I mentioned Ayub as an example. I could have also asked the question, which Punjabi establishment made Bhutto and Musharraf do what they did. There have been seven army chiefs who are actually Punjabis. But without splitting hairs, we can say that being an army chief isn't a crime. General Asif Nawaz, Waheed Kakar or Jahangeer Karamat, for example, did nothing wrong. The criticism is against the people who are in power, take wrong decisions and then stop people from criticizing them. This is true for Punjabis and non-Punjabis. I agree with you about Bajwa and Munir. I didn't need anyone to convince me that they were bad. The point was the false claim that it was "always" the Punjabi establishment that sold the country. This is a favorite ploy of racist sub-nationalists to absolve their own elite of any responsibility and find a bogeyman for their narrative. Punjabis are present in large numbers in all institutions due to their higher population doesn't mean that they're also involved in all decision making processes. I understand that out of frustration, people blame the first person they see, and in many cases that is a Punjabi soldier or a civil servant. That is like the non-Pashtun population of Afghanistan often blame the Afghan Pashtuns for all of Afghanistan's problems because the Pashtuns are the largest population group there.
As a side note, the propaganda that Pakistani (Punjabi) soldiers were mass raping Bengali women is absolutely false and has been refuted by credible non-Pakistani sources. There were some incidents, but no such rape campaign as we're often sold.
I think I've already made my point at length and don't need to add anything more, so I'll stop here. It was nice talking to you.