The best comment the way you have interpreted it is "NO COMMENT"What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
Aap ko aik aam aadmi ki interpretation regarding Womens right tou itnee acchee turha samjhe aai kay aap nay paper kay pape fill kurdiya by writing, and you just could'nt understand such a precise bayaan.AAp aik aalim kee baat sunoo aur samjhoo nay kay mayree or xyz kee.What was the "Subject" of this speech. The speech started from darkness, and like typical Mulla, ran here and then there and then here and then there, neither the beginning nor the ending, what he wanted to convey and ultimately arabic words. When our Ulemas will learn to start with a "Subject", remain
on that subject, to the point, coincise and convincing and will end the speech still on the subject.
The reason being that it was:Aap ko aik aam aadmi ki interpretation regarding Womens right tou itnee acchee turha samjhe aai kay aap nay paper kay pape fill kurdiya by writing,
whereas the above points a) to d) were the not the case of Mullah Tariq Jamil.and you just could'nt understand such a precise bayaan.AAp aik aalim kee baat sunoo aur samjhoo nay kay mayree or xyz kee.
@DEENO,
The reason being that it was:
a) One subject;
b) to the point;
c) consistent
d) and the author conveyed what wished to convey;
whereas the above points a) to d) were the not the case of Mullah Tariq Jamil.
and this is also answer to all other's posts who just wish to move their heads like
snake does before bansari/bean without taking into account the rationale of a speech/
statement.
Even living under the umbrella and environment of "Maple Leaf", your way of "soochana" does not change.Aik point aap miss kur gai Maulan Tariq Jameel unfortunaltely Male hain female nahin.
Even living under the umbrella and environment of "Maple Leaf", your way of "soochana" does not change.
Tamohoree (which stings) tamohoree hee rahtee hay, irrespective of the place where she should be! Man get change.
@DEENO,
The reason being that it was:
a) One subject;
b) to the point;
c) consistent
d) and the author conveyed what wished to convey;
whereas the above points a) to d) were the not the case of Mullah Tariq Jamil.
and this is also answer to all other's posts who just wish to move their heads like
snake does before bansari/bean without taking into account the rationale of a speech/
statement.
You could have written Maulana Tariq Jamil.
Maulana likhtay huway haath dukhtay hain ya mazaq urana maqsood hay?
East or the West, Home is the Best.Aap kahan baythoo hoo ya bhee tou batao, CAN< US< BRIT.......
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|