25 civilians court-martialed during PTI tenure

Termitenator

Senator (1k+ posts)

25 civilians court-martialled during PTI tenure


ISLAMABAD:
Colonel (retd) Inamur Rahiem, a famous lawyer who has been representing various accused in military courts, has revealed that 25 civilians faced court martial during the rule of former prime minister Imran Khan.

“Trying civilians in military courts is lawful [in some cases] but 25 people faced military court trials when Imran Khan was the prime minister. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, therefore, has no moral high ground to oppose military trials now,” Rahiem said on Sunday, while speaking to The Express Tribune.

He said military courts gave death sentences to three of these people while others were sentenced to 10-year to 14-year imprisonment for violating the Official Secret Act, 1923. He said neither the convicts were given a counsel of their choice nor were they allowed to present witnesses in their defence.

Rahiem said he, as counsel for these accused later, challenged all these 25 convictions in the Lahore High Court (LHC). The LHC suspended the death sentences and the cases are still pending. Human rights and political activist Idris Khattak was among these 25 people, he added.

He said Articles of a fair trial –9, 10, 10-A – should be followed even if the civil and military leaders have decided to hold the trial of the perpetrators of the May 9 attacks in the military courts under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 and the Official Secrets Act,1923.


https://twitter.com/x/status/1735001999630877035
Rahiem said Article 9, 10, 10-A deal with the security of persons, safeguards as to arrest and detention, and the right to fair trial. He said the decision to hold trials of civilians in military courts has already been challenged in the Supreme Court. “Let’s see what the SC finally decides.”

He recalled that the military courts established in the past had stopped functioning when the Supreme Court ruled in the Sheikh Liaquat case that there was no need for military or parallel courts as a judicial system was already working in the country.

“The democratic government should try to strengthen the existing judicial system,” he said.

Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (Pildat) President Ahmed Bilal Mehboob said trying civilians for certain offences committed against military personnel and properties under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 is provided for in the law.



“Neither the PPP [Pakistan Peoples Party], the PML-N [Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz] nor the PTI ever tried to amend this law,” he added.

The Pildat chief said trying civilians under the army act will, therefore, be lawful. However, he added, he would plead against trying civilians under the army act on political grounds “with the exception of those who are directly found involved in the planning and attacking military installations”.

When asked what message will the military court trials send to the international community, Mehboob said many countries, including the US, have adopted extraordinary measures when their vital interests were attacked in the past. Having said that, he added, the “military trial of civilians especially of Imran Khan will not send a positive message about the democratic system in Pakistan.”

To another question, Mehboob said he did not think the military courts would solve any problems. “We need to do our course correction on the implementation of the Constitution and rule of law.”

He said these court-martial may give a breather to the government but it needs to take other long-term measures such as the provision of quality education to youth in order to address basic issues effectively.

“Unless we address the issues relating to education and employment of youth,” Mehboob said, “the problems will not go away. One group or the other will continue to exploit youth’s [sense of] deprivation and frustration.”

Commenting on the human rights organizations urging the government not to try civilians in military courts as it violates Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law, Mehboob said some countries and human rights organisations will rightly criticise the move.

Prominent lawyer and political analyst Abdul Moiz Jaferii says that conducting trials of civilians in military courts undermines the legitimacy of the judiciary and erodes public trust in due process. “These trials will be nothing but a farce.”

The legal expert expressed his skepticism regarding the possibility of Imran Khan being tried in military courts, stating that if such a scenario were to unfold, the process would likely have already been initiated.

Jaferii said there is “enough material” to hold the trial of Imran Khan in an accountability court in order to get to “the desired goal.”

“The government only wants to hold trials of civilians in military courts to spread terror and fear amongst the people,” he said.


Source: Express Tribune (June 12, 2023)
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2421287/25-civilians-court-martialled-during-pti-tenure
 

Azaadi

Minister (2k+ posts)

25 civilians court-martialled during PTI tenure


ISLAMABAD:
Colonel (retd) Inamur Rahiem, a famous lawyer who has been representing various accused in military courts, has revealed that 25 civilians faced court martial during the rule of former prime minister Imran Khan.

“Trying civilians in military courts is lawful [in some cases] but 25 people faced military court trials when Imran Khan was the prime minister. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, therefore, has no moral high ground to oppose military trials now,” Rahiem said on Sunday, while speaking to The Express Tribune.

