Excuse me ... are you talking of Supreme Court of PAKISTAN?CMs of Punjab and KPK dissolved their assemblies under the constitution after taking vote of confidence from majority of members in their respective assembly. How is this illegal dog?
At the behest of an irrelevant individual.CMs of Punjab and KPK dissolved their assemblies under the constitution after taking vote of confidence from majority of members in their respective assembly. How is this illegal dog
Supreme Court cannot overrule the Constitution. Supreme Court is under the constitution of Pakistan
He is not an irrelevant individual. He was party leader of the ruling parties in Punjab and KPK when the assemblies dissolved. Bughaz Imrani dogAt the behest of an irrelevant individual.
To be honest, this is even not a question of law. Otherwise, can anyone defend the meetings of the whole sitting cabinet in London? that too with a criminal and an absconder?At the behest of an irrelevant individual.
Will it not be hard to prove that in court? Ie if CM says I dissolved it on my own, how can his statement be refuted? Possibility they can bring up previous statements where CM was saying he didn’t want to dissolve assembly, but it would be his last statement and action which would take precedence?
Another concern is how free and fair elections would be held in the center if there were newly elected governments in the provinces. PTI prefers to simply kidnap the presiding officers.
Why don’t PDM dissolve centre govt and elections can be held togetherAnother concern is how free and fair elections would be held in the center if there were newly elected governments in the provinces. PTI prefers to simply kidnap the presiding officers.
Teri soch hi hay mere bhai. Chalo, acha gumaan rakhna koi gunaah nahi. Sirf bewaqoofi hi to hay... aur hum sab kisi na kisi hadd per bewaqoof hotay hi hain. Aap koi alaihda nahi hain. Jiyaaay BHUTTOOOOOSupreme Court cannot overrule the Constitution. Supreme Court is under the constitution of Pakistan
I'm just lampooning the PTI neonate.
Another concern is how free and fair elections would be held in the center if there were newly elected governments in the provinces. PTI prefers to simply kidnap the presiding officers.
Exactly. But the again there are always double standards in Bughaz Imran.To be honest, this is even not a question of law. Otherwise, can anyone defend the meetings of the whole sitting cabinet in London? that too with a criminal and an absconder?
Is that a concern? How about the concern that Chief election commissioner is a notorious Bughaz Imrani who always give anti Imran / anti PTI judgments?
This again is not a question of law and the premise of SC to decide upon (ideally). If there is a provision in the Constitution to dissolve the assemblies through legal means and the Constitution also provides for holding up the elections in 90 days under the interim Govt setup, then there is no legal infirmity in it.Another concern is how free and fair elections would be held in the center if there were newly elected governments in the provinces. PTI prefers to simply kidnap the presiding officers.
Because they are afraid to lose badly of course. PDM desperately wants martial law or emergency imposed to avoid meeting awam in elections…Why don’t PDM dissolve centre govt and elections can be held together
Courts are there to protect the constitution. Not bend or change it in Bughaz Imran.
No, but since 1973, provincial and federal elections have been held concurrently with an interim setup. If provincial assemblies were to hold early elections and two provinces would have new governments, how would free and fair elections be ensured? On election day, blood would be shed at all costs.
Brother, it is not about Bughaz e Imran. It is about Hubb-e-iqtidar, Hubb-e-Corruption and Hubb-e-maal. If IK changes his stance and ensures them that he will not intrude with their corruption and exercise of (backdoor) power, then he will rise up again.
Why did they make the ECP an independent institution in the Constitution of Pakistan?
If the court allowed the different aspects of these cases to be evaluated, especially with honourable judges like Mandokhel, Mansoor, and Athar on the bench, these issues would, in my opinion, be addressed sooner or later.
