What is shirk (شرک کیا ہے) ??

basim973

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
To All my brothers:

"Verily, you (O Muhammad) guide not whom you like, but Allah guides whom He wills. And He knows best those who are the guided." (28:56)



Enough evidences have been put forwarded by many brothers in 25 pages, still there are some illogical arguments to disguise shirk in fancy hide.


Can any one guide those who has no guidance in their naseeb?

May Allah guide us all.

(28:56)​
 

Veila Mast

Senator (1k+ posts)
I am a simple muslim and i only want to follow the prophrt(pbuh) who's guarantee has been given by the Rab-ul-Alameen.

Ulmah of hadith rate saheeh bukhai as the top most book in the rating of all hadith books.

Following link gives the reference of the hadith (i am talking about) and also explains the health of hadith which says al-fatiha behind imam is not obligatory.

For me these references are enough.
Allah knows best

Oh Really Baim, Your are "SIMPLE MUSLIM", follow saying of Syedi Rasool Allah Sal Allah o Alaih Wasalam!

You beileve in Sahi Bukhari!

How about Hadith I quoted from Sahi Bukhari where Syed Rasool Allah Sal Lallah o Alaih Wasalam predicted His Ummah won't Shirk!

I hope you will agree to this.

Or it's just Pick and Choose!

Choose the one YOU want and REJECT the ones YOU want!
 

Pakistani1947

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Reciting Sura Fathiha in Prayers behind Imam

Please Sura Fathiha in ever Rakat is not for the Prayers behind Imam

Read These Hadith: Yahya related to me from Malik from Abu Nuaym Wahb ibn Kaysan that he heard Jabir ibn Abdullah say, "Someone who prays a raka without reciting the umm al-Qur'an in it has not done the prayer except behind an imam." (Book #3, Hadith #3.9.40)

Malik Muwatta "Whoever catches the ruku has caught the sajda." (Book #1, Hadith #1.3.17)

There are enough to show us that Sura Fathia in ever Rakat is needed but not behind Imam

Dear Abdullah, I think we have discussed this issue earlier. Please do not divert from the topic, which is "What Is SHIRK"

Anyhow, please watch following Tafseer of Sura Fatiha by Dr. Israr Ahmed, where he talks about above issue in detail:

 
Last edited:

Pakistani1947

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
New (distorted) meaning of Hadith? It is: "that the Islamic nation would never fall into Shirk" ??????

Are you accosting me while pasting these Ayats?
How come you differ saying of Syedi Rasool Allah Sal Lallah o Wasalam:

Volume 8, Book 76, Number 434:


Narrated 'Uqba bin 'Amir:The Prophet went out and offered the funeral prayer for the martyrs of the (battle of) Uhud and then ascended the pulpit and said, "I am your predecessor and I am a witness against you. By Allah, I am now looking at my Tank-lake (Al-Kauthar) and I have been given the keys of the treasures of the earth (or the keys of the earth). By Allah! I am not afraid that after me you will worship others besides Allah, but I am afraid that you will start competing for (the pleasures of) this world."

At least sigh of relief as Syedi Rasool Allah Sal Lallah o Wasalam has predicted that His Ummah won’t do Shirk!

Imam Bukhair narrated in his Sahih in "Heart-Softeners", "Funerals" and "Signs of Prophethood" from 'Uqbah bin 'Amir that:
The Prophet went out and offered the funeral prayer for the martyrs of the (battle of) Uhud and then ascended the pulpit and said, "I am your predecessor and I am a witness against you. By Allah, I am now looking at my Tank-lake (Al-Kauthar) and I have been given the keys of the treasures of the earth (or the keys of the earth). By Allah! I am not afraid that after me you will worship others besides Allah, but I am afraid that you will start competing for (the pleasures of) this world."


Imam Muslim also narrated this narration in his Sahih. This is a great hadith, which the Muslim scholars over the centuries have taken care to explain and to focus on the jurisprudence that can be derived from it. And these scholars, whether they mastered the science of traditions (Muhaddithoon) or the science of jurispudence (fiqh), or to whatever reliable jurisprudential school of thought they associated with, they did not differ what this hadith meant or implied.


