How Do You Fast in These Regions of The World?

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
You may also want to consider following this person's YouTube channel.

12:106 And most of them do not believe in Allah without associating others with Him.

Yeah I listen to him as well as many others. Infact I was just about to watch his latest video that he just posted. Reading the title I think I already know what its going to be about, as Allah describes people who blindly follow the worst of all creatures

The Worst of All Creatures – A Powerful Warning from the Quran​

 

observer-x

Councller (250+ posts)
He references "riwayat" as he calls them are to totally discredit them. That see no where in the Quran this is said but yet we will find a twisted meaning in the "riwayat" a total innovation or he will reference them to expose bogus practices made part of the religion by so called holy men and today taking to be part of religion saying not only can you find this in the Quran but "riwayat ke pooray zakheeray yeh cheez nai pai jaati"
Interesting, so its like reading bible and telling christians and jews why its wrong.
So he used hadith in a two fold manner one to expose them as totally contrary to the Quran and secondly to further expose manmade traditional Islam that look even you have gone even a step further that you cannot find any of this even in your own manmade books.
Bold claims. Wow so none of the ahadith never ever compliment the Quran, they always are contrary to it?
This is what knowledge brings to the table.

Edit : Many times he also gives small zingers, that according to sahi fulan fulan this is the case, but calling these thing sahih once again is another big topic and we will deal with that issue some other day
So he also quotes sahih ahadith? But says they can't be sahih coz ...?
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Interesting, so its like reading bible and telling christians and jews why its wrong.
Or reading the Quran and telling hadithist's why they are wrong

Bold claims. Wow so none of the ahadith never ever compliment the Quran, they always are contrary to it?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, there are so many things in the Torah, Talmud, Bible, vedas, guru grant sahib, tripitaka that also align with the principles of Islam, but doesn't make them right or word of God as a whole.

So he also quotes sahih ahadith? But says they can't be sahih coz ...?
I don't think I've ever heard him quote Shia hadith. But where did the question of Shia hadith come from. And no when Sunni Hadith can't be sahi, there is 0 chance of shia hadith ever being sahi. If the criterion of authenticity of Sunni is graded as 0 out of 10, then shia hadith is at grade -10
 

observer-x

Councller (250+ posts)
Or reading the Quran and telling hadithist's why they are wrong
How do you back up the claims of why Hadith are entirely wrong via Quran?

Imagine being in the times of Prophet SAW and sahaba telling each other what they heard from him in certain encounters. Did they lie if they did it? And if few people who captured those interactions in book forms were they wrong at doing it?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, there are so many things in the Torah, Talmud, Bible, vedas, guru grant sahib, tripitaka that also align with the principles of Islam, but doesn't make them right or word of God as a whole.
Do you know that is why we have 16 categories of hadith too, so that we know which one to take and which ones to outright reject. Does that not make it a valuable complimentary literature other than Quran?
I don't think I've ever heard him quote Shia hadith. But where did the question of Shia hadith come from. And no when Sunni Hadith can't be sahi, there is 0 chance of shia hadith ever being sahi. If the criterion of authenticity of Sunni is graded as 0 out of 10, then shia hadith is at grade -10
Shia have many fabricated ahadith, according to the established hadith categorization of course you'd never consider those reliable.
 
Last edited:

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
How do you back up the claims of why Hadith are entirely wrong via Quran?

Imagine being in the times of Prophet SAW and sahaba telling each other what they heard from him in certain encounters. Did they lie if they did it? And if few people who captured those interactions in book forms were they wrong at doing it?

Where do you want me to start? I can literally write pages upon pages on this but in a nutshell. There were people who captured and complied them, were defeated Persians and did that more than two centuries after the Prophet had passed away. Thats why there are no hadith books from the time of the khulafa rashidun and early Muslims. In fact hadith were pretty much discouraged by them. But when the early Muslims passed away few generations had passed you start to see these hadith book pop up.

