Why successfully? What did they achieve… to be honest, it was just simply PM exercising his power in choosing the right ISI chief… Army had overlooked it and now they have agreedThey appeared to be still using that policy quite successfully as we have witnessed with ISI Chief Saga...
Why successfully? What did they achieve… to be honest, it was just simply PM exercising his power in choosing the right ISI chief… Army had overlooked it and now they have agreed
It was more of an attempt to make it look like a horror show by the journo-prostitutes in this country. All military officers who reach the rank of a Major general are competent to take on the job of any corps, ISI chief or finally the COAS. The ISI chief is giving almost daily briefings in times of need and the PM should feel comfortable with the officer. The 'toads' of haramkhor pimps of Amritsar tried to make it look like the ISI chief was going to assume office of the PM and the ganjas would be 'enthroned' and made the 'Amirul Momineen. It was a lousy charade by pygmies . It flopped badly but did cause some joy in the hearts of Indians who were recovering from the beating by China.They appeared to be still using that policy quite successfully as we have witnessed with ISI Chief Saga...
It was more of an attempt to make it look like a horror show by the journo-prostitutes in this country. All military officers who reach the rank of a Major general are competent to take on the job of any corps, ISI chief or finally the COAS. The ISI chief is giving almost daily briefings in times of need and the PM should feel comfortable with the officer. The 'toads' of haramkhor pimps of Amritsar tried to make it look like the ISI chief was going to assume office of the PM and the ganjas would be 'enthroned' and made the 'Amirul Momineen. It was a lousy charade by pygmies . It flopped badly but did cause some joy in the hearts of Indians who were recovering from the beating by China.
Desan, army needs a good civilian administration. Army cannot only rely on weapons or ammunition but it also need social support from its civilian setup. Can this civilian setup support anything? Can this civilian govt run matters without support from army? . Also its army plans which saved us from 20 years of interference from the enemies sitting in neighbour. We may have lost alot but alhamdolillah we are not like many other Muslims countries Iraq and Syria to name a few.
Washington was quite miffed due to Faiz Hameed's triumphant visit to Afghanistan and ended up paying for it in the end, thanks to our subservient army...
Desan, army needs a good civilian administration. Army cannot only rely on weapons or ammunition but it also need social support from its civilian setup. Can this civilian setup support anything? Can this civilian govt run matters without support from army? . Also its army plans which saved us from 20 years of interference from the enemies sitting in neighbour. We may have lost alot but alhamdolillah we are not like many other Muslims countries Iraq and Syria to name a few.
As PM ik has changed many secretaries and IG in lahore alone. Why?
Again I am only trying to understand why do you blame army. What they could do better?