And then came our current era: the era in which we saw the passing away of scholars, and [according to the hadith] knowledge became scant because of their death, and the earth became fertile for the ignorant people to raise their heads, the ones who speak without knowledge and mislead people and sow confusions. History is going to remember them due to their ugly actions, which they did knowingly or unawares. These are the people who distorted the meaning of this hadith and explain in it in such a way which goes against everything which was said about this for the past 14 centuries.


Do you know what is this new [
distorted] meaning? It is: that the Islamic nation would never fall into SHIRK, and that there is hence no need to warn the Muslims about Shirk, since they are free from any possibility of indulging in Shirk. This, brothers, is a very dangerous matter, because the distortion of clear and obvious meaning is aimed at pulling down the pillars of Islam and its summit [Tahuheed: monotheism].

Let's see what the scholars have said about the hadith:


Imam Al-Nawawi
in Sharh Al-Muslim:
"This hadith shows the miracles of the Prophet Muhammad (
[FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) : It gives news the his nation will possess the treasures of the earth, and this came to pass; that the Islamic nation [Ummah] would not apostate as a whole, and it [the Ummah] is saved from it by Allah, i.e. it [the Ummah] would compete (with each other in the pleasures) in this world, and all of it came to pass".[/FONT]

Ibn Hajra said explaining this hadith in Book of Funerals of Sahih Al-Bukhari
"His saying that i am not afraid that you would commit shirk after me, means that i am not afraid that all of you would commit shirk, because some people did fall into shirk, may Allah Protect us from that. This hadith contains miracles of the Prophet Muhammad (
[FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) and that is why Bukhari mentioned it in the Book of Signs of Prophethood".

Then ibn Hajr explained this in the Book of Signs of Prophethood of Sahih Al-Bukhari:
[/FONT]
"His saying that I am afraid that you will start competing for (the pleasures of) this world: It contains warning of what will happen [in the future] and it came to pass as he said; they started having many conquests and victories till such a time that they started envying each other and fighting each other (for worldly gains) as can be seen and felt by anyone. This bears witness to truth of what the Prophet Muhammad ([FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) informed. And this hadith also contains the news that he is their 'farat' i.e. predecessor (i.e. he would die earlier than them? (allahu a'alam) or that he would be before them at the Kawthar pond, as in the other hadith] and it came to pass, and that the his Companions would not commit shirk after him and that came to pass ...."[/FONT]

So the scholars are unanimous that this hadith addresses the Companions who were present at the time, not everyone who believed in him at the time (as some apostated later), and of course not the whole of his Ummah.
 

Veila Mast

Senator (1k+ posts)
Re: New (distorted) meaning of Hadith? It is: "that the Islamic nation would never fall into Shirk" ??????


Imam Bukhair narrated in his Sahih in "Heart-Softeners", "Funerals" and "Signs of Prophethood" from 'Uqbah bin 'Amir that:
The Prophet went out and offered the funeral prayer for the martyrs of the (battle of) Uhud and then ascended the pulpit and said, "I am your predecessor and I am a witness against you. By Allah, I am now looking at my Tank-lake (Al-Kauthar) and I have been given the keys of the treasures of the earth (or the keys of the earth). By Allah! I am not afraid that after me you will worship others besides Allah, but I am afraid that you will start competing for (the pleasures of) this world."


Imam Muslim also narrated this narration in his Sahih. This is a great hadith, which the Muslim scholars over the centuries have taken care to explain and to focus on the jurisprudence that can be derived from it. And these scholars, whether they mastered the science of traditions (Muhaddithoon) or the science of jurispudence (fiqh), or to whatever reliable jurisprudential school of thought they associated with, they did not differ what this hadith meant or implied.


And then came our current era: the era in which we saw the passing away of scholars, and [according to the hadith] knowledge became scant because of their death, and the earth became fertile for the ignorant people to raise their heads, the ones who speak without knowledge and mislead people and sow confusions. History is going to remember them due to their ugly actions, which they did knowingly or unawares. These are the people who distorted the meaning of this hadith and explain in it in such a way which goes against everything which was said about this for the past 14 centuries.