And according to your figures and history, the closet companion of the Prophet Abu Bakr someone who knew him since before prophet hood and spent almost his entire waking moment with the prophet narrated how many hadith? One would think he narrated 1000s and 1000s of hadith, seems logical doesn't it, highest number attributed at 142 and few of them are in the sahih sitta, same situation with his other closet companion Umar.

And then there is this fellow whose real name also you don't know till this date and your scholars are still debating what was his actual name only thing you have is "the most popular opinion of these 2 scholars" that his name could have been this, hardly spent 2 to 3 years with the Prophet in his final years and yet he has narrated 5,374 hadith a major chunk of your hadith corpus and forming large part of your belief system, practices and law. Who are we talking about here? Well its the dubious Mr Abu Hurairah i.e father of the cats/the cat man/ the man of cats. So a major chunk of your religion is based on this one shady unknown character, why dubious? Somehow a man, about who a lot is not known, including his past and if criticized ( by your own sources and scholars ) as not being reliable, narrating excessive hadith and an outright liar by none other than the prophets wife.

So when it comes to the authenticity of hadith, thanks but no thanks.


I've got tons and tons more to say on this topic but I suppose just a this somewhat short intro will suffice for now.


Do you know that is why we have 16 categories of hadith too, so that we know which one to take and which ones to outright reject. Does that not make it a valuable complimentary literature other than Quran?
Oh I know very well of these so called Hadith sciences and its classifications. If you are just like the 100s I have talked to here, I've probably forgotten more about hadith sciences than you have read about then. Talking of which most of your books from the Sahih Sitta cannot be even classified as sahih by standards set by your own hadith sciences, for eg: Sahih Bukhari at best can be classified as majhool. And its been proven again and again that human testimony is the weakest kind of evidence that can be provided for anything.

Specially if there is only one witness ( or narrator in these cases ) and as you might know or most probably don't about 99% of your hadith is khabar wahid i,e narrated by only one person. Honestly I wouldn't buy a used washing machine on the criteria set by these hadith sciences let alone base my deen, dunya and akhira on them. X heard that Y heard that Z heard that B heard that C heard that D heard that fulan sahaba heard the prophet say or do this. Oh Phuleeeez. Come on! And then when people started questioning who are these XYZBCD's they had a bright idea of coming up with the book Ilm al Rijal i,e knowledge of men so they can vouch for these XYZs and honest and of sound memories. ( Forget that fact there were munafiqs even amidst the prophet which he did not know about ) but these people were very quick to "verify" men that lived centuries before they were even born. Double Oh Phuleeez here!!!!.
As for shis I wouldn't even bother talking about Shia hadith, they are even a bigger waste of time than sunni hadith
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
How do you back up the claims of why Hadith are entirely wrong via Quran?
Ohhhh I am sooo sorry I somehow forgot to or misread this part so allow me.

[Quran 18:27] You shall recite what is revealed to you of your Lord's scripture. Nothing shall abrogate His words, and you shall not find any other source beside it.

77:50 So in which hadith after it will they believe ?

[Quran 6:114] Shall I seek other than God as a source of law, when He has revealed to you this book fully detailed?* Those who received the scripture recognize that it has been revealed from your Lord, truthfully. You shall not harbor any doubt.

[Quran 45:6] These are God's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than God and His revelations do they believe?

Quran 31:6 Among the people there are those who uphold basless hadith, and this diverts others (from the Way of Allah, and make a mockery of it. For such people there is a disgraceful punishment.

42:21 How can they believe in others who ordain for them things which God has not sanctioned in the practice of their faith? If it were not for God’s decree concerning the final Decision, judgement would already have been made between them. The evildoers will have a grievous punishment


Quran 5:3 ...........Today I have perfected your faith for you, completed My favour upon you, and chosen Islam as your way.....................

So when Allah has completed the deen for you on this day. So if anything comes after this is not from Allah or part of deen.

Note : Please do not bother quoting the partial verse from 59:7 which hadithists have abused to no end trying to justify hadith. Nor any verse which says Atti Allah wa Atti Rasool also trying justify hadith. Or any such thing like the prophet is the "hikmah" i.e somehow sunnis think that means hadith.

