Dr. Tahir ul Qadri's threads collections

[arshypk]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

[video]http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=CA#/watch?v=aO_RD7MFM4Q[/video]

This guy is a mushrik watch this and decide yourself. Great man my ***. I thought Hasan Nisar was a better man this. Praising Tahir ul Qadri no way.......

 

[Pakistani1947]

Tahirul qadris corrupt beliefs

TAHIRUL QADRIS CORRUPT BELIEFS
​

Certain half-baked individuals and intellectual pygmies, dressed up in the garb of Molvis, have claimed that there are no valid accusations against Tahirul Qadri. They are saying that Sunnis have no proofs against Tahirul Qadris beliefs. They are saying that the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah are causing open fitna. Ma azallah!We want you, the Sunnis, to now use your common sense and judge for yourselves the beliefs of Tahirul Qadri. We have translated Urdu extracts from books written by Tahirul Qadri himself, and some of his corrupt anti-Sunni beliefs. We have commented only on a few of his beliefs, but a more in-depth explanation will follow in the next chapter. Here are his shocking revelations:-
BELIEF ONE
With all praise to Allah, all the Islamic schools of thought in the issues of beliefs do not possess any differences on basic fundamental beliefs, However, in minor subsidiary matters this difference is only as far as minor details, whose types and kinds are explanatory and detailed. It is due to this, that in missionary affairs to leave the areas of fundamental beliefs and solely become immersed in subsidiary and minor details, and on the basis of this, to make other schools of thought ones target of criticism is not fairness and wisdom. Reference : Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 65.
What Tahirul Qadri is trying to say is that as far as the beliefs of the different groups (firqas) are concerned, they are only based on subsidiary and minor details! When Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has said that it is these very same groups that will enter Jahannam, Tahirul Qadri says that to pick on the beliefs and teachings of Shias, Deobandis, Khaarajites and other groups is not fairness and wisdom. When Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has already passed a decision on these groups, do we need a misguided professor to tell us that these are small matters! May Allah save us from Tahirul Qadris fitnah.
BELIEF TWO
When the Creator of the Universe did not give the Prophet the authority that he appoint anything according to his wishes in the affairs of religion. Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 86
Does this professor realise the implication of his statement? As far as Tahirul Qadri is concerned, he says that Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) has no authority over any matter. What greater disrespect towards the Holy Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) than this! This belief is akin to that of the Wahabi/Deobandi/Tablighi belief as stated in Taqwiyatul Jmaan, page 41 by Molvi Ismail Dehlwi, wherein he says that Whosoevers name is Muhammad or Ahmed has no authority over anything.
BELIEF THREE
I do not only like performing Salaah behind the Wahabis and Shias but whenever I get the opportunity I perform Salaah behind them. Reference : Risaalah Deed Shoneed, Lahore, 19 April 1986, page 4
Immediately after this interview, which was recorded in the above magazine, Tahirul Qadri claimed to the Sunni Ulema of Hyderbad that he had never made this statement. The editor of the magazine has the cassette of this interview. Attempts are being made to obtain this cassette.
BELIEF FOUR
I curse sectarianism. I do not belong to any sect. I am a representative of the Prophets community. Reference: Risaalah Deed Shoneed, Lahore, 19 April 1986, page 4
In a video recording interview taped in Durban (South Africa), Tahirul Qadri, very emotionally, told his unsuspecting audience that he is a Sunni Hanafi. Yet, he holds a firm belief that he does not have an excessive devotion and adherence to any particular group. This professor has already cursed himself!
BELIEF FIVE
In Salaah, to fold ones hand or to leave ones hand is not amongst the Wajiba#146adats of Islam. The important thing is Qiyaam. In the (position) of standing l am following (whoever the Imaam is). If the Imaam makes Qiyaam, Sajdah, Qadah or Salaam then the Muqtadi should do the same. At this point, it is not necessary that the Imaam leaves his hand, and the Muqtadi folds his hands and performs the Salaah or leaves his hand. Reference: Nawaa-e-Waqt Magazine, 19 December 1986.