Do you know what is this new [
distorted] meaning? It is: that the Islamic nation would never fall into SHIRK, and that there is hence no need to warn the Muslims about Shirk, since they are free from any possibility of indulging in Shirk. This, brothers, is a very dangerous matter, because the distortion of clear and obvious meaning is aimed at pulling down the pillars of Islam and its summit [Tahuheed: monotheism].

Let's see what the scholars have said about the hadith:


Imam Al-Nawawi
in Sharh Al-Muslim:
"This hadith shows the miracles of the Prophet Muhammad (
[FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) : It gives news the his nation will possess the treasures of the earth, and this came to pass; that the Islamic nation [Ummah] would not apostate as a whole, and it [the Ummah] is saved from it by Allah, i.e. it [the Ummah] would compete (with each other in the pleasures) in this world, and all of it came to pass".[/FONT]

Ibn Hajra said explaining this hadith in Book of Funerals of Sahih Al-Bukhari
"His saying that i am not afraid that you would commit shirk after me, means that i am not afraid that all of you would commit shirk, because some people did fall into shirk, may Allah Protect us from that. This hadith contains miracles of the Prophet Muhammad (
[FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) and that is why Bukhari mentioned it in the Book of Signs of Prophethood".

Then ibn Hajr explained this in the Book of Signs of Prophethood of Sahih Al-Bukhari:
[/FONT]
"His saying that I am afraid that you will start competing for (the pleasures of) this world: It contains warning of what will happen [in the future] and it came to pass as he said; they started having many conquests and victories till such a time that they started envying each other and fighting each other (for worldly gains) as can be seen and felt by anyone. This bears witness to truth of what the Prophet Muhammad ([FONT=&quot]صلی [FONT=&quot]اللہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]علیہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وآلہ[/FONT] [FONT=&quot]وسلم[/FONT]) informed. And this hadith also contains the news that he is their 'farat' i.e. predecessor (i.e. he would die earlier than them? (allahu a'alam) or that he would be before them at the Kawthar pond, as in the other hadith] and it came to pass, and that the his Companions would not commit shirk after him and that came to pass ...."[/FONT]

So the scholars are unanimous that this hadith addresses the Companions who were present at the time, not everyone who believed in him at the time (as some apostated later), and of course not the whole of his Ummah.


You have Quoted Imam Nawawi and Ibn e Hajr!

Didn't you!

Only Two Scholars!

And You call it UNANIMOUS!

How about conclusion "Hadith adresses the companions who were present at that time"!

Who said it?

Imam Nanawi or Ibne Hajr!

Or YOU said it!
 

habib22

MPA (400+ posts)
MR. SUPER MODERATOR, I WOULD LIKE TO BRING YOUR ATTENTION ON THESE KIND OF POST FROM PAKISTANI 1947 SUCH AS
What is shirk (شرک کیا ہے) ?

PLEASE BAND THIS FORM FOR CONTROVERSIAL RELIGIOUS DISCUSSIONS FOR SPREADING HATE
OTHERWISE I CAN WRITE A VERY OPEN AND HARD ANSWER WITCH WILL LEAD TO MORE MORE CONTROVERSIES , IF YOU WANT THIS FORUM TO DIE DOWN BECAUSE OF THE PEOPLES SUCH AS , THEN YOU ALLOW THESE TO POST THESE KIND OF RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSY WITCH WILL RESULT ONLY THESE FIGHTER AND SO CALLED RELIGIOUS SELF MADE AUTHORITIES WILL BE ON HERE THE REST WILL GO TO SOMEWHERE ELS LIKE PUNJAB RANG.COM OR OTHER SITES
IS THIS FORUM TO SETTLE 1400 YEARS OLD RELIGIOUS ISSUE BY THE SAUDI AGENTS ON THIS FORUM YOU KNOW THAT SAUDI GOVT AND SALFIES SPEND 20% OF THE OIL MONEY WITH THE HELP OF CHURCH AND JEWESS TO CREATE HATE AMONG MUSLIMS SPECIALLY OF PAKISTAN
STOP AND BAND THESE MEMBERS.
 

Pakistani1947

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
For a Muslim, one of the most important obligations is to know the meaning of SHIRK, its seriousness and its different types, so that our Tawheed (belief in the Oneness of Allah) and our Islam may be complete, and our faith may be sound.

In terms of sharee’ah or Islamic terminology, shirk means ascribing a partner or rival to Allah in Lordship (ربوبییہ), worship or in His names and attributes. For example:

(Qur'an 6:14) قُلْ أَغَيْرَ اللَّهِ أَتَّخِذُ وَلِيًّا فَاطِرِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَهُوَ يُطْعِمُ وَلَا يُطْعَمُ ۗ قُلْ إِنِّي أُمِرْتُ أَنْ أَكُونَ أَوَّلَ مَنْ أَسْلَمَ ۖ وَلَا تَكُونَنَّ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
Say: "Shall I take for my protector any other than Allah, the Maker of the heavens and the earth? And He it is that feedeth but is not fed." Say: "Nay! but I am commanded to be the first of those who bow to Allah (in Islam), and be not thou of the company of those who join gods with Allah."
کہہ دو جو الله آُسمانوں اور زمین کا بنانے والا ہے کیا اس کے سوا کسی اور کو اپنا مددگار بناؤں اور وہ سب کو کھلاتا ہے اور اسے کوئی نہیں کھلاتا کہہ دو مجھے تو حکم دیا گیا ہے کہ سب سے پہلے اس کا فرمانبردار ہو جاؤں اور تو ہرگز مشرکوں میں شامل نہ ہو

Above verse (Qur'an 6:14) may be considered to understand that somebody who makes helpers (مددگار) beside Allah (غائب میں) would be considered as if he/she has joined the company of “Mushrikeen”, (الْمُشْرِكِينَ). Note: The term “غائب میں” would be explained in detail later in this thread.

Another verse:
(72:20)
قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَدْعُو رَبِّي وَلَا أُشْرِكُ بِهِ أَحَدًا
Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "I invoke only my Lord (Allah Alone), and I associate none as partners along with Him."
کہہ دو میں تو اپنے رب ہی کو پکارتا ہوں اور اس کے ساتھ کسی کوبھی شریک نہیں کرتا

It is very clear from above verse that invoking (پکارنا) someone other than Allah is SHIRK.

Following is the verse from First Surah of Qur’an:

(Qur'an 1:5)
إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ
It is You we worship and You we ask for help.
ہم تیری ہی عبادت کرتے ہیں اور تجھ ہی سے مدد مانگتے ہیں

There is another verse, (Qur'an 4:82):

أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ الْقُرْآنَ ۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ اللَّهِ لَوَجَدُوا فِيهِ اخْتِلَافًا كَثِيرًا
Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein many a contradiction.
کیا یہ لوگ قرآن میں غور نہیں کرتے اور اگر یہ قرآن سوائے الله کے کسی اور کی طرف سے ہوتا تو وہ اس میں بہت اختلاف پاتے

If first Sarah of Qur’an says “اور تجھ ہی سے مدد مانگتے ہیں” then you will not find any other Surah till end of Qur’an where you can prove “یا علی مدد” or “یا شیخ عبدالقادر جیلانی مدد” because as per above verse 4:82, “اور اگر یہ قرآن سوائے الله کے کسی اور کی طرف سے ہوتا تو وہ اس میں بہت اختلاف پاتے”. In verse 1:5, it is categorically denied to ask help (غائب میں) anybody accept Allah, (غائب میں مدد = دعا).

Now, try to understand with an example, if you are sitting in front of me and I say to you “please help me bringing drinking water for me”, then you becomes physical source/ physical means, “Asbab” (اسباب), to help me and hence it is NOT SHIRK, read the following verse, (Qur'an 5:2), click here for complete verse with translation:

"اور آپس میں نیک کام اور پرہیز گاری پر مدد کرو اورگناہ اور ظلم پر مدد نہ کرو" (Qur'an 5:2)

For physical means (ظاہری اسباب), Prophet Muhammad ﷺ asked his companions (صحابہ کرام) for help. Also, for physical means (ظاہری اسباب), Prophet Essa (عَلَيْهِ ٱلسَّلَامُ) asked for help from his companions, as per (Qur'an 3:52) (Note: for complete verse with translation, click here):

