Rearranging the Subcontinent

[Samlee]

(clap)(clap)..this coming from a patriotic pakistani and a baloch !- is even a more royal slap on the face of the rapist banya !

sir throughout the recorded pre Islamic history of the land that makes up pakistan today except for a brief 40 year buddhist rule of mauryas this area was never part of any empire based in patna or delhi but was a part of empires based in iran(archaemenid,sassanid etc.) or central asia(kushan).
Sir our true link is with middle east and central asia and not with subcontinent as the safma ****** would want us to believe


we should be studying the history of iran and central asia they are our true roots

 

[Samlee]

just out of curiosity, how do you explain the creation of Bangladesh then?

We Alienated Them Out Of Our Own Mistakes Not Because There Was Anything Fundamentally Wrong With The Ideology of Pakistan

 

[RiazHaq]

Kaplan's boss George Friedman in his book "The Next 100 Years" raises serious doubts about India's viability as a modern nation-state, and dismisses the talk of its emergence as one of the great powers of the 21st century. Friedman does not accept that any of the four BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will achieve great world power status in this century. Instead, he believes that Turkey, Poland and Japan will join the United States as the most important world powers in the next 50 years. [FONT=Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif]http://www.riazhaq.com/2010/02/are-india-and-pakistan-failed-states.html[/FONT]

 

[Samlee]

Kaplan's boss George Friedman in his book "The Next 100 Years" raises serious doubts about India's viability as a modern nation-state, and dismisses the talk of its emergence as one of the great powers of the 21st century. Friedman does not accept that any of the four BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will achieve great world power status in this century. Instead, he believes that Turkey, Poland and Japan will join the United States as the most important world powers in the next 50 years. http://www.riazhaq.com/2010/02/are-india-and-pakistan-failed-states.html

Sir, India Is An Un Natural Country From Day One.Credit May Be Given To The Political Mind of Nehru and His Daughter For Keeping The Country Together But Fact Of The Matter is That The Unfortunate Souls That Live In India Today Have Far Less In Common Than We In Pakistan.The Ethno Linguistic Groups Of Pakistan Have Much More In Common Than India.The Biggest of These Commonalities Is Islam and Our Overall Muslim Identity



U Don't Know Whether You Have Experienced This In USA But When I Was In LONDON Many Sikhs Used To Celebrate Their Independence Day With Us on 14th August and Not With Their Fellow Indian Countrymen

 

[RiazHaq]

Sir, India Is An Un Natural Country From Day One.Credit May Be Given To The Political Mind of Nehru and His Daughter For Keeping The Country Together But Fact Of The Matter is That The Unfortunate Souls That Live In India Today Have Far Less In Common Than We In Pakistan.The Ethno Linguistic Groups Of Pakistan Have Much More In Common Than India.The Biggest of These Commonalities Is Islam and Our Overall Muslim Identity



U Don't Know Whether You Have Experienced This In USA But When I Was In LONDON Many Sikhs Used To Celebrate Their Independence Day With Us on 14th August and Not With Their Fellow Indian Countrymen

Given the many ethnic, regional, religious and caste fault lines running through the length and breadth of India, there have long been questions raised about India's identity as a nation. Speaking about it last April, the US South Asia expert Stephen Cohen of Brookings Institution said, " But there is no all-Indian Hindu identity—India is riven by caste and linguistic differences, and Aishwarya Rai and Sachin Tendulkar are more relevant rallying points for more Indians than any Hindu caste or sect, let alone the Sanskritized Hindi that is officially promulgated".

http://www.riazhaq.com/2009/08/chinese-strategist-argues-for-indias.html

 

[Renegade]

Kaplan's boss George Friedman in his book "The Next 100 Years" raises serious doubts about India's viability as a modern nation-state, and dismisses the talk of its emergence as one of the great powers of the 21st century. Friedman does not accept that any of the four BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) will achieve great world power status in this century. Instead, he believes that Turkey, Poland and Japan will join the United States as the most important world powers in the next 50 years. http://www.riazhaq.com/2010/02/are-india-and-pakistan-failed-states.html

Turkey is believable, but If he thinks Poland ( one of the poorest countries in Europe) will emerge to become a greater power than China, I can only take anything he says with a pinch of salt.