Un-teaching extremism - Fahad Faruqui's Article : AWESOME!

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
80x80-Fahad-Faruqui.jpg



http://www.dawn.com/2012/01/07/un-teaching-extremism.html/print/

Un-teaching extremism
Posted By Fahad Faruqui On January 7, 2012 @ 1:42 pm In Blog > Pakistan,Culture > Blog,Home > Blogs | 9 Comments


The US has taken an initiative to spread the counter-extremist message across Pakistan [1] to prevent the breeding of extremism and to deradicalise militants who were completely taken by the jihadist ideology — which is a tough battle becausePakistan is, perhaps, the only country where the state, with funding from US andSaudi Arabia, financed and trained jihadis to fight Soviet Russia and did nothing todeprogram the mujahideen after the war was over.


The one of its kind three-person unit, whose aim is to support grassroots groups and moderate religious leaders to counter extremist ideology, started operating in Pakistan last July.


Sultan Mehmood Gujar, 46, a property dealer by profession, is reported to be one of the many staunch supporters of the “holy war.” But his views changed after listening to a 40-day lecture series offering a counter narrative to jihad. Hopefully, this measure will prevent the youth from joining radical groups and deradicalise militants — if the message seeps in!


For over a decade, Pakistan has endured the wrath of extremist ideology that has successfully bred terrorism and convinced many to blow themselves up to “fight theInfidels” in foreign soil and even perish those Muslims who do not subscribe to the cause on home ground. But have the leaders done anything besides giving lip service to its people on combating violent extremism?


“Pakistan has done absolutely nothing to deradicalise the militants,” said Tariq Pervez [2], ex-chairman National Counter-Terrorism Authority (NACTA). “World over, one dimension for deradicalisation is to rehabilitate those people who are in jails on terrorism charges.”


If the al Qaeda poster boy, Dr. Fadl [3], can take a U-turn in the jail and write a book titled “Rationalising Jihad in Egypt and the World” that shattered the extremist ideology, it gives cause to believe that rehabilitation is possible no matter how brainwashed the person is.


Saudi Arabia has been running terrorist rehabilitation programs for ex-Guantanamo detainees. And the kingdom officials claim to have 80 per cent success rate [4]. However, they have enormous resources and are seemingly committed to make a change as well.


But in Pakistan, initiatives to counter-violent extremism pose a difficulty when the subject starts to question the legitimacy of the program. “The problem is that conspicuous support from Western governments for ‘moderate Islam’ is usually counterproductive, in that it contaminates the moderates with the stain of association with Western policies, notably support for unpopular despotic regimes, unjust financial systems, and hard-line backing for Israeli policies,” wrote Tim Winter [5], lecturer of Islamic Science at Cambridge University. “To accept such support is usually a kiss of death, and strengthens the hand of the radicals.”


Perhaps this is why the US is leveraging local groups and moderate religious leaders.Knowing how keen the Pakistani government is to fight terrorism, one can only rely on grassroots initiatives.


“The problem with the groups working on ground is that their efforts are not coordinated,” said Mr. Pervez. “People were systematically radicalised in GeneralMuhammad Zia-ul-Haq’s regime and a greater effort is required to deradicalise the militant psyche and to neutralise the breeding grounds.”


Akbar Ahmed, author of “Journey into Islam,” rightly noted: “unless these [initiatives] are conducted on a national scale, they will only create the smallest of dents in Pakistani society.”


And that’s not it.


Militant material is readily available on social media that adds another tier to the problem. “US policy makers have focused on YouTube because videos are one of the most effective tools for radical recruiters,” wrote J.M. Berger, author of “Jihad Joe [6]” said in an email.


“Facebook has a constantly growing body of radical material available, and there hasn’t been much focus on policing it…Over the last year, we’ve seen a surge of violence-oriented radicals using Twitter.”


With the growing difficulty to prevent radicalisation and rehabilitate militants, there is a lot more that needs to be done by parents, imams, scholars, teachers, and the entire society to promote the message of mercy and compassion.


