عمران خان کی قانونی ٹیم کے اخراجات سے متعلق شیر افضل مروت کا بڑا انکشاف

اسلام آباد: پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے رہنما شیر افضل مروت نے بانی چیئرمین عمران خان کے جیل میں قیام کے حوالے سے اخراجات پر میڈیا کے نمائندوں سے گفتگو کی۔ انہوں نے اس بات کا انکشاف کیا کہ عمران خان کے ایک دن جیل میں رہنے پر حکومت کے لاکھوں روپے خرچ ہوتے ہیں۔

مروت نے کہا کہ عمران خان کے وکلا کیسز کی فیس شامل ہوتی ہیں، جو کہ ایک خاص رقم ہوتی ہے، تاہم وہ کروڑوں روپے کی وکلا فیسوں کو معقول قرار نہیں دیتے۔ انہوں نے مزید بتایا کہ عمران خان کے لیے ڈونیشنز آتی ہیں، جن میں پارٹی کے لوگ بھی شامل ہیں جو اس عمل میں اپنا حصہ ڈالتے ہیں۔

انہوں نے واضح کیا کہ وکلا کی فیس کی مد میں گزشتہ ایک ماہ کے دوران علی امین خان نے 7 کروڑ روپے کی ادائیگیاں کی ہیں، اور اس رقم کی وصولی کے بعد یہ ضروری ہے کہ وکلا کی فیسوں کی شفافیت کو یقینی بنایا جائے۔ شیر افضل مروت نے کہا کہ پیسوں کا آنا یہ نہیں کہ ان پر بے حسی برتی جائے، بلکہ صحیح حساب کتاب ہونا چاہیے تاکہ پارٹی کے وسائل کا درست استعمال ہو سکے۔​

 

[RajaRawal111]

صدقہ خیرات چوری کر کے اب یہ کام کے جا رہے ہیں

 

[RajaRawal111]

اس بےشرم چور عمران خان پر فائننشل ٹائم نے صدقہ چوری کرنے کا الزام دو سال سے لگایا ہوا ہے

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise​

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise

Despite laws banning foreign funding of politics in Pakistan, documents show a money trail from Oxfordshire via the UAE to the coffers of Khan’s party

www.ft.com

بےشرم اگر چور نہ ہوتا تو شہباز شریف کی طرح اخبار پر مقدمہ چلاتا اس آرٹیکل پر معافی منگواتا

 

[crankthskunk]

اس بےشرم چور عمران خان پر فائننشل ٹائم نے صدقہ چوری کرنے کا الزام دو سال سے لگایا ہوا ہے

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise​

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise

Despite laws banning foreign funding of politics in Pakistan, documents show a money trail from Oxfordshire via the UAE to the coffers of Khan’s party

www.ft.com

بےشرم اگر چور نہ ہوتا تو شہباز شریف کی طرح اخبار پر مقدمہ چلاتا اس آرٹیکل پر معافی منگواتا

You are such a shameless crook. Like Shahbaz Sharif? He settled out of court on financial grounds, he didn't win the case. Even though the liars tried to portrayed.
So many cases of corruption and money laundering had been set aside because the Generals wanted him to take the PM positions like a lap dog he is. Get a life loser.

 

[RajaRawal111]

You are such a shameless crook. Like Shahbaz Sharif? He settled out of court on financial grounds, he didn't win the case. Even though the liars tried to portrayed.
So many cases of corruption and money laundering had been set aside because the Generals wanted him to take the PM positions like a lap dog he is. Get a life loser.

Buzz off Bughlol and stop lying. Shahbaz Shareef won the initial case which decided that the paper has put up the degrading remarks. Then the case went to 2nd level in which the Paper had to prove their blames.

Tell me which proofs Daily Mail had given??

When they found out that they have nothing in their hands they kicked David Ross out and apologized. The article was deleted. Tell me what else should have been done if they are accepting them being at fault.

اپنے اٹھائی گیرے ریاست مدینہ کے چور سے کہو کہ شاباششریف کی طرح فائننشل ٹائم پر مقدمہ کرنے کی جرات تو کرے بےغیرت

 

[Amatuka]

Shahbaz Shareef made a world record by becoming Prime Minister on the day who was supposed to be convicted for money laundering. Masha-Allah

 

[scolfeild]

صدقہ خیرات چوری کر کے اب یہ کام کے جا رہے ہیں

Everyone is not like your duffers daddies .

