Hasan Nisar lambasts media journalist "munafaqat"

Adeel

Founder
Rana Mubasher (TV One) discusses the dubious "memorandum of understanding" that Zardari has signed in the U.S. (with the U.S. and Karzai).

Moves on to asking Hasan Nisar (journalist who used to criticize Musharraf, but has since moderated his views) about role of media in manipulating perception of events.

He and another journalist Mohsin Beg point out that just like the Tehreek-e-Taliban in Swat who call themselves "Taliban" will need to be brought under the writ of government, in the same way THOSE journalists are supporters of Tehreek-e-Taliban and have been misleading the public by not counting Army deaths, but lamenting damage to Tehreek-e-Taliban.

They too mention the Lal Masjid operation and the behaviour of these media people in pushing a perception that hundreds of "women and children" were killed in the operation and their deaths were "hidden" from the public.

Yet by now it has become clear that no women and children were killed. Musharraf has made a statement recently, and those who participated in the operation have indicated that no such deaths occurred. Musharraf has been repeating a challenge that the burial place should be audited. In other TV programs there have been challenges to the feasibility of smuggling out of "hundreds of dead bodies" from the area (given the monitoring by media and neighbours of the place).

Yet, these journalists refuse to correct participants who continue to push the fantasy of "hundreds of women and children" killed in the operation. This has been done by Jamaat-e-Islami (Munawar Hasan) and others from "religious parties". That is, they REFUSE to criticize Sufi Muhammed and Tehreek-e-Taliban. It is only very recently when Sufi Muhammed criticized THEM and Tehreek-e-Taliban interfered with madrassas that these "religious parties" have started to issue some negative comments as well (Munawar Hasan saying that Sufi Muhammed has also been "thoray say kafir" by participating in elections himself in the past).



By doing so they give the perception that this
Journalists who have supported Tehreek-e-Taliban in the past and hinted at several things that were falsehoods in order to generate public disgust at the "actions of the Army" or the state:
Dr. Shahid Masood (Geo TV and PTV Chairman for a period)
Hamid Mir (Geo TV)
Ansar Abbasi (The News - print army of Geo TV)

Journalists who have, because of their timidity, called for "writ of the state" in the Lal Masjid issue, but who switched attitudes after the establishment of writ of government:

Talat Hussain (AAJ TV)
and others

Talat Hussain is even now asking the government to establish writ of government in Swat - possible repeat performance.

Hasan Nisar and others criticize the "munafaqat" of these journalists who they testify they have seen pushing Musharraf for action on Lal Masjid prior to the operation.

Pakistani viewers themselves have seen Talat Hussain and others talk about the "writ of government" incessantly prior to the operation.

One of the reasons "journalists" have been unwilling to criticize the Tehreek-e-Taliban maybe because they fear bombings on their offices.

However they should at least indicate this possibility.

Instead they have tried to appease them - by criticizing Musharraf all the time during his tenure, and rarely criticizing the Taliban, or criticizing the PPP, PML-N parties.

As noted here before that suggests the extremely "ghattia" behaviour of the media criticizing THOSE people who they KNOW will not chastise them (i.e. Musharraf who has bent over backwards to foster media freedom in the face of criticism by PML-Q - source: Sheikh Rashid's comments), while NOT criticizing those people who are aggresive (Taliban, Benazir, Nawaz Sharif).


As the state fights the Tehreek-e-Taliban, the participants recognize the need to identify the journalists who have been trying to bring Pakistani governments while trying to raise the strength of the Tehreek-e-Taliban.

In a trend that is starting to catch on, Hasan Nisar ALSO compares the Tehreek-e-Taliban to the Kharijites. It took a long time for these media people to realize it - perhaps in their hatred of Musharraf they couldn't bring themselves to criticize "his opponents". But it seems even these people are starting to see the striking parallels between the Kharijites and the Tehreek-e-Taliban and to see the situation beyond their "taasub" (i.e. bigotry).

Participants also debate the merits of a "blackout" on the statements of the Tehreek-e-Taliban and such outfits - there is disagreement about the value of that. Also there IS value in exposing the extreme and un-Islamic nature of the Tehreek-e-Taliban and an airing of their statements does occasionally reveal those problems in their ideology.

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8ybRHhhIL0[/video]
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbIzfA9Sduo[/video]
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zo-v9q4t5c[/video]
 
Hassan nisar is another Nazir Naji. he was on Musharraf's payroll. i think Zardari is not paying him enough. please dont listen to him. he is Lifafa journalist like Nazir Naji who was abusing an honest journalist.
 

alirizvi

New Member
Hassan Nisar is one the best Journalists and one of the most Neutral guys you'll ever find. That's why we don't come across any of his supporters, He whips everyone and everyone cries that he's a paid journalist.

So SAD.
 

pakistan first

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
I am 100% agreed with Ali Rizvi's comments about Hassan Nisar, he critisize all politicians including Musharraf for their wrong doings and appreciate their correct actions but not bias as Hamid Mir, shahid Masood and particularly Ansar Abbasi. Also Hassan Nisar normally analyse the situation by putting the ground reality in front, which shows the neutriliaty of the anchor. hamid Mir always wanted to listen those things which is near to his idea.
 

sniperkhan

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
if you had watched yesterday's capital talk, you would have noticed that the paid media terrorist Hamid Mir (a CIA-Sponsored Blackmailer) was cussing the Army about some hypothetical scenario regarding the army taking over government, another one of his poodle Rauf Klasra and that self-employed 'expert' Nazir Naji had also joined in to throw mud on the army on something that is NOT even happening. this hypocritical lot is quite amazing, first they somehow invent the news that army is about to take over, then they go on about holding an hour long program about this nonsense. what was certainly boiling my blood was hamid mir saying that ''its good that america dislikes the same hosts that musharraf disliked''. someone needs to remind that liar that US ambassador anne patterson was roaming around all tv channels especially GEO news and supporting its campaign of lies during the emergency. I swear to God, Musharraf should have kept Geo news shut down during the emergency rule long enough to bankrupt them.
Also, a few months ago, these two clowns (mir and klasra) were on TV saying that pakistan has lost territory as far back as bannu. now where the hell are their proofs. As for the Justice Iftikhar, i think he is the one who shuold be tried for treason for letting loose the 63 terrorists captured during lal masjid operation.
The law and order situation wasnt bad after the operation itself, but rather after the release of these terrorists.
 

MQM

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
@alirizvi
Mr. Hassan nisar ki apni koi soch nahee main en ko qareeb 25 saal se pareh raha hoon en ka ek line main tajzia kia jai tu ye LEFAFA MARKA JOURNALIST OR KANFIUZ banda hey kabhi taraqi pasandi or kabhi jamati or kisi zamane main lafaazi or jazbaati baqwas lekhta raha hey or aaaj tak
[musharaf]
 
@ MQM:

Hazrat agar Hassan Nisar Itnaa hee bara Lifafa Journalist hai toa phir aap 25 sai unn koa parh kaar time kiyun kharab kaar rahay hain.
Please Dont compare Nazir Naji with Hassan Nisar.............. Nazir Naji is a PIMP Journalist
 

Back
Top