RajaRawal111
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Jee. I will do so
نو مئی: عمران کا بھرپور کردار، 34 ماسٹر مائنڈ، : انصار عباسی کا دعویٰ
- Thread starter RajaRawal111
- Start date
RajaRawal111
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
اس کو کمال عمرانیوں نے دیا ھے جی
Wake up Pak
(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Imran Khan nay jail may hotay huay bhi inn madcher choodon key bund may dunda diya hua hay. cheekh BC cheekh
zaheer2003
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Ohh Yeah and they best way is to go forward keep depriving people from their basic rights and even stole their mandate and if they protest, say they are violent.
Establishment and its jamuray on a death road no future of you guys
کون سے کیس میں جیل میں رکھیں؟؟؟ کوئی عقلمندوں والا مشورہ دیں ڈفرز کو
غیر یقینی صورتحال تو جعلی فارم ۴۷ بنانے سے نہیں پیدا ہوئی؟؟؟
کس کیس میں دس سال؟؟؟ عدت؟؟؟
ek hindustani
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
sajhassan
MPA (400+ posts)
Hate_Nooras
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Challo Raja the govt of criminals finally gives you a talking point. After you had to suck the dicks of PKs on the 8th February, you finallly got the nufta out of your throat and posted some shitانصار عباسی نوں گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس
Caretaker govt’s report says Imran ‘actively contributed’ to May 9 planning
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively contributed” to the planning of these violent attacks on military installations.
The report claims, “Evidence shown to the Committee suggests several party leaders were involved in this planning. It further suggests that Mr Khan actively contributed to it.”
It also disclosed, “Investigations conducted so far suggest that there were 34 individuals who masterminded the strategy of violent street power, actively contributed to planning the violence and mayhem. Additionally, 52 individuals contributed to detail planning and 185 individuals executed this plan.”
The report said, “As part of the strategy, party supporters including armed men were relocated from the party’s strongholds, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to Lahore, several days in advance of Mr Khan’s arrest. Groups of these people were housed at different locations across Lahore and their expenses were borne by party leaders and sympathisers. They were tasked to, in the first instance, resist Mr Khan’s arrest and, as a last resort, to cause violence and mayhem in the event of his arrest. These people successfully resisted police and other LEAs from arresting Mr Khan on a number of occasions.”
The report said, “On May 9, 2023, following Mr Khan’s arrest, these people assembled at pre-decided locations to serve as rallying points for other party workers. Evidence shows these people were already armed with batons etc., to cause violence. Taking lead from social media, they successfully further enflamed the already charged emotions of the crowd. They also helped steer crowds towards pre-decided locations such as the GHQ in Rawalpindi and the Jinnah House in Lahore. Testimonies recorded of those present at these places speak of voices from within the crowd prompting them to march to certain locations and silencing opposition to those suggestions. Once at those locations, these people initiated violence and encouraged others to participate.”
It added, “The pattern of violence on May 9, 2023 suggests that these people were following a carefully crafted strategy in attacking specific targets, including military installations. An examination of call logs shows that these calls were made by certain PTI leaders to the rioters attacking the Jinnah House. A day earlier the same PTI leaders made multiple calls to the same rioters on May 8, 2023, establishing very close coordination between PTI leaders and the rioters. Many of the culprits who were subsequently arrested, confessed during interrogation to have received instructions from PTI party leaders to cause violence and mayhem and attack specific targets such as the residence of Corps Commander, Lahore.” “The events of May 9, 2023 were neither isolated nor entirely spontaneous. They were part of an organised strategy to demonstrate street power through violence in the event of Mr Khan’s arrest. Evidence shown to the Committee suggests that as Mr Khan’s arrest became increasingly likely (owing to his own recalcitrant behaviour), the party leadership formulated a strategy to respond to his arrest by causing violence and mayhem by attacking military installations.
“Mr Khan had long seen the military establishment as, both, the entity responsible for his ouster from the government and the only institution he was open to negotiating with. Mr Khan had repeatedly voiced his contempt for other political parties and their leaders and his constant refusal to even sit in parliament with them. He had also expressed a desire to engage with the military establishment to find political solutions. Mr Khan refused to respect the constitutional role for the armed forces that require them to remain apolitical. He desired active engagement by the armed forces in politics in violation of their constitutional mandate. When the armed forces refused to be dragged into politics, Mr Khan and his party sought to create an environment that would pressure them into engaging with him. This was augmented by a media strategy through local and external platforms. Mr Khan at no point denounced or disowned the May 9 event, rather twisted its facts to widen the divide between the people and the armed forces, nor he has publicly acknowledged the consequences of this event on the national security of Pakistan.
