نتاشا دانش اور جاں بحق باپ بیٹی کے اہلخانہ کے درمیان دیت کا معاہدہ طے پاگیا

[Kashif Rafiq]

ساڑھے 5 کروڑ روپے سے زائد دیت کے طور پر رقم ادا کر دی گئی

ورثا نے نتاشا کو معاف کر دیا
https://twitter.com/x/status/1831923642575544631
رقم کی ادائیگی پے آرڈر کے زریعے کی گئی

آمنہ کے کسی رشتے دار کو کمپنی میں ملازمت بھی دی جائے گی
https://twitter.com/x/status/1831920519475818680 https://twitter.com/x/status/1831930570886279286 ​

 

[Dr Adam]

اس معاہدے پر لعنت اب کس پر بنتی ہے؟؟؟​

 

[aqibarain]

Islam ko use karna koi Pakistanion si seekhay....

 

[Aliimran1]

Yad hai mein nay kaha tha ——- Kuch nahi ho ga ——- Iss Beghairat Mulk mein Qazi Kanjar MUNIRAY Dalay Nooron Murdarion ki hukamrani mein İnsaf nahi mil sakta —— Buzdil Beghairat Qaom ka yehi anjaam hona tha ​

 

[snowballpk]

Aur ice ka nasha kerna tu koi baat hi nhi Pakistan main

 

[انقلاب]

اس معاہدے پر لعنت اب کس پر بنتی ہے؟؟؟​

M_Shameer
پر، کیونکہ اب اُسے مذہب میں کوئی خرابی نظر نہیں آۓ گی

 

[Conservative liberal]

chalein qatal tu daet pe settle hogaya (zabardasti hi sahi)...

ab jo wo drunk drive kar rahe thi? license bhi theek nahe?

 

[crankthskunk]

The way religious affairs are misused in Pakistan is alarming. Deeat is one of those choice given to the victim's family. But there should be no coercion and scheming behind it. The family has to decide on their own, not as a matter of practice imposed upon them by force or cajoling so rich people can get away from their crimes.

 

[Wadaich]

اس معاہدے پر لعنت اب کس پر بنتی ہے؟؟؟​

If it is accepted by family with their own choice & free will then it is a wise decision by the family and in accordance with Shariah law, otherwise the Laanat is on the rulers.

 

[waseem137]

اور کسی مسلمان کے لئے (جائز) نہیں کہ وہ کسی مسلمان کو قتل کر دے مگر (بغیر قصد) غلطی سے، اور جس نے کسی مسلمان کو نادانستہ قتل کر دیا تو (اس پر) ایک مسلمان غلام / باندی کا آزاد کرنا اور خون بہا (کا ادا کرنا) جو مقتول کے گھر والوں کے سپرد کیا جائے (لازم ہے) مگر یہ کہ وہ معاف کر دیں، پھر اگر وہ (مقتول) تمہاری دشمن قوم سے ہو اور وہ مومن (بھی) ہو تو (صرف) ایک غلام / باندی کا آزاد کرنا (ہی لازم) ہے اور اگر وہ (مقتول) اس قوم میں سے ہو کہ تمہارے اور ان کے درمیان (صلح کا) معاہدہ ہے تو خون بہا (بھی) جو اس کے گھر والوں کے سپرد کیا جائے اور ایک مسلمان غلام / باندی کا آزاد کرنا (بھی لازم) ہے۔ پھر جس شخص کو (غلام / باندی) میسر نہ ہو تو (اس پر) پے در پے دو مہینے کے روزے (لازم) ہیں۔ اللہ کی طرف سے (یہ اس کی) توبہ ہے، اور اللہ خوب جاننے والا بڑی حکمت والا ہے

وَمَا كَانَ لِمُؤۡمِنٍ اَنۡ يَّقۡتُلَ مُؤۡمِنًا اِلَّا خَطَـــًٔا‌ۚ وَمَنۡ قَتَلَ مُؤۡمِنًا خَطَـــًٔا فَتَحۡرِيۡرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُّؤۡمِنَةٍ وَّدِيَةٌ مُّسَلَّمَةٌ اِلٰٓى اَهۡلِهٖۤ اِلَّاۤ اَنۡ يَّصَّدَّقُوۡا‌ؕ فَاِنۡ كَانَ مِنۡ قَوۡمٍ عَدُوٍّ لَّـكُمۡ وَهُوَ مُؤۡمِنٌ فَتَحۡرِيۡرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُّؤۡمِنَةٍ‌ؕ وَاِنۡ كَانَ مِنۡ قَوۡمٍۢ بَيۡنَكُمۡ وَبَيۡنَهُمۡ مِّيۡثَاقٌ فَدِيَةٌ مُّسَلَّمَةٌ اِلٰٓى اَهۡلِهٖ وَتَحۡرِيۡرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُّؤۡمِنَةٍ‌ۚ فَمَنۡ لَّمۡ يَجِدۡ فَصِيَامُ شَهۡرَيۡنِ مُتَتَابِعَيۡنِ تَوۡبَةً مِّنَ اللّٰهِ‌ؕ وَكَانَ اللّٰهُ عَلِيۡمًا حَكِيۡمًا‏

النِّسَآء 4:92

 

[ek hindustani]

.... agar islami qanoon k motabiq aisaa hai to, phir hai.
Accha lagay ya buraa.
Albatta....
Aisaa kuch aur bhi karna chahiay jis say haadsaat na hoon. Aur kisi ki jaan na ja,ay.

 

[Dr Adam]

If it is accepted by family with their own choice & free will then it is a wise decision by the family and in accordance with Shariah law, otherwise the Laanat is on the rulers.

JW: That is the logical answer and I knew that, and I totally agree with that. But please keep it in mind that the State of Pakistan is not governed by the Sharia law. Its governed by a so called Constitutional (English) Law. Which interestingly is neither English nor Sharia Law. In essence, the crime was committed inside the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Law, culpable under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and not the Sharia code. According to that, the crime.... regardless of any other type of settlement like paying blood money the committed crime does not go away. The person has to be brought to justice under PPC of Pakistan.
Khoon baha dey ker Allah kay haan maafi zaroor ho gaye laykin raij ul waqat mulki qanoon kay tahat phir bhee muqaddama chalay gaa. Otherwise there is no point of PPC.

I will cite here three examples to build my case:
1. Sharif's Huddybia paper mill case was closed on technical grounds but the crime even after 35 years is still there.
2. Kazi Faiz Isa's London property case was closed on technical grounds but the crime after 20 years is still there.
3. Similarly, today's SC judgement in regards to NAB case has been closed on technical grounds but the colossal crimes committed against the State 10 years ago are still there,

Therefore, in the subject Natasha case though the blood money has been paid, regardless of enticement or under influence, the case will be closed on technical grounds but the crime will still be there.

Kee khay'yal aye???
Gal zara bareek aye, samjhna paina aye!

 

[Lathi-Charge]

this is simply heart breaking. was anybody in any doubt about the outcome of this roadside massacre? its so depressing that I stopped following this news for my own sanity.
they are misusing Islam, the concept of دیت for their nefarious designs which needs to be stopped immediately before its too late.

 

[Muhammad_1996]

If it is accepted by family with their own choice & free will then it is a wise decision by the family and in accordance with Shariah law, otherwise the Laanat is on the rulers.

why is it a wise decision? will you sell blood of your father for 5 or 10 crore?

 

[Lathi-Charge]

the woman was clearly under the influence of drugs confirmed by the medical reports, she decided to take a seat of a vehicle which she turned into a killing machine, took precious lives of innocent people with no remorse & got away with it within days just because she is loaded.
she not only massacred innocent people on the road but your justice system too.
declare the god damn country a secular state if it can guarantee rule of law instead of having this آدھا تیتر آدھا بٹیر mishmash arrangement which could be twisted & used for personal benefits when it suits the rich & powerful.

 

[Democratics]

پے در پے دو مہینے کے روزے (لازم) ہیں​

 

[Rizwan2009]

یہ قتل خطاء نہیں ہے بلکہ نشے کی حالت میں گاڑی چڑھائی گئی ہے قتل عمد ہے دوسرے کو حقیر سمجھ کر چڑھنے پر وکٹری کا نشان بنانا۔
قتل عمد پر دیت نہیں ہوتی

 

[FahadBhatti]

Acha kia pese le liye , yehan konsa insaaf hona tha. Chalo pese kaam aajayenge. Rishtedaar bhi pyaar se milenge.

 

[crankthskunk]

JW: That is the logical answer and I knew that, and I totally agree with that. But please keep it in mind that the State of Pakistan is not governed by the Sharia law. Its governed by a so called Constitutional (English) Law. Which interestingly is neither English nor Sharia Law. In essence, the crime was committed inside the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Law, culpable under the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and not the Sharia code. According to that, the crime.... regardless of any other type of settlement like paying blood money the committed crime does not go away. The person has to be brought to justice under PPC of Pakistan.
Khoon baha dey ker Allah kay haan maafi zaroor ho gaye laykin raij ul waqat mulki qanoon kay tahat phir bhee muqaddama chalay gaa. Otherwise there is no point of PPC.

I will cite here three examples to build my case:
1. Sharif's Huddybia paper mill case was closed on technical grounds but the crime even after 35 years is still there.
2. Kazi Faiz Isa's London property case was closed on technical grounds but the crime after 20 years is still there.
3. Similarly, today's SC judgement in regards to NAB case has been closed on technical grounds but the colossal crimes committed against the State 10 years ago are still there,

Therefore, in the subject Natasha case though the blood money has been paid, regardless of enticement or under influence, the case will be closed on technical grounds but the crime will still be there.

Kee khay'yal aye???
Gal zara bareek aye, samjhna paina aye!

On the point of crimes are still there.
I have one thing to say. Do you realize that it makes an iota of difference to people like Sharifs, Zardaris and Qazi!!
Given the chance, they are still keen to commit these crimes over and over.
The Pakistani system is run on the basis of technical grounds.
Take the example of Shahbaz, there are allegations that he was involved in burning people alive.
We know he used rouge police officers for killings to shut the mouths of anyone who he suspected would spill the beans about his crimes.
He is accused of killing by poison witnesses of his crimes, many suspected deaths, including NAB's investigators.
We know he is repeatedly burning records of his corruption.
We know the Sharifs got away with killing 14 people in Lahore with the help of the corrupt judiciary of Pakistan.
Stuff the notion of crimes still be there, what about the law punishing these people? This is the purpose and the reason states exists, so they can upheld the rule of Law, fairly, justly and equitably.
No wonder these criminals as rulers of God forsaken land have made Pakistan a Banana Republic.

 

[Choudhry ji]

deet ka qanoon tu hey .... kis tarah impliment kia ... iss per shaq kia ja sakta hey . Hona tu kuch bhi nahein tha saza tu honi nahein thi bnehter hey ghareeb family ko kuch raqam mill gai