“With the growth of new media, it is important for prominent and trusted voices to get on television, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter to help counter narratives which might promote extremism,” wrote Arsalan Iftikhar, author of “Islamic Pacifism: Global Muslims in the Post-Osama Era [7]” He added: “Since many youth are quite impressionable, it is important to get to them an early age.”


Imams and religious scholars, across the globe, tweet and update their Facebook statuses and fan pages regularly, often with a thought-provoking line or a religious quote, there is a dire need to counter extremist ideology on networking sites, regardless of how unpalatable it may be to the followers.


A national security analyst, speaking off the record, said that counter narratives would work when one person hears from 10,000 voices that militant ideology is unfounded and unjust.


I wish we could rely on Jon Stewart to spread the counter-extremist message, like we’re depending on him to counter Islamophobia on The Daily Show, but we really need to mobilise the entire Muslim community if we really want to counter the extremist ideology.





80x80-Fahad-Faruqui.jpg
Fahad Faruqui is a journalist, writer and educator. Alumni Columbia University.


The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.
 

brilTek

Senator (1k+ posts)
Finish Muslim grievousness all over world --- Muslims are victims all over

Solve Kashmir, Afghanistan and Palestinian issue --- the radicalisation will die down gradually



There is no need for aid programs --- change in syllabus --- Jihad is and will be un-detachable stone of our religion Islam ---- Hit the root of the problem --- trimming bushes will be in vain and bring no results



---
brilTek
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Only proper understanding of the quran can solve the problems but that is anti oppression, anti injustice, anti unfairness, anti cruelty, anti animosity, anti stagnation and regression and anti ignorance and poverty etc and this suits not those who want to create problems for others.
 

Mojo-jojo

Minister (2k+ posts)
Radicalism and extremism is taking Muslims and Pakistanis away from solving their problems and causing more harm to their causes including struggles of freedom in Palestine, Kashmir, etc. Majority of our problems are self -created and and we should stop blaming foreign powers all the time. Bringing justice and meritocracy along with education are the most important steps needed.
 

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Sab baatein sahi. Lekin think of what you're expecting from your enemies - to solve all problems which Muslims havent been able to resolve. Possible?

And another thing. This whole recent jihad movement, of blowing up Namazis and Dargaah, wasnt there before ZIA. Co-incidence or correlation?

Finish Muslim grievousness all over world --- Muslims are victims all over

Solve Kashmir, Afghanistan and Palestinian issue --- the radicalisation will die down gradually



There is no need for aid programs --- change in syllabus --- Jihad is and will be un-detachable stone of our religion Islam ---- Hit the root of the problem --- trimming bushes will be in vain and bring no results



---
brilTek
 

jahanzaibi

Senator (1k+ posts)
Jo media kehtay hay wo hum such samajh littay hain.. Afghan nay pehlay jihad start kar dia tha russia kay khilaf with axe and small weapon.. Islam kay name per .. phir america involve hooa isi kay sath .. taliban america ya pakistan ka banaya hooa group nahi hay .. unki support ki hay start unhoo nay khud lia tha
 

tz00007

Minister (2k+ posts)
WHO the hell is america to be involved in our internal affairs??

first they bring the jihadi literature.. now they want to bring a secular literature..

as a nation... isnt this our own responsibility and choice?? why do we let americans do this in our country????????

beghairati ki had hay.. or is pe bohot se pakistani fakhar bhi krte hein.. acha bura apni jaga.. but onko koi haq nahi hamarey mulk me unglian maarney ki
 

tz00007

Minister (2k+ posts)
agar americans itney he acheyyyyyyy hein tho y dont they stop killing muslims all over the world???

why dont they stop the bloodshed across the world where they are involved... their military is actively involved in 70% of the bloodshed across the globe.. ab hamey sabaq parhaaney aye hein...
 

