de-seat him. But there is no misgiving about what happened after the Imran Khan was removed.

Imran Khan has said repeatedly that Generals have lied to him on many occasions and have played double games. Besides the cynical statement of DGISPR, no General has come out and refuted Imran Khan’s claims.

So that many don't get bogged down in the meaning of English words, before an intervention in anyone's affairs a plot is hatched which is called a conspiracy.

The President of Pakistan asked the Supreme court to look into Imran Khan's claim of foreign conspiracy/intervention but so far there is no outcome of that request.

Why? Is it because an inquiry would expose many characters of the game?

In all this, the role of the Supreme Court has been nothing but dubious. The court was concerned about the rights of the people who were kept hostage in the Sindh house but was least bothered to find out the cause of the public uproar. Indeed, there are serious questions about the judgment of the people at the highest court of the nation.

In the Supreme Court, there should NOT be any other business more important than issues that affect the nation. Instead of hiding behind legal mumbo jumbo, why the Supreme court didn’t do a hearing on a daily basis to look at all the petitions submitted related to the current political upheaval in the country. It is pretty naïve for the Supreme Court to say it doesn’t interfere in the political affairs of the country whereas it was a decision of this very court that started the current political turmoil.

And what is the point of the Supreme court’s verdict when it is not going to be accepted in letter & spirit by lower courts? A glaring example of that is the drama in Punjab where the CJ of LHC has made a mockery of the system. Why the Supreme court wouldn’t put its foot down and summon the CJ of LHC to explain his delaying tactics to implement SC's judgments.

Another character is the Chief Election commissioner. Why is that man not summoned to the court to explain his decisions? That man is full of controversies and has shown through his decisions time after time his affiliations for a particular political party. Why hasn’t Supreme Court summoned the man and ask him to explain the rationale of his decisions?

There is a legal maxim, “Justice delayed is justice denied”. And that is evident in the world ranking of the Pakistani judiciary.

WJP Index, in 2021 placed Pakistan 130th out of 139 countries. Pakistan’s score places it at 5 out of 6 countries in the South Asia region (only ahead of Afghanistan). And 30th out of 35 among lower-middle-income countries.

There is no shortage of incompetence at every level of the government. But if a Prime Minister can be removed because of his incompetence’ then why not the army chief and CJP?


Okay, they removed the PM who in there senile grey matter thought process was a so called nincompoop man. But make no mistake, the ousted man did not have any stain of even a dime financial corruption on his clothing, NOR did he break even a single law of the land. They did whatever most they could.... removed him. He will InshaAllah come back with a thumping majority
But the other two rascals..... I have repeatedly said broke the law of the land by ousting a democratically elected honest government thus abrogating the Constitution of Pakistan. Simple removal of these two culprits is NOT enough. They have already attracted clause 6 of the Constitution which is an act of treason.

These two deserve and they SHOULD be publicly executed.
There is NO other way to put a STOP on such whimsy future shenanigans on the behest of outside hostile powers.
 

Resilient

Minister (2k+ posts)
A Prime Minister is the highest officer of the Government of Pakistan. He runs the country and makes policies in the best interest of the citizens. He is empowered to implement legislation, develop, and implement policies, direct and co-ordinate the work of the government, prepare and initiate legislation, etc.

Let there be no illusion that anyone in the army or judiciary is as high, or higher, than the Prime Minister.

It is a separate debate whether Imran Khan was competent or not, and who was involved in the political engineering to de-seat him. But there is no misgiving about what happened after the Imran Khan was removed.

Imran Khan has said repeatedly that Generals have lied to him on many occasions and have played double games. Besides the cynical statement of DGISPR, no General has come out and refuted Imran Khan’s claims.

So that many don't get bogged down in the meaning of English words, before an intervention in anyone's affairs a plot is hatched which is called a conspiracy.