"جب عیسیٰ نے بنی اسرائیل کاکفر معلوم کیا تو کہاکہ الله کی راہ میں کون میرا مددگار ہے حواریو ں نے کہا ہم الله کے دین کی مدد کرنے والے"

Now, if the person I just asked for drinking water, is actually in Baghdad or is buried inside a grave in Baghdad, then if I repeat the same sentence, while I am in Pakistan, the same sentence, “Give me drinking water” will become SHIRK. Because now I am calling that person in “Ghaib” (غائب). Hence the appropriate translation of ‘’ وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ’ becomes “دعا صرف اللہ ہی سے ہے”- we call only Allah for help, in “Ghaib” (غائب).

Let’s consider the following verse, which was revealed specifically for the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, (Qur'an 66:4) Note: complete verse with translation click here) :

اور اگر پیغمبر (کی ایذا) پر باہم اعانت کرو گی تو خدا اور جبریل اور نیک کردار مسلمان ان کے حامی (اور دوستدار) ہیں۔ اور ان کے علاوہ (اور) فرشتے بھی مددگار ہیں

Here Allah tells (interpretation of meaning) that Allah and Jibrael, and righteous of the believers (نیک کردار مسلمان) are helpers (مددگار) of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Prophet Muhammad ﷺ always called Allah directly (for help) and never said (“یا جبریل مدد” (أستغفر الله or never called (for help) his Saheed uncle [(یا حمزا مدد (أستغفر الله] although he (رضي الله عنه) was among the righteous of the believers.

It’s mean that Allah has attached Jibrael and righteous of the believers (نیک کردار مسلمان) to help Prophet Muhammad ﷺ with His authority, and these believers were ready to die upon any order of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

Now consider another verse, (Qur'an 8:9) Note: complete verse with translation click here):

"جب تم اپنے رب سے فریاد کر رہے تھے اس نے جواب میں فرمایا کہ میں تمہاری مدد کے لیے پے درپے ایک ہزار فرشتے بھیج رہا ہوں"


Did Prophet Muhammad ﷺ called Angels for help [ (یا جبریل مدد (أستغفر الله]? No, not at all, he ﷺ, according to above verse, only called Allah for help. In response, Allah send Angels to help him. But if someone calls Angels directly for help, it becomes SHIRK. Calling for help in “Ghaib” is only for Allah (پکارنا صرف اللہ کے لئے ہے), Ya Allah Madad (یا الله مدد) NOT [یا علی مدد )أستغفر الله)] NOT [یا غوث اعظم مدد (أستغفر الله)].

I have sufficiently enough explained that Sahabah e Karam were there to help Prophet Muhammad ﷺ in physical means (ظاہری اسباب), still someone would say that according to Sahih Bukhari (2942) and Sahih Muslim (6223), Prophet Muhammad ﷺ called Ali (رضي الله عنه) for help during Ghazwa e Khyber (غزوہ خیبر). Here, it is very clear that Prophet Muhammad ﷺ called Ali (رضي الله عنه) for physical means (ظاہری اسباب). Prophet Muhammad ﷺ did not called Ali (رضي الله عنه) in Ghaib (غائب) as he (رضي الله عنه) was in front of him ﷺ. To call anybody except Allah in Ghaib (غائب) is SHIRK, that is why, Prophet Muhammad ﷺ did not called (for help) his uncle, Hamza (رضي الله عنه), who was a great warrior and was Shaheed during Ghazwa e Ahad (غزوہ احد).

If Ali (رضي الله عنه) were alive and standing in front of us today, then we would not hesitate to ask Ali (رضي الله عنه) for help. Since Ali (رضي الله عنه) was Shaheed and now is in Alam e Barzukh (عالم برزخ) and has no contact with this world, if we ask help from him now it becomes pure SHIRK and a Unforgivable Sin. اَللَّهُمَّ أَجِرْنِي مِنَ النَّارِ.

