sobia403 said:
Let me get this straight :
Money will not solve the problem of dalits!! so it means that if I take away the education and money and jobs based on the education that the rich and middle class hindus/indians recieve they will be happy to say that 'Oh money can not solve our problems'.
Live with the consequence of their decisions" an argument emanating from living an affluent life, so this means if the child is born in a dalit family it is his/her fault? and if born in brahmin family it is his good fortune? Is this not the very idea of the caste system which according to indians is now constitutionally ensured not to happen?
bal thakeray is not supported by tax payers money ? so how is he supported ? By the tax payer directly or he extorts money from them.In either senario your govt is either weak or condoning his acts.
You do not ALLOW him to pollute anything? Have you forgotten his threats to SRK, and many before that some people had to leave there because of him.obviously you will choose selective memory.
Defending against hostile countries?? OK thats agood one 'aik to choree ooper say seena zoree'. 1965,1971,Siachin,currently Baluchistan and many more incidences of aggression against Pakistan and you feel threatened?
I fmoney can not solve the problems of Dalits in india then how will it solve the problems of people in Afghanistan?? Do you see or you just write because you feel like writing! I am amazed at the casual approach you have towards your people.
Bal Thakury has the same mind set as most of the Pakistanis have, it was evident during east Pakistan conflict with Bengalis, only in reverse, he believes one day Muslims will take over and make him slaves. He feels the same way about Biharis, there are too many of them in Maharashtra and they might take over one day these are unfounded arguments most of us don't subscribe to them. They demonstrated in front of Amithab Bachan's house for his pro-Bihari statements.
I can send you the links for Bal Thakurays of Pakistan, even though minorities in Pakistan are virtually non existent, or of America, if you want.
Live with the consequence of their decisions" an argument emanating from living an affluent life Issue is weather this statement is true or not, not who made it.
You should at least listen to people like Asghar Khan and others who participated in operation Gibraltar in 1965 as to who aggressed rather than dismissing them as traitors. You should study 1971 in a little better detail and at least consult some Bangladeshis to determine as to who was the aggressor. Event of 1971 took years in making it started about a month after partition when Mr. Jinnah made a speech in Dhaka about language and most of East Pakistanis walked out and subsequent language riots, India had nothing to do with it.
Ps. Furry I cannot pick an argument with you I concede that you are way too smarter than me.