“Accordingly, a strategy was developed to demonstrate street power by attacking defence installations. This would, at once, allow PTI supporters to vent their anger for the no-confidence motion at the armed forces, and to pressure them into engagement with PTI. This strategy was based on a simple assumption that a clash between unarmed protestors and the military would generate anti-military sentiment, thus creating a gulf between the people and the armed forces. Such a gulf would corner the military into engaging politically and, perhaps, Mr Khan saw himself as a savior capable of bridging such a gulf.”
The report in its conclusion said, “Having reviewed the information, documents and materials provided to the Committee, this Committee is of the view that the responsibility for the events of 9 May 2023 rests exclusively on the leadership of the PTI. The events of 9th May were coordinated and organised. They were part of a strategy to demonstrate street power and use violence as weapon to exert pressure on military, while indirectly pressurising judiciary, ECP and other state institutions. It was a calculated attack on the state and its institutions.”
Those who planned, executed and aided such criminality must face the full might of the law. The investigative agencies, the prosecution services and judiciary must all play their part in ensuring swift justice for those involved.
'Imran actively contributed to May 9 planning'
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively...www.thenews.com.pk
Hate_Nooras
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
But he has all you haraamis talking about him 24/7, 365. He has you by the short and curlies and as prison has made no difference and if you kill him, there will be a BD style in KP, you are in a bind. And what is to say Munir, Nadeem etc won't be also killed. The PK fauj Supports IK and if they take the ultimate step their will be civil war.
Hate_Nooras
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
So him want his mandate where he won around 70% of the vote will create instability. May I also remind that you guys barely won 20,000 in any constituency
Hate_Nooras
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Why don't you have the courage to say that they are illegally holding an innocent man in prison because he has the love of PKs whilst they are hated by the 80% or more. Show some balls man and tell the truth
Islamabadiya
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
I have already mentioned many times that he shouldn’t be in jail
Masud Rajaa
Siasat member
jo marzi kar lo, aakhir mein khan ne hi surkhuru hona hai
3rd_Umpire
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
سر جی، بندہ نون لیگی ہی تب بنتا ہے،جب وہ راجے پٹواری کی طرح
پکّا دلّا ہو،،اور دلّا گیری بھی اپنے ہی گھر سےاپنی جنانیوں سے شروع کی ہو ۔ ۔ ۔
پکّا دلّا ہو،،اور دلّا گیری بھی اپنے ہی گھر سےاپنی جنانیوں سے شروع کی ہو ۔ ۔ ۔
Husaink
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
انصار عباسی دے سالے پہلوں تیری چھوٹی وڈی اک نہ کر کرلئیےانصار عباسی نوں گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس
Caretaker govt’s report says Imran ‘actively contributed’ to May 9 planning
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively contributed” to the planning of these violent attacks on military installations.
The report claims, “Evidence shown to the Committee suggests several party leaders were involved in this planning. It further suggests that Mr Khan actively contributed to it.”
It also disclosed, “Investigations conducted so far suggest that there were 34 individuals who masterminded the strategy of violent street power, actively contributed to planning the violence and mayhem. Additionally, 52 individuals contributed to detail planning and 185 individuals executed this plan.”
The report said, “As part of the strategy, party supporters including armed men were relocated from the party’s strongholds, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to Lahore, several days in advance of Mr Khan’s arrest. Groups of these people were housed at different locations across Lahore and their expenses were borne by party leaders and sympathisers. They were tasked to, in the first instance, resist Mr Khan’s arrest and, as a last resort, to cause violence and mayhem in the event of his arrest. These people successfully resisted police and other LEAs from arresting Mr Khan on a number of occasions.”
The report said, “On May 9, 2023, following Mr Khan’s arrest, these people assembled at pre-decided locations to serve as rallying points for other party workers. Evidence shows these people were already armed with batons etc., to cause violence. Taking lead from social media, they successfully further enflamed the already charged emotions of the crowd. They also helped steer crowds towards pre-decided locations such as the GHQ in Rawalpindi and the Jinnah House in Lahore. Testimonies recorded of those present at these places speak of voices from within the crowd prompting them to march to certain locations and silencing opposition to those suggestions. Once at those locations, these people initiated violence and encouraged others to participate.”