At the end I would like to make it clear that it is not a matter of debate whether Ali (رضي الله عنه) or Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani are capable to help anyone now or not. Assuming, even if they were capable to help , it would be SHIRK to call them in Duaa (دعا) because دعا صرف اللہ کے لیے ہے . Why? Let's consider following example:

Who brings the rain? Allah
Whose duty is that? Angels
Are we going to pray for rain, from Allah or Angels? Obviously, Allah.

If somebody start pray Angels to bring rain then it is violation of verse “وَإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ” and hence pure SHIRK.

Allah says in Qur’an:

(Qur'an 2:186) وَإِذَا سَأَلَكَ عِبَادِي عَنِّي فَإِنِّي قَرِيبٌ ۖ أُجِيبُ دَعْوَةَ الدَّاعِ إِذَا دَعَانِ ۖ فَلْيَسْتَجِيبُوا لِي وَلْيُؤْمِنُوا بِي لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْشُدُونَ
And when My servants ask you, [O Muhammad], concerning Me - indeed I am near. I respond to the invocation of the supplicant when he calls upon Me. So let them respond to Me [by obedience] and believe in Me that they may be [rightly] guided.
اور جب آپ سےمیرے بندے میرے متعلق سوال کریں تو میں نزدیک ہوں دعا کرنے والے کی دعا قبول کرتا ہوں جب وہ مجھے پکارتا ہے پھر چاہیئے کہ میرا حکم مانیں اور مجھ پر ایمان لائیں تاکہ وہ ہدایت پائیں

Allah never put any protocol in place (الله نے کبھی کوئی پروٹوکول نہیں رکھا).
He (الله) says, I (الله) respond to the invocation (پکار) of the supplicant (دعا) when he calls upon Me (الله).
 

Pakistani1947

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Sahih Muslim - 2010 - Islam360
کتاب:کتاب: جمعہ کے احکام و مسائل
باب:نماز جمعہ اور خطبے میں تخفیف

حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ وَمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ نُمَيْرٍ قَالَا حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ عَنْ سُفْيَانَ عَنْ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ بْنِ رُفَيْعٍ عَنْ تَمِيمِ بْنِ طَرَفَةَ عَنْ عَدِيِّ بْنِ حَاتِمٍ أَنَّ رَجُلًا خَطَبَ عِنْدَ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَقَالَ مَنْ يُطِعْ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ فَقَدْ رَشَدَ وَمَنْ يَعْصِهِمَا فَقَدْ غَوَى فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِئْسَ الْخَطِيبُ أَنْتَ قُلْ وَمَنْ يَعْصِ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ قَالَ ابْنُ نُمَيْرٍ فَقَدْ غَوِيَ

ابو بکر بن ابی شیبہ اور محمد بن عبداللہ بن نمیر نے کہا : ہمیں وکیع نے سفیان سے حدیث بیان کی ، انھوں نے عبدالعزیز بن رفیع سے ، انھوں نے تمیم بن طرفہ سے اور انھوں نے حضرت عدی بن حاتم رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہ سے روایت کی کہ ایک شخص نے رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کے سامنے خطبہ دیا اور ( اس میں ) کہا : جو اللہ اور اس کے رسو ل کی اطاعت کرتاہے اس نے رشدوہدایت پالی اور جو ان
دونوں کی نافرمانی کرتاہے وہ بھٹک گیا ۔ اس پر رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے فرمایا : تو بُرا خطیب ہے ، ( فقرے کے پہلے حصے کی طرح ) یوں کہو ، جس نے اللہ کی اور اس کے ر سول کی نافرمانی کی ( وہ گمراہ ہوا ۔ )
ابن نمیر کی ر وایت میں غوي ( واہ کے نیچے زیر ) ہے ۔​

Lesson Learned:
Khateeb said: جو ان دونوں کی نافرمانی کرتاہے وہ بھٹک گیا
Prophet ﷺ corrected him with wording: جس نے الله کی اور اس کے ر سولﷺ کی نافرمانی کی
Prophet ﷺ disapprove word "ان دونوں" for الله کی اور اس کے ر سولﷺ
How sensitive Prophet Muhammad ﷺ in the matter of using appropriate words because when so say word "both" (ان دونوں) for Allah and Rasool ﷺ than you are equating Allah and Rasool (أستغفر الله)
 

Back
Top