He said military courts gave death sentences to three of these people while others were sentenced to 10-year to 14-year imprisonment for violating the Official Secret Act, 1923. He said neither the convicts were given a counsel of their choice nor were they allowed to present witnesses in their defence.

Rahiem said he, as counsel for these accused later, challenged all these 25 convictions in the Lahore High Court (LHC). The LHC suspended the death sentences and the cases are still pending. Human rights and political activist Idris Khattak was among these 25 people, he added.

He said Articles of a fair trial –9, 10, 10-A – should be followed even if the civil and military leaders have decided to hold the trial of the perpetrators of the May 9 attacks in the military courts under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 and the Official Secrets Act,1923.


https://twitter.com/x/status/1735001999630877035
Rahiem said Article 9, 10, 10-A deal with the security of persons, safeguards as to arrest and detention, and the right to fair trial. He said the decision to hold trials of civilians in military courts has already been challenged in the Supreme Court. “Let’s see what the SC finally decides.”

He recalled that the military courts established in the past had stopped functioning when the Supreme Court ruled in the Sheikh Liaquat case that there was no need for military or parallel courts as a judicial system was already working in the country.

“The democratic government should try to strengthen the existing judicial system,” he said.

Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (Pildat) President Ahmed Bilal Mehboob said trying civilians for certain offences committed against military personnel and properties under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 is provided for in the law.



“Neither the PPP [Pakistan Peoples Party], the PML-N [Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz] nor the PTI ever tried to amend this law,” he added.

The Pildat chief said trying civilians under the army act will, therefore, be lawful. However, he added, he would plead against trying civilians under the army act on political grounds “with the exception of those who are directly found involved in the planning and attacking military installations”.

When asked what message will the military court trials send to the international community, Mehboob said many countries, including the US, have adopted extraordinary measures when their vital interests were attacked in the past. Having said that, he added, the “military trial of civilians especially of Imran Khan will not send a positive message about the democratic system in Pakistan.”

To another question, Mehboob said he did not think the military courts would solve any problems. “We need to do our course correction on the implementation of the Constitution and rule of law.”

He said these court-martial may give a breather to the government but it needs to take other long-term measures such as the provision of quality education to youth in order to address basic issues effectively.

“Unless we address the issues relating to education and employment of youth,” Mehboob said, “the problems will not go away. One group or the other will continue to exploit youth’s [sense of] deprivation and frustration.”

Commenting on the human rights organizations urging the government not to try civilians in military courts as it violates Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law, Mehboob said some countries and human rights organisations will rightly criticise the move.

Prominent lawyer and political analyst Abdul Moiz Jaferii says that conducting trials of civilians in military courts undermines the legitimacy of the judiciary and erodes public trust in due process. “These trials will be nothing but a farce.”

The legal expert expressed his skepticism regarding the possibility of Imran Khan being tried in military courts, stating that if such a scenario were to unfold, the process would likely have already been initiated.

Jaferii said there is “enough material” to hold the trial of Imran Khan in an accountability court in order to get to “the desired goal.”

“The government only wants to hold trials of civilians in military courts to spread terror and fear amongst the people,” he said.


Source: Express Tribune (June 12, 2023)
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2421287/25-civilians-court-martialled-during-pti-tenure
I request Siasat pk: to put a dogs leech on This haraam kor patwari he lies so much and he is gives explains from lifafa haraam kor judges and newspapers. You know they are all controlled by ISI wing all lies and propaganda against Imran khan. Imran khan never tried any civilian in military courts the haraam kors are lying. This haraam kor patwari day and nigh likes like a patwari dog. He just lies and lies on this forums. He should be banned until his masters are not hanged to death in military courts or on the streets by a angry millions of Pakistani public.
 

Termitenator

Senator (1k+ posts)
I request Siasat pk: to put a dogs leech on This haraam kor patwaris he lies so much and he is giving explained from lifafa haraam kor judges, newspapers. You know it’s all controlled by ISI wing all lies and propaganda. Imran khan or it’s goverment never tried any civilian in military courts the haraam kors are lying. This haraam kor patwari day and nigh likes ap patwari dog lies in this forums. He should be banned.

care to point what is a lie? didnt u see the source?
 

Azaadi

Minister (2k+ posts)
care to point what is a lie? didnt u see the source?
That’s what I just explained the source is haraam kor lifafa newspaper tribunal, then you give explains from Geo Group another haraam kor people. If the military chief and Nawaz sharif are haraam kor corrupt then how can rest be good. Think patwari brain dead donkey eating piece of shot you are are.
 