BELIEF SIX
I am not working for the loftiness of Hanafiyat or for the school of the Ahle Sunnat. Reference : Nawaa-e-Waqt Magazine, 19 December 1986, page 4.
If Tahirul Qadri is not working for the school of the Ahle Sunnah, then what is he really working for? The Ahle Sunnah Wa Jammah is the only right group that have been promised Jannah. Tahirul Qadri is not working towards Jannah, need we say towards which place he is heading for!
BELIEF SEVEN
If a person claims that a certain person who has read the Kalimah is a Munafiq and Kaafir, if this is not similar to sitting on the Throne of Allah and His Prophet, then what is? Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 72
BELIEF EIGHT
Allah and His Rasool did not issue any school of thought a permit to Jannah. If any person is involved in this conceit, that because he is involved in a certain school of thought and is entitled to Jannat, then this is his vain thoughts and his personal fraud. Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 54
BELIEF NINE
There should be such a religious institute which is above the constraining teachings of schools of thought so that a student of any school of thought may gain advantage from lessons in this free environment. Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 91
BELIEF TEN
The clear victims among the worshippers of school of thought have been those people whose education and training have been (confined) to a special school of thought. After they become armed with religious education and they walk in the field of a life of action, then they make their own beliefs and thoughts and the propagation of this as their objectives. Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 108
BELIEF ELEVEN
Bareillviat, Deobandiat, Ahle Hadithiat, Shiaat, and these titles (makes me) fearful. Reference: Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 111
Tahirul Qadri cannot say that the book, Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh is not his work and not published under the banner of his organisation, Minhaajul Quran. We have ample proof to show that this is his own writings!
Sunnis must bear in mind that Shaitaan has always used religious frauds to put forward arguments, which are totally contrary to the Holy Quran and Sunnah. Tahirul Qadri wants Sunnis and all other groups to compromise or come to a settlement. We must remember that Shaitaan uses people to present arguments based on misconstrued (distorted) compromise. We should realise that this total compromise is nothing but the evil whisperings of Shaitaan. Almighty Allah has stated in the Holy Quran that Shaitaan is an open enemy to you. An appeal is made to innocent Sunnis not to he deceived by this compromise. We should bear in mind that this message of total compromise preached by Tahirul Qadri is even against the teachings of Ijma (Consensus). It should, therefore, be the priorities of Sunnis to refer to the learned Ulema of the Anle Sunnah Wa Jamaah if they are in doubt about Tahirul Qadri.
O Muslims! Bear in mind that when a thief intends stealing from a house he first throws a stone. If there is no reaction from the occupants of the house, then the thief takes full advantage of the situation. This self-styled thinker and scholar of Islam, Tahirul Qadris, first stone on the house of Islam was on the issue of DIYAT or compensation for Blood-Money. Tahirul Qadri presented points totally contrary to the Ijma-e-Ummah (Consensus of the Ummah) on this issue.
But, Alhamdulillah, we wish to state that the occupants of the House of Islam were not sleeping. The foremost among the Ulema-e-Ahle-Sunnah who refuted this professors corrupt teachings were, amongst others:-
1. Allama Mohammed Abdullali Qadri Ashrafi Barakaati who wrote Awrat Ki Diy at. This book contains enough proof exposing the ignorance of Tahirul Qadri.
2. Hazrat Allama Ata Mohammed Saheb Bindiyaalwi.
3. Ghazali-e-Zamaa, Allama Sayed Ahmed Saeed Kazmi (alaihir rahmah)
4. Allama Moulana Abu Dawood Mohammed Sadeck. He has written the book entitled Khatreh Ki Ghanti in which the true beliefs of the Taahiriyah group has been clearly exposed.
5. Allama Mufti Mehboob Raza Khan who wrote Fitnah Taaiiriyah Ki Haqiqat.
6. Allama Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Al Qaadri who has written two in-depth volumes entitled Professor Ka I imi Wa Tahqeeqih Jaa izah.
Many other books have also been written by the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnah exposing Tahirul Qadris corrupt beliefs and teachings.
​

