Would moderators explain these rules

Status
Not open for further replies.

samar

Minister (2k+ posts)
1-Why a thread which is not abusing any religious personality is closed and threads attacking ,abusing religious personalities not closed ???????????

2-All threads against wahabi/Deobandi/tableeghi are quickly deleted ,merged ore closed so that no one can see their short comings.why ??????

3-All threads against Awlia Allah /Barelvi/sunni/ are well protected even if they spread religious hatred , even if they are spreading sectarian hatred ,even if they are abusing religious figures without any proof, why ????????

4-Where do the rules go when the situation is in favor of wahabies/deobandies/tableeghies etc. and brelvies/sunnies are targetted ?????

5-Why its allowed to abuse barelvi/sunni alims and religious figures but when a tableeghi/wahabi/or deobandi is targetted then it becomes a sin ??????

6-Why wrong statements which expose wahabies/deobandies/tableeghies are merged under other threads so that no one can find them out, but on the other hand threads against sunni/barelvies are well protected and no notice is taken even if reported against the rules of the forum.


I think the moderators should explain why this is so and what specific rule set is followed to protect wahabi/deobandi threads.

If anyone has guts then please have courage in an open debate instead of teaming with the moderators.

In the recent threads Dr. Tahir ul qadri clearly exposes how Dr. Zakir Naik misquoted a Bukhari sharif Hadyt to justify jannat for yazeed l.a.

But no one had the guts to prove Dr. Qadri wrong ore accept the reality by reason, instead some people only showed their family.

In another thread Professor Ahmad rafiq Akhter pointed out some weaknesses in tableeghi brothers .............. instead of giving a reasonable or logical answer cheap mentality people started targeting personalities.


why such stupid people are allowed to use such abusive words against a religious personality.

Its a matter of great shame that these cheap mentality people have every right to abuse any religious figure (only barelvi/sunni) and their comment is not deleted, not even edited if reported, but when i reply these cheap people i get a warning why ???????????????

Under which law this action is justified plz answer this moderators ??????????
 

Adeel

Founder
Our basic rule is to avoid sectarian debates as much as possible. Our aim is to unite Pakistanis, not divide but still sometimes moderators let some threads go.

I'm emailing this thread to all the moderators and whoever is dealing with those threads will respond.
 

samar

Minister (2k+ posts)
Our basic rule is to avoid sectarian debates as much as possible. Our aim is to unite Pakistanis, not divide but still sometimes moderators let some threads go.

I'm emailing this thread to all the moderators and whoever is dealing with those threads will respond.


I agree with that rule what i disagree with is that it is only used to suppress/defame/abuse a particular school of thought and to protect/promote/safeguard a particular school of thought.
 

Adeel

Founder
I agree with that rule what i disagree with is that it is only used to suppress/defame/abuse a particular school of thought and to protect/promote/safeguard a particular school of thought.

Believe me there is no such thing in our mind. Please tell us which of your thread was deleted and by whome? You get a notification once a thread gets deleted.
 

mir_imran

Citizen
my dear brother i would like to mentioned here about tahir ul qadri and DR zakir naik ...why tahir ul qadri dint accept the open challenge from DR zakir naik to debate on this matter openely , why tahir ul qadri and other scholars started giving their arguments after 10th day of dr zakir speeh......as we know HAQ baat chupanay ma dare nhi kernee ciya..
 

NO FEAR

Banned
wahabi/Deobandi/tableeghi/ Barelvi/sunni/

Ahhhhhh , where is Muslim.
Allah and His Prophet(pubh) give only one name to their true followers ,( A Muslim).

Plz come out from your narrow mind
 

Joker

Minister (2k+ posts)
wahabi/Deobandi/tableeghi/ Barelvi/sunni/

Ahhhhhh , where is Muslim.
Allah and His Prophet(pubh) give only one name to their true followers ,( A Muslim).