The President of Pakistan asked the Supreme court to look into Imran Khan's claim of foreign conspiracy/intervention but so far there is no outcome of that request.

Why? Is it because an inquiry would expose many characters of the game?

In all this, the role of the Supreme Court has been nothing but dubious. The court was concerned about the rights of the people who were kept hostage in the Sindh house but was least bothered to find out the cause of the public uproar. Indeed, there are serious questions about the judgment of the people at the highest court of the nation.

In the Supreme Court, there should NOT be any other business more important than issues that affect the nation. Instead of hiding behind legal mumbo jumbo, why the Supreme court didn’t do a hearing on a daily basis to look at all the petitions submitted related to the current political upheaval in the country. It is pretty naïve for the Supreme Court to say it doesn’t interfere in the political affairs of the country whereas it was a decision of this very court that started the current political turmoil.

And what is the point of the Supreme court’s verdict when it is not going to be accepted in letter & spirit by lower courts? A glaring example of that is the drama in Punjab where the CJ of LHC has made a mockery of the system. Why the Supreme court wouldn’t put its foot down and summon the CJ of LHC to explain his delaying tactics to implement SC's judgments.

Another character is the Chief Election commissioner. Why is that man not summoned to the court to explain his decisions? That man is full of controversies and has shown through his decisions time after time his affiliations for a particular political party. Why hasn’t Supreme Court summoned the man and ask him to explain the rationale of his decisions?

There is a legal maxim, “Justice delayed is justice denied”. And that is evident in the world ranking of the Pakistani judiciary.

WJP Index, in 2021 placed Pakistan 130th out of 139 countries. Pakistan’s score places it at 5 out of 6 countries in the South Asia region (only ahead of Afghanistan). And 30th out of 35 among lower-middle-income countries.

There is no shortage of incompetence at every level of the government. But if a Prime Minister can be removed because of his incompetence’ then why not the army chief and CJP?

PM has all the authority to remove an incompetent COAS, PM Nawaz Sharif has done this twice.

Removal CJ of SC or any judge of SC or High Court should not by wish of executive, they can be removed through Supreme Judicial Council.
 

javaidmafasha

MPA (400+ posts)
pakistani awam asal main zulum sayhny ki aadi ho chuki hy zalam mafiya ny awam ko kabhi sakoon sy jeeny hi nhi diya es main army ,addaliya ,siyasatdan sab shamil hain apni aayasheyion k liyay awam ko ghulam bana rakha hy first time imran khan ny in ko lalkara hy tab hi sab k sab us k dushman bab gy hain .
 

javaidmafasha

MPA (400+ posts)
yay ghulam type k pupets hukamran jaan boujh ker awam ko jahil rakhty hain awam ko apny haqooq ka eilm hi nhi hy first time imran khan ny in sab ko nanga ker diya hy .
 

Bubber Shair

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
بالکل اگر آرمی آفیشلز ایسا سمجھتے ہوں کہ کوی آرمی چیف فوج کے لئے اور ملکی سلامتی کیلئے خطرہ ہے تو اسے ہٹانے کے کئی طریقے ہیں مگر ایسا آرمی چیف جو ایک تانگہ پارٹی سمجھتی ہو کہ اس کے اقتدار کی راہ میں رکاوٹ ہے اسے کسی بھڑوے نسوار خور نشئی بکاو مال ، انڈین ایجنٹ کے کہنے پر نہیں ہٹایا جاسکتا
ہاں البتہ ایک آرمی چیف پر کئی ایسی تانگہ پارٹیاں قربان کی جاسکتی ہیں جن کا منبع ہی بھنگ کو لیگل کرنے پر ہو نشہ بیچ کر پیسے کمانا جن کا نصب العین ہو ہاتھ میں تسبیح اور کرتوت سیاہ کالے ہوں جو بات کریں تو جھوٹ بولیں اور عہد کریں تو توڑ دین یعنی پکے منافق ہوں
 
Sponsored Link