We humbly supplicate in the Darbar of Almighty Allah that He reward these distinguished Ulema for having revealed this new and corrupt group.
REFUTATION OF HIS BELIEFS
​

HIS CALL FOR COMPROMISE IS COMPARABLE TO KUFR
Almighty Allah states in the Holy Quran: And cover not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth when you know what it is. (2:42) From this verse we clearly come to understand that truth and falsehood can never be reconciled, just as Islam and Kufr cannot be reconciled. This has always been the belief from the time of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam).Sayyiduna Rasoolullah#146s (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) command is very clear when he says: Do not sit with the corrupt, do not drink with them and do not eat with them. Therefore, the message of compromise by Tahirul Qadri is against the very principles of Islam.
Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said: My Ummah will be divided into 73 sects. One of them will enter Jannah, while the rest will enter Jahannam. When he was asked as to who the Ahle Jannah was, he replied: Those with whom I and my Ashaab are in. We must bear in mind that the syllable ma in this Hadith clearly signifies Aqidah and the fundamental principles of action and not minor subsidiary issues as Tahirul Qadri claims.
We must also bear in mind that two other Ahadith of Sayyidnna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) use the words Jamaath and Sawad-e-Azam. It is because of this that the Ahle Sunnat Wa Jamaah has been termed the major group. It is our Imaan that this is the Jannati group.
Tahirul Qadri believes and says that NO GROUP has been given the permit to enter Jannat, while Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) assures us that only one group wlll enter Jannat. Is not Tahirul Qadris teaching totally contrary to the Holy Ouran and Sunnah? One wonders whose words the followers of Tahirul Qadri.are going to accept!
We wish to pose two very important questions to Tahirul Qadri and to his representatives in South Africa and elsewhere. Firstly, Tahirul Qadri, when you claim that no group has been given the permit to enter Jannah, then why is it that you persist in claiming to be a Sunni? (Proof of this can be seen from two video recordings in Durban)Secondly, Tahirul Qadri, you also claim to accept the decision of Ala Hazrat (radi Allahu anha) from his book, Husaamul Haramain, in which the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah have justifiably branded certain Deobandi Molvis as Kaairs. Why brand Deobandis only as Kaafirs when you believe that no group has been given permission to enter Jannah? You yourself have said that you cannot call anybody a Kaafir!
O Sunnis! This man claims to be a scholar of lslam, but see how confused he is about his own Imaan.
Tahirul Qadri claims to be a lover of Ala Hazrat, Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (alaihir rahmah). In his lectures he says that he is a Sunni and a follower of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah). Why does he do this? There is a very simple explanation to all of this. He knows that every Sunni is a fervent admirer of A#146la Hazrat (alaihir rahmah). What easier way of luring or trapping the innocent Sunnis than to use the name of a great person who is beloved to them!
We are fully aware of Tahirul Qadris plots against Islam. He is so well trained as a master con-artist that when confronted by Sunnis, he claims to be a Sunni! When Deobandis and Shias corner him, he says that there is no problem in performing Salaah behind them. He even practices this! Perhaps he is practising, as described in the following Ouranic Verse: When they meet those who believe, they say We believe, But when they are alone with the evil ones, they say We are really with you. We were only joking. (2: 14) This is a perfect description befitting the founder of the Taahiriyah sect! As it is said in the English phrase: If the cap fits, wear it. It certainly fits the professor.
In the monthly magazine of Minhaajul Quran, 12 February (year not stated), many people from various schools of thought were invited by Tahirul Qadri. In this instance, Tahirul Qadri and these persons gave indications that it was important for members of various schools of thought to meet and discuss so that misconceptions can be removed. A question still hangs in the air. Was this really the reason for the meeting? Or was it merely a very diplomatic way of accepting and compromising with other groups?
This professor claims to be a Sunni. He has full knowledge of all the Kufr statements made by the Deobandis and, in spite of this, says that compromise with them is still possible. He has also stated that whoever doubts the Kufr of certain Deobandi Molvis, they themselves are Kaafirs. Which Deobandi can truly admit that they regard certain of their leaders as Kaafirs? After knowing this and knowing that the majority of Deobandis still consider those Deobandis as their leaders, even though a Kufr Fatawa has been issued against them, Tahirul Qadri still says that Muslims must compromise with them. We thank Almighty Allah for guiding us through His rightly-guided Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah and not leading us to Kufr.
Tahirul Qadri claims that he has never performed Salaah behind a Shia Imaam. According to a teacher, Sayyid Bakhtiar Hussain Subzwari, of a Shia madressa (Jaamiatun Muntazir), situated in Model Town, Lahore Pakistan), who met Tahirul Qadiri in Iran confirms that Tahirul Qadri and himself performed Salaah behind a Shia Imaam.
In Denmark, Tahirul Qadri performed Salaah behind a certain Molvi Idris Deobandi. The Sunni Ulema wrote letters about this incident. These letters are in the possession of Mufti Ghulam Sarwar Al Qadri and Moulana Abu Dawood Mohammed Sadeck.Judge for yourself as to what type of person Tahirul Qadri is! He calls himself a staunch Sunni but does not hesitate in intentionally reading his Salaah behind the enemies of Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) and his Ashaab (radi Allahu anham). See how Tahirul Qadri compromises!
At this moment we would like to mention an incident that occurred during the time of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). It is reported that a dispute arose between a Jew and a so-called Muslim. When this case was brought to Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam), he ruled in favour of the Jew. When this so-called Muslim went to Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) to complain about the decision given against him, Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) immediately drew his sword and struck of the head of this so-called Muslim (Munafiq).
Had Tahirul Qadri been witness to such an incident, would be have said that Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) was sitting on the Throne of Allah and His Prophet.According to Tahirul Qadri only Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallarn) have knowledge of the Kaafir and Munafiq. We ask Tahirul Qadri, did Sayyiduna Umar Farooq (radi Allahu anhu) perform such a deed without knowledge? We are sure that you will say yes, that he had knowledge. In the same manner, today too, the Ulema-e-Ahle Sunnan by virtue of their knowledge can ascertain who is a Munafiq, a Kaafir, a Murtad or a Faasiq. After all, can you not by virtue of your knowledge perceive a Munafiq? Perhaps, you yourself are saving your own skin from the decision of the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah from branding you to a term applicable to your own self! Are you not contradicting your beliefs by calling certain Deobandi Molvis and their followers Kaafirs!
It is a fact of documented history that when the Muslims were still in a minority in Madinatul Munawarrah, Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) banished the Munafiqs from Masjidun Nabawi. Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) never agreed to a compromise with the Munafiqs for whatever reasons.
Today, when we Muslims are in a majority as when compared to the Munafiqs amongst us, we will never compromise on Islamic principles. But Tahirul Qadiri, who claims to be a representative from the Prophets community believes that we must compromise with those who are misled. He believes that we are now living in modem times and circumstances. In other words, he knows the present times and circumstances better than even Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). Ma azzallah!If compromise is the remedy of Muslim survival then Sayyidnna Imam Hussain (radi Allahu anhu) would have compromised with Yazid, after all, Yazid had also recited the Kalima Yet, he never did. (Ala Hazrat, Imam Ahmad Raza Khan (alaihir rahmah) would have compromised with certain Deobandis. Yet, he never did. Why? Because true Muslims believe: And cover not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth when you know what it is. (2: 42)
Ala Hazrat, Imam Ahmed Raza Khan (radiAllahu anhu) has clearly stated that, To organise such a function in which Shias and Wahabis can be members, to attend such functions is Haraam and to frequent the corrupt sects is like afire. Only such a person will donate money to this function who has no religion and has totally lost all senses. Therefore, stay far from the corrupt, remain aIoof from them so that they will not be able to corrupt you or immerse you in their fitnah. Alhamdullllah, Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) never compromised. We too will never compromise!
MINHAAJUL QURAN IS IN FACT MINHAAJUS SHAITAAN
Minhaajul Quran is an organisation that has been formed by Tahirul Qadri. Let us see what he has to say about the policy of this organization. Tahirul Qadri says: In my Institute, Minhaajul Quran, members of Jamaat-e-Islami can also become members. In Minhaajul Quran even followers of the AhIe Hadith, Shia, and Deobandis can also be members. (Reference: Jung Newspaper, 2 7February 1987)
Let us now inspect the Islamic decision of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) about what he says about such mixed gatherings. Ala Hazrat (radi AIlahu anhu) said: To organise such a mixed function in which Shias and Wahabis can be members, to attend such functions is Haraam, and to frequent the corrupt sects is like a fire. Only such a person will donate money to this function who has no religion and has totally lost all senses. Therefore, stay far from the corrupt, remain aloof from them so that they will not be able to corrupt you or immerse you in their fitnah.
DECLARES THAT A RASOOL IS NOT A RASOOL
In part 2, page 26 of his book, Ajzaae Imaan, Tahirul Qadri declares that a Rasool has to be sent with a Revealed Kitab to be regarded as a Rasool. Yet, it is an accepted fact according to Surah Maryam, verse 54, of the Holy Quran, wherein Hazrat Ismail (alaihis salaam) is regarded as a Rasool and a Nabi, although no Revealed Kitab was sent to him. If you are prepared to accept Tahirul Qadris definition of a Rasool, you will be guilty of excluding a great Prophet like Hazrat Ismail (alaihis salaam) from the list of Rasools. Allah forbid us from such heresy!