I'm tired of explaining those, if you want an explanation please search the forum and you'll find the answer in many posts.
 

observer-x

Councller (250+ posts)
Where do you want me to start? I can literally write pages upon pages on this but in a nutshell. There were people who captured and complied them, were defeated Persians and did that more than two centuries after the Prophet had passed away. Thats why there are no hadith books from the time of the khulafa rashidun and early Muslims.
Well there was no compiled Quran in a book form either. It was only when majority of huffaz got martyred in one battle the need for preserving Quran in a book form was started. Likewise the need of preserving hadith came in later.

Not a compelling reason.
In fact hadith were pretty much discouraged by them. But when the early Muslims passed away few generations had passed you start to see these hadith book pop up.

And according to your figures and history, the closet companion of the Prophet Abu Bakr someone who knew him since before prophet hood and spent almost his entire waking moment with the prophet narrated how many hadith?
Did you intentionally not mention Ayesha RA who has many many more narrations for one being the closest to Prophet SAW? Also, she's the daughter of Abu Bakar RA.
One would think he narrated 1000s and 1000s of hadith, seems logical doesn't it, highest number attributed at 142 and few of them are in the sahih sitta, same situation with his other closet companion Umar.

And then there is this fellow whose real name also you don't know till this date and your scholars are still debating what was his actual name only thing you have is "the most popular opinion of these 2 scholars" that his name could have been this, hardly spent 2 to 3 years with the Prophet in his final years and yet he has narrated 5,374 hadith a major chunk of your hadith corpus and forming large part of your belief system, practices and law. Who are we talking about here? Well its the dubious Mr Abu Hurairah i.e father of the cats/the cat man/ the man of cats. So a major chunk of your religion is based on this one shady unknown character, why dubious? Somehow a man, about who a lot is not known, including his past and if criticized ( by your own sources and scholars ) as not being reliable, narrating excessive hadith and an outright liar by none other than the prophets wife.

So when it comes to the authenticity of hadith, thanks but no thanks.


I've got tons and tons more to say on this topic but I suppose just a this somewhat short intro will suffice for now.
Be my guest, not amused by the reasons so far.
Oh I know very well of these so called Hadith sciences and its classifications. If you are just like the 100s I have talked to here, I've probably forgotten more about hadith sciences than you have read about then. Talking of which most of your books from the Sahih Sitta cannot be even classified as sahih by standards set by your own hadith sciences, for eg: Sahih Bukhari at best can be classified as majhool. And its been proven again and again that human testimony is the weakest kind of evidence that can be provided for anything.

Specially if there is only one witness ( or narrator in these cases ) and as you might know or most probably don't about 99% of your hadith is khabar wahid i,e narrated by only one person. Honestly I wouldn't buy a used washing machine on the criteria set by these hadith sciences let alone base my deen, dunya and akhira on them. X heard that Y heard that Z heard that B heard that C heard that D heard that fulan sahaba heard the prophet say or do this. Oh Phuleeeez.
Lame argument. Every sahaba had their own strengths, you might argue why Abu Huraira RA did not fight wars like Khali bin Walid RA did or vice versa.

Sahaba did whatever they were best in and that was according to how their greatest teacher Prophet SAW encouraged them to do.
Come on! And then when people started questioning who are these XYZBCD's they had a bright idea of coming up with the book Ilm al Rijal i,e knowledge of men so they can vouch for these XYZs and honest and of sound memories.
See what happens to Christians and Jews for having this Ilm ul Rijal and have to deal with anonymous writers of bible(s).
Understand the utility of why anything is really needed for preservation of Deen, and Allah caused it to happen.
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Well there was no compiled Quran in a book form either.
No there was no such thing, you believe this because your manmade fairytales tell you to believe these wild tales. Think logically, you think the one major job Allah had given the Prophet he would not do and fail at it, leaving bits and pieces of the Quran strewn across the land on pieces of bone and bark??? Only then the great Khalifah had the bright idea to compile it into a book so he send Zaid Ibn Thabit to go collect all these pieces of flotsam and jetsam on which the Quran was written to write into one book. Which in it self is hugely contradictory because Zaid was suppose to be the Prophets personal scribe for the Quran, so what was he doing when the prophet was alive? Goofing off! So both the Prophet and his scribe failed at the most important jobs they had in their lives. When in actuality the Quran was completed as a book and verified by the Prophet in his lifetime. Look at the Birmingham Manuscript that provides solid evidence that a written Quran existed during the time of the Prophet.