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
I bet you $1 you didnt read beyond the 1st 2 lines of this article. $1!


agar americans itney he acheyyyyyyy hein tho y dont they stop killing muslims all over the world???

why dont they stop the bloodshed across the world where they are involved... their military is actively involved in 70% of the bloodshed across the globe.. ab hamey sabaq parhaaney aye hein...
 

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
I can confidently say that before the Americans got involved in Afghanistan, the Mujahideen were taking huge casualties. Even after Americans got involved, things remained bleak for the struggle. When CIA assessed the matter and decided to deploy those heat-seeking shoulder launching missiles, that marked the end to the GUNSHIP chopper. Once the sky was cleared, tanks and convey thru the valleys held no chance. Soviet took heavy casualties. Fact is, it was the strategic deployment of those heat-seeking missiles that marked a turn-around in the battle.

Back then, I think it was Robert Fisk who asked OBL what he thought of USA and OBL said he see USSR and USA in the same color. He didnt mince words.

Guys the fact of the matter is, things are alot more complicated then just RIGHT or WRONG. Right now things are somewhere b/w messed up and fcvked up.

About the Taliban history. Taliban was a Pakistani Pashtoon faction, with the support of ISI, that joined the afghan war. Shareef took seconds to recognize them as a Afghan Govt. Wonder why? because Taliban was the creation of the Pak Army and guarantied its interests in Afghanistan.


Jo media kehtay hay wo hum such samajh littay hain.. Afghan nay pehlay jihad start kar dia tha russia kay khilaf with axe and small weapon.. Islam kay name per .. phir america involve hooa isi kay sath .. taliban america ya pakistan ka banaya hooa group nahi hay .. unki support ki hay start unhoo nay khud lia tha
 

jahanzaibi

Senator (1k+ posts)
I can confidently say that before the Americans got involved in Afghanistan, the Mujahideen were taking huge casualties. Even after Americans got involved, things remained bleak for the struggle. When CIA assessed the matter and decided to deploy those heat-seeking shoulder launching missiles, that marked the end to the GUNSHIP chopper. Once the sky was cleared, tanks and convey thru the valleys held no chance. Soviet took heavy casualties. Fact is, it was the strategic deployment of those heat-seeking missiles that marked a turn-around in the battle.

Back then, I think it was Robert Fisk who asked OBL what he thought of USA and OBL said he see USSR and USA in the same color. He didnt mince words.

Guys the fact of the matter is, things are alot more complicated then just RIGHT or WRONG. Right now things are somewhere b/w messed up and fcvked up.

About the Taliban history. Taliban was a Pakistani Pashtoon faction, with the support of ISI, that joined the afghan war. Shareef took seconds to recognize them as a Afghan Govt. Wonder why? because Taliban was the creation of the Pak Army and guarantied its interests in Afghanistan.

American get involved when they get a hope that these afghan mujahedin can defeat russia with their help if they there were no hope they didnt involve themselves. otherwise afghan will finish this war by giving all their lives and this war kept continue until a single afgani life.
 

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Dekho. Yahan koi kisi ka dost nahi hai. Lets take the facts at face value and move on.

USA wanted stop the militarization of Soviet influenced or occupied areas. It wanted to stop the Soviet influence. It was all Economics and Military strategics. Yahan KOI duud ka dhula nahi. Whether be it USA, USSR, Afghan or Pakistan.

USA backed Afghan to stop Soviet influence. Pakistan backed afghan to secure its strategic, political and commerce influence in the Afghan area. Again, koi duud ka koi dhula nahi. This is a classic example of what happens when MILITARIES are given a blank check by nations, whether be it the US or Pakistan.

American get involved when they get a hope that these afghan mujahedin can defeat russia with their help if they there were no hope they didnt involve themselves. otherwise afghan will finish this war by giving all their lives and this war kept continue until a single afgani life.
 

jahanzaibi

Senator (1k+ posts)
Dekho. Yahan koi kisi ka dost nahi hai. Lets take the facts at face value and move on.

USA wanted stop the militarization of Soviet influenced or occupied areas. It wanted to stop the Soviet influence. It was all Economics and Military strategics. Yahan KOI duud ka dhula nahi. Whether be it USA, USSR, Afghan or Pakistan.

