#ForwardedAsReceived

Husain中川日本

Senator (1k+ posts)
دو قومی نظریہ انہیں بے غیرتوں کے ڈھاکہ میں ہتھیار ڈالنے سے خلیج بنگال میں غرق ہو گیا تھا ، یہ پتہ نہیں کہاں سےدو قومی نظریہ جھاڑ پونچھ کر لے آیا ہے ، ابے اپنا اصل کام کر جس کی تنخواہ لیتے ہوں
 

exitonce

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
images
 

abdlsy

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Kiss baat kae medal daetae hein zero wars nothing fk to do
🤯🧐😡
Bully balochis n kpk

take steal their resources

fkup election with worst dakoos on our heads

kha kha kae free army mess with huge belly

steal 50% defense budget😡😡😡

for what🤯

Wtfk daily job they do eat sleep loot again n again😡🤬

n all get medals n fking bamboo stick such frauds😡

May allahtallah severely punish them severely ameen😨
 

wasiqjaved

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Asim Muneer has come like a destroyer of Fitna party

Brilliant work AM, thank you for getting us rid of Fitnas
Look, I know exactly why you people use the word "Fitna" — and it’s nothing new. Let me explain.

“Fitna” wasn’t just a political label — it was a psychological and religious framing designed to demonize Imran Khan and morally delegitimize his movement. It was meant to paint him not merely as a political opponent but as a threat to the moral and religious order — an “agent of chaos” in Islamic terms.

This term gained traction among PDM (brought to power via the infamous “London Plan”) after the false flag operation of 9 May 2023, when the establishment and its media proxies pushed a single, unified narrative: Imran Khan and his supporters weren’t just dissenters — they were enemies of the state. The term “Fitna” was then used to justify crackdowns, censorship, arrests, and even military court trials for civilians.

Of course, the establishment has a long-standing habit of hiding behind Islamic references. In Islamic history, the term “Fitna” is closely linked with the Khawarij — a group known for rebellion against legitimate Islamic rulers. The aim here was simple: equate PTI and its supporters with religiously outlawed insurgents.

But what the state deliberately ignores is that PTI is a mainstream political party, not an armed group. Its members are ordinary, tax-paying citizens — mostly working-class — demanding justice. Labeling them as “Fitna” was a deliberate move to sidestep democratic norms and due process, and instead justify suppression under a moral-religious pretext.


Imran Khan campaigned on justice and anti-corruption. Branding him as “Fitna” was a way to flip the script — to brainwash the masses into seeing him as a false messiah or even Dajjal-like figure in the eyes of religious conservatives. But this narrative failed to stick, especially in the age of social media.




📜 Has it happened before? Absolutely. This is textbook Pakistan.​

Let’s take a look:

🟤 Fatima Jinnah (1965)​

  • Branded a “traitor,” “fitna,” and “Indian agent” for daring to run against Field Marshal Ayub Khan.
  • State-sponsored mullahs publicly questioned whether a woman could lead in Islam.
  • Sound familiar?

🟠 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (1970s)​

  • Declared “Mujrim-e-Qaum” and “Enemy of Islam.”
  • PNA Movement, backed by clerics, accused him of spreading “fitna” through cinema, alcohol, and liberalism.
  • Establishment even labeled him “Firaun.”
  • He was later hanged in a sham trial, with religious overtones used to justify it.

🔵 Benazir Bhutto (1988–2007)​

  • Smeared as a “Western fitna” and a threat to Islamic values.
  • Clergy claimed Islam forbids women rulers.
  • Friday sermons were weaponized to paint her as morally corrupt.

🟢 Nawaz Sharif (1999–2017)​

  • Once he turned against the establishment, ISI-linked clerics began calling him the “Fitna of Democracy.”
  • Judges labeled him “Godfather” and “Sicilian Mafia”—a secularized version of the same script.



🎭 This is the establishment's playbook — rinse and repeat.

Here's how it works:​

  • ✅ Religious/moral delegitimization
  • ✅ Fear-mongering via clergy and media
  • ✅ Censorship and suppression justified under morality
  • ✅ Mobilize mobs or justify state brutality
  • ✅ Erode trust in popular civilian leadership


🤔 Why does this “Fitna” tactic keep getting recycled?​

Because it works.

Pakistan is a deeply religious society. They can read arabic, but they have no idea what it means. The clergy + military + media triangle is the most potent weapon the establishment has. It doesn’t need evidence — just a narrative. Once someone is labeled “fitna,” the public is conditioned to:
  • Stay silent
  • Justify repression
  • Feel moral guilt for supporting them


Break their legitimacy, so we can break their back.” — That’s always been the real agenda.
 

Back
Top