It added, “The pattern of violence on May 9, 2023 suggests that these people were following a carefully crafted strategy in attacking specific targets, including military installations. An examination of call logs shows that these calls were made by certain PTI leaders to the rioters attacking the Jinnah House. A day earlier the same PTI leaders made multiple calls to the same rioters on May 8, 2023, establishing very close coordination between PTI leaders and the rioters. Many of the culprits who were subsequently arrested, confessed during interrogation to have received instructions from PTI party leaders to cause violence and mayhem and attack specific targets such as the residence of Corps Commander, Lahore.” “The events of May 9, 2023 were neither isolated nor entirely spontaneous. They were part of an organised strategy to demonstrate street power through violence in the event of Mr Khan’s arrest. Evidence shown to the Committee suggests that as Mr Khan’s arrest became increasingly likely (owing to his own recalcitrant behaviour), the party leadership formulated a strategy to respond to his arrest by causing violence and mayhem by attacking military installations.
“Mr Khan had long seen the military establishment as, both, the entity responsible for his ouster from the government and the only institution he was open to negotiating with. Mr Khan had repeatedly voiced his contempt for other political parties and their leaders and his constant refusal to even sit in parliament with them. He had also expressed a desire to engage with the military establishment to find political solutions. Mr Khan refused to respect the constitutional role for the armed forces that require them to remain apolitical. He desired active engagement by the armed forces in politics in violation of their constitutional mandate. When the armed forces refused to be dragged into politics, Mr Khan and his party sought to create an environment that would pressure them into engaging with him. This was augmented by a media strategy through local and external platforms. Mr Khan at no point denounced or disowned the May 9 event, rather twisted its facts to widen the divide between the people and the armed forces, nor he has publicly acknowledged the consequences of this event on the national security of Pakistan.
“Accordingly, a strategy was developed to demonstrate street power by attacking defence installations. This would, at once, allow PTI supporters to vent their anger for the no-confidence motion at the armed forces, and to pressure them into engagement with PTI. This strategy was based on a simple assumption that a clash between unarmed protestors and the military would generate anti-military sentiment, thus creating a gulf between the people and the armed forces. Such a gulf would corner the military into engaging politically and, perhaps, Mr Khan saw himself as a savior capable of bridging such a gulf.”
The report in its conclusion said, “Having reviewed the information, documents and materials provided to the Committee, this Committee is of the view that the responsibility for the events of 9 May 2023 rests exclusively on the leadership of the PTI. The events of 9th May were coordinated and organised. They were part of a strategy to demonstrate street power and use violence as weapon to exert pressure on military, while indirectly pressurising judiciary, ECP and other state institutions. It was a calculated attack on the state and its institutions.”
Those who planned, executed and aided such criminality must face the full might of the law. The investigative agencies, the prosecution services and judiciary must all play their part in ensuring swift justice for those involved.
'Imran actively contributed to May 9 planning'
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively...
ذرا اس دی وی خبر دس کہ سعودی بھائی محمد بن سلمان نے دورہ کرن توں جوابا دے دتا ؟
cheema lahori
MPA (400+ posts)
These kind of people
ANSAR ABASSI etc etc
Played big role ro destroy our country
Because these people are moral corrupt
ANSAR ABASSI etc etc
Played big role ro destroy our country
Because these people are moral corrupt
If PM Imran Khan wanted to use street power, he could have used it when hundreds and thousands of his supporters were attending his 'jalsas' throughout the country but always advocated peaceful and non-violent protests. Punjab police, Rangers and intelligence agencies used brutal and barbaric force on thousands of unarmed and peaceful demonstrators who were not only PTI supporters but thousands who were vehemently opposed to the illegally installed PDM-1 government by ex-COAS General Bajwa.
If PTI supporters were armed with guns, rifles and pistols many men from police forces, Rangers and intelligence agencies in civilian clothes would have been killed but none were reported. Instead, over 30-40 unarmed demonstrators were killed by the Punjab police, Rangers and secret services men firing live bullets directly at them.
Why was Lahore Commander House not secured by placing containers and hundreds of policemen, Rangers and military police? Why was not the cantonment area completely cordoned off by the orders of IG Punjab and the caretaker CM? Where were the Punjab and military police when demonstrators entered the house given free access to enter? It was evident from events on the scene that the violent agitation was well-planned in advance and deliberately encouraged to exacerbate by the police, Rangers and secret service authorities.
If PTI supporters were armed with guns, rifles and pistols many men from police forces, Rangers and intelligence agencies in civilian clothes would have been killed but none were reported. Instead, over 30-40 unarmed demonstrators were killed by the Punjab police, Rangers and secret services men firing live bullets directly at them.
Why was Lahore Commander House not secured by placing containers and hundreds of policemen, Rangers and military police? Why was not the cantonment area completely cordoned off by the orders of IG Punjab and the caretaker CM? Where were the Punjab and military police when demonstrators entered the house given free access to enter? It was evident from events on the scene that the violent agitation was well-planned in advance and deliberately encouraged to exacerbate by the police, Rangers and secret service authorities.
انصار عباسی نوں گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس - گالاں کڈوس
Caretaker govt’s report says Imran ‘actively contributed’ to May 9 planning
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively contributed” to the planning of these violent attacks on military installations.
The report claims, “Evidence shown to the Committee suggests several party leaders were involved in this planning. It further suggests that Mr Khan actively contributed to it.”
It also disclosed, “Investigations conducted so far suggest that there were 34 individuals who masterminded the strategy of violent street power, actively contributed to planning the violence and mayhem. Additionally, 52 individuals contributed to detail planning and 185 individuals executed this plan.”
The report said, “As part of the strategy, party supporters including armed men were relocated from the party’s strongholds, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to Lahore, several days in advance of Mr Khan’s arrest. Groups of these people were housed at different locations across Lahore and their expenses were borne by party leaders and sympathisers. They were tasked to, in the first instance, resist Mr Khan’s arrest and, as a last resort, to cause violence and mayhem in the event of his arrest. These people successfully resisted police and other LEAs from arresting Mr Khan on a number of occasions.”
The report said, “On May 9, 2023, following Mr Khan’s arrest, these people assembled at pre-decided locations to serve as rallying points for other party workers. Evidence shows these people were already armed with batons etc., to cause violence. Taking lead from social media, they successfully further enflamed the already charged emotions of the crowd. They also helped steer crowds towards pre-decided locations such as the GHQ in Rawalpindi and the Jinnah House in Lahore. Testimonies recorded of those present at these places speak of voices from within the crowd prompting them to march to certain locations and silencing opposition to those suggestions. Once at those locations, these people initiated violence and encouraged others to participate.”
It added, “The pattern of violence on May 9, 2023 suggests that these people were following a carefully crafted strategy in attacking specific targets, including military installations. An examination of call logs shows that these calls were made by certain PTI leaders to the rioters attacking the Jinnah House. A day earlier the same PTI leaders made multiple calls to the same rioters on May 8, 2023, establishing very close coordination between PTI leaders and the rioters. Many of the culprits who were subsequently arrested, confessed during interrogation to have received instructions from PTI party leaders to cause violence and mayhem and attack specific targets such as the residence of Corps Commander, Lahore.” “The events of May 9, 2023 were neither isolated nor entirely spontaneous. They were part of an organised strategy to demonstrate street power through violence in the event of Mr Khan’s arrest. Evidence shown to the Committee suggests that as Mr Khan’s arrest became increasingly likely (owing to his own recalcitrant behaviour), the party leadership formulated a strategy to respond to his arrest by causing violence and mayhem by attacking military installations.
“Mr Khan had long seen the military establishment as, both, the entity responsible for his ouster from the government and the only institution he was open to negotiating with. Mr Khan had repeatedly voiced his contempt for other political parties and their leaders and his constant refusal to even sit in parliament with them. He had also expressed a desire to engage with the military establishment to find political solutions. Mr Khan refused to respect the constitutional role for the armed forces that require them to remain apolitical. He desired active engagement by the armed forces in politics in violation of their constitutional mandate. When the armed forces refused to be dragged into politics, Mr Khan and his party sought to create an environment that would pressure them into engaging with him. This was augmented by a media strategy through local and external platforms. Mr Khan at no point denounced or disowned the May 9 event, rather twisted its facts to widen the divide between the people and the armed forces, nor he has publicly acknowledged the consequences of this event on the national security of Pakistan.
“Accordingly, a strategy was developed to demonstrate street power by attacking defence installations. This would, at once, allow PTI supporters to vent their anger for the no-confidence motion at the armed forces, and to pressure them into engagement with PTI. This strategy was based on a simple assumption that a clash between unarmed protestors and the military would generate anti-military sentiment, thus creating a gulf between the people and the armed forces. Such a gulf would corner the military into engaging politically and, perhaps, Mr Khan saw himself as a savior capable of bridging such a gulf.”
The report in its conclusion said, “Having reviewed the information, documents and materials provided to the Committee, this Committee is of the view that the responsibility for the events of 9 May 2023 rests exclusively on the leadership of the PTI. The events of 9th May were coordinated and organised. They were part of a strategy to demonstrate street power and use violence as weapon to exert pressure on military, while indirectly pressurising judiciary, ECP and other state institutions. It was a calculated attack on the state and its institutions.”
Those who planned, executed and aided such criminality must face the full might of the law. The investigative agencies, the prosecution services and judiciary must all play their part in ensuring swift justice for those involved.
'Imran actively contributed to May 9 planning'
ISLAMABAD: The caretaker government’s report on May 9 says that evidence, shared with the cabinet committee which had probed the matter, shows that Imran Khan “actively...