USA backed Afghan to stop Soviet influence. Pakistan backed afghan to secure its strategic, political and commerce influence in the Afghan area. Again, koi duud ka koi dhula nahi. This is a classic example of what happens when MILITARIES are given a blank check by nations, whether be it the US or Pakistan.

Thik kaha ..likin aik sawal hay jis ka answer bohat zaroori hay .. kay america nay afghanistan per attack kion kia. 9/11 a cheap kisim ka plan tha
wo targets kia hain aur kion hain? jaab tak america appnay target nahi hasil kar litta ya jang khatam nahi hoo gi.. hoo sakta hay 5-10 saal ka gap
aa jay jaisay Iraq may aaya tha likin jang khatam nahi hoo gi .
 

khanaman

Senator (1k+ posts)
Lets leave America out of it. That is the whole point. Anyone raising a voice to deradicalise society in Pakistan is quickly stamped as an American/Zionist agent and the effort ends up being counterproductive. Atleast the educated classes of society needs to realise that we have a problem which we should try to address ourselves. It is an extremely difficult process and can only be accomplished over generations. But we need to start somewhere.
 

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
I honestly didnt get your point. Whats your fascination with America?

I am talking about Pakistan and the welfare of its citizens.

Dont let hate overcome rationality

Thik kaha ..likin aik sawal hay jis ka answer bohat zaroori hay .. kay america nay afghanistan per attack kion kia. 9/11 a cheap kisim ka plan tha
wo targets kia hain aur kion hain? jaab tak america appnay target nahi hasil kar litta ya jang khatam nahi hoo gi.. hoo sakta hay 5-10 saal ka gap
aa jay jaisay Iraq may aaya tha likin jang khatam nahi hoo gi .
 

اجل کنول

MPA (400+ posts)
اسلام میں انتہا پسندی کی کوئی گنجائش نہیں۔ لیکن مسجد۔ مدرسے جو اسلامی تعلیم کا گہوارہ ہیں اور وہیں سے شدت پسندی کی سوچ کوبڑھاوہ مل رہا ہے تو ایک عام انسان کیا کرے؟ ایک مچھلی ہی کافی ہوتی ہے سارے تلاب کو گندہ کرنے کے لئے۔
 

drkjke

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
yes your example is so true.fits on seculars in pakistan.aik secular machli hi kaafi hai talaab gandaa karnay kay liyay.

what you call "extremists" islam is the true islam...seculars like you dont give muslims the right to fight for their freedom under attack from kufar and munafiqqeenn.how can this be logical.no one agrees with you.you can fool a few people but you kufars agents cant fool all muslims.


why not kufar and munafiqqs stop killing practicing muslims,after all they started this war.if they let practicing muslims live than these muslims will have no reason to fight you people back.
you seculars islam allergic people are so funny.even the british and american intellectuals agree with talibans right for freedom fight but you go one step ahead of kufar in hatred of islam and dont even give right of fight back to muslims.

jihad is an integral part of islam.mirza qadiani and many other satans came to end jihad in islam but they failed.so will people like you.as this deen is in Allahs protection and one day when these "extremists" will rule the world that day will be worse than hell for agents of kufar.



Allah says in quran that


THOSE WHO BELIEVE SAY:”WHY IS NOT A SURAH (CHAPTER FROM QURAN ) SENT DOWN FOR US? BUT WHEN A DECISIVE SURAH (EXPLAINING THINGS) IS SENT DOWN AND FIGHTING (JIHAD ,THE HOLY FIGHT FOR ALLAH) IS MENTIONED (ORDAINED) THEREIN,YOU WILL SEE THOSE IN WHOSE HEARTS THERE IS A DISEASE (OF HYPOCRISY) LOOKING AT YOU WITH A LOOK OF ONE FAINTING TO DEATH…BUT IT WAS BETTER FOR THEM (HYPOCRITES TO LISTEN TO ALLAH AND TO OBEY HIM).OBEDIENCE (TO ALLAH) AND GOOD WORDS (WERE BETTER FOR THEM ).AND WHEN THE MATTER ( PREPARATION FOR JIHAD) IS RESOLVED ON,THEN IF THEY HAD BEEN TRUE TO ALLAH,IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER FOR THEM…..(SURA AL MUHAMMAD AYAAT NO.20 21)