Likewise the need of preserving hadith came in later.
There was no preservation of hadith at all, infact Umar and Abu Bakr both burned the few hadith that people had written down. As mentioned your so called most authentic book after the Quran cannot be technically classified as Sahih/authentic because no copy of it exists written by Bukhari himself not even a partial page. All the copies what you have today were copied by this one ( incomplete and out of order ) copy of Sahih Bukhari by one of his alleged students ( although it is claimed that Bukhari had 1000s of students ) that no one has heard of or vouched for, that's why in my previous post I said at best according to your own hadith sciences it can be classified as majhool. Oh yeah some bright spark more than a century later came in and vouched for him, someone he had never seen, met or even written a letter to and someone who had died almost a century earlier to fill in this huge gaping hole! lol

Did you intentionally not mention Ayesha RA
We were talking about his companions, she was his wife and still the amount of narrations are no where close to the Mr Dubious Cat Father

Be my guest, not amused by the reasons so far.
I'm not here for you amusement. Just say you have no counter argument instead of trying to dodge the facts.

Lame argument. Every sahaba had their own strengths, you might argue why Abu Huraira RA did not fight wars like Khali bin Walid RA did or vice versa.
The only thing lame here is that you cannot see beyond your programming and indoctrination. From your own sources, Umar beat this abu hurairah and threated to exile him if he didn't keep on narrating hadith all the time. Wonder why that was? And he stopped and when Umar died he started again. Then the prophets own wife Aisha straight out called him a liar and in returned he insulted her. And this is the kind of shady dubious unknown character you want to base your deen duniya and akhirah on. Be my freakin' guest! But like I said, thanks but no thanks.

Sahaba did whatever they were best in and that was according to how their greatest teacher Prophet SAW encouraged them to do.
I'm sure they did it do the best of their abilities, but one thing they did not do was write hadith. In fact according to your own hadith, the prophet asked for a pen and paper on his dying bed ( according to your fairytales he was illiterate, so I wonder why would he be asking for a pen and paper as his dying wish!) and Umar refused saying we have the Quran and this is sufficient for us, once again you totally missed the fact that there were no hadith books during the time of khulafa rashideen, the tabieen the taba tabieen and a few more generations after that. Wonder why!

See what happens to Christians and Jews for having this Ilm ul Rijal and have to deal with anonymous writers of bible(s).

The church was not dumb enough or smart enough ( depending on your point of view ) to write a book after the fact "verifying" people. And like I said ilm ul rijal is bigger hogwash than the hadith corpus itself, its right there with Shia hadith maybe even a couple of rungs lower than that. How can anyone vouch for some tom dick and harry that he was an honest person of integrity and sharp mind and memory when that person has been dead for centuries. Seriously the verbal and mental gymnastics the hadithists conjure up to justify their fairytales is extraordinary!

Understand the utility of why anything is really needed for preservation of Deen, and Allah caused it to happen.

And that some more great fabricated bovine excrement to justify these fairytale books. Allah made no such promise or guarantee, he only guarantees to preserve and protect the Quran himself, that's why people had to come up with hadith in the first place to corrupt Islam because no one could change the Quran.

As he says in the Quran, if it had been from anyone else the Quran would have much contradiction in it. And it doesn't, while the hadith, contradiction is it's middle name.
 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
observer-x
You wrote the following:
Well there was no compiled Quran in a book form either. It was only when majority of huffaz got martyred in one battle the need for preserving Quran in a book form was started. Likewise the need of preserving hadith came in later.

Would it make sense for a book revealed by Allah, the Almighty, to the Prophet Mohammad for the guidance of humanity, and the Prophet departed this world without compiling it in book form?
You are just being dogmatic and following conjecture, nothing else.
 

observer-x

Councller (250+ posts)
No there was no such thing, you believe this because your manmade fairytales tell you to believe these wild tales.
At least we have something to read in Islamic literature, whether we believe it or not. Quranists don't have that luxury either, they just assume Quran came down in a secure tunnel without any human influence.
Think logically, you think the one major job Allah had given the Prophet he would not do and fail at it, leaving bits and pieces of the Quran strewn across the land on pieces of bone and bark???
Yes. Logically it does make sense. Arab culture was all poetry based, they memorized stuff and took pride in their language. Quran was preserved in the same way. Also, Quran was a progressive revelation, it did not reveal in one go. It took 23 years.
Only then the great Khalifah had the bright idea to compile it into a book so he send Zaid Ibn Thabit to go collect all these pieces of flotsam and jetsam on which the Quran was written to write into one book. Which in it self is hugely contradictory because Zaid was suppose to be the Prophets personal scribe for the Quran, so what was he doing when the prophet was alive?
Memorizing and reading Quran basically and Madinan times was mostly filled with battles so they took part in those as well.
Goofing off!
They did not have as much time like us to waste. They had the company of Prophet SAW who had a mission and they all were 100% on it.
So both the Prophet and his scribe failed at the most important jobs they had in their lives.
Establishing Islam was one of the most important job, preserving Quran is the promise of Allah and Allah made it happen even after passing of Prophet SAW.
When in actuality the Quran was completed as a book and verified by the Prophet in his lifetime. Look at the Birmingham Manuscript that provides solid evidence that a written Quran existed during the time of the Prophet.
Agreed, completed as a revelation almost at the end of his life before passing. But there were no one copy they all adhered to, for it being a progressive revelation.
There was no preservation of hadith at all, infact Umar and Abu Bakr both burned the few hadith that people had written down.
They might have, it was not a burning problem to solve for them.
Quran copies were also burnt. That is how one baseline copy of Usmanic mushaf came about.
As mentioned your so called most authentic book after the Quran cannot be technically classified as Sahih/authentic because no copy of it exists written by Bukhari himself not even a partial page.
That's your opinion, we disagree.
All the copies what you have today were copied by this one ( incomplete and out of order ) copy of Sahih Bukhari by one of his alleged students ( although it is claimed that Bukhari had 1000s of students ) that no one has heard of or vouched for, that's why in my previous post I said at best according to your own hadith sciences it can be classified as majhool. Oh yeah some bright spark more than a century later came in and vouched for him, someone he had never seen, met or even written a letter to and someone who had died almost a century earlier to fill in this huge gaping hole! lol


We were talking about his companions, she was his wife and still the amount of narrations are no where close to the Mr Dubious Cat Father
You got to be kidding me, you have issue with a sahabi for writing most hadith? Why don't you have issue with Khalid bin Walid RA winning all wars. This is so lame.
I'm not here for you amusement. Just say you have no counter argument instead of trying to dodge the facts.