CONTRADICTION OF ISSUE OF DIYAT WITH FOUR IMAAMS
Tahirul Qadri says that he is a true Hanafi. Now let us see how this Hanafi totally contradicts the verdicts of not only Imam Abu Hanifa (alaihir rahmah) but all four celebrated Imams (radi Allahu anhum). This man says that as far as Diyat of both men and women is concerned, the amounts are equal.
Imam Muhammad bin Hasan Shaybaani (alaihir rahmah), one of the students of Imam Azam, Imam Abu Hanifa (alaihir rahmah) states: Imam Abu Hanifa in the issue of Diyat has mentioned that the Diyat for women, be it a severe wound or loss of life, is half that of male. (Kitaabul Hujjah, VoL 4, page 276) The Diyat of the female, being half that of a male, has also been substantiated in the Muwatta, page 670, of Imam Malik (alaihir rahmah). Imam Shafee (alaihir rahmah) states: I have never seen any scholars in my time and those preceding me refuting the fact that the Diyat of women is half that of man, and this is 50 camels. (Kitaabul Umm, Vol. 5, page 106)
This is also accepted in the authentic book of the Hambali school of thought whose leader is Imam Ahmed bin Hambal (alaihir rahmah), the fourth Imam. (Ar Roudul Murraba, Volume 2, page 339)
From this issue we learn that Tahirul Qadri is not a Hanafi. In fact, he does not follow any Madhab! He is attempting to form a fifth Madhab in Islam.
INDIRECTLY CLAIMING TO BE A MUJTAHID
In refutation of Tahirul Qadri, Hadrat Moulana Sayed Ahmed Saeed Kaazmi Shah Saheb (alaihir rahmah), considered to be the Gazzalli of his age, wrote a book entitled, Islam me Awrat Ki Diyat.
In this book he considers Tahirul Qadri a misled and corrupt individual for having refuted Ijma (Consensus) of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah. He clearly states that if a person refutes an argumentation of a Mujtahid, then that person has to be on par with a Mujtahid.
HIS TRUE FEELINGS OF TAQLEED
Tahirul Qadri says: If Taqleed is followed and based on all matters then the capacity of knowledge of Muslims will become tainted and useless. (Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 25)
We can imagine what he must be thinking of all those giant Awliya and Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah who have followed Taqleed throughout their lives. What a great enemy of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah this man is!
QADRI TITLE MISLEADING
Hazrat Allama Ata Mohammed Saheb Bindiyaalwi, a leading Sunni Scholar in Pakistan, has stated that It is very sad that a person who calls himself a Qadri, refutes the teachings of Ghousal Azam, Shaikh Abdul Qaadir Jilaani (alaihir rahmah). Even Ghousal Azam (radi Allahu anhus) teachings are in accordance with Ijmah (Consensus) in the issue of Diyat. This fact is substantiated by his student, Ibne Qudhaamuh. And we are certain that his student knows him better than a scholar presently going around calling himself a Qadri.This substantiates that Tahirul Qadris title of Qadri does not befit him. His policy of adopting this title is synonymous with his mission, which is but a deception or ploy. Again his intention is nothing but to deceive you, the innocent Sunnis! After all, which Sunni will doubt a person who has the title of Qadri after his name.
In the ealier sixties, a staunch Wahabi/Deobandi poet and Molvi arrived in South Africa posing as a Sunni and Aashiq-e-Rasool. He was the guest of the Buzme Adab Society. His name was Mahirul Qadri. Look at the similarity of their names. He deceived a lot of Sunnis and attacked the great Sunni Ulema subsequently in his book. Dear Muslims, by Tahirul Qadri refusing to accept the Ijma on the issue of Diyat, he is not only trying to prove that he is a Mujtahid, but on par with them. We ask you: do you think that this man is on par with Imam A#146zam, Imam Abu Hanifa (alaihir rahmah), who was the Imam-e-Mujtahid?
MISINTERPRETION AND PRESENTATION OF QURANIC VERSES AND ARABIC WORDS
We should remember that for a person to present a Tafsir on the Holy Quran he has to be well versed with the Arabic language. He must make sure that he does not recite the Arabic verses incorrectly. He must not quote from the Holy Quran incorrectly. He must be knowledgeable of the basic laws of Arabic Grammar.
This scholar of Islam cannot even satisfy these basic rules. He has proven that not only is he totally ignorant about the Arabic language but also of the Holy Quran. In page 123 of his book Tasmiyatut Quran, he incorrectly quotes the 7th verse of Sura Mumin. In the same book, page 110, he gives the examples of many words, which is based on the Scale of Ar Rahmaan. However, two examples presented by this man to prove his statements are totally incorrect as both these words are not included in the scale of Ar Rahmaan.
This again proves his ignorance as far as the Arabic language is concerned. He is not qualified to make Tafsir of the Holy Quran.
HIS REJECTION OF A FUNDAMENTAL BELIEF OF ISLAM
We should bear in mind that a person who refutes a fundamental belief of Islam is certainly a Kaafir. Therefore, to deliberately assist this person or to create an accord with that person is Haraam. It is our belief that members of the Deobandi, Wahabi, Shia or Qadiani group (firqah) have rejected certain fundamental beliefs of Islam. If this was not the case, then the Ulema of the Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah would not have dared considered these groups as misguided or Kaafirs.