Plz come out from your narrow mind
Why those narrow minded people feel inferiority complex to introduce themselves as a Muslim, Name which is given by Allah(SWT) and Prophet Muhammad(PBUH).
 

samar

Minister (2k+ posts)
Believe me there is no such thing in our mind. Please tell us which of your thread was deleted and by whome? You get a notification once a thread gets deleted.

I cannot remember all but i would share some threads which faced this special treatment apart from many posts.

1-Verdict of two renowned scholars on a sensitive issue
this thread has been merged with an old finished thread in with a different title in order to safeguard Zakir Naik.
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?34692-Official-reply-by-dr-zakir-naik-on-karbala-amp-yazid&p=308117&viewfull=1#post308117
You can see the difference in attitude here these two are totally different threads but this thread was converted to a post intentionally so that nobody can see that Zakir Naik misquoted Bukhari sharif hadyt.

And you can see how cleverly the thread was merged with a thread which was already closed to safeguard Zakir Naik.
Secondly why i was not informed about it ,i did not get any mail whatsoever about this action.
If you are sincere enough its not difficult to find out who did it if one has admin rights.
Plz share with us this cheap culprit.

2-Another thread regarding wahabi extremist financed by america in which Hillary Clinton exposed them was removed from religious section to India /International siasat by waseem Why ????

3-why this thread was closed in the name of sectarian debate
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?53736-Professor-Ahmad-Rafiq-Akhtar-answering-Imran-khan-s-Question

according to one of moderators Communicator mentioning forum rules http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?53736-Professor-Ahmad-Rafiq-Akhtar-answering-Imran-khan-s-Question&p=305663&viewfull=1#post305663

Please dare to ask him about forum rules applicability on the thread 'What is shirk' http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?52519-What-is-shirk-(%26%231588;%26%231585;%26%231705;-%26%231705;%26%231740;%26%231575;-%26%231729;%26%231746;) which is tolerated here on forum for about 3-4 weeks.....i had reported it that it is against forum rules but no action taken plz explain why ????????????????????

4-What would you say about this thread i also reported this one that it would promote sectarian hatred but no action taken against it why ?????????????????
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?53559-Christmas-Greetings-to-Milad-People-By-SAMEEN-AHMED-KHAN

5-I also reported this thread which is totally against a sect and also targetting a religious figure http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?53487-Merey-Pir-Dee-Har-Dam-Khar-(manqabt)

why was this thread not deleted or closed or merged ???????????????
Plz explain.

6-Another thread in which zakir Naik says against partition of India was removed why ???????????

7-Another post "Importance of Adab e Mustafa s.a.w" http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?52519-What-is-shirk-(%26%231588%3B%26%231585%3B%26%231705%3B-%26%231705%3B%26%231740%3B%26%231575%3B-%26%231729%3B%26%231746%3B)&p=294717&viewfull=1#post294717 was merged under "what is shirk" why ??????????????

this was totally a different topic but still the thread was converted to a post so that people might not see it.

If you are fair enough please explain why this happened ?????????

8-Another thread of mine "A renowned scholar provoking people to attack Milaad events."http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?52519-What-is-shirk-(%26%231588%3B%26%231585%3B%26%231705%3B-%26%231705%3B%26%231740%3B%26%231575%3B-%26%231729%3B%26%231746%3B)&p=294720&viewfull=1#post294720

was converted to a post in the thread "what is shirk " it had nothing to do with shirk but the same tactics were used to hide this from the viewer.
plz explain why this post was merged with a thread which targeted a sect (barelvies) which is against your rules of the forum.

In my view this was used to promote the thread against brelvies and hide or stop threads against wahabies /deobandies.
if you have any other reason do share that.

Mr Adeel if you are sincere enough then you should know about this. I hope you would take proper action about it and expose the culprit behind this.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear friends,

I think mods should not close threads nor remove posts but remove abusive material from the posts and warn the offender and if one does not learn then set three ban periods to give them maximum 3 chance before banning such people permanently.

We cannot solve problems by suppressing the issues that divide us rather we should discuss them till we are done and then we will end up united once the truth becomes appearant.