The only thing lame here is that you cannot see beyond your programming and indoctrination.
You have your own programming and indoctrination for rejecting the hadith. What's the point.
From your own sources, Umar beat this abu hurairah and threated to exile him if he didn't keep on narrating hadith all the time. Wonder why that was? And he stopped and when Umar died he started again. Then the prophets own wife Aisha straight out called him a liar and in returned he insulted her. And this is the kind of shady dubious unknown character you want to base your deen duniya and akhirah on. Be my freakin' guest! But like I said, thanks but no thanks.
What's wrong with people having differences? The best of the best had mutual issues yet they were given the glad tiding of paradise in this world.
I'm sure they did it do the best of their abilities, but one thing they did not do was write hadith. In fact according to your own hadith, the prophet asked for a pen and paper on his dying bed ( according to your fairytales he was illiterate, so I wonder why would he be asking for a pen and paper as his dying wish!)
For something to be written by someone around him, it doesn't say he wanted to write with his own hands. Your points are really weak sir, to be honest.
and Umar refused saying we have the Quran and this is sufficient for us, once again you totally missed the fact that there were no hadith books during the time of khulafa rashideen, the tabieen the taba tabieen and a few more generations after that. Wonder why!
For simple reason it was initial times, things are needed when few generations pass by and need for preservation of deen is really felt.
The church was not dumb enough or smart enough ( depending on your point of view ) to write a book after the fact "verifying" people. And like I said ilm ul rijal is bigger hogwash than the hadith corpus itself, its right there with Shia hadith maybe even a couple of rungs lower than that. How can anyone vouch for some tom dick and harry that he was an honest person of integrity and sharp mind and memory when that person has been dead for centuries. Seriously the verbal and mental gymnastics the hadithists conjure up to justify their fairytales is extraordinary!
Well if you have company of prophet your level of spirituality and deen is way different that ones who don't.
Prophet SAW himself said:
خير القرون قرني
ثم الذين يلونهم
ثم الذين يلونهم
The best of centuries is my generation, then those who come after them, then those who come after them.

Things went in decline after that, that is why preservation mechanism of various other literature is needed.
And that some more great fabricated bovine excrement to justify these fairytale books. Allah made no such promise or guarantee, he only guarantees to preserve and protect the Quran himself, that's why people had to come up with hadith in the first place to corrupt Islam because no one could change the Quran.
That's your heretic view.
 

observer-x

Councller (250+ posts)
observer-x
You wrote the following:
Well there was no compiled Quran in a book form either. It was only when majority of huffaz got martyred in one battle the need for preserving Quran in a book form was started. Likewise the need of preserving hadith came in later.

Would it make sense for a book revealed by Allah, the Almighty, to the Prophet Mohammad for the guidance of humanity, and the Prophet departed this world without compiling it in book form?
You are just being dogmatic and following conjecture, nothing else.
Deen of Islam is not something that you take what ONLY MAKES SENSE and leave rest that doesn't due to our weaknesses for being a human.
 

Dr Adam

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Hun ki dussan Ustad Ji. I literally lost a boat load of money that would have changed the entire trajectory of my life but because of ramadan sub dui ooper ker ke soo rahay the, no one picks up anyones call or does any work.
👆 👆 👆
Ustad e Azam ess pairay nu thora explain karow .
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
At least we have something to read in Islamic literature, whether we believe it or not. Quranists don't have that luxury either, they just assume Quran came down in a secure tunnel without any human influence.

Yes. Logically it does make sense. Arab culture was all poetry based, they memorized stuff and took pride in their language. Quran was preserved in the same way. Also, Quran was a progressive revelation, it did not reveal in one go. It took 23 years.

Memorizing and reading Quran basically and Madinan times was mostly filled with battles so they took part in those as well.

They did not have as much time like us to waste. They had the company of Prophet SAW who had a mission and they all were 100% on it.

Establishing Islam was one of the most important job, preserving Quran is the promise of Allah and Allah made it happen even after passing of Prophet SAW.

Agreed, completed as a revelation almost at the end of his life before passing. But there were no one copy they all adhered to, for it being a progressive revelation.

They might have, it was not a burning problem to solve for them.
Quran copies were also burnt. That is how one baseline copy of Usmanic mushaf came about.
I would answer you step by step but basically all of this comes from your fairytale books with no real foundation in reality or it having any real evidence to being true, so I've just clumped it together.

That's your opinion, we disagree.
Unlike you I don't believe in fairytales and deal only in facts and these are pretty much are facts and you can crosscheck them with your own sources. There is a lot of talk about this in the Arab world, but since us desi's are so intolerant, any such discussion is immediately shut down and swept under the carpet. Take this forum as an example, any such posts here and everyone is immediately shouting, delete this thread, ban these people! I'll have to admit this has been one of the most civil conversations and (I must admit I am enjoying it too)I've had from any one from the other side in quite a few years. Lets hope it doesn't end the way it usually does.