Husain中川日本

Senator (1k+ posts)

25 civilians court-martialled during PTI tenure


ISLAMABAD:
Colonel (retd) Inamur Rahiem, a famous lawyer who has been representing various accused in military courts, has revealed that 25 civilians faced court martial during the rule of former prime minister Imran Khan.

“Trying civilians in military courts is lawful [in some cases] but 25 people faced military court trials when Imran Khan was the prime minister. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief, therefore, has no moral high ground to oppose military trials now,” Rahiem said on Sunday, while speaking to The Express Tribune.

He said military courts gave death sentences to three of these people while others were sentenced to 10-year to 14-year imprisonment for violating the Official Secret Act, 1923. He said neither the convicts were given a counsel of their choice nor were they allowed to present witnesses in their defence.

Rahiem said he, as counsel for these accused later, challenged all these 25 convictions in the Lahore High Court (LHC). The LHC suspended the death sentences and the cases are still pending. Human rights and political activist Idris Khattak was among these 25 people, he added.

He said Articles of a fair trial –9, 10, 10-A – should be followed even if the civil and military leaders have decided to hold the trial of the perpetrators of the May 9 attacks in the military courts under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 and the Official Secrets Act,1923.


https://twitter.com/x/status/1735001999630877035
Rahiem said Article 9, 10, 10-A deal with the security of persons, safeguards as to arrest and detention, and the right to fair trial. He said the decision to hold trials of civilians in military courts has already been challenged in the Supreme Court. “Let’s see what the SC finally decides.”

He recalled that the military courts established in the past had stopped functioning when the Supreme Court ruled in the Sheikh Liaquat case that there was no need for military or parallel courts as a judicial system was already working in the country.

“The democratic government should try to strengthen the existing judicial system,” he said.

Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (Pildat) President Ahmed Bilal Mehboob said trying civilians for certain offences committed against military personnel and properties under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 is provided for in the law.



“Neither the PPP [Pakistan Peoples Party], the PML-N [Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz] nor the PTI ever tried to amend this law,” he added.

The Pildat chief said trying civilians under the army act will, therefore, be lawful. However, he added, he would plead against trying civilians under the army act on political grounds “with the exception of those who are directly found involved in the planning and attacking military installations”.

When asked what message will the military court trials send to the international community, Mehboob said many countries, including the US, have adopted extraordinary measures when their vital interests were attacked in the past. Having said that, he added, the “military trial of civilians especially of Imran Khan will not send a positive message about the democratic system in Pakistan.”

To another question, Mehboob said he did not think the military courts would solve any problems. “We need to do our course correction on the implementation of the Constitution and rule of law.”

He said these court-martial may give a breather to the government but it needs to take other long-term measures such as the provision of quality education to youth in order to address basic issues effectively.

“Unless we address the issues relating to education and employment of youth,” Mehboob said, “the problems will not go away. One group or the other will continue to exploit youth’s [sense of] deprivation and frustration.”

Commenting on the human rights organizations urging the government not to try civilians in military courts as it violates Pakistan’s obligations under international human rights law, Mehboob said some countries and human rights organisations will rightly criticise the move.

Prominent lawyer and political analyst Abdul Moiz Jaferii says that conducting trials of civilians in military courts undermines the legitimacy of the judiciary and erodes public trust in due process. “These trials will be nothing but a farce.”

The legal expert expressed his skepticism regarding the possibility of Imran Khan being tried in military courts, stating that if such a scenario were to unfold, the process would likely have already been initiated.

Jaferii said there is “enough material” to hold the trial of Imran Khan in an accountability court in order to get to “the desired goal.”

“The government only wants to hold trials of civilians in military courts to spread terror and fear amongst the people,” he said.


Source: Express Tribune (June 12, 2023)
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2421287/25-civilians-court-martialled-during-pti-tenure
چل کنجر یہاں بھی تیری دیہاڑی درج ہو گئی اگلی پوسٹ پر اپنی باجی پیش کرو

Dog Monday GIF
 

g i joe

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
Patwaris and company's tout again spreading here false narrative military courts were established after APS in the term of gawalmandela in 2014 then in the term of daqan khabassi means khaqan abbasi they were extended for 2 years and in the time of Khan the courts was there in their end days where 25 accused was present before them after in PTI's era hey were demolished another thing there is no excuse wot so ever comparing hardcore terrorists with political workers who r there to demonstrate against the army's rule against the abduction of peoples leader by the army
 

Back
Top