Truth Seeker
Citizen
In whole Qadiani debate I have found some very interesting facts that is about 73 sects.
According to Qadianis all other 72 sects are against them and they are the one NO. 73 and that is their basis of being true.
Intersting fact is that all 73 sects have come into EXISTANCE so there will be no further SECTS.
Because if there are more than 73 scects then prediction is false which everyone here shall agree is IMPOSSIBLE.
That is sigh of relief for me at least we are not going to have any more sects in Islam untill DAY OF QAYAMAH so no more divisions.
Second Interesting Fact is that all 72 are against them so thay can't quote anyone including Ghamdi, Pervaiz, Sir Syed etc to prove them innocent as its their own claim that everyone opposes them so that means Ghamdi, Pervaiz, Sir Syed etc oppose them too.
Third intersting fact is about RIAZ AHMAD who claimed to be MAHDI as well like GHULAM AHMAD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riaz_Ahmed_Gohar_Shahi
Riaz Ahmad was born in 1941 and Ghulam Ahmad in 1835 so it's quite possible that in every century there is going to ONE MAHDI.
But 72 sects have already come into existance so what is Qadiani's stance about Riaz Ahmad.
Then why do they believe in Ghulam Ahmad not in Riaz Ahmad because it's quite possible AHMAD mentioned in Quran or Hadith is infact Riaz Ahmad not Ghulam Ahmad?
According to Qadianis all other 72 sects are against them and they are the one NO. 73 and that is their basis of being true.
Intersting fact is that all 73 sects have come into EXISTANCE so there will be no further SECTS.
Because if there are more than 73 scects then prediction is false which everyone here shall agree is IMPOSSIBLE.
That is sigh of relief for me at least we are not going to have any more sects in Islam untill DAY OF QAYAMAH so no more divisions.
Second Interesting Fact is that all 72 are against them so thay can't quote anyone including Ghamdi, Pervaiz, Sir Syed etc to prove them innocent as its their own claim that everyone opposes them so that means Ghamdi, Pervaiz, Sir Syed etc oppose them too.
Third intersting fact is about RIAZ AHMAD who claimed to be MAHDI as well like GHULAM AHMAD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riaz_Ahmed_Gohar_Shahi
Riaz Ahmad was born in 1941 and Ghulam Ahmad in 1835 so it's quite possible that in every century there is going to ONE MAHDI.
But 72 sects have already come into existance so what is Qadiani's stance about Riaz Ahmad.
Then why do they believe in Ghulam Ahmad not in Riaz Ahmad because it's quite possible AHMAD mentioned in Quran or Hadith is infact Riaz Ahmad not Ghulam Ahmad?
