Dr. Tahir ul Qadri exposing the dirty face of Nawaz Sharif in detail
- Thread starter mirror777
- Start date
karachiwala
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
yaar tum mein se her aek minion ki kam az kam 10 ids zaroor hae is site per aur khud post kar ke khud hi usko thumbs up bhi dete ho. Yaar jaan chodo ****** bhejo is padri pe aur halal ki kamai khao. Is ka paisa zehr hae.
AhmadAli66
Banned
Everyone should realize that Dr Saab is not the enemy of Pakistan bur rather the savior of Pakistan, lets all unite against the corrupt electoral dictatorship system
$418m corruption by Nawaz during his stints as PM: Book
ISLAMABAD - PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif made financial gains of $418 million during his twice stints as Prime Minister of the country, according to a book entitled Capitalism’s Achilles Heel by Raymond W Baker.
The book is a dossier on the corruption of most dominated political families in the history including Nawaz Sharif and how they accumulated their properties, factories and enormous wealth.
According to the book, at least $160 million were pocketed by Nawaz Sharif during his first stint as the Prime Minister in the 1990, from a contract to build a highway from Lahore, his home town, to Islamabad, the nation’s capital.
At least $140 million in unsecured loans from Pakistan’s state banks. More than $60 million generated from government rebates on sugar exported by mills controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates.
At least $58 million skimmed from prices paid for imported wheat from the United States and Canada. In the wheat deal, Mr. Sharif’s government paid prices far above market value to a private company owned by a close associate of his in Washington, the records show. Falsely in?ated invoices for the wheat generated tens of millions of dollars in cash.
The book review went on to state that “The extent and magnitude of this corruption is so staggering that it has put the very integrity of the country at stake.”
Under Sharif, unpaid bank loans and massive tax evasion remained the favorite ways to get rich.
Upon his loss of power the usurping government published a list of 322 of the largest loan defaulters, representing almost $3 billion out of $4 billion owed to banks. Sharif and his family were tagged for $60 million.
Like Bhutto, offshore companies have been linked to Sharif, three in the British Virgin Islands by the names of Nescoll, Nielson, and Shamrock and another in the Channel Islands known as Chandron Jersey Pvt. Ltd. Some of these entities allegedly were used to facilitate purchase of four rather grand flats on Park Lane in London, at various times occupied by Sharif family members.
In 1999 Musharraf had Sharif probed, tried, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison, but then in 2000 exiled him to Saudi Arabia. Twenty-two containers of carpets and furniture followed, and, of course, his foreign accounts remained mostly intact. Ensconced in a glittering palace in Jeddah, he is described as looking “corpulent” amidst “opulent” surroundings.
$418m corruption by Nawaz during his stints as PM: Book
ISLAMABAD - PML-N leader Nawaz Sharif made financial gains of $418 million during his twice stints as Prime Minister of the country, according to a book entitled Capitalism’s Achilles Heel by Raymond W Baker.
The book is a dossier on the corruption of most dominated political families in the history including Nawaz Sharif and how they accumulated their properties, factories and enormous wealth.
According to the book, at least $160 million were pocketed by Nawaz Sharif during his first stint as the Prime Minister in the 1990, from a contract to build a highway from Lahore, his home town, to Islamabad, the nation’s capital.
At least $140 million in unsecured loans from Pakistan’s state banks. More than $60 million generated from government rebates on sugar exported by mills controlled by Mr. Sharif and his business associates.
At least $58 million skimmed from prices paid for imported wheat from the United States and Canada. In the wheat deal, Mr. Sharif’s government paid prices far above market value to a private company owned by a close associate of his in Washington, the records show. Falsely in?ated invoices for the wheat generated tens of millions of dollars in cash.
The book review went on to state that “The extent and magnitude of this corruption is so staggering that it has put the very integrity of the country at stake.”
Under Sharif, unpaid bank loans and massive tax evasion remained the favorite ways to get rich.
Upon his loss of power the usurping government published a list of 322 of the largest loan defaulters, representing almost $3 billion out of $4 billion owed to banks. Sharif and his family were tagged for $60 million.
Like Bhutto, offshore companies have been linked to Sharif, three in the British Virgin Islands by the names of Nescoll, Nielson, and Shamrock and another in the Channel Islands known as Chandron Jersey Pvt. Ltd. Some of these entities allegedly were used to facilitate purchase of four rather grand flats on Park Lane in London, at various times occupied by Sharif family members.
In 1999 Musharraf had Sharif probed, tried, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison, but then in 2000 exiled him to Saudi Arabia. Twenty-two containers of carpets and furniture followed, and, of course, his foreign accounts remained mostly intact. Ensconced in a glittering palace in Jeddah, he is described as looking “corpulent” amidst “opulent” surroundings.
He is right , in London Mian Family were obliged to pay back all amount by court orders. They are corrupt by nature. 15 members of their family is in Brother Party, they are mafia, mian brothers have very low IQ.
They are shame less. NAWAZ he told his friends and relitives that he is changing the dollors into rupeess, so withdraw your dollors and pounds, whe they did , next day he convert all dollors into rupeess. HOW DISHONEST THESE MIAN BROTHERS ARE.
They are shame less. NAWAZ he told his friends and relitives that he is changing the dollors into rupeess, so withdraw your dollors and pounds, whe they did , next day he convert all dollors into rupeess. HOW DISHONEST THESE MIAN BROTHERS ARE.
AhmadAli66
Banned
[FONT=&]Everyone should realize that Dr Saab is not the enemy of Pakistan bur rather the savior of Pakistan, lets all unite against the corrupt electoral dictatorship system[/FONT][FONT=&]
The $60-Million Question[/FONT]
[FONT=&]As president‚ can Zardari be tried?[/FONT]
[FONT=&]By Ahmer Bilal Soofi | From the Oct. 11‚ 2010‚ issue[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Aamir Qureshi / AFP[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The final showdown between the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry‚ and the government‚ led by President Asif Ali Zardari‚ is nigh. On Sept. 27‚ the court gave the attorney-general until Oct. 13 to finally explain why his government is dragging its feet on implementing an earlier ruling: requesting Swiss authorities to reopen an old case against the president. What happens in court may determine whether Pakistan continues with democracy or reverts to equally familiar other options.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]
The case in Switzerland‚ initiated at the behest of the Nawaz Sharif government in 1998‚ centers on the allegation that Zardari and his late wife‚ Benazir Bhutto‚ may have squirreled away $60 million in kickbacks in Swiss bank accounts. In August 2003‚ a Swiss court convicted the first couple‚ in absentia‚ of money laundering. The sentences of six months’ suspended jail time‚ a fine of $100‚000‚ and the order that they return some $2 million to Pakistan’s government‚ were suspended on appeal.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]In October 2007‚ in order to woo Bhutto and her Pakistan Peoples Party‚ the then president‚ Pervez Musharraf‚ issued an amnesty law that got rid of the Swiss case. In December 2009‚ the court struck down this National Reconciliation Ordinance‚ and demanded the reopening of all cases against Zardari and the return of $60 million. The court says it is being stonewalled by the government on the issue. Zardari supporters say the president is being persecuted. (It can’t help that Zardari did not want Chaudhry reinstated as the country’s top judge‚ but conceded last minute to popular pressure.)[/FONT]
[FONT=&]As head of state‚ the Constitution grants the president immunity from prosecution. Zardari also enjoys “sovereign immunity” under international law and cannot be tried while in office. This is as clear to Aitzaz Ahsan‚ erstwhile friend and colleague of Zardari’s and architect of the popular campaign that got Chaudhry reinstated as chief justice‚ as it is to Daniel Zappelli‚ Switzerland’s prosecutor-general. “We can’t prosecute Mr. Zardari while he has immunity unless Pakistan lifts that immunity‚” he told Reuters in March. “And if he doesn’t have immunity‚ why don’t they try him in Pakistan?”[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Reassured by Zappelli’s statements‚ some Zardari supporters feel the government should write to the Swiss to satisfy Chaudhry and the court. Government lawyers argue‚ convincingly‚ that any letter to this effect would be taken as Zardari voluntarily waiving immunity since he heads the party in government and since such a request would be made in his name. It is for this reason that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani hit back at the letter-writing lobby by comparing the president to Dr. Aafia Siddiqui‚ the Pakistani neuroscientist convicted and recently sentenced in a New York court for the attempted murder of her U.S. interrogators. Gilani said his government is under fire for not having been able to stop Siddiqui's trial in the U.S.‚ and yet people want their country’s president tried in another foreign court.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The Supreme Court has made clear that it intends to seek the repatriation of the funds in the Swiss accounts. On Sept. 27‚ the court asked the government to present details of other closed foreign cases against Zardari as well. The court is also likely now to review Article 248 and examine the doctrine of presidential immunity as it is codified in the Constitution‚ and to determine whether past and present instances of alleged corruption constitute official acts.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]With its attorney-general the only official authorized to communicate with Swiss authorities‚ the government has two choices now: it can continue to resist implementing the court’s order forcing a judicial review of the immunity provision in the Constitution‚ or it could write to the Swiss effectively voiding the Constitutional protection.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]If the government does not heed the judge’s order‚ the Supreme Court has‚ at least in theory‚ the right under the Constitution to ask the military to help implement its orders. Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah tried this in 1997 when he asked Army chief Jehangir Karamat to side with him against the then prime minister Sharif. Karamat declined. Shah resigned soon thereafter‚ followed by Karamat. If it gets to that stage‚ this time the Army may have to act given the ability of lawyers to whip up protests. Whatever the outcome on Oct. 13‚ one thing is clear: the system will not remain paralyzed for long. Something’s going to give‚ and soon.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]SOOFI is president of the Research Society for International Law, and an advocate at the Supreme Court of Pakistan.[/FONT]
The $60-Million Question[/FONT]
[FONT=&]As president‚ can Zardari be tried?[/FONT]
[FONT=&]By Ahmer Bilal Soofi | From the Oct. 11‚ 2010‚ issue[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Aamir Qureshi / AFP[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The final showdown between the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry‚ and the government‚ led by President Asif Ali Zardari‚ is nigh. On Sept. 27‚ the court gave the attorney-general until Oct. 13 to finally explain why his government is dragging its feet on implementing an earlier ruling: requesting Swiss authorities to reopen an old case against the president. What happens in court may determine whether Pakistan continues with democracy or reverts to equally familiar other options.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]
The case in Switzerland‚ initiated at the behest of the Nawaz Sharif government in 1998‚ centers on the allegation that Zardari and his late wife‚ Benazir Bhutto‚ may have squirreled away $60 million in kickbacks in Swiss bank accounts. In August 2003‚ a Swiss court convicted the first couple‚ in absentia‚ of money laundering. The sentences of six months’ suspended jail time‚ a fine of $100‚000‚ and the order that they return some $2 million to Pakistan’s government‚ were suspended on appeal.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]In October 2007‚ in order to woo Bhutto and her Pakistan Peoples Party‚ the then president‚ Pervez Musharraf‚ issued an amnesty law that got rid of the Swiss case. In December 2009‚ the court struck down this National Reconciliation Ordinance‚ and demanded the reopening of all cases against Zardari and the return of $60 million. The court says it is being stonewalled by the government on the issue. Zardari supporters say the president is being persecuted. (It can’t help that Zardari did not want Chaudhry reinstated as the country’s top judge‚ but conceded last minute to popular pressure.)[/FONT]
[FONT=&]As head of state‚ the Constitution grants the president immunity from prosecution. Zardari also enjoys “sovereign immunity” under international law and cannot be tried while in office. This is as clear to Aitzaz Ahsan‚ erstwhile friend and colleague of Zardari’s and architect of the popular campaign that got Chaudhry reinstated as chief justice‚ as it is to Daniel Zappelli‚ Switzerland’s prosecutor-general. “We can’t prosecute Mr. Zardari while he has immunity unless Pakistan lifts that immunity‚” he told Reuters in March. “And if he doesn’t have immunity‚ why don’t they try him in Pakistan?”[/FONT]
[FONT=&]Reassured by Zappelli’s statements‚ some Zardari supporters feel the government should write to the Swiss to satisfy Chaudhry and the court. Government lawyers argue‚ convincingly‚ that any letter to this effect would be taken as Zardari voluntarily waiving immunity since he heads the party in government and since such a request would be made in his name. It is for this reason that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani hit back at the letter-writing lobby by comparing the president to Dr. Aafia Siddiqui‚ the Pakistani neuroscientist convicted and recently sentenced in a New York court for the attempted murder of her U.S. interrogators. Gilani said his government is under fire for not having been able to stop Siddiqui's trial in the U.S.‚ and yet people want their country’s president tried in another foreign court.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The Supreme Court has made clear that it intends to seek the repatriation of the funds in the Swiss accounts. On Sept. 27‚ the court asked the government to present details of other closed foreign cases against Zardari as well. The court is also likely now to review Article 248 and examine the doctrine of presidential immunity as it is codified in the Constitution‚ and to determine whether past and present instances of alleged corruption constitute official acts.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]With its attorney-general the only official authorized to communicate with Swiss authorities‚ the government has two choices now: it can continue to resist implementing the court’s order forcing a judicial review of the immunity provision in the Constitution‚ or it could write to the Swiss effectively voiding the Constitutional protection.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]If the government does not heed the judge’s order‚ the Supreme Court has‚ at least in theory‚ the right under the Constitution to ask the military to help implement its orders. Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah tried this in 1997 when he asked Army chief Jehangir Karamat to side with him against the then prime minister Sharif. Karamat declined. Shah resigned soon thereafter‚ followed by Karamat. If it gets to that stage‚ this time the Army may have to act given the ability of lawyers to whip up protests. Whatever the outcome on Oct. 13‚ one thing is clear: the system will not remain paralyzed for long. Something’s going to give‚ and soon.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]SOOFI is president of the Research Society for International Law, and an advocate at the Supreme Court of Pakistan.[/FONT]
haqiqath
Senator (1k+ posts)
Qadri and nawaz sharif both corrupt liars just fooling Pakistani nation nothing else all dramay baz munafiq.where was qadri since 5 years when there are and were so many problems floods blasts many other things now he came after enjoying in west now what he is doing in Pakistan in the days of elections?
Last edited:
<ChOuDhArY>
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
This would be deciding year for Pakistan !! inshahallah the end of status quo in Pakistan
MunchyMike
Minister (2k+ posts)
Re: Tahir Ul Qadari exposing Nawaz Sharif with proof
We already know that Nawaz is the bigger brother of Zardari! but this should open the
eyes of blind noora supporters!
Vote for Naya Pakistan! Vote for PTI!
We already know that Nawaz is the bigger brother of Zardari! but this should open the
eyes of blind noora supporters!
Vote for Naya Pakistan! Vote for PTI!
