Saarey gunahh maaf ho agaar

[Arrest Warrant]

to aap ko kya lagta hai konsi jamaat jeetay gi?

 

[Arrest Warrant]

Agar aap noon league wale hain to loot maar maaf.
agaar aap peoples party waley hain to sarey qatal maaf.
agaar aap pti waley hain to toshakhana aur cypher case maaf,
agar aap pak army hain to aap ko apki maa ka zina maaf.

agaar saab ko sab maaf, to aaj ke halaat mein konsi party jeetay gi?

 

[atensari]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1738283156032172143 ​

 

[jigrot]

Agar aap noon league wale hain to loot maar maaf.
agaar aap peoples party waley hain to sarey qatal maaf.
agaar aap pti waley hain to toshakhana aur cypher case maaf,
agar aap pak army hain to aap ko apki maa ka zina maaf.

agaar saab ko sab maaf, to aaj ke halaat mein konsi party jeetay gi?

Agar aap noon league wale hain to loot maar maaf.
agaar aap peoples party waley hain to sarey qatal maaf.
agaar aap pti waley hain to toshakhana aur cypher case maaf,
agar aap pak army hain to aap ko apki maa ka zina maaf.

agaar saab ko sab maaf, to aaj ke halaat mein konsi party jeetay gi?

 

[jigrot]

Agar aap noon league wale hain to loot maar maaf.
agaar aap peoples party waley hain to sarey qatal maaf.
agaar aap pti waley hain to toshakhana aur cypher case maaf,
agar aap pak army hain to aap ko apki maa ka zina maaf.

agaar saab ko sab maaf, to aaj ke halaat mein konsi party jeetay gi?

PTI

 

[Arrest Warrant]

PTI

Dost, Aap to thori der pehlay boycott ki baat ker rahey they. Phir aisa ghanchakr kaisey?

 

[Arrest Warrant]

let me please put, ask it more simple.
There is something, what we want?
and there is something, that we know is likely to happen.

what do you think will happen?

 

[jigrot]

Dost, Aap to thori der pehlay boycott ki baat ker rahey they. Phir aisa ghanchakr kaisey?

میں عمران خان کو کراچی ائرپورٹ پر لینے گئے تھا جب وہ ورلڈکپ جیت کر آیا تھا چودہ سال میری اس وقت عمر تھی گیارہ سال کی عمر میں کرکٹ کھیلنی شروع کی عمران خان ہی کو دیکھ کر گیارہ سال کی عمر سے عمران خان کو ہی دیکھ رہا ہوں اسی کی سپورٹ کرتا ہوں۔ میں زمینی حالات دیکھ کر بات کرتا ہوں عوام کا مقبول ترین لیڈر عمران خان ہے پاکستان کی طاقتور ترین ادارہ فوج ہے اور فوج عمران خان کے خلاف ہے۔ فوج انتخابات میں دھاندلی کرے گی اس لیے میں نے کہا بائکاٹ کردو۔ آپ نے پوچھا اگر سب کچھ معاف کردیا جائے تو اس کا آسان جواب پی ٹی آئی ہے

 

[Arrest Warrant]

میں عمران خان کو کراچی ائرپورٹ پر لینے گئے تھا جب وہ ورلڈکپ جیت کر آیا تھا چودہ سال میری اس وقت عمر تھی گیارہ سال کی عمر میں کرکٹ کھیلنی شروع کی عمران خان ہی کو دیکھ کر گیارہ سال کی عمر سے عمران خان کو ہی دیکھ رہا ہوں اسی کی سپورٹ کرتا ہوں۔ میں زمینی حالات دیکھ کر بات کرتا ہوں عوام کا مقبول ترین لیڈر عمران خان ہے پاکستان کی طاقتور ترین ادارہ فوج ہے اور فوج عمران خان کے خلاف ہے۔ فوج انتخابات میں دھاندلی کرے گی اس لیے میں نے کہا بائکاٹ کردو۔ آپ نے پوچھا اگر سب کچھ معاف کردیا جائے تو اس کا آسان جواب پی ٹی آئی ہے

Mein aik zamaney mein haakey player tha. aik din bhai ko ghusa aaya aur meri aik taang tor di. tab sey aab tak mein besakhi le ker chalta hoon. bhaai ghusey ke tez magar dil ke bahut achhey hain. etc.

seriously brother?

 

[jigrot]

Mein aik zamaney mein haakey player tha. aik din bhai ko ghusa aaya aur meri aik taang tor di. tab sey aab tak mein besakhi le ker chalta hoon. bhaai ghusey ke tez magar dil ke bahut achhey hain. etc.

seriously brother?

Boycotting the upcoming assembly session, especially by a significant political entity like PTI, holds crucial implications for the perceived legitimacy of the election process and the extension of the army chief's tenure. While debates may exist regarding the selection process of the prime minister who appointed the army chief, the member of parliaments elected during that time enjoyed a level of acceptance across various political parties. However, if the PTI decides to boycott the assembly session, it could undermine the credibility of the entire democratic process, raising concerns about representation and inclusivity. Without the participation of a major political player, the assembly's decisions may lack the necessary mandate, and the extension of the army chief's tenure could be viewed as lacking democratic endorsement. Internationally, the absence of a key political party in the assembly may cast doubt on the legitimacy of the political processes, potentially leading to diplomatic repercussions and a diminished standing on the global stage. A boycott, therefore, serves as a powerful tool to highlight perceived flaws in the democratic system and provoke a reevaluation of key institutional decisions.

Amidst these political dynamics, the decision to boycott the election becomes a strategic imperative for PTI, given the severe constraints it faces. The party finds itself in a precarious state, with top members either in hiding, changing affiliations, or unjustly imprisoned. Local members are compelled to lay low, and the manipulation of nomination papers and voter lists further compromises the integrity of the electoral system. The prevailing conditions, including the lack of impartiality in the police and judiciary, paint a bleak picture for the prospect of a fair and transparent election. In this context, engaging in the electoral process seems futile for PTI, as it risks giving an undeserved veneer of legitimacy to what appears to be a predetermined and rigged outcome.

The top leadership's incarceration, coupled with the onslaught of false legal suits, exacerbates the party's predicament and underscores the urgency of addressing systemic issues plaguing the democratic process. Boycotting the election, therefore, emerges as a principled and strategic response to the myriad challenges faced by PTI. By choosing to abstain, the party signals its resistance to an electoral system marred by irregularities, aiming to draw attention not only to its own plight but also to the broader flaws undermining the democratic ideals the nation aspires to uphold. This deliberate act of dissent holds the potential to provoke a reevaluation of key institutional decisions, urging a comprehensive overhaul of the electoral framework to ensure a level playing field for all political entities.

While the decision to boycott carries risks, it is a calculated move that reflects PTI's commitment to upholding democratic principles. In the absence of participation from a major political player, the assembly's decisions may indeed lack the necessary mandate, raising legitimate concerns about representation and inclusivity. Moreover, the extension of the army chief's tenure, if not democratically endorsed, could face international skepticism, potentially leading to diplomatic repercussions and a diminished global standing for the country.

In conclusion, the boycott, in this context, transcends a mere act of protest; it becomes a powerful tool to spotlight the inherent flaws in the democratic system and galvanize efforts toward comprehensive reform. PTI's decision to abstain is rooted in the stark realities it confronts, and it serves as a clarion call for a reinvigorated commitment to democratic ideals and transparent electoral processes, both nationally and on the international stage.

 

[Arrest Warrant]

Boycotting the upcoming assembly session, especially by a significant political entity like PTI, holds crucial implications for the perceived legitimacy of the election process and the extension of the army chief's tenure. While debates may exist regarding the selection process of the prime minister who appointed the army chief, the member of parliaments elected during that time enjoyed a level of acceptance across various political parties. However, if the PTI decides to boycott the assembly session, it could undermine the credibility of the entire democratic process, raising concerns about representation and inclusivity. Without the participation of a major political player, the assembly's decisions may lack the necessary mandate, and the extension of the army chief's tenure could be viewed as lacking democratic endorsement. Internationally, the absence of a key political party in the assembly may cast doubt on the legitimacy of the political processes, potentially leading to diplomatic repercussions and a diminished standing on the global stage. A boycott, therefore, serves as a powerful tool to highlight perceived flaws in the democratic system and provoke a reevaluation of key institutional decisions.

Amidst these political dynamics, the decision to boycott the election becomes a strategic imperative for PTI, given the severe constraints it faces. The party finds itself in a precarious state, with top members either in hiding, changing affiliations, or unjustly imprisoned. Local members are compelled to lay low, and the manipulation of nomination papers and voter lists further compromises the integrity of the electoral system. The prevailing conditions, including the lack of impartiality in the police and judiciary, paint a bleak picture for the prospect of a fair and transparent election. In this context, engaging in the electoral process seems futile for PTI, as it risks giving an undeserved veneer of legitimacy to what appears to be a predetermined and rigged outcome.

The top leadership's incarceration, coupled with the onslaught of false legal suits, exacerbates the party's predicament and underscores the urgency of addressing systemic issues plaguing the democratic process. Boycotting the election, therefore, emerges as a principled and strategic response to the myriad challenges faced by PTI. By choosing to abstain, the party signals its resistance to an electoral system marred by irregularities, aiming to draw attention not only to its own plight but also to the broader flaws undermining the democratic ideals the nation aspires to uphold. This deliberate act of dissent holds the potential to provoke a reevaluation of key institutional decisions, urging a comprehensive overhaul of the electoral framework to ensure a level playing field for all political entities.

While the decision to boycott carries risks, it is a calculated move that reflects PTI's commitment to upholding democratic principles. In the absence of participation from a major political player, the assembly's decisions may indeed lack the necessary mandate, raising legitimate concerns about representation and inclusivity. Moreover, the extension of the army chief's tenure, if not democratically endorsed, could face international skepticism, potentially leading to diplomatic repercussions and a diminished global standing for the country.

In conclusion, the boycott, in this context, transcends a mere act of protest; it becomes a powerful tool to spotlight the inherent flaws in the democratic system and galvanize efforts toward comprehensive reform. PTI's decision to abstain is rooted in the stark realities it confronts, and it serves as a clarion call for a reinvigorated commitment to democratic ideals and transparent electoral processes, both nationally and on the international stage.

Please post the source for this article.

But if you can understand that, you will also understand me.
PTI already once boycott the electoral system. had to wait a patwari generation before things started to turn to a betterment.
Boycott is a good art of protest, but boycotting your own people will end up in a demise. it will be too late.

if you do a boycott of an electoral process, they will always put your boycott in your face because all they know is their rigging was good.
but when you will fight, they may end on the very next day of their looting of public opinion.

 

[jigrot]

Please post the source for this article.

But if you can understand that, you will also understand me.
PTI already once boycott the electoral system. had to wait a patwari generation before things started to turn to a betterment.
Boycott is a good art of protest, but boycotting your own people will end up in a demise. it will be too late.

if you do a boycott of an electoral process, they will always put your boycott in your face because all they know is their rigging was good.
but when you will fight, they may end on the very next day of their looting of public opinion.

I have written it, Chatgpt fixed some issues with it, this is what I think

 

[Siberite]

میں عمران خان کو کراچی ائرپورٹ پر لینے گئے تھا جب وہ ورلڈکپ جیت کر آیا تھا چودہ سال میری اس وقت عمر تھی گیارہ سال کی عمر میں کرکٹ کھیلنی شروع کی عمران خان ہی کو دیکھ کر گیارہ سال کی عمر سے عمران خان کو ہی دیکھ رہا ہوں اسی کی سپورٹ کرتا ہوں۔ میں زمینی حالات دیکھ کر بات کرتا ہوں عوام کا مقبول ترین لیڈر عمران خان ہے پاکستان کی طاقتور ترین ادارہ فوج ہے اور فوج عمران خان کے خلاف ہے۔ فوج انتخابات میں دھاندلی کرے گی اس لیے میں نے کہا بائکاٹ کردو۔ آپ نے پوچھا اگر سب کچھ معاف کردیا جائے تو اس کا آسان جواب پی ٹی آئی ہے

Mein aik zamaney mein haakey player tha. aik din bhai ko ghusa aaya aur meri aik taang tor di. tab sey aab tak mein besakhi le ker chalta hoon. bhaai ghusey ke tez magar dil ke bahut achhey hain. etc.

seriously brother?

ابےعمران خان کو لینے گیا تھا یا عمران خان کا لینے گیا تھا ۔ اس ناپختہ عمر میں اتنا بڑا کباب کھایا تبھی تو آج تک پٹاخے چھوڑ رھا ہے ۔ ۔​

 

[jigrot]

Please post the source for this article.

But if you can understand that, you will also understand me.
PTI already once boycott the electoral system. had to wait a patwari generation before things started to turn to a betterment.
Boycott is a good art of protest, but boycotting your own people will end up in a demise. it will be too late.

if you do a boycott of an electoral process, they will always put your boycott in your face because all they know is their rigging was good.
but when you will fight, they may end on the very next day of their looting of public opinion.

The boycott slogan can be serves as a potent tool for negotiation, especially considering the immense pressure the party is currently facing. Instead of succumbing to the prevailing challenges, PTI can strategically leverage the boycott stance to foster a more favorable environment. By employing this slogan, the party opens the door for negotiations that could potentially yield more favorable outcomes, such as an increased number of seats or even securing a government position in a particular state.
Recognizing that the electoral results may not be overwhelmingly in favor of PTI, it becomes crucial to pragmatically assess the available options within the system. Rather than a rigid adherence to a black-and-white decision, embracing negotiation allows the party to wield its influence more effectively. This approach acknowledges the realities of the political landscape and encourages the exploration of various avenues to maximize gains.
In essence, the boycott slogan becomes a strategic entry point for dialogue and compromise, providing PTI with the flexibility to secure tangible benefits even in challenging circumstances. By demonstrating a willingness to engage in negotiations, the party positions itself as a pragmatic and constructive participant in the political process, potentially paving the way for a more nuanced and advantageous political landscape.

 

[jigrot]

ابےعمران خان کو لینے گیا تھا یا عمران خان کا لینے گیا تھا ۔ اس ناپختہ عمر میں اتنا بڑا کباب کھایا تبھی تو آج تک پٹاخے چھوڑ رھا ہے ۔ ۔​

اگر تجھ میں تھوڑی سے بھی تمیز یا عقل ہوتی تو پھول فروشی کا دھندہ کرنے والوں کا ساتھ نہ ہوتا۔ ایک ما کا دینا پہلے ہی میرا میٹر گھوما گیا تو آگیا اب لنڈ کھانے

 

[Arrest Warrant]

The boycott slogan can be serves as a potent tool for negotiation, especially considering the immense pressure the party is currently facing. Instead of succumbing to the prevailing challenges, PTI can strategically leverage the boycott stance to foster a more favorable environment. By employing this slogan, the party opens the door for negotiations that could potentially yield more favorable outcomes, such as an increased number of seats or even securing a government position in a particular state.
Recognizing that the electoral results may not be overwhelmingly in favor of PTI, it becomes crucial to pragmatically assess the available options within the system. Rather than a rigid adherence to a black-and-white decision, embracing negotiation allows the party to wield its influence more effectively. This approach acknowledges the realities of the political landscape and encourages the exploration of various avenues to maximize gains.
In essence, the boycott slogan becomes a strategic entry point for dialogue and compromise, providing PTI with the flexibility to secure tangible benefits even in challenging circumstances. By demonstrating a willingness to engage in negotiations, the party positions itself as a pragmatic and constructive participant in the political process, potentially paving the way for a more nuanced and advantageous political landscape.

Sir, your english paragraphing is mind boggling.

Thank you god bless you. I love you all.

 

[Siberite]

اگر تجھ میں تھوڑی سے بھی تمیز یا عقل ہوتی تو پھول فروشی کا دھندہ کرنے والوں کا ساتھ نہ ہوتا۔ ایک ما کا دینا پہلے ہی میرا میٹر گھوما گیا تو آگیا اب لنڈ کھانے

ابے تو سچ کڑوا کیوں لگ ریا اے تجھے ۔ صاف کہہ دے کہ یہ بچپن کی غلطی نہیں تھی بلکہ بڑھاپے کا شوق تھا ۔​

 

[jigrot]

ابے تو سچ کڑوا کیوں لگ ریا اے تجھے ۔ صاف کہہ دے کہ یہ بچپن کی غلطی نہیں تھی بلکہ بڑھاپے کا شوق تھا ۔​

غلیظ مسلمان بس گند میں ہی گھسے رہنا گ سے سوچنا اور منہ سے ہگ دینا

 

[jigrot]

ابے تو سچ کڑوا کیوں لگ ریا اے تجھے ۔ صاف کہہ دے ​

ابے کدھر مرگیا بے

 

[Siberite]

ابے کدھر مرگیا بے

دیکھ بھائ جگروٹ ، چار دن کی زندگی ہے ، پھر اندھیری رات ۔تو خومخواہ ہی کو غم کر ریااے ۔ سوکھ کے چڈی ہوگیا اے ۔ کھا پی خوش رہ ، یہ سیاست تیرے بس کا روگ نہیں ھے ، تو بس گھر میں ہی پیسی جا ۔​