so b4 I left pk, satellite dishes were the thing, there were hardly any cable operators. indian channels were not officially allowed, so we caught them on the dish. many ppl had 2 or even 3.
If OSPs establish a channel out of uk/europe that has no anchors on ground in pk, but local content is produced by reporters, who never show their face. their content is uploaded to places like secure drop and then is edited and presented by OSP based anchors. People watching that channel would have dishes to watch and it would never be carried on cable.
Now this whole thing is premised on the fact, that the reason that agencies are doing a crackdown on old media, is it has greater viewership than social media. If this premise doesnt hold true, and its a typical boomer-fluffer(thats what army high command is, fluffers not duffers, look it up) fallacy then the whole point is moot.
If regular media still holds a greater percentage than something like this will create a channel where content creation is distributed, maybe the ppl are paid thru crypto and the only faces are outside pk.
If OSPs establish a channel out of uk/europe that has no anchors on ground in pk, but local content is produced by reporters, who never show their face. their content is uploaded to places like secure drop and then is edited and presented by OSP based anchors. People watching that channel would have dishes to watch and it would never be carried on cable.
Now this whole thing is premised on the fact, that the reason that agencies are doing a crackdown on old media, is it has greater viewership than social media. If this premise doesnt hold true, and its a typical boomer-fluffer(thats what army high command is, fluffers not duffers, look it up) fallacy then the whole point is moot.
If regular media still holds a greater percentage than something like this will create a channel where content creation is distributed, maybe the ppl are paid thru crypto and the only faces are outside pk.