 
Last edited:

AsifAmeer

Siasat.pk - Blogger
you can fool a few people but you kufars agents cant fool all muslims

You called me a Kafir. When the HOUR comes, look at my face. I promise you, I will come to you and ask God to be the Judge. It will cost you atleast 1 Neki.


yes your example is so true.fits on seculars in pakistan.aik secular machli hi kaafi hai talaab gandaa karnay kay liyay.

what you call "extremists" islam is the true islam...seculars like you dont give muslims the right to fight for their freedom under attack from kufar and munafiqqeenn.how can this be logical.no one agrees with you.you can fool a few people but you kufars agents cant fool all muslims.


why not kufar and munafiqqs stop killing practicing muslims,after all they started this war.if they let practicing muslims live than these muslims will have no reason to fight you people back.
you seculars islam allergic people are so funny.even the british and american intellectuals agree with talibans right for freedom fight but you go one step ahead of kufar in hatred of islam and dont even give right of fight back to muslims.

jihad is an integral part of islam.mirza qadiani and many other satans came to end jihad in islam but they failed.so will people like you.as this deen is in Allahs protection and one day when these "extremists" will rule the world that day will be worse than hell for agents of kufar.



Allah says in quran that


THOSE WHO BELIEVE SAY:”WHY IS NOT A SURAH (CHAPTER FROM QURAN ) SENT DOWN FOR US? BUT WHEN A DECISIVE SURAH (EXPLAINING THINGS) IS SENT DOWN AND FIGHTING (JIHAD ,THE HOLY FIGHT FOR ALLAH) IS MENTIONED (ORDAINED) THEREIN,YOU WILL SEE THOSE IN WHOSE HEARTS THERE IS A DISEASE (OF HYPOCRISY) LOOKING AT YOU WITH A LOOK OF ONE FAINTING TO DEATH…BUT IT WAS BETTER FOR THEM (HYPOCRITES TO LISTEN TO ALLAH AND TO OBEY HIM).OBEDIENCE (TO ALLAH) AND GOOD WORDS (WERE BETTER FOR THEM ).AND WHEN THE MATTER ( PREPARATION FOR JIHAD) IS RESOLVED ON,THEN IF THEY HAD BEEN TRUE TO ALLAH,IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER FOR THEM…..(SURA AL MUHAMMAD AYAAT NO.20 21)






 

اجل کنول

MPA (400+ posts)
[FONT=&amp]
انتہا پسند' اسلام سچااسلام ہوتا ہے؟ کیا اس بیان میں کوئی تضاد نہیں؟ [/FONT]


میں پھر یہ کہوں گی کہ اسلام میں انتہا پسندی کی کوئی گنجائش نہیں۔ اور میں ہر اس شخص کی مذمت کروں گی جو اسلام کا نام لے کر بےگناہوں، نے ہتھوں کو اپنی تشدد کا نشانہ بناتے ہیں۔ ایسے شخص کی مذمت کرنے کا مطلب یہ نہیں کہ اسلام پے تنقید کی ہے۔ اور اگر کوئی یہ سمجھتا ہے تو وہ اسکی سوچ کامسئلہ ہے۔ میرے یا کسی اور کے یقین کی پیمائش نہیں۔


جہاں تک بات رہی کہ مسلمان اپنی آزادی کی جنگ لڑ رہےہیں تو یہ کیسی آزادی کی جنگ ہے جو اپنے ہی نی ہتھے، بے گناہ مسلمان بہنوں اوربھائیوں کو اپنے تشدد کا نشانہ بنا رہے ہیں؟