Why is a Constitution written?
To secure important social benefits by establishing fundamental laws, mandating the rule of law, entrenching political procedures, limiting government powers, and guaranteeing basic human rights.
Today, in the Supreme Court, some judges look left and right, speak from both sides of their mouths about the Constitution, and quote different articles to support their arguments. They however miss the bigger picture of the purpose of the Constitution and if the rights of the people are getting fulfilled, and their mandate is not stolen.
After the February 8 election, only a lunatic will say that every constitutional body is performing the way it should. If a judge says that then either he is mentally sick or has an agenda. In either case, he should not be part of the highest court in the land.
If the Supreme Court can't protect the rights of the people and purge institutions, constitutional or otherwise, that didn't perform per the constitution and were involved in violation of human rights and/or stealing people's mandate, and judges who facilitated it then they are asking for a public uproar that no one will be able to stop and which will crush lots of idols.
If a judge, can't stand in front of his peers to justify his rationale on a case then he should be ashamed of his twisted rationale and must resign and go home before it gets any worse.
To secure important social benefits by establishing fundamental laws, mandating the rule of law, entrenching political procedures, limiting government powers, and guaranteeing basic human rights.
Today, in the Supreme Court, some judges look left and right, speak from both sides of their mouths about the Constitution, and quote different articles to support their arguments. They however miss the bigger picture of the purpose of the Constitution and if the rights of the people are getting fulfilled, and their mandate is not stolen.
After the February 8 election, only a lunatic will say that every constitutional body is performing the way it should. If a judge says that then either he is mentally sick or has an agenda. In either case, he should not be part of the highest court in the land.
If the Supreme Court can't protect the rights of the people and purge institutions, constitutional or otherwise, that didn't perform per the constitution and were involved in violation of human rights and/or stealing people's mandate, and judges who facilitated it then they are asking for a public uproar that no one will be able to stop and which will crush lots of idols.
If a judge, can't stand in front of his peers to justify his rationale on a case then he should be ashamed of his twisted rationale and must resign and go home before it gets any worse.
