Fresh fatwas - article

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Within a week, countless gripping Saudi fatwas were issued, thus triggering the tensions on the Saudi arena once again. These fatwas addressed the "hijab", women's driving, "adult breastfeeding," the banning of sports for young women, the permission of singing, the banning of graduation clothes and questioning the fact that scientists and researchers landed on the moon.




Indeed, in response to the statements of officials in the Education Ministry, member of the Council of Senior Scholars Abdul Karim al-Khudheir banned the teaching of sports to young women in schools due to what he described as being "decadence" and following the steps of the devil. Asked about prayer on the surface of the moon, this same al-Khudheir who was appointed two weeks ago in the Permanent Committee for Ifta' by a royal decree stated: "That is all we needed! Some of those who tricked people and told them they reached it are now denying that." Prayer must be performed beneath the Kaaba in terms of direction. "They did not reach it. It is all empty talk aiming at making Muslims doubt their religion. We reached it We did not reach it, and whoever believes the first statement, believes the second."




Nearly 24 hours before that, Sheikh Adel al-Kalbani allowed singing which was prohibited by Saudi scholars and sheikhs. He said to al-Watan in this regard that the total banning of acting or singing was not right, just like total permissiveness is not right either.



He thus allowed the Ardha sword dance of Najd, the Khbety, the Samiri and the flute of the Hijaz, quoting Imam al-Nawawi and Ibn Kathir as saying this was permitted on occasions. Al-Kalbani added: "I allow singing and Sheikh Youssef al-Qardawi and Sheikh Abdullah al-Judai' also allow it."






Regarding the issue of women's driving, which has been keeping the Saudi street busy for many years and is almost periodically stirred again, member of the Council of Senior Scholars Dr. Qais al-Mubarak said that the issue should be discussed by the scholars in a "purely legal" context. He stated: "Saying that women are not allowed to drive cars means that Allah would sanction them for doing that. However, this conclusion can only be reached through an explicit text in the Qoran or the Sunnah or through syllogism in one of them. In the absence of something of the sort, the ban is null."






Speaking about the "adult breastfeeding" fatwa, Sheikh Abdul Mohsen al-Obeikan reiterated the fatwa of a scholar from al-Azhar in regard to the activation of the "adult breastfeeding" issue mentioned by one of the female Companions of the Prophet. Nonetheless, the difference between the fatwa of Obeikan and the fatwa of the Egyptian scholar who was ousted from his post because of it, is the fact that the first did not use specific cases when he issued it and stressed that the suckling should be made via proper means, i.e. not directly from the "breast," and only when extremely necessary as stated in the Hadith of al-Bukhari. As for the Egyptian scholar, he issued the fatwa as a solution to avoid mixing in the work place!





Also last week, phone messages were sent around featuring a fatwa related to the hijab as issued by member of the Council of Senior Scholars Sheikh Saleh al-Fawzan, who - answering a question by a man living in France in regard to his wife's ability to remove the Niqab to avoid the payment of a fine - considered that the solution resided in patience or in having the wife stay at home.




On the other hand, many conflicts and criticisms were exchanged between certain sheikhs, knowing that some of them were hidden while others were public!




For example, about three months ago, Mohsen al-Awaji criticized Muhammad al-Arifi after the latter accused Shiite reference Al-Sistani of heresy. Moreover, Muhammad al-Nujeimi criticized Youssef al-Ahmad following his fatwa to tear down the pavement of al-Mataf and rebuild it to prevent mixing between men and women.



Also, al-Kalbani criticized Sheikh Ayedh al-Garni whom he said was going through a stage of "heedlessness of the good" by banning singing then cooperating with a singer, criticizing al-Nujeimi as well over his prevention of mixing and then his appearance with Kuwaiti women which he justified by saying it was "temporary mixing."


In that same context, there were insults and slander campaigns which affected the director of the Committee for the Prevention of Vice and the Promotion of Virtue in Holy Mecca, Sheikh Ahmad al-Ghamidi, to the point where his family and his honor were attacked by his "ill-intentioned" oppositionists, while Sheikh Issa al-Ghayth was also attacked by people who were incapable of confronting him with logic and arguments.




This series of "announced" criticisms was then concluded with the statements of Sheikh Mohammed al-Doureihi, a faculty member in Imam Mohammed Bin Saud University, who called during a televised Islamic show for cutting the tongues of al-Obeikan and al-Kalbani following their fatwas about adult breastfeeding and the permission to sing, saying: "Had the fatwas they issued been pronounced during the days of Sheikh Muhammed bin Ibrahim or Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Baz, they would have been put in prison and had their tongues cut out." He added: "They would better find jobs in the vegetables market instead of addressing religious issues and misleading the people."



What is certain is that although it may look "harmful," the action currently seen on the Saudi arena is "healthy" since society does not become accustomed to the jurisprudence of divergence until after many discrepancies and agreements.




Nonetheless, I fear that we will turn into the country of "one million muftis" and that the flow of "fresh" fatwas over which we disagree more than we agree will never stop.

by Jameel Theyabi



Mods kindly do not merge or delete it as its only a neutral views on news by a Saudi journalist
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Saudi Council of Senior Scholars member Dr. Qais bin Muhammad Aal Al-Sheikh Mubarak has ruled that Muslims may respond to invitations to participate in the holiday celebrations of non-Muslims. He explained that rejecting such an invitation could arouse disgust about Muslims, but Muslims are commanded to get along with all people.

Egyptian Mufti Dr. Ali Gum'a extended holiday greetings to the Copts and to all Christians.


Source: 'Okaz, Saudi Arabia; Al-Ahram, Egypt, December 23, 2010
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Khalid Alnowaiser a Saudi lawyer and columnist



What is happening in our country is terrifying. The rising incidence of fatwas (religious edicts) is extremely frightening. Fatwas that demand the murder of persons who are alleged to violate Islamic laws are extremely dangerous and destabilizing to a tolerant, civilized society. These demands are frequently issued with no thought or concern as to its breadth or the consequences to Saudi society and the nation.



Like many others, I read recently the fatwa posted on the official website of Sheikh Abdul Rahman bin Nassir Al-Barrak. It said, “Certainly the one who permits mixing of men and women, if it leads to prohibited relations, is in fact permitting prohibited relations. Any one who approves them is a kafir (unbeliever). This means he is an apostate and he should be tried for it and if he does not recant, must be executed.” My topic of discussion is not the fatwa itself, although I feel saddened that the debate triggered by the fatwa has focused more on the topic of gender mixing and not on the more important topic of issuing a fatwa to kill someone.



This is a topic that calls for not only a thorough study but the immediate intervention of the government. The state should stop such voices by all available means and not turn a blind eye to any individual, whoever he may be, issuing a fatwa calling for killing without being accountable for it in any manner. This is nothing less than a call to the law of the jungle, not of a great nation and a system in which law and order is based upon Shariah.



A question that comes up is who gives to an individual, whatever may be his status in terms of his erudition in Islamic theology and jurisprudence, the right to make killing another person permissible and call people to take someone’s life and determine his fate just because he holds a different view on certain matters. Is this not an aggression and outrage against the great religion of Islam which calls for tolerance, love and peace and shuns violence, murder and assassination? Is this not a deviation from the state’s system of law and order? Does not this amount to a total disregard for the country’s laws and all of its legal institutions?



Yes, there are issues in which members of our society have differing views. Unfortunately, those who represent themselves as official spokesmen of Islam are not promoting solutions other than the language of violence, murder, intimidation and threats as they respond to those individuals who have different opinions than their own.



Saudi Arabia has suffered a great deal from the evil of terrorism and has paid a huge price for it. We are still paying that price everyday in spite of the enormous efforts the state’s security apparatus has been making. Nevertheless, anyone who claims to have learned the Shariah and views himself as eligible to issue fatwas, even if he is right in that claim, remains free to issue fatwas, one after the other, neglecting the authority of the state, its establishments, and its prestigious justice system. Issuing fatwas demanding that someone be killed is itself terrorism, and it should be condemned because it strikes a blow at the heart of peace in our society.



It is high time that Saudi Arabia undertook not only the protection of its citizens from this menace, abuse and confusion, but also preservation of its good reputation, status and cultural image in the world. Otherwise, our silence on the matter may be interpreted as an implied consent to such fatwas and thus to tarnish the image of Saudi Arabia and its people throughout the world.



The government should take the lead in regulating the issuing of fatwas so the only option available to those who resort to issuing such fatwas when they find any one disagreeing with their views should be our courts of law. And this should be done immediately. Our system of justice and our courts should decide the punishment to those persons who are wrong in their views. The courts should be the only institution with the authority to make a decision in such matters.



Further, the system to regulate the issuing of fatwas calling for murder and physical violence should require that those who do so should be taken into custody and tried as terrorists, because they are inciting people to kill, commit violence and crimes, and create chaos and destruction. They should be punished not just as terrorists are punished, but in a more severe manner because they are causing greater damage to our society than the terrorists could ever hope for. If the present situation is left as it is, its harm will not be limited to the lives of the people and the violation of their rights.



It is shameful and lamentable that our society is preoccupied with fatwas and issues such as whether gender mixing and being alone with a woman should be allowed or not, while the rest of the world is discussing major issues such as the far-reaching effects of climate change, the role of genes in the treatment of incurable diseases, and vast studies on man, animals, nature, environment and space. Is this not a painful and sad situation? Can a society be expected to be healthy and rational if these are the issues that concern its citizens and dominate their thinking? Where is the opportunity for intellectual activities, creativity, inventiveness and participation in nation-building under a suffocating atmosphere that leaves no room for intelligence, knowledge and inventiveness?



Lastly, history and experience teach us that any changes, especially in a conservative society such as ours, must come from the top down and not from the bottom up. It is extremely dangerous for a civilized society to relegate these issues to extrajudicial voices who create a climate favorable for extremism, fundamentalism, and the ever more frequent issuing of fatwas that encourage violence.



I call on our government to make the great and bold decisions for the advancement of our society, preserving its essential character and dignity and protecting its people in such a way that every person has the ability to think, express his opinions, and move about freely and safely. The state’s bold decisions should also uproot the Taleban style of thinking in our society, and make all citizens, including those who call for violence, murder and destruction, realize that the Kingdom is a nation of humanity, peace and love.
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Dubai to allow females to issue fatwas: report


The United Arab Emirates' city of Dubai is set to appoint female muftis by the end of next year in an unprecedented step that allows women to issue fatwas, or religious edicts, press reports said on Tuesday.


Six Emirati women are being selected for a training program that starts early next year, the National newspaper reported, quoting the Dubai's grand mufti Ahmed al-Haddad as saying.

Haddad issued a fatwa in February authorizing women to become muftis and in May he called on qualified candidates to apply for a training program that includes instruction in Sharia law and legal thought.

"A woman who is learned and trained in issuing fatwas is not limited to her role of issuing fatwas that relate to women only, but rather she is qualified to issue on matters of worship, jurisprudence, morality and behavior," the paper quoted him as saying.


Haddad played down the prospect of a major backlash from religious conservatives.


"The controversy over female muftis is not necessarily over this point, but about whether or not a woman should be appointed as the grand mufti of a state," he said. "And this is not what we're trying to do at this point."


Last year, Egypt appointed its first female Islamic notary with the ability to perform marriages and divorces but the country generally rejects the appointment of women as grand muftis.
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Age differences cause most Saudi divorces: Justice Minister

Saudi mulls child marriage law as divorces rise


With skyrocketing divorce rates and a flurry of cases in which older men married young girls, Saudi Arabia is considering a new law to prohibit girls marrying before the age of 18, according to press reports Saturday.

Recognizing changes in contemporary society and the prevalence of divorce among girls married before they turn 18 years old, Justice Minister Mohamed al-Eissa declined to disregard fatwas that permit minor marriages but said that such religious rulings do not address its drawbacks.

“We cannot dispute the fatwas that permit the marriage of young girls, but these fatwas did not tackle the disadvantages,” Eissa said in an interview with the pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat, adding that reaching puberty should not be the only prerequisite for marriage.

He acknowledged that the ministry has experienced several difficulties following an alarming increase in divorce rates, primarily due to significant age differences and minor marriages, an said the laws needed to adapt to contemporary realities.

"According to preliminary surveys, most divorces are due to age difference, especially when the girl is a minor and even if the age difference is not that big," he told the London-based newspaper.

A girl under the age of 18 is not ready to assume the responsibilities of marriage, especially if she has children immediately, he said, noting that traditional practices might need to be adapted to present-day concerns.


"In this age, many guardians act irresponsibly towards their daughters, which led to many failing marriages. That is why laws need to change in accordance with the current circumstances."

The recent controversy surrounding the marriage and subsequent divorce of an eight-year old girl and a 47-year-old man was the latest case to rivet public attention and spurred human rights organizations to label minor marriage an abuse of children's rights.

Many Saudi families marry their daughters to older men because of financial problems.
 

Veila Mast

Senator (1k+ posts)
Sir, I would highly appreciate if you could share your knowledge about motives behind these decisions.

What really made them to come out wirh such "revolutionary" ideas?

How many things are new to Islam among these fatwas?

What else we can expect from them in future?

Many Thanks & Kind Regards
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Sir, I would highly appreciate if you could share your knowledge about motives behind these decisions.

What really made them to come out wirh such "revolutionary" ideas?

How many things are new to Islam among these fatwas?

What else we can expect from them in future?

Many Thanks & Kind Regards

The only reason sir is that these people have been successful in deciding that every one is a nonmuslim except their divine self. Now the time has started for them to self destruct and so they have started to fight with each other and r trying to find the nonmuslims within their own home. The amusing part is that some of them still dont believe that people have landed on moon. Reminds of those days when they used to call the television a satanic box. These days they dont shy to appear on those satanic boxes frequently to propogate their beliefs.

Some of the members are adherents to them and peraps can shed some more light and explain this looming threat of self destruction.
 

Back
Top