Also no point in unity with animosity in minds against each other. Internet is good thing to help people know the truth about things because it is not easy to control it. Let things find there own equilirium.

Here we have seen people accepting the truth that is why they change their minds about things or each other or their beliefs. So let people who have questions raise questions and let those who want to answer, answer them so that this interactions produces some worthwhile results.

regards and all the best
 

dukelondon

Senator (1k+ posts)
I have noticed that anything against Wahabis like Zakir Naik, Israr Ahmed is not tolerated on this forum. Every one is free to criticize Shaikh-ul-Islam Dr. Tahir-ul-Qadri but when we criticize Zakir Naik and Israr Ahmed, people become all emotional as if they are Prophets or something. Most moderators on this forum are good, balanced people but one can see a couple of moderators' inclination towards Zakir Naik and Israr Ahmed.
 
Last edited:

Veila Mast

Senator (1k+ posts)
my dear brother i would like to mentioned here about tahir ul qadri and DR zakir naik ...why tahir ul qadri dint accept the open challenge from DR zakir naik to debate on this matter openely , why tahir ul qadri and other scholars started giving their arguments after 10th day of dr zakir speeh......as we know HAQ baat chupanay ma dare nhi kernee ciya..

Open Challenge!!!!

Wow man!

Will Dr. Zakir Nayak accept my challenge?

Get him over here and In Sha Allah we shall sort him out.

Kiya Ishq Nay Samjha Hai, Kiya Husn Nay Jana Hai

Hum Khaak Nasheno Ki Thokar Main Zamana Hai!
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Why those narrow minded people feel inferiority complex to introduce themselves as a Muslim, Name which is given by Allah(SWT) and Prophet Muhammad(PBUH).

Dear ak, let us not go there because that is not possible at the moment rather we can challenge people to reflect on their individual beliefs in light of the quran and the hadith.

All sects are wrong here and there and all are right here and there, the point is to see which of them can justify their individual beliefs in light of proper context of the quran.

It is very wrong of anyone to think that wahabies or deobandies are brelavies or shias or sunnies etc etc are totally wrong. Thanks to all of these that we still have the original whole islam in tact with us. We find one is sticking to one very important part of islam the while the other to another part. This is how we have all the parts of islam but the question is, how to get all parts together to make one whole islam that works as one unit or a system? This is where debate and discussion is needed and moving and that is what will help us unite. It is going to be a bit of bumpy ride to begin with but gradually people will learn how to talk once they realise that we are all sincere people and just want to know the truth so that we are comfortable with it as well as united.

This is going to take time but let us give it a push in the right direction.

regards and all the best.
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Although I dont hate any sect and would extend a friendly hand to every body but I too have noticed that a certain sect is being promoted and the other being oppressed with fake propoganda. When the oppressed people reply with Islamic evidence for their beliefs than they start abusive behaviour instead of replying. The thread then gets closed when the extremists like Pakistani 1947 have no reply. This itself is a sign of acceptance of mental defeat in the debates by some mods and members.

They have no replies when their beliefs are questioned and instead of justifying their beliefs they change the topic to another issue. I laugh when they say that they are following Quran and Sunna. Actually its their own man made interpretation that they call Quran and Sunna.
 
Last edited:

canadian

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Believe me there is no such thing in our mind. Please tell us which of your thread was deleted and by whome? You get a notification once a thread gets deleted.

They will never unite be it Religion,politics or anything else .That's our National Tragedy.They have not learned how to agree to disagree and perhaps that's the reason we are in this deep pit.May Almighty forgive us.
 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Open Challenge!!!!

Wow man!

Will Dr. Zakir Nayak accept my challenge?

Get him over here and In Sha Allah we shall sort him out.

Kiya Ishq Nay Samjha Hai, Kiya Husn Nay Jana Hai

Hum Khaak Nasheno Ki Thokar Main Zamana Hai!


No need to challenge him. Only tell him to keep his sons and grand sons name Yazeed because he tells that he is jannati. Every one who tells that yazeed is jannati can name his son and grandson yazeed.