 

[Wadaich]

Lols ............ Mr. Hawaldar in action.

 

[crankthskunk]

Buzz off Bughlol and stop lying. Shahbaz Shareef won the initial case which decided that the paper has put up the degrading remarks. Then the case went to 2nd level in which the Paper had to prove their blames.

Tell me which proofs Daily Mail had given??

When they found out that they have nothing in their hands they kicked David Ross out and apologized. The article was deleted. Tell me what else should have been done if they are accepting them being at fault.

اپنے اٹھائی گیرے ریاست مدینہ کے چور سے کہو کہ شاباششریف کی طرح فائننشل ٹائم پر مقدمہ کرنے کی جرات تو کرے بےغیرت

There were not different cases idiot. You don't know even the basic of legal processes. If in a hearing there is a determination by the court that the material used could constitute defamatory, doesn't mean someone win the first case.

Under Defamation Act 2013

Serious harm​

(1)A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.

Truth​

(1)It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true.

(2)Subsection (3) applies in an action for defamation if the statement complained of conveys two or more distinct imputations.

(3)If one or more of the imputations is not shown to be substantially true, the defence under this section does not fail if, having regard to the imputations which are shown to be substantially true, the imputations which are not shown to be substantially true do not seriously harm the claimant's reputation.

Therefore, if the actual hearing gone on, Daily Mail has to prove that part of their allegations were true. Then there would be no serious harm to the reputation of the joker.

If joker knew that Daily Mail has no evidence , why he engaged in out of court settlement? Why not asked the court to hear the case and reject the settlement?
The daily mail could only provide the evidence in the actual case, they are not obliged to declare any evidence before the case starts.

Now get a life idiot.

 

[Azpir]

صدقہ خیرات چوری کر کے اب یہ کام کے جا رہے ہیں

Teri didiyo ka be kharcha wahan se e ata ha gandu

 

[RajaRawal111]

There were not different cases idiot. You don't know even the basic of legal processes. If in a hearing there is a determination by the court that the material used could constitute defamatory, doesn't mean someone win the first case.

Under Defamation Act 2013

Serious harm​

(1)A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.

Truth​

(1)It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true.

(2)Subsection (3) applies in an action for defamation if the statement complained of conveys two or more distinct imputations.

(3)If one or more of the imputations is not shown to be substantially true, the defence under this section does not fail if, having regard to the imputations which are shown to be substantially true, the imputations which are not shown to be substantially true do not seriously harm the claimant's reputation.

Therefore, if the actual hearing gone on, Daily Mail has to prove that part of their allegations were true. Then there would be no serious harm to the reputation of the joker.

If joker knew that Daily Mail has no evidence , why he engaged in out of court settlement? Why not asked the court to hear the case and reject the settlement?
The daily mail could only provide the evidence in the actual case, they are not obliged to declare any evidence before the case starts.

Now get a life idiot.

Baghlol you are the people with nude Ass, you will never feel any shame in speaking blatant lies and twisting the things up. You probably posted the part of the Defamation Act and tried to make your case.
The first Slap that came to your Harami IKs face was from the DFID itself, which published the Rebuttal within the couple of hours that No embezzlement of funds was done.
Now net is loaded with the facts that Daily mail apologized to Shahbaz Shareef and took the article down. All that was left to do was to leach some money out from the publisher, which Shabaz Shareef did not care about.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11516855/Clarifications-corrections.html

UK's Daily Mail apologizes to Pakistan premier over corruption allegations

In 2019 article, tabloid accused Shehbaz Sharif of stealing British aid money meant for earthquake victims - Anadolu Ajansı

www.aa.com.tr

It is time for Imran Khan now to show the courage and put Case on Financial times. I dare you idiot to do it for you beloved leader who is stripped all necked on blame of stealing Sadiqa Money.

 

[Imjutt]

There were not different cases idiot. You don't know even the basic of legal processes. If in a hearing there is a determination by the court that the material used could constitute defamatory, doesn't mean someone win the first case.

Under Defamation Act 2013

Serious harm​

(1)A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant.

Truth​

(1)It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true.

(2)Subsection (3) applies in an action for defamation if the statement complained of conveys two or more distinct imputations.

(3)If one or more of the imputations is not shown to be substantially true, the defence under this section does not fail if, having regard to the imputations which are shown to be substantially true, the imputations which are not shown to be substantially true do not seriously harm the claimant's reputation.

Therefore, if the actual hearing gone on, Daily Mail has to prove that part of their allegations were true. Then there would be no serious harm to the reputation of the joker.

If joker knew that Daily Mail has no evidence , why he engaged in out of court settlement? Why not asked the court to hear the case and reject the settlement?
The daily mail could only provide the evidence in the actual case, they are not obliged to declare any evidence before the case starts.

Now get a life idiot.

Don't waste your energy n time . he sold out his filthy soul for Rs.30000/= Per month... don't bother thier ooooooo ooooo

 

[ahameed]

صدقہ خیرات چوری کر کے اب یہ کام کے جا رہے ہیں

عاسم یزید اتنا نااہل کہ بلیک اینڈ وائٹ کیس بھی نہیں بنا سکا تین سالوں میں

 

[Azpir]

Baghlol you are the people with nude Ass, you will never feel any shame in speaking blatant lies and twisting the things up. You probably posted the part of the Defamation Act and tried to make your case.
The first Slap that came to your Harami IKs face was from the DFID itself, which published the Rebuttal within the couple of hours that No embezzlement of funds was done.
Now net is loaded with the facts that Daily mail apologized to Shahbaz Shareef and took the article down. All that was left to do was to leach some money out from the publisher, which Shabaz Shareef did not care about.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11516855/Clarifications-corrections.html

UK's Daily Mail apologizes to Pakistan premier over corruption allegations

In 2019 article, tabloid accused Shehbaz Sharif of stealing British aid money meant for earthquake victims - Anadolu Ajansı

www.aa.com.tr

It is time for Imran Khan now to show the courage and put Case on Financial times. I dare you idiot to do it for you beloved leader who is stripped all necked on blame of stealing Sadiqa Money.

Chal be bhosri k harami

 

[RajaRawal111]

عاسم یزید اتنا نااہل کہ بلیک اینڈ وائٹ کیس بھی نہیں بنا سکا تین سالوں میں

پہلے جو کے ہووے ہیں ان کا جواب تو دے نہیں رہا چور کا پتر
پچاس کروڑ والی معافی کی درخوست دی ہوئی ہے اس نے - وہ قانون جو اس نے اپنی چوری کو چھپانے کے لےخد بنایا تھا

Imran Khan seeks relief after Supreme Court reinstates NAB laws | The Express Tribune

Imran Khan has filed an acquittal plea in the NAB court following the Supreme Court’s decision.

tribune.com.pk

 

[RajaRawal111]

Don't waste your energy n time . he sold out his filthy soul for Rs.30000/= Per month... don't bother thier ooooooo ooooo

O come on 30000 per month is too much. Putwaris do it on one plate of Khota Biryani.

 

[RajaRawal111]

Don't waste your energy n time . he sold out his filthy soul for Rs.30000/= Per month... don't bother thier ooooooo ooooo

What about this investigative journalist guy who said Imran Khan stole Sadiqa money.
How much his soul was sold at.

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise​

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise

Despite laws banning foreign funding of politics in Pakistan, documents show a money trail from Oxfordshire via the UAE to the coffers of Khan’s party

www.ft.com

 

[Azpir]

What about this investigative journalist guy who said Imran Khan stole Sadiqa money.
How much his soul was sold at.

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise​

The strange case of the cricket match that helped fund Imran Khan’s political rise

Despite laws banning foreign funding of politics in Pakistan, documents show a money trail from Oxfordshire via the UAE to the coffers of Khan’s party

www.ft.com

Wo investigative journalist RajaChawal ka gumnam Abu ha.

 

[RajaRawal111]

Wo investigative journalist RajaChawal ka gumnam Abu ha.

کھوتی کے پیارے سے بچے - اس کہانی کا کوئی رایٹر ہے اور اس کا نام اس میں لکھا ہوا ہے

 

[ahameed]

پہلے جو کے ہووے ہیں ان کا جواب تو دے نہیں رہا چور کا پتر
پچاس کروڑ والی معافی کی درخوست دی ہوئی ہے اس نے - وہ قانون جو اس نے اپنی چوری کو چھپانے کے لےخد بنایا تھا

Imran Khan seeks relief after Supreme Court reinstates NAB laws | The Express Tribune

Imran Khan has filed an acquittal plea in the NAB court following the Supreme Court’s decision.

tribune.com.pk

اگر یہ قانون تھا تو پھر جھوٹا کیس کس خنزیر نے بنایا؟؟؟