I'll give you a starting point. Go research the name Muhammad Ibn Yusuf Al Firabri, add student of Bukhari to it, since there is also another historical figure with that last name.

You got to be kidding me, you have issue with a sahabi for writing most hadith?
I don't have an issue. like I mentioned earlier Abu Bakr and Umar made sure they burned them. So you gotta figure out why they had issues with people writing hadith. I think you are very ill informed, no surprise there as more defenders of the hadith are. So let me educate you a little and you can cross check for yourself to its autneticity

Bukhari and students of bukhari and students of the student of Bukhari were not Sahabis. Let me repeat they were not sahabis, not even tabieens or taba tabieens ( please go look up the definition of those last too terms) I think you don't know Bukhari didn't live in the time of the Prophet. Bukhari was born a full 238 years after the Prophet died. He was born in Bukhara ( a place very very very far away from Makkah and Medina, present day Uzbekistan ) which used to be part of the Persian empire. In fact majority of your hadith compilers are of Persian descent, you know the same glorious Persian Empire which had just been conquered by a bunch of ragtag desert people and nothing angered them more and very sore about it. In fact they are still sore to this day about it, Try calling an Irani, arab or middle easterner, or call the Persian gulf the Arabian gulf and see what happens!!!!

You have your own programming and indoctrination for rejecting the hadith.
You see I spent 40 plus years being a very good boy sunni Full acha bacha. Doing all the namaz roza hajj and all that good stuff and it wasn't like overnight or even a few nights I came to the side of the real truth. It was a long drawn up journey spread over many many years and verified everything myself countless times over because I did not want to be jumping out of the firepan straight into the fire as the saying goes. So there is no brainwashing, programming or indoctrination here. This is all self researched. Its like saying to a new convert to Islam you have been brain washed. The only thing that "indoctrinated" me were facts, all out in the public domain for all to see and accepting the Quran as it is without any preconceived notions

What's wrong with people having differences?
You can't have it both ways mate, one moment you literally worship the sahabas and everything they say or do is 1001% kosher and you have to follow because the Prophet told them to do such and such but when it comes this. Abu Bakr and Umar burning hadith and Umar whipping the Cat Father and Aisha calling him a liar is Ohhh nothing wrong with that its all glad tidings and stuff they were just having minor differences, So what if umar beat the shit out cat father and the umm al momineen called him liar, so what, come one man, its all good in the hood.

Like I said the amount of mental and verbal hoops you are willing to jump for this cause is truly astonishing!

For something to be written by someone around him, it doesn't say he wanted to write with his own hands. Your points are really weak sir, to be honest
It was narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas said: When the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was dying, there were men in the house among whom was ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Come, let me write for you a document after which you will not go astray.” ‘Umar said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) is overcome with pain, and you have the Quran; the Book of Allah is sufficient for us.

Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6932) and Muslim (1637)

I'm sure I read it write, and don't think no matter how many mental and verbal hoops you jump through this time it can be said to say or mean "Can someone write this down" Because only when someone one wants to write something himself he will say bring me a pen and paper, if he wants it to be written down, he will say "write this down" The words and intentions are very clear. Many mullahs have tried as I'm sure you will also try now to spin this into something it is not.



For simple reason it was initial times, things are needed when few generations pass by and need for preservation of deen is really felt.
In all honesty this one really did make me laugh out loud. I swear Ive been doing this for a while now and I have never ever heard anyone say this before ! LOL. Good one bro, in case you were wondering. This also falls under the verbal and mental gymnastic category. Honestly bro I am started to feel bad for you that you have to come up with such far fetched non sensical excuses for these things.


Well if you have company of prophet your level of spirituality and deen is way different that ones who don't.
Prophet SAW himself said:
خير القرون قرني
ثم الذين يلونهم
ثم الذين يلونهم
The best of centuries is my generation, then those who come after them, then those who come after them.