 

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
CHEEKO bro thread

SUFI MUSIC ----- Whats the reality?



has also been closed.,.....


Cefspan sir what was the reason told to you by mods. They would have told that it has become sectarian. Instead of taking action against the members who were posting sectarian hate material the mod closed the thread. It is unbelievable. It shows how the mods take the side of the extremists against the peaceful muslims.
 

Pakistani1947

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Why muslims are we so divided

Muslims can be united ONLY AND ONLY IF they accept to follow Qur'aan and Sunnah pbuh.

I would request the moderators to add a rule to all Islamic posts that nobody shall quote anything outside Qur'aan and Sihah Sitta Books.

The Six Authentic Hadeeth Books (Sihah Sitta) are:

- Sahih al-Bukhari
- Sahih Muslim
- Sunan an-Nasa'i al-Sughra
- Sunan Abu Dawood
- Sunan al-Tirmidhi
- Sunan ibn Majah

Now, I am posting here my earlier post on this forum:

WHY ARE WE SO DIVIDED?

... Because of Shirk, innovations and leaving the Sunnah


All Praise is for Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) Lord of all the creation and May His peace and Blessings be upon is last Prophet Muhammad (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) and upon the Prophet's (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) family and upon the companions and on all those who follow the path of guidance until the last day.
We saw in last weeks issue that without doubt the Muslim Ummah is in a divided and fragmented state and that this division is prohibited in Islam. Rather Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has enjoined upon us to hold onto the rope of Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala), which we established is the Qur'an and the Sunnah as understood by the Companions. But how did we reach this state in the first place, what causes disunity?
Shirk - Associating partners in worship with Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala)
Without doubt one of the major causes for people splitting up the religion and leaving holding on to the rope of Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) is shirk. This is the grave sin of ascribing partners with Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) in worship. Today throughout the world there are numerous examples of shirk amongst the Ummah, such as those who call upon the dead in the grave. Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"And invoke not besides Allah anything that will neither profit you nor hurt you, but if (in case) you did so, you shall certainly be one of the Dhal (polytheists and wrong-doers)." [Surah Yoonus 10:106]
Verily Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has created us to worship Him alone, as He (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"And I (Allah) created not the jinn and mankind except that they should worship Me (Alone)." [Surah adh-Dhaariyaat 51:56]
So the one who gives worship to other than Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has he not committed the most severe sin. Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"Verily! Allah forgives not (the sin of) setting up partners (in worship) with Him, but He forgives whom He wills sins other than that." [Surah an-Nisaa 4:116]
It is reported that Ibn Masood (radhi-Allaahu 'anhu) asked the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam):
"Which is the Greatest sin?" The Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) said: "That you set up a rival for Allah, While He is the one who created you." [Bukhaaree]
O noble reader it will not be hidden from you that throughout the world Muslims are stooped in such practices of calling upon the dead saint in the grave, asking him to remove their difficulty whether it be Abdul Qaadir al Jeelanee or al Badawee or other people who's graves have been made places of worship. How can unity be achieved amongst the Muslims when some Muslims cannot unify their worship for Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) alone? O noble reader consider the following, how many Muslims:
Wear Amulets and charms, despite the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) saying:
"Whoever wears an amulet has committed shirk."
[Ahmad]

Read astrology in magazines or go to fortune tellers, despite the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) saying:

"Whoever goes to a fortune-teller and asks him something and believes in his words, will have his prayers rejected for forty days." [Muslim]
So while all these non-Islaamic beliefs and practices are present amongst the Muslims how can unity take place? Is not our first obligation to give da'wah to those Muslims who are stooped in these practices? Thereby calling to tawheed as all 124,000 Prophets from Aadam (alayhi-salam) to the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) did. They all began their call to the people with Tawheed - worshipping Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) alone.

Having incorrect beliefs

Another major reason for disunity is the wide range of beliefs prevalent amongst the Muslims. Despite us having the same Qur'an and the same Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam), Muslims still have different beliefs. Why is this? If we all are referring back to the Qur'an and the Sunnah in every matter then why the differences. Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"(And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam), if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. That is better and more suitable for final determination." [Surah an-Nisaa 4:59]
So verily O noble reader, imagine if every Muslim acted upon this ayah - would there be any differences then? NO, except maybe in the issues of fiqh, such as the prayer. But our beliefs and methodology would be one, so why is this not the case? It is because many Muslims today do not refer every issue back to Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) and His Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam), rather they ask their local Imaam or their parents or refer it back to their madhab.
Know O noble reader that the first thing that all the Prophets called to was the rectification of the beliefs, before calling to the Islaamic state or to Jihad, the first thing was purifying the beliefs of the Muslim. So how can we have unity while there are Muslims who believe:
That Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) is everywhere, despite Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) saying:
"They fear their Lord Who is above them, and they do what they are commanded." [Surah an-Nahl 16:50]
That the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) was not human and was made from light, despite Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) saying:
"Say (O Muhammad sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam): 'I am only a human being like you. It is revealed to me that your Ilaah (God worthy of being worshipped) is One Ilaah (God)." [Surah Fussilat 41:6]
That the saying of an Imaam should be acted upon over the hadeeth, despite Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) saying:
"And let those who oppose the Messenger's (Muhammad sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) commandment (i.e. his Sunnah) beware, lest some Fitnah (trials i.e. shirk) should befall them or a painful torment be inflicted on them." [Surah an-Noor 24:63]
That Imaan does not increase or decrease, despite the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) saying:
"Imaan has seventy odd or sixty odd branches. The most virtuous of them is the statement, 'There is none worthy of worship except Allah, and the slightest of them is to remove something harmful from the road. And hayaa is a branch of Imaan." [Bukhaaree and Muslim]

Bid'ah - Innovations in the religion

Another cause for disunity and not holding fast to the rope of Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) is the occurrence of innovations in this Ummah.
Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has informed us in the Qur'an that He has completed this religion of Islam for us as He (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion." [Surah al-Maa'idah, 5:3]
Since the religion is complete how can it be that we need to add new things and ways of worship to Islam? Whatever was not part of the religion at the time of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) cannot be accepted as a part of the religion now. The Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) has warned us against adding new things to the religion when he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) said:
"Whoever Innovates in this affair of ours that which is not from it will have it rejected." [Muslim]

The people who propose unity at all costs have a saying that 'An innovation that unites us is better than a Sunnah which divides'.

SubhanAllaah look at such a statement O noble reader, innovations are grave and serious and a cause for entering the fire as he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) said:
"... and every innovation is misguidance and all misguidance is in the Hellfire." [Reported by an-Nasaa'ee (1/224)]
So if someone said to you look there is a fire over there, lets all hold hands and unify and then go in to it, you would think they were crazy! So how can we come together upon something as dangerous as innovations, such as the innovations of mystics, who practice all kinds of weird and innovated invocations, which at times involve switching off the lights or chanting one of Allah's name so that after some time what they are chanting is unrecognisable as a name of Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala). Or the innovations of those who take their scholars as 'spiritual leaders' giving their allegiance to them and 'selling' themselves to these 'scholars' obeying everything they say. How O noble reader can unity occur amongst all the Muslims as long as these practices, which have nothing to do with Islam, keep occurring?
Blind following and Partisanship
This is one of the most evil of occurrences today and a major cause for disunity. Muslims are following their madhahab or their scholars over and above the Sunnah of the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) despite Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) saying:
"And whosoever opposes the Messenger (Muhammad sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers' way, We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell - what an evil destination!" [Surah an-Nisaa 4:115]
When you tell Muslims that 'you should do this because it says so in the Qur'an and the Sunnah', they reply 'well that's not what it says in my madhab' or 'that's not what my Shaykh says'. SubhanAllaah, O noble reader why did Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) send us His final Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) if it was not to teach us the religion of Islam.
Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission." [Surah an-Nisaa 4:65]
No Muslim will openly say I am disobeying the Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam), but how many of us ask for the proof on issues of beliefs and practices and look to see what is the truth.
Another problem is the setting up of groups and parties with members, then being loyal only to that party, believing in the beliefs and aims of that party - not questioning it. Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has warned against this:
"And be not of Al-Mushrikoon (polytheists). Of those who split their religion, and became sects, each group rejoicing in that which is with it." [Surah ar-Room 30:31-32]
Setting up groups is a cause for disunity and spreads hatred amongst the Muslims so that a Muslim from one group will not give salaam to a Muslim from another group just because they belong to different groups. Or a group from one masjid will not like Muslims from another masjid to come and pray in their mosque. All this stems from partisanship and it divides the Ummah. Unity will not occur whilst Muslims are in this state rather unity will occur when an end is put to partisanship (hizbiyyah) and Muslims love each other because they are all have the same aims, beliefs and practices.

The Means for Revival

Having looked at the reason why we are so divided, the question now arises as to what the means for reviving this Ummah are. Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has given us the means for the revival of this Ummah, when He (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"Verily! Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is within themselves." [Surah ar-Ra'd 13:11]
The Prophet (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) also said:
"When you involve yourselves in interest bearing business transactions, and you hold on to the tails of cows, and you are pleased with agriculture (i.e. the land) and you abandon making Jihad in the Cause of Allah, Allah will send humiliation down upon you. He will not remove it from you until you return back to your Religion." [Abu Dawood and al-Bayhaqee]
So this humiliation that Muslims are under will not be removed from us until we return back to the religion of Islam. So what is the religion of Islam if not Tawheed, having the correct Aqeedah, worshipping Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) correctly? So should we not start our revival with these issues.
So just as the condition of the Arabs during the Days of Ignorance (Jaahiliyyah) was not rectified except by the coming of their Prophet Muhammad (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) with revelation from the heavens, which aided them in this world and which will save them in the next, then know O noble reader the foundation that the Islamic revival must be built upon in this time, is nothing else but the return to the Qur'an and the Sunnah, as implemented by the noble companions.
We know from the Book of Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) and the Sunnah of His Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) that the way towards realising this revival is only one way, and it is the way which Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) has mentioned in His (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) saying:
"And verily, this is My Straight Path, so follow it, and follow not (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path." [Surah al-An'aam 6:153]
The Messenger of Allah (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) explained this to his Companions. Thus, one day he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) drew a straight line for them on the ground and then drew short lines on the sides of it. Then, while his (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) noble finger moved up and down the straight line, he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) recited the aforementioned verse. Then he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) pointed to the lines that were drawn on the sides of the straight line and said:
"This is the Path of Allah and these are the (other) paths. At the top of each of these (other) ways, there is a devil calling towards it." [Authentic hadeeth, graded in Dhilaal-ul-Jannah fee Takhreej-is Sunnah(16-17)]
Furthermore, Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says:
"And whosoever opposes the Messenger (Muhammad sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) after the right path has been shown clearly to him, and follows other than the believers' way, We shall keep him in the path he has chosen, and burn him in Hell - what an evil destination!" [Surah an-Nisaa 4:115]
In this ayah there is profound and extensive wisdom, for Allah (subhaanahu wa ta'aala), has connected the "the believers' way" to what the Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) came with. The Messenger (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) has (also) indicated this point in the hadeeth about the splitting up of the Ummah into sects. When he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) was asked concerning the saved sect, he (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) responded: "That which (adheres to what) I and my companions are upon today."
What then is the wisdom behind Allah's mentioning of "the believers' way" in this ayah? And what is the significance in the Messenger of Allah's (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) linking of his companions to himself in the previous hadeeth?
The answer is: These noble Companions (radhi-Allaahu 'anhum) were the ones who received the two revelations (i.e. the Qur'an and Sunnah) from the Messenger of Allah (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam), having that explained to them by him (sal-Allaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) directly, without there being any intermediary. They best knew how to implement the Sunnah, so after knowing this O noble reader can any Islaamic revival take place when the way of the Companions (radhi-Allaahu 'anhum) is abandoned and not adhered to, rather No it can not. For us to revive Islam and bring unity to the Muslims we must adopt the way and example of the Noble Companions (radhi-Allaahu 'anhum).
Imaam Maalik (rahima-hullaah) said:
"The latter part of this Ummah will not be rectified except by that which rectified its former part." [ash-Shifaa of Qaadee 'Iyyaadh, (2/676)]
So it will be clear to the reader that the only way to revive the Ummah is to return every affair of the Muslim back to the Qur'an and the Sunnah as understood and implemented by the best generation, the Companions (radhi-Allaahu 'anhum). To believe as they believed, to worship as they worshipped, to look like them, to give da'wah in the way they gave it. Then only will we be united and have a true Islaamic revival.
So dear noble brothers and sisters your Lord (subhaanahu wa ta'aala) says....
"Has not the time come for the hearts of those who believe to be affected by Allah's Reminder (this Qur'an), and that which has been revealed of the truth." [Surah al-Hadeed 57:16]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++

Some related quotes from Qur’aan and Hadeeths:
Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
Such is Allaah, your Lord; His is the kingdom. And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a Qitmeer (the thin membrane over the date stone).
If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call; and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them. And none can inform you (O Muhammad) like Him Who is the All?Knower (of everything
” [Faatir 35:13-14]

Say (O Muhammad): ‘Call upon those — besides Him whom you pretend [to be gods like angels, ‘Eesa (Jesus), ‘Uzayr (Ezra) and others]. They have neither the power to remove the adversity from you nor even to shift it from you to another person.'

Those whom they call upon [like ‘Eesa (Jesus) ? son of Maryam (Mary), ‘Uzayr (Ezra), angel and others] desire (for themselves) means of access to their Lord (Allaah), as to which of them should be the nearest; and they [‘Eesa (Jesus), ‘Uzayr (Ezra), angels and others] hope for His Mercy and fear His Torment. Verily, the Torment of your Lord is (something) to be afraid of!
" [al-Isra’ 17:56-57]


It was narrated that ‘Aa’ishah and ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Abbaas (may Allaah be pleased with them both) said: When death was approaching the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), he put a cloak over his face, and when he felt hot he removed it and said, “May Allaah’s curse be upon the Jews and Christians, for they took the graves of their Prophets as places of worship” – warning against doing what they did. Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 436; Muslim, 529.

And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The most evil of people are those upon whom the Hour will come when they are still alive and those who take graves as places of worship." Narrated by Ahmad, 1/405. It is also narrated by al-Bukhaari in a mu’allaq report in Kitaab al-Fitan, Baab Zuhoor al-Fitan, 7067. Also narrated by Muslim in Kitaab al-Fitan.

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 426: Sahih Bukhari
Narrated 'Aisha:
Um Salama told Allah's Apostle about a church which she had seen in Ethiopia and which was called Mariya. She told him about the pictures which she had seen in it. Allah's Apostle said, "If any righteous pious man dies amongst them, they would build a place of worship at his grave and make these pictures in it; they are the worst creatures in the sight of Allah."

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 428: sahih bukhari
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "May Allah's curse be on the Jews for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets."


Whoever innovates something in this matter of ours (Islam) that is not part of it, will have it rejected." (Narrated by al-Bukhaari and Muslim).

Jabir b. Abdullah said: When Allah's Messenger (may peace he upon him) delivered the sermon, his eyes became red, his voice rose. and his anger increased so that he was like one giving a warning against the enemy and saying:" The enemy has made a morning attack on you and in the evening too." He would also say:" The last Hour and I have been sent like these two." and he would join his forefinger and middle finger; and would further say:" The best of the speech is embodied in the Book of Allah, and the beet of the guidance is the guidance given by Muhammad. And the most evil affairs are their innovations; and every innovation is error." He would further say:, I am more dear to a Muslim even than his self; and he who left behind property that is for his family. and he who dies under debt or leaves children (in helplessness). the responsibility (of paying his debt and bringing up his children) lies on me."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 4: Number 1885.

Or have they partners with Allaah (false gods) who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not ordained?" [al-Shooraa 42:21]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top