Musharraf releases a Video after Today's Incident on facebook - reacts on rejection of nomination pa

[brilTek]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

pti should have challenged sharifs papers on the bases of asghar khan case,they took money from iji & their case of default is pending.if ECP asked them to clear their name 1st.its their responsibility to get clear their cases.ECP/ROs should have asked questions on article 63 as well,they only considered article 62 and made fun of some candidates,we already have enough fun,we should have stopped corrupt/defaulters/loan written off candidates.ECP has just done nothing right,it looks they are doing according to the SCRIPT or they are not capable to do that.

Dear, nothing would have happened.

You are saying like the courts follow the law ------ my foot.

The verdict is not out in bank default case --- hearing finished few months ago --- the delay in verdict is deliberate to make NAWAZ, a PM. Inshallah he won't


DOWN WITH CJ --- he should die with shame ---- People of Pakistan stood for HIM ---- BUT HE SERVED HIS MASTER WELL --- NAWAZ

 

[rabbi_zidni_ilma]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

There must be level playing field for everyone including Musharraf. All the looters are allowed to run for election why not Musharraf? let the people decide.

 

[PIND-WALA]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

Sad thing in this whole episode is that he has brought too much heat on Army when they are already under so much pressure . One question still remains that who is pulling the strings now ?

 

[usm100]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

Utter Non sense by the guy who posted such rubbish. If the decision is not in there favor they would start bashing the system. Trust the judiciary and EC and better results would come. Things are done according to law and not by likes and dislikes.

 

[appkhi]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

Utter Non sense by the guy who posted such rubbish. If the decision is not in there favor they would start bashing the system. Trust the judiciary and EC and better results would come. Things are done according to law and not by likes and dislikes.

wa wa wa wa wa ... you are saying things are done according to law and not by likes and dislikes....All these things are happening only bcos of likes and dislikes... all these ugly faces (Looters) allow not only to participate in election but there is nothing done against these looters from court of law... why this is just for Musharraf ...why this does not apply to rest of the looters... I am not saying why this happened with Musharraf I am saying why this does not happened to others....they are also criminals ...why our so called CJ not to see all this crap....

I do not have trust on Pakistan court system but there is court for all these looters they wont be able to save their self from court of Allah.

 

[Doorandesh]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

Yes. From day one I was anti Musharraf and pro judiciary. But recent incidents have proved that all the looters, fake degree submitters, tax evaders, loan defaulters, ISI money takers have been given a clean chit. It is not justice. I think there is Muk muka between Nawaz, Zardari and forces that be. I think this election is going to be another joke. No hope for IK and PTI. I am very disappointed with ECP and election tribunals.

 

[Saladin A]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

I have always said that any politician, an individual or a bureaucrat should be tried in the court of law if they had committed a criminal offence, fraud, looted, embezzled, looted and deceived nation and the state and if found guilty banned from participating in national politics and holding a high office in the land.

Genral Mushraff broke the constitution and extended his term of office by supporting NRO that allowed looters, loan defaulters, criminals, tax dodgers and crooks to prosper. While in office, he seriously believed that he was untouchable, the faroon and get away with anything that he wished to do legally or illegally.

 

[desan]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

This chapter of military dictatorship should be closed once and for all.

This should a be test case, and
​

he should be punished to fullest extent of the law....
​

 

[values]

Re: Was article 62 & 63 just for Musharraf

That article should be for CJ first.

 

[aamir_uetn]

Dost toh kafi jazbati hai...par lagta hai toh b TV or media par he chalta hai...b neutral, look at his work n look at twitter FB how people r reacting

bhai mere bomb blasts tv aur media pay ho rahay thay ??? mere roz k guzarney ki jaga bom blast hua timing different thi warna gaya tha m bhi .......... 50,000 log maarey gaye musharaf ki policies ki waja se , yeh aap ko jazbaati pan lagta hai ??? yeh media ne jhoot bola hai ??

 

[aamir_uetn]

lolz.. he was the army chief, his core commanders did the coup after nawaz's blunder and he came to power, then he was leader of state for 8 years, and you say he was not a leader.

If this is the IQ level of PTI supporters, the only Allah will guide you.

commander aur leader mein bohat faraq hota hai mere bhaai , agar aapka yeh IQ level hai k aap commander aur leader mein farq nai jaantey to mujhe koi hairani nai hai k u r still supporting musharaf

agar general acha leader hota to phir army chied he ko den den pakistan , elections ki kya zroorat hai aur agar yahi theek tareeqa hai to mujhe plz aikkkkkk aik mulk bata den jahan martial law ho aur usney taraqi ki ho, main maan jaaun ga aapke IQ level ko ....;)