Wake up Pak
(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Once again
There is no Mahdi or Dajjal in Islam. All men made stories inserted by Majoosi of Persia
There is no Mahdi or Dajjal in Islam. All men made stories inserted by Majoosi of Persia
Once again
There is no Mahdi or Dajjal in Islam. All men made stories inserted by Majoosi of Persia
16:89 On the Day when We raise in every community a witness against them, from among them, and bring you as a witness against these. We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submitجو بات کسی کو نا سمجھا سکو اس کا انکار کر دو۔ اسی لیئے پرویز نے اطباع رسولﷺ سے بھی انکار کر دیا کیونکہ اب اللہ کے رسولﷺ اس دنیا میں نہیں لہذا اطباع سے بھی انکار کر دو۔ اگر مانو گے تو حدیث کو بھی ماننا پڑے گا۔
باقی تو سب چھوٹی چیزیں ہیں۔ اسی لیئے ایمان کا تقاضہ ہے کہ اللہ کر رسولﷺ پر ایسا ہی ایمان جیسا اللہ پر ایمان۔ موئی رعایت نہیں۔
اب مان لو کہ تم لوگ ایک غیر مسلم اقلیت ہو قادیانی کی طرح
We all agree that but you have not even replied to what I have mentioned in my previous posts which are all based on Quran only. Quran says all the time to ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. As I have said, if all the things were written in the Quran as explicit as possible then there was no point ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. There are things that are stated clearly and there are things that are not stated clearly or atleast there meaning sometimes become clear after some event happen just like Firoun body example that I have mentioned. I have given enough examples but you can keep repeating the above what you have mentioned like a parrot but not willing to ponder upon the ayahs that I have mentioned. You need to show that you have some bit of intelligence to participate in a healthy discussion.As received
When we tell people that 'we believe the Quran alone is all we need
They will respond by claiming we have denied the sunna of the messenger because God says "obey God and the messenger" in the Quran
And they claim that 'obey God' refers to the Quran, and 'obey the messenger' with the books of Hadith and Sunna
So they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources.
So let's study the phrase 'obey God and the messenger' from a Quranic point of view
The first Observation: The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger'.
Never does it say 'obey the prophet' or 'obey Muhammad'.
It is always 'obey God and the messenger'
So it is important to understand what the term 'messenger' (Rasool) means.
And why God did not say 'obey the prophet (nabi)'?
Muhammad had two status: The status of NUBUWA (prophethood) And the status of RASOOL (messenger)
The status of NUBUWA - the word NUBUWA means 'high or elevated place'.
This means that God has chosen Muhammad, out of all the humans, to communicate with him certain news, prophecies, etc.
So the status of NUBUWA (prophet) means that a human being is communicating with God.
The status of RASOOL - God tells us the status of RASOOL in the Quran:
(5:67) O messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord. And if you do not, then you have not delivered His message...
We see that God clearly tells us the duty of the messenger is to deliver the message of God
God also says: (24:54) ...there is nothing upon the messenger except the clear delivery...
This teaches us that the sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message to the people
So if God did not give Muhammad the 'message', then he would not be called 'messenger' (Rasool).
So God calls him 'Rasool because Muhammad is carrying the 'message'.
What is this message that Muhammad carried? The messenger himself answers this in the Quran:
(6:19) ...this Quran has been inspired me to deliver it to you and whoever it reaches...
All these verses teach us that the duty of a messenger is to deliver the message.
Muhammad - the messenger - is required to send us the Quran
So when God says "obey the messenger" we are essentially obeying the 'message' itself
Another observation: God says in the Quran (4:80) "Whoever obeys the messenger, has obeyed God..."
This means when we obey the messenger - the message - the Quran, we have in reality obeyed God
All these verses teach us that 'obey God and the messenger' is essentially obeying ONE source - the Quran
Let's assume that the Quran tells us "obey God" without mentioning obeying the messenger. How would we do that?
This would mean that God Himself would have to come to earth and give us the Quran directly
This of course is illogical
This is why we are to 'obey God and the messenger' - because God gave Muhammad 'the message' which makes him a messenger'
And the messenger is required to deliver it to humanity.
So this is what 'obey God and the messenger' means from the Quran.
"Obey God and the messenger" is essentially ONE source - the Quran.
We obey the messenger because he has the 'message'.
As received
When we tell people that 'we believe the Quran alone is all we need
They will respond by claiming we have denied the sunna of the messenger because God says "obey God and the messenger" in the Quran
And they claim that 'obey God' refers to the Quran, and 'obey the messenger' with the books of Hadith and Sunna
So they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources.
So let's study the phrase 'obey God and the messenger' from a Quranic point of view
The first Observation: The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger'.
Never does it say 'obey the prophet' or 'obey Muhammad'.
It is always 'obey God and the messenger'
So it is important to understand what the term 'messenger' (Rasool) means.
And why God did not say 'obey the prophet (nabi)'?
Muhammad had two status: The status of NUBUWA (prophethood) And the status of RASOOL (messenger)
The status of NUBUWA - the word NUBUWA means 'high or elevated place'.
This means that God has chosen Muhammad, out of all the humans, to communicate with him certain news, prophecies, etc.
So the status of NUBUWA (prophet) means that a human being is communicating with God.
The status of RASOOL - God tells us the status of RASOOL in the Quran:
(5:67) O messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord. And if you do not, then you have not delivered His message...
We see that God clearly tells us the duty of the messenger is to deliver the message of God
God also says: (24:54) ...there is nothing upon the messenger except the clear delivery...
This teaches us that the sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message to the people
So if God did not give Muhammad the 'message', then he would not be called 'messenger' (Rasool).
So God calls him 'Rasool because Muhammad is carrying the 'message'.
What is this message that Muhammad carried? The messenger himself answers this in the Quran:
(6:19) ...this Quran has been inspired me to deliver it to you and whoever it reaches...
All these verses teach us that the duty of a messenger is to deliver the message.
Muhammad - the messenger - is required to send us the Quran
So when God says "obey the messenger" we are essentially obeying the 'message' itself
Another observation: God says in the Quran (4:80) "Whoever obeys the messenger, has obeyed God..."
This means when we obey the messenger - the message - the Quran, we have in reality obeyed God
All these verses teach us that 'obey God and the messenger' is essentially obeying ONE source - the Quran
Let's assume that the Quran tells us "obey God" without mentioning obeying the messenger. How would we do that?
This would mean that God Himself would have to come to earth and give us the Quran directly
This of course is illogical
This is why we are to 'obey God and the messenger' - because God gave Muhammad 'the message' which makes him a messenger'
And the messenger is required to deliver it to humanity.
So this is what 'obey God and the messenger' means from the Quran.
"Obey God and the messenger" is essentially ONE source - the Quran.
We obey the messenger because he has the 'message'.
Mula sb ne bilkul theek farmaya hai..ملا حافظ عاطف کے مطابق گھوڑا حلال ہے. گھوڑا حلال ہے تو گدھا اور خچر بھی حلال ہوا. وقت کی ضرورت ہے عوام کو بتایا جائے تاکہ خوراک کی کمی کی شکار عوام کو کچھ راحت مل سکے
To be fair, I also don't believe in Taqleed and I don't consider myself Hanfi, Malki, Shafai etc. but only consider myself a Muslim. At the same time I dont put hadiths over Quran. But it has nothing to do with whether you reject all the hadiths or not. The main issue that those who only consider Quran as the source of the deen and rejects all the hadiths, they need to realize few things.
First, all the main/basic beliefs (عقائد) or foundation for the deen can only come from Quran. We cannot use a hadith without its support from Quran for basic/main beliefs. This also include beliefs of all the unseen. So, anyone who is deriving a belief from a hadith without its proper support from Quran, cannot be accepted as something that if you don't believe then you are out of the deen. That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs, although I have mentioned in my previous posts some indirect hints of Quran for the second coming of Jesus and Dajjal. But since those are not clear cut right now (just like Ayahs of Firoun body presevation that was unclear till the 1900s century), so if someone does not understand they still be consider Muslims. However, if someone don't believe in the day of judgement, then he is out of Islam.
Secondly, there are serious consequences of out right denying all the hadiths as follows:
1. From Quran, we get commandments of different religious activities such as salah, fasting, hajj, nikah, etc. and many more but Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths. If you deny all the hadiths, then how are you going to get information about how to perform those activities? Or you will just come up with your own actions for these activities. E.g. just come up with your own actions that you would do to perform salah?
2. Secondly, the only true source of the life events of our prophet PBUH (and his sunnah) are authentic hadiths. If you outright deny all the hadiths, how can you determine, when the prophet was born, at what age his mother died, at what age he became a prophet, when did he performed hijrah, when ghazwa-e-badr, ahud, etc happen and what happen in those ghazwaats? What other events happened in the life of the prophet? By denying hadiths, you are depriving yourself and your children from all the authentic knowledge of the life events of the prophet PBUH and his companions. After denying the hadiths, the life event of the prophet PBUH will merely become a story and after sometime all stories are bound to corrupt (change/alter). Hence, this big treasure of knowledge will eventually be lost. Then Islam will become merely a story and all the proof of authenticity of Islam will be lost, making people easily believe that Quran is nothing but a set of random verses. The reason why we believe that Quran is authentic is because it was something told to us by the prophet Muhammad PBUH (Allah used prophet as a vessel to transfer this knowledge to us but at the end these are words coming out of his mouth) and we consider Muhammad PBUH to be someone who was Sadiq and Ameen based on his documented life events (which are hadiths) and thus consider Quran to be words of Allah swt because the prophet told us that Quran is the words of Allah swt.
Thus, we don't deny all the hadiths but at the same time we don't consider all the hadiths to be authentic. There is a science of how to determine the authenticity of hadiths and many people have worked on it. In the end, the basic concepts about using hadiths are:
- a hadith cannot be the only source of the basic beliefs in Islam. All the main beliefs of Islam come from Quran.
- we only consider a hadith if it does not goes against Quran. If a hadith goes against Quran, we don't consider that hadith.
I hope people who outright deny all the hadiths, would participate in a healthy debate (based on logic) and will reply to the points that I have mentioned instead of just copy/pasting some verses of the Quran saying:
- The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger' - because you cannot conclude that it means you only consider Quran and outright deny all the hadiths. You gave an stupid argument that 'they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources' however it actually does not mean following two different sources because we always obtain the basic/main beliefs of Islam from Quran and all the main commandments from Quran and hadith is only used for explanation. So, the root source of Islam is Quran and hadiths provide merely explanations.
- 5:99 The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺. And Allah ˹fully˺ knows what you reveal and what you conceal. - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths.
-16:89 We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths. If you say that it is mentioned here that Quran is explanation of all things then can you elaborate what does it mean by Quran being "explanation of all things"? Because then if you consider "all things" as literally all the things then it will become very easy to prove Quran wrong, because you will find explanation of many things missing in Quran. So, for this you need to actually understand what "explanation of all things" mean. My explanation is here if you go and read the context (i.e. ayahs before and after) you will come to a conclusion that here Quran is claiming about explaining all things of the unseen.
That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs
Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths.
Wa'Salam Brother.AoA Brother:
No human has the right to declare another human non-Muslim or Jannati or Jahannami. That is for Allah SWT.
Quran doesnt not mention dajjal, mehdi, second coming of jesus etc as basic/main OR non-basic/non-main/secondary beliefs. Allah SWT has repeatedly told us in Quran what He will ask about and how HE will judge us.
Riwaayaat are snippets of conversations "attributed" to our Prophet PBUH - that were recorded many decades after the demise of our Prophet PBUH. They are for sure a valuable historic record. But riwaayaat do not add AND do not take away anything from the deen of Allah SWT. As valuable as they might be, Quran's authenticity does not depend upon Riwaayaat. On the other hand the improper placement of "historical record" and "riwaayaat" has caused a lot of trouble among muslims over centuries.
The source of Sunnah is not riwaayaat or akhbaar-e-ahaad! Sunnah is the set of actions that has been prescribed as part of Deen and propgated en-masse in the muslim community. I have not known anyone in my limited life, that had to open a book of riwaayaat to know how to perform Salah, or Fast, or perform Hajj.
Morever, Islamic law/shariah has been recorded in the books of Fiqh - not in riwaayaat!
Alhamdulillah we still have Quran with us, lets follow it and supplicate to Allah that He takes us in his immense Mercy!
well one of their beliefs is that ata'at of The Holy Prophet is not necessary as he is no longer amongst us. I have asked this question a hundred times but never received an answer if they could prove anything and I mean any thing who our Prophet SAW was? They have no answer. Quran asks you to make Wudu and specifies all the arkaan but they have no idea for what? because anything they cannot prove they outright deny that it a requirement just like namaz and other ibadaatTo be fair, I also don't believe in Taqleed and I don't consider myself Hanfi, Malki, Shafai etc. but only consider myself a Muslim. At the same time I dont put hadiths over Quran. But it has nothing to do with whether you reject all the hadiths or not. The main issue that those who only consider Quran as the source of the deen and rejects all the hadiths, they need to realize few things.
First, all the main/basic beliefs (عقائد) or foundation for the deen can only come from Quran. We cannot use a hadith without its support from Quran for basic/main beliefs. This also include beliefs of all the unseen. So, anyone who is deriving a belief from a hadith without its proper support from Quran, cannot be accepted as something that if you don't believe then you are out of the deen. That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs, although I have mentioned in my previous posts some indirect hints of Quran for the second coming of Jesus and Dajjal. But since those are not clear cut right now (just like Ayahs of Firoun body presevation that was unclear till the 1900s century), so if someone does not understand they still be consider Muslims. However, if someone don't believe in the day of judgement, then he is out of Islam.
Secondly, there are serious consequences of out right denying all the hadiths as follows:
1. From Quran, we get commandments of different religious activities such as salah, fasting, hajj, nikah, etc. and many more but Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths. If you deny all the hadiths, then how are you going to get information about how to perform those activities? Or you will just come up with your own actions for these activities. E.g. just come up with your own actions that you would do to perform salah?
2. Secondly, the only true source of the life events of our prophet PBUH (and his sunnah) are authentic hadiths. If you outright deny all the hadiths, how can you determine, when the prophet was born, at what age his mother died, at what age he became a prophet, when did he performed hijrah, when ghazwa-e-badr, ahud, etc happen and what happen in those ghazwaats? What other events happened in the life of the prophet? By denying hadiths, you are depriving yourself and your children from all the authentic knowledge of the life events of the prophet PBUH and his companions. After denying the hadiths, the life event of the prophet PBUH will merely become a story and after sometime all stories are bound to corrupt (change/alter). Hence, this big treasure of knowledge will eventually be lost. Then Islam will become merely a story and all the proof of authenticity of Islam will be lost, making people easily believe that Quran is nothing but a set of random verses. The reason why we believe that Quran is authentic is because it was something told to us by the prophet Muhammad PBUH (Allah used prophet as a vessel to transfer this knowledge to us but at the end these are words coming out of his mouth) and we consider Muhammad PBUH to be someone who was Sadiq and Ameen based on his documented life events (which are hadiths) and thus consider Quran to be words of Allah swt because the prophet told us that Quran is the words of Allah swt.
Thus, we don't deny all the hadiths but at the same time we don't consider all the hadiths to be authentic. There is a science of how to determine the authenticity of hadiths and many people have worked on it. In the end, the basic concepts about using hadiths are:
- a hadith cannot be the only source of the basic beliefs in Islam. All the main beliefs of Islam come from Quran.
- we only consider a hadith if it does not goes against Quran. If a hadith goes against Quran, we don't consider that hadith.
I hope people who outright deny all the hadiths, would participate in a healthy debate (based on logic) and will reply to the points that I have mentioned instead of just copy/pasting some verses of the Quran saying:
- The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger' - because you cannot conclude that it means you only consider Quran and outright deny all the hadiths. You gave an stupid argument that 'they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources' however it actually does not mean following two different sources because we always obtain the basic/main beliefs of Islam from Quran and all the main commandments from Quran and hadith is only used for explanation. So, the root source of Islam is Quran and hadiths provide merely explanations.
- 5:99 The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺. And Allah ˹fully˺ knows what you reveal and what you conceal. - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths.
-16:89 We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths. If you say that it is mentioned here that Quran is explanation of all things then can you elaborate what does it mean by Quran being "explanation of all things"? Because then if you consider "all things" as literally all the things then it will become very easy to prove Quran wrong, because you will find explanation of many things missing in Quran. So, for this you need to actually understand what "explanation of all things" mean. My explanation is here if you go and read the context (i.e. ayahs before and after) you will come to a conclusion that here Quran is claiming about explaining all things of the unseen.
Mula sb ne bilkul theek farmaya hai..
Your posts make no sense whatsoever. Before you start writing nonsense, you should study the fundamentals of the religion of Islam.We all agree that but you have not even replied to what I have mentioned in my previous posts which are all based on Quran only. Quran says all the time to ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. As I have said, if all the things were written in the Quran as explicit as possible then there was no point ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. There are things that are stated clearly and there are things that are not stated clearly or atleast there meaning sometimes become clear after some event happen just like Firoun body example that I have mentioned. I have given enough examples but you can keep repeating the above what you have mentioned like a parrot but not willing to ponder upon the ayahs that I have mentioned. You need to show that you have some bit of intelligence to participate in a healthy discussion.
Bhai khootha kha sktey hai bus adtein patwarion jesi hu jyw gi.آپ ہی کھوتا کھاو مہم کا آغاز کر دیں
A standard response of below IQ level person who does not have enough brain to engage in a healthy discussion.Your posts make no sense whatsoever. Before you start writing nonsense, you should study the fundamentals of the religion of Islam.
© Copyrights 2008 - 2025 Siasat.pk - All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer|