Oho, aik toh tum hamesha judgemental/emotional hojatay ho :P
Dude, calculation of the moon's orbit was a very precise science even back in the days of Rasulullah (SAW). It was so accurate that lunar calculations back then would need an offset once every 3,300 years! This is unlike Solar calculations that we follow TODAY where we have to add a "leap year" (extra day for Feb) after every 4 years in order to calibrate the calendar properly.
Furthermore, Muslims DID follow calculations even back then. The insistence on the physical sighting though is only apparent to the person who knows this debate in more detail. The birth of the new moon will ALWAYS be an estimation and to follow calculations you would have to assume that the world is flat and that therefore the birth of the new crescent takes place simultaneously across all points on Earth, which is just scientifically hogwash.
So physical sighting is just as scientific as calculations are. It's not a debate of what is more/less scientific, but rather an appreciation of how the relativity of heavenly bodies.
Lastly, please consider the following about the Shawwal moon this time:
1- It was born at around 9 pm Universal Time (Britain).
2- This translates to around 12 midnight KSA time.
3- This translates to early morning Japan time.
So when do these countries individually celebrate Eid? Quite clearly, in Japan it is already morning so they will have to celebrate Eid the NEXT evening (bear in mind that in lunar calendars NIGHT comes BEFORE day; therefore, the new date starts after Maghrib).
Hope this clarifies.
Dude, calculation of the moon's orbit was a very precise science even back in the days of Rasulullah (SAW). It was so accurate that lunar calculations back then would need an offset once every 3,300 years! This is unlike Solar calculations that we follow TODAY where we have to add a "leap year" (extra day for Feb) after every 4 years in order to calibrate the calendar properly.
Furthermore, Muslims DID follow calculations even back then. The insistence on the physical sighting though is only apparent to the person who knows this debate in more detail. The birth of the new moon will ALWAYS be an estimation and to follow calculations you would have to assume that the world is flat and that therefore the birth of the new crescent takes place simultaneously across all points on Earth, which is just scientifically hogwash.
So physical sighting is just as scientific as calculations are. It's not a debate of what is more/less scientific, but rather an appreciation of how the relativity of heavenly bodies.
Lastly, please consider the following about the Shawwal moon this time:
1- It was born at around 9 pm Universal Time (Britain).
2- This translates to around 12 midnight KSA time.
3- This translates to early morning Japan time.
So when do these countries individually celebrate Eid? Quite clearly, in Japan it is already morning so they will have to celebrate Eid the NEXT evening (bear in mind that in lunar calendars NIGHT comes BEFORE day; therefore, the new date starts after Maghrib).
Hope this clarifies.
Dude, firstly :doh:.
What confusing arguments that you know something is accurate but you will not follow it.
It is this kind of 'literal-ness' the Muslim world has been dogged with for the last 800 years or so that there has been no single advancement of science from the Muslim world. Somehow, the Muslims world sees science as an enemy where it really is nothing but a tool.
1,500 years ago sightings was the only way to follow lunar calender. Islam follows lunar calender and there is no obligation for which methods to use. Common sense dictates that the most accurate methods of the times should be followed to arrive at a calender - and that's what the Muslim world is against. (Why? I am stumped myself).
I expected more from you. Some how you've made it a part of your faith that practicing 7th century methods for Moon sightings makes a good Muslim, because that's the only reason you'd be sticking to it right? I thought a man of 21st century and especially one educated like yourself would have a better analytic ability. I really did man.