Things went in decline after that, that is why preservation mechanism of various other literature is needed.
Cool proving hadith is authentic from the hadith itself. ........🤪

That's your heretic view.
Errr wrong once again.BIG TIME!

Allah says in the Quran 75:17 - We shall make sure of its safe collection and recitation. And its a well know fact and even the greatest sunni scholar will admit the hadith is full of contradiction.

I'm starting to get the feeling you don't know much about the Quran itself, let alone hadith.
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
👆 👆 👆
Ustad e Azam ess pairay nu thora explain karow .
Forget it ustad ji. Lets just say I had exclusive access to a large swath of land when the real estate boom was at its peak here in Dubai. Land usually reserved only for citizens and right in the middle of the action. and I mean huge piece of untouched land. Taking about millions of sqft Because one of my real estate contacts had a buyer from UK who wanted to make a heavy investment here. So I got a the person who friends brothers who worked in a local real estate agency and knew the owner of his big chunk of land.

The deal was in its final stages and ramadan started, The buyers agent was a fat pathan and all of a sudden he went dark. Wont answer calls, wont reply to messages, all the while the agent with land was calling nonstop saying he can't hold off the land anymore because he is constantly getting offers for it. Try as I may I couldn't get hold of that fat pathan, and when after a week or so I did get hold of him, the land was already sold to someone else.

And this bastards excuse yaar rozay the, din ko banda soo raha hota hai aur iftar ke baad taabiyat sahi nai thi mein aram ker raha tha, chalo koi baat nai next time. ....and I was like 😡 😡 😡 😡 🤬 You son of a mother trucker!

Like I said I was getting a good 15bucks per square foot in commission and I just gave you an estimate how big the land was. So I literally lost millions in commission due to bastard fat pathan dui ooper ker ke sooing in ramadan.

Chalo Ustad ji no point in crying over spilt milk. Shayad is mein bi kuch behteri thi.
 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
I'm starting to get the feeling you don't know much about the Quran itself, let alone hadith.
Yes, you are right. I was arguing with him on another thread, and I asked him to interpret the verse, as he claims to know Arabic. As usual, he misconstrued a couple of words, and on top of that, he added a fairy tale to justify the verse.
 

Dr Adam

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Forget it ustad ji. Lets just say I had exclusive access to a large swath of land when the real estate boom was at its peak here in Dubai. Land usually reserved only for citizens and right in the middle of the action. and I mean huge piece of untouched land. Taking about millions of sqft Because one of my real estate contacts had a buyer from UK who wanted to make a heavy investment here. So I got a the person who friends brothers who worked in a local real estate agency and knew the owner of his big chunk of land.

The deal was in its final stages and ramadan started, The buyers agent was a fat pathan and all of a sudden he went dark. Wont answer calls, wont reply to messages, all the while the agent with land was calling nonstop saying he can't hold off the land anymore because he is constantly getting offers for it. Try as I may I couldn't get hold of that fat pathan, and when after a week or so I did get hold of him, the land was already sold to someone else.

And this bastards excuse yaar rozay the, din ko banda soo raha hota hai aur iftar ke baad taabiyat sahi nai thi mein aram ker raha tha, chalo koi baat nai next time. ....and I was like 😡 😡 😡 😡 🤬 You son of a mother trucker!

Like I said I was getting a good 15bucks per square foot in commission and I just gave you an estimate how big the land was. So I literally lost millions in commission due to bastard fat pathan dui ooper ker ke sooing in ramadan.

Chalo Ustad ji no point in crying over spilt milk. Shayad is mein bi kuch behteri thi.

Sad though, however yes.... shayad is mein bi kuch behteri thi.
 

Citizen X

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Yes, you are right. I was arguing with him on another thread, and I asked him to interpret the verse, as he claims to know Arabic. As usual, he misconstrued a couple of words, and on top of that, he added a fairy tale to justify the verse.
Oh do tell, how could I be missing out!

Link please.
 

Back
Top