I dont think its fair to blame Geo or anyone, he is pretty much right. Not just in Pakistan but anywhere in the world an evidence must be admissible. If its not a direct evidence it is only considered a "Hearsay". Im pretty sure the folks in PTI understand this and they will focus on providing direct evidence or the evidence supporting the book and other articles published in other newspaper. Having said that Panama Papers are significant evidence unless some one challenges their health(which aint possible I think) IMHO Shareef's can only get away if:
1- They provide refutable evidence of their income and money trail
2- Raise enough doubts in litigation that lead SC to declare the case to vague to continue (Just like Kh.Asif vs Usman Dar where they admitted irregularities but gave KH Asif benefit of so called doubt)
In either case, if PTI loses this case, It wont be IK who loses it will be Pakistan who lose it and our next generations will be destined to serve these two dynasty. I feel gutted as I type this last line.
Allah meray Mulk per rahm keray Ameen
This moron on Jew trying to teist the facts. PTI also submitted account details and NAB investigating reports to SC. Jew group at their best to save their financier.