Yet, Tahirul Qadiri declares in his book, Firqah Parasti Ka Khaatimah Qu Kar Mumkin Heh, page 59, that: This is an indisputable fact that between all Islamic groups fundamental beliefs are common. The system of Islamic beliefs stands upon this common foundation. Muslims do not refute the Nabi or Rasool and his Shariah and, besides Islam, they do not accept any other religion. Every Muslim accepts and believes in both action and beliefs pertaining to Tauheed, Risalah, Wahy, the Hereafter, the presence of Angels, the finality of prophethood, Salaah, Roza, Zakaah and Hajj and its compulsion. If there is any dispute then this is only in minor subsidiary issues. This is only according to explanation and interpretation. This does not effect the foundation of Islamic beliefs.Astagfirullah! Concealing the Kufr of others is also Kufr. What Tahirul Qadri is really doing is that he is trying to accommodate and satisfy the corrupt sects by cleverly hiding their derogatory statements made against Allah and His Rasool (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam). He says that there is no fundamental difference between the different groups the Sunni, Deobandi, Wahabi, Shia, etc. He claims that this dispute is only in minor subsidiary issues. He also claims that for Sunnis to target other groups by merely using minor subsidiary issues is unfair.
The above statement of Tahirul Qadri is a contradiction of the statement of Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) who said that 72 groups will enter into Jahannam and only one, the Ahle Sunnah, will enter into Jannah. Tahirul Qadri is now trying to prove that Rasoolullah (salal laahu alaihi wasallam) was incorrect in his statement Maaazallah! What further proofs does one need to prove this mans open insult to Sayyiduna Rasoolullah (salal laahu alaihi wasallam)?
O Sunni Muslim, let us hear the reply from the blessed lips of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah). A question was put to Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) which read, What do the Ulema of religion have to say about Zaid who is a Sayed and also an Imam. He also considers the Wahabi, Shia, Deobandi and Ahle Sunnah as equal. (Fatawah Radwiyah, vol.3, pg. 292). Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah)s reply to this question was: He who believes that the Ahle Sunnah, the Wahabi, the Deobandis and the Shia are equal, so profound is his omittance from the folds of Islam. Salaah behind such a person is Baatil, similar to the performance of Juma Salaah behind a Hindu and a Christian.Therefore Sunni Muslims, do not let this professor deceive you. No greater enemy of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) has appeared in the present times, than this reformer. He said that from the time of A#146la Hazrats passing away, no structural progress has been made in this blessed place.
Do you know that by this statement, he has insulted the blessed family of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah), which includes such Awliya as: Hujjatul Islam, Hazrat Haamid Raza Khan (alaihir rahmah) and Huzoor Mufti Azam-Hind, Shah Mustapha Raza Khan (alaihir rahmah). These were the illustrious sons of A#146la Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) who followed the great Imam.
He has also insulted every Khalifa of Ala Hazrat (alaihir rahmah) who include, among others, such blessed personalities as:
A. Qutbe Madina, Hazrat Moulana Zia-ud-Deen Madani (alaihir rahmah), the father of Hazrat Shaikh Fazlur Rahmaan Madani (alaihir rahmah) of Madina Shareef,
B. Hazrat Moulana Abdul Aleem Siddique, who was the Shaikh and Spiritual teacher of Professor Fazlur Rahman Ansaari (radi Allahu anhum).
He has also insulted practically every Sunni Scholar and layman whose spiritual allegiance is to one of the successors of Ala Hadrat (alaihir rahmah).
PROVEN A LIAR
Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi relates that he once found himself sitting next to Tahirul Qadri in a function held at the Jinnah Hall, Pakistan.
Tahirul Qadri told him, Mufti Saheb! Today is the time to take the lead.
When Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi enquired as to how this was possible, Tahirul Qadri replied, If you proclaim that the Diyat of men and women are equivalent then you will be able to take the lead.
Mufti Mohammed Hussein Naeemi states that to further prove his point Tahirul Qadri gave him references from three books to prove that Diyat for men and women is equal. However, Multi Mohammed Hussein declares that when he refereed to these three books none of them proved that Diyat for men and women is equal. (Rooz Nama Wafaaq, Amrooz Jang Lahore, Jasaarat, Karachi, 19 October 1984)
It is clear to you that Tahirul Qadri tried to mislead Mufti Naeemi on the Diyat issue. He was proven a liar!
HIS BELIEFS WITH REGARDS TO CONDITIONS IN THE QABAR
In part 1, page 215 of his book, Aftaae lmaan, Tahinil Qadri writes: In the issue of resurrection after death it is not necessary that the same body will come to life the second time with the same parts and cells, which was, as was found in the world. He also considers the punishment in the grave as a dream. These beliefs of Tahirul Qadri are new to Islam and totally contrary to the Holy Quran and Sunnah.
​

Let us see though, what the Holy Quran has to declare. In Surah Qiyaamah, verses 14, it is stated: I do call to Witness the Resurrection Day: and I do call to witness the Self-reproaching Spirit: Does man think we cannot assemble his bodies, No! we are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers. Source​

 

[Mojo-jojo]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

I thought Hasan Nisar was a better man this. Praising Tahir ul Qadri no way.......

This is the problem. Too many of us can not recognize the fake people posing as intellectuals on our media.

 

[arshypk]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

Sons of Punjab. I envy both...

Shame on you. People like you are dividing our country and Islam. Punjabi, Sindhi, Baluchi, Pathan my ***. Be a Muslim or a Pakistani then you might get some respect. I am from Punjab and I hate telling people. U r mentioning Punjab as if it's part of Switzerland and people living there are taking shower with milk and honey. Shut the f up and start promoting your country then Punjab which is named after five rivers and three of them are dead as dessert.

 

[barhaich]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

Tahir ul Qadri don't need Hassan Nisar cetiificate.

 

[ummah]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

tahir ul qadri .... great

 

[rana14801]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

I think Dr Israr Ahmed :rahm: was the greatest thinker and Islamic scholar Pakistan has ever produced.

He was the only person i have seen who had vast knowledge of Quran, History, Philosophy, Science, Islam and other religions at the same time.
May Allah bless his soul and enter him into Jannah, Ameen.


Tahir ul Qadri is no match to him. He was good in 80s and 90s but now he is more of a Priest than an Islamic scholar.

​i agree 100% with ur view and as i heard most of the people calling him Tahir ul Paderee.

 

[AsifAmeer]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

Whats wrong with your own identity? Which part of Islam forces you to give up your heritage? I simply appreciated the heritage of diversity. Whats so messed up about that?

Shame on you. People like you are dividing our country and Islam. Punjabi, Sindhi, Baluchi, Pathan my ***. Be a Muslim or a Pakistani then you might get some respect. I am from Punjab and I hate telling people. U r mentioning Punjab as if it's part of Switzerland and people living there are taking shower with milk and honey. Shut the f up and start promoting your country then Punjab which is named after five rivers and three of them are dead as dessert.

 

[Aleph]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

Wow, so many opinions, and I am sorry to say almost ALL of them are based on ignorance?? I can't, for the life of me, understand how people who give the shahadah of ash-hadu an-la-ilaha il-Allah, wa ash-hadu anna muhammadar Rasulullah can hold such ignoramous opinions about other fellow Muslims?

For those of you who know me, will know that I take a special liking for the works and scholasticism of the 'ulama of Deoband. However, idiosyncracies should never dictate objective truth. Dr. Tahirul Qadri is one of the most learned and articulate authorities on Islam! Why do you guys have to judge him based on the oddities and not on his content? I also don't subscribe to some of his opinions or actions, but that doesn't stop me from admitting the scholarly brilliance of the man. People who badmouth him have no idea of his works and the level of his learning.

Someone over here commented on how he was "no match" for Dr. Israr. Please dont get me wrong, and May Allah accept Dr. Israr (rah) efforts and grant him the highest place in Paradise, but really comparing Tahirul Qadri to Dr. Israr? Janab, Tahirul Qadri is a muhaddith to boot! He has ijazahs from some of the highest authorities in Islam for ahadith, tafsir, fiqh etc. Dr. Israr did not hold ijazahs for any of this and was largely self-taught. Have any of you even bothered to see the 6 hours of the video lecture of Tahirul Qadri on the Salman Taseer issue? Please do if you havent. You will understand the level of `ilm this man has.

There are very few `ulama of the Barelwi school whom I can name in terms of their erudity in Islamic sciences. But, Tahirul Qadri is RIGHT UP THERE. If there is anyone in the Barelwi school can feel proud of for their literary skills (in comparison to the scholars of Deoband) then it is Tahirul Qadri. Please get over your prejudices and respect the 'ulama who spend their lives studying Islam only to be ridiculed by jahils like us whose only claim to fame are our useless comments on an online forum.

 

[Serving Islam]

Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

 

[jahanzaibi]

Re: Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

famous sharabi ghada .. na khud islam kay lia kuch kia na iski tehreer say islam ko koi faida hay.. bus doosroon ko bura kehata hay kay muslim aisay hain
waisay hain.. khud kia kia ?

 

[cefspan]

Re: Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

ARE U SERVING ISLAM ? OR SERVING TAHIR UL QADRI ?


Theek Hae , AP CHEETAE haen , but a lady already posted this video yesterday . . . . . .

At-least do check whether what u are posting is already posted or not .

 

[sahiL]

Re: Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

oh bhai naiki kar derya mein daal....yeh baat Qadri saab ko bhi samjha do yaar....
nothing personal against Qadri saab
unko bolo plz asaan urdu ka istamal kerein in his lectures....motive logon ko samjhana hota hai, apne ilm ko show off karna nai by throwing big words
indeed, he's very knowledgeable person, but I disagree with him about certain things...
May Allah give him jaza for all the good work he's doing for the betterment of the ppl of Pakistan

 

[Sana_]

Re: Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

Tahir ul Qadri certainly played great role as far as islam is concerned,but in POLITICSvote only for IK

 

[Aam_Admi]

Re: Hassan Nisar famous intellectual & analyst applauds services of Dr.Tahir ul Qadri for Islam Pakistan

حسن نثار اور طاہر القادری کیا کہنے بھائی کیا کہنے وہ کہتے ہیں نا جیسی روح ویسے فرشتے۔ وہی مثال یہاں پر پوری اترتی ہے ایک ایس ٓدمی جو گالی کے بغیر بات نہیں کر سکتا پی کر ٹن ہو کر لائیو پروگراموں میں آجاتا ہے وہ یقینا اسی قابل ہے کہ طاہر جیسے ایک اور ڈرامے باز کے بارے میں اپنے نیک خیالات کا اظہار کرے۔
​

 

[WatanDost]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

Yaar mujhay zaati toar per aik foriegn country ki TOP Agency ki taraf sai mushwara diya gaya hai kai
"Agar aap es mulk mai rehtay howey kissi achi Islami Tanzeem ko join karna chahtay hain tow
Minhaj waloon ko join karain BAray Achay log hain"

WHY They are sweetheart to them????

 

[AsifAmeer]

Re: Hassan Nissar about Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri

because those deployed in or around Pakistan, simply want to return back home when things get better in Pakistan.

Yaar mujhay zaati toar per aik foriegn country ki TOP Agency ki taraf sai mushwara diya gaya hai kai
"Agar aap es mulk mai rehtay howey kissi achi Islami Tanzeem ko join karna chahtay hain tow
Minhaj waloon ko join karain BAray Achay log hain"

WHY They are sweetheart to them????

 

[ummah]

Dr tahir ul qadri announced to return in november 2012 to pakistan...

http://www.nawaiwaqt.com.pk/E-Paper/Lahore/2012-04-09/page-2/detail-17

 

[ummah]

Re: Dr tahir ul qadri announced to return in november 2012 to pakistan...

Now propaganda from political and religious parties will go on high against dr tahir ul qadri,but truth will prevails .inshallah

 

[insaf-seeker]

Re: Dr tahir ul qadri announced to return in november 2012 to pakistan...

Bari lambi date dey di, Pakistan ki garmi bardasht nahin hoti na :lol: