"Will Pakistani Establishment Change its Course?"
No. because that would mean giving away riches.. dollars.. huge farm houses..etc etc
Basically they are nawaz and zardari in uniforms..
Very true."Will Pakistani Establishment Change its Course?"
No. because that would mean giving away riches.. dollars.. huge farm houses..etc etc
Basically they are nawaz and zardari in uniforms..
Very true.
But the counter argument is.... Will PTI change its course too?
I mean the modus operandi, not the vision or the purpose.
What more peaceful protestors do ? Other than gather in huge number for the just cause. If the army hell bent on killing then the people do not have enough weaponry to face them.
From today though , army families will not be safe. Their wives and kids will face the peoples rage.
The question is .... why they did not agree on the venue of Sangjani, as agreed upon by the Govt too?What more peaceful protestors do ? Other than gather in huge number for the just cause. If the army hell bent on killing then the people do not have enough weaponry to face them.
From today though , army families will not be safe. Their wives and kids will face the peoples rage.
The question is .... why they did not agree on the venue of Sangjani, as agreed upon by the Govt too?
If they were showing actions of rebellion, then they provided the state with every possible excuse to use brute force against them.
Wouldn't it be better to first stage a protest at Sangjani and see if the Government is ready for a political dialogue? and also give time to the protesters to gather in larger numbers there?
What was the actual plan? that they are going to stage a sit in at D-Chowk and Govt will release IK unconditionally?
Correction, Nawaz Zardari and Co are extension of Army. There is no establishment in Pakistan, it has always been the Army that was the problem."Will Pakistani Establishment Change its Course?"
No. because that would mean giving away riches.. dollars.. huge farm houses..etc etc
Basically they are nawaz and zardari in uniforms..
Why? Isnt it a free country?The question is .... why they did not agree on the venue of Sangjani, as agreed upon by the Govt too?
If they were showing actions of rebellion, then they provided the state with every possible excuse to use brute force against them.
Wouldn't it be better to first stage a protest at Sangjani and see if the Government is ready for a political dialogue? and also give time to the protesters to gather in larger numbers there?
What was the actual plan? that they are going to stage a sit in at D-Chowk and Govt will release IK unconditionally?
What is the name of your movement? Haqeeqi Azadi? Why?Why? Isnt it a free country?
Well that is your opinion. I respect it, however, no law in the entire world supports this.They can protest anywhere , d chowk , in front of ghq or anywhere. Its a democratic right. Only dictators use brute force against unarmed protestors.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|