مریم نواز اپنی تقریر کا ایک ایک لفظ لاجک اور دلیری کے ساتھ بیان کرتی ہیں۔

Masud Rajaa

Masud Rajaa

Siasat member
Lanut GIF by Siasat.pk
 
B

BlackBirdSSG

Citizen

🔄 Timeline: How Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza’s Tone Evolved​

PeriodTone & FocusKey Themes / Behavior
2014–2018🔥 Confrontational & Reformist- Aggressively exposed sectarian scholars (Sunni, Shia, Deobandi, Barelvi)
- Called out fabricated Hadith, weak scholarship
- Criticized Maulana Tariq Jameel, Zakir Naik, etc.
- Refused to align with any school of thought
- Very anti-status quo, both religious and political
2019–2021🧠 Philosophical & Pan-Islamic- Began calling for unity of Muslims, while continuing his critique
- Balanced approach: would still name powerful figures, but also advocate understanding
- Occasionally praised Imran Khan's “efforts” for Muslim world unity
- Still seen as independent and neutral
2022🧭 Cautious but Critical- Criticized Imran Khan's politics and other leaders
- Warned against populism, cult-like following of political figures
- Didn’t praise establishment but avoided naming army directly
- After Imran’s ouster (Apr 2022), shifted toward “I told you so” narrative
2023 (Post-May 9)🧍‍♂️ Defensive & Pro-Establishment- Sharp turn: harshly criticized PTI supporters
- Portrayed May 9 protesters as irrational, disrespectful of army
- Repeatedly defended Army Chief Asim Munir, calling him “a man of deen”
- Started defending Maryam Nawaz’s development initiatives
2024–2025🪟 Controlled Commentary- Became extremely soft on the military and PML-N
- Ignores crackdown on dissent, rigging allegations, media blackout
- Selectively targets PTI while praising establishment narratives
- Openly aligned with “reform from within” stance regarding system

⚖️ Comparison with Other Religious Scholars​

ScholarStance on Imran KhanStance on EstablishmentPublic Image
Mufti Tariq Masood⚖️ Neutral-Critical❌ Critical (indirectly)Balanced but less political. Warns against military overreach and blind political following. Avoids naming names.
Israr Ahmad (Late)✅ Supported Khan’s vision❌ Strongly anti-establishmentLegacy of ideological purity. Criticized both mullahs and generals.
Dr. Ghulam Hussain Sialvi✅ Pro-Khan❌ Anti-establishmentHas spoken clearly against military interference and election manipulation.
Allama Khadim Rizvi (Late)❌ Strongly anti-Khan (blasphemy row)✅ Seen as used by establishmentHis movement was later seen as manipulated for political pressure.
Javed Ahmed Ghamidi⚖️ Very neutral❌ Clear institutional criticNever aligned with power. Intellectual and reformist but doesn’t interfere in politics directly.
Engineer Ali Mirza❌ Harsh critic of Khan✅ Defends Army, praises Maryam NawazSeen as shifting toward state-approved narrative, despite non-sectarian past.

📌 Key Differences​

AspectEngineer Ali MirzaOthers (e.g., Ghamidi, Sialvi, Tariq Masood)
Tone Post-May 9Echoes state narrativeBalanced or cautious criticism
Public TrustDeclining among anti-establishment circlesRelatively stable
Engagement with Political CrisisSelective — avoids PML-N/Army criticismMore holistic (e.g., Ghamidi critiques both sides)
Accusations of BiasIncreasingly seen as compromised or scaredOthers maintain perceived neutrality
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Featured Discussion Latest Blogs خبریں

© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|

Back
Top