کیا پشتون یہودی النسل ہیں؟ - Are the Pashtuns from Bani-Israel?

[ImRaaN]

پشتون بنی اسرائیل نہیں ہیں البتہ کشمیری ضرور بنی اسرئیل میں سے ہیں
کیونکہ سلیمان علیہ اسلام اور داؤد علیہ اسلام کی تاریخ میں کشمیر کا ذکر موجود ہے

 

[brohiniaz]

Stop spreading fake propaganda coined by Molvies which has no basis

Hazrat Issa (AS) was from Jews but Jews refused to accept him as Prophet. Prophet Balam was a non Jew but Jews accepted him as Prophet.

کوڑہ مغزی لگتا ہے تیرے دماغ میں گدھے کا گوبر بھرا ہوا ہے ،ضروری ہے ہر جگھہ اپنا بواسیر زدہ پچھواڑہ رگڑنا ؟ میری بات اس فورم کے عقلمند لوگوں کیلیئے تھی ، ہر ایرے غیرے نتھو خیرے ، جاہل گنوار ،ننگ دین ننگ ایمان اور اول فول بکنےوالے کھوتےکیلیئے نھیں ۔۔۔

 

[Liberal 000]

کوڑہ مغزی لگتا ہے تیرے دماغ میں گدھے کا گوبر بھرا ہوا ہے ،ضروری ہے ہر جگھہ اپنا بواسیر زدہ پچھواڑہ رگڑنا ؟ میری بات اس فورم کے عقلمند لوگوں کیلیئے تھی ، ہر ایرے غیرے نتھو خیرے ، جاہل گنوار ،ننگ دین ننگ ایمان اور اول فول بکنےوالے کھوتےکیلیئے نھیں ۔۔۔

I just pointed out to the fact that the usual arguement which we often listen from Molvies for Jews not accepting Prophet PBUH is historically baseless

 

[Liberal 000]

پشتون بنی اسرائیل نہیں ہیں البتہ کشمیری ضرور بنی اسرئیل میں سے ہیں
کیونکہ سلیمان علیہ اسلام اور داؤد علیہ اسلام کی تاریخ میں کشمیر کا ذکر موجود ہے

There was never ever any Kashmir entity in history, the Area was always called Arya Vert, Sapta Sindhu,Hapta Hindu , Bharat , Sindh , Hindh , Indo,Yindu , Indu etc in history.

 

[Liberal 000]

The author of the article which I invited you to read did try to address, in a way, the points you are raising. Here is an excerpt: "There is no denying that many crimes were perpetrated by Muslims, some perhaps even in the name of Islam, but to paint Islam and Muslims with the broad brush used by the saffron brigade is unjustified, baseless and bigoted. At the same time history should not be whitewashed for the sake of political correctness. As the Bombay High Court ruled in a 1967 case (Anant Janardan v. State): “History is not to serve as a handmaid of a particular school of thought. History must be impartial and objective. To rewrite history according to the views which are popular or which are necessary for bolstering up nationalistic egoism or jingoism, is perversion of history.” Thank you. :)(y)

Agree with you!

 

[ImRaaN]

There was never ever any Kashmir entity in history, the Area was always called Arya Vert, Sapta Sindhu,Hapta Hindu , Bharat , Sindh , Hindh , Indo,Yindu , Indu etc in history.

Simply go to jamia ashrafia or jamia naimeia or if you live in karachi go to jamia banoria ask them about the story of a man who requested Suleiman alyhisalam to transfer him in kashmir the vally of hidustan before his death.
Or phone them and ask them.

 

[Liberal 000]

Simply go to jamia ashrafia or jamia naimeia or if you live in karachi go to jamia banoria ask them about the story of a man who requested Suleiman alyhisalam to transfer him in kashmir the vally of hidustan before his death.
Or phone them and ask them.

Do we have any such stories in Jewish text ? If not then it is just another story concocted by Molvies most probably a thousand year back!

Remember Christian and Muslim missionaries often concoct such stories to try to establish the connection of their religion to the local people to intice them and convert

For example, the passage between India and Siri lanka was renamed by a European geographer just 200 hundred years ago as Adam Bridge though throughout history in Hindu books it was called Ram Situ

The foot print on a Hill in Sri Lanka was holy to Hindus and Budhish is also now called Adam footstep

 

[ImRaaN]

Do we have any such stories in Jewish text ? If not then it is just another story concocted by Molvies most probably a thousand year back!

Remember Christian and Muslim missionaries often concoct such stories to try to establish the connection of their religion to the local people to intice them and convert

For example, the passage between India and Siri lanka was renamed by a European geographer just 200 hundred years ago as Adam Bridge though throughout history in Hindu books it was called Ram Situ

The foot print on a Hill in Sri Lanka was holy to Hindus and Budhish is also now called Adam footstep

Oh..so if this story is quoted somewhere in islamic history then its fabricated but if is not quoted in the jewish or christen history then its fake.
if you don't wanna search dont search.
if you don't want believe dont believe .
if jews and christens history is authentic to you wish you best of luck.
i know molvi is a problem for you stay away i am not forcing you.

 

[Liberal 000]

Oh..so if this story is quoted somewhere in islamic history then its fabricated but if is not quoted in the jewish or christen history then its fake.
if you don't wanna search dont search.
if you don't want believe dont believe .
if jews and christens history is authentic to you wish you best of luck.
i know molvi is a problem for you stay away i am not forcing you.

No for me Jewish and Christian history is not authentic. But it helps us to know when a new idea was born!

Plz tell me the book you are recommending me to refer, when it was written and who wrote it?

 

[ImRaaN]

No for me Jewish and Christian history is not authentic. But it helps us to know when a new idea was born!

Plz tell me the book you are recommending me to refer, when it was written and who wrote it?

well all i know for sure that the Greeks have mislead most of the history.
if i find it i will let you know.

 

[عؔلی خان]

Agree with you!

Thank you. :)(y)