کیا خدا قرآن میں مہدی اور دجال کا ذکر کرنا بھول گیا؟

karachiwala

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Once again
There is no Mahdi or Dajjal in Islam. All men made stories inserted by Majoosi of Persia
جو بات کسی کو نا سمجھا سکو اس کا انکار کر دو۔ اسی لیئے پرویز نے اطباع رسولﷺ سے بھی انکار کر دیا کیونکہ اب اللہ کے رسولﷺ اس دنیا میں نہیں لہذا اطباع سے بھی انکار کر دو۔ اگر مانو گے تو حدیث کو بھی ماننا پڑے گا۔
باقی تو سب چھوٹی چیزیں ہیں۔ اسی لیئے ایمان کا تقاضہ ہے کہ اللہ کر رسولﷺ پر ایسا ہی ایمان جیسا اللہ پر ایمان۔ موئی رعایت نہیں۔
اب مان لو کہ تم لوگ ایک غیر مسلم اقلیت ہو قادیانی کی طرح
 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
جو بات کسی کو نا سمجھا سکو اس کا انکار کر دو۔ اسی لیئے پرویز نے اطباع رسولﷺ سے بھی انکار کر دیا کیونکہ اب اللہ کے رسولﷺ اس دنیا میں نہیں لہذا اطباع سے بھی انکار کر دو۔ اگر مانو گے تو حدیث کو بھی ماننا پڑے گا۔
باقی تو سب چھوٹی چیزیں ہیں۔ اسی لیئے ایمان کا تقاضہ ہے کہ اللہ کر رسولﷺ پر ایسا ہی ایمان جیسا اللہ پر ایمان۔ موئی رعایت نہیں۔
اب مان لو کہ تم لوگ ایک غیر مسلم اقلیت ہو قادیانی کی طرح
16:89 On the Day when We raise in every community a witness against them, from among them, and bring you as a witness against these. We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit
 

Niazbrohi

Senator (1k+ posts)



ڈاکٹر صاحب اب تو مجھے یقین ہو گیا کہ آپ منکر حدیث ہیں ، میرے سوالوں کا جواب ضرو دیجیئے گا

کیاآپ وضو اور غسل جنابت کرتے ہیں ؟

کیا آپ نماز پڑھتےہیں ؟

کیا آپ روزہ رکھتے ہیں ؟

کیا آپ زکوات نکالتے ہیں نصاب کے ساتھ ؟

کیا آپ نے حج کیا ہوا ہے ؟

کیا آپ کتا کھانے کو حرام سمجھتے ہیں ؟

فی الحال اتنا کافی ہے ، اگر آپ کا جواب ہاں میں ہیں ،تو براء مہربانی یے بھی بتا دیجیئے کہ کس طریقے سے کرتے ہیں ؟ کیونکہ اس کی وظاہت اور طریقہ تو قرآن میں نہیں ہے ! اور حدیثوں کے آپ منکر ہیں ! برادرم آپ اپنے آپ کو بھلیگمراہ کریں لیکن لوگوں کو گمراہ مت کریں اور نہ ہی اپنی عاقبت گندی کریں ، آپ نہ تو تین میں ہیں اور نہ ہی تیرہ میں حضور نبی اکرم ﷺ کی اِطاعت ہی اللہ کی اِطاعت ہے


1۔ یٰٓایُّهَا الَّذِيْنَ آمَنُوْا اَطِيْعُوْا اللهَ وَاَطِيْعُوْا الرَّسُوْلَ وَاُوْلِی الْاَمْرِ مِنْکُمْ فَاِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِيْ شَيْئٍ فَرُدُّوْهُ اِلَی اللهِ وَالرَّسُوْلِ اِنْ کُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُوْنَ بِاللهِ وَالْیَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذٰلِکَ خَيْرٌ وَاَحْسَنُ تَاْوِيْلاً

(النساء، 4 : 59)

’’اے ایمان والو! اللہ کی اطاعت کرو اور رسول( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کرو اوراپنے میں سے (اہلِ حق) صاحبانِ اَمر کی، پھر اگر کسی مسئلہ میں تم باہم اختلاف کرو تو اسے (حتمی فیصلہ کے لئے) اللہ اور رسول( ﷺ ) کی طرف لوٹا دو اگر تم اللہ پر اور یومِ آخرت پر ایمان رکھتے ہو، (تو) یہی (تمہارے حق میں) بہتر اور انجام کے لحاظ سے بہت اچھا ہےo‘‘

2۔ مَنْ یُّطِعِ الرَّسُوْلَ فَقَدْ اَطَاعَ اللهَ ج وَمَنْ تَوَلّٰی فَمَآ اَرْسَلْنَاکَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَفِيْظًا

(النساء، 4 : 80)

’’جس نے رسول( ﷺ ) کا حکم مانا بیشک اس نے اللہ (ہی) کا حکم مانا اور جس نے روگردانی کی تو ہم نے آپ کو ان پر نگہبان بنا کر نہیں بھیجا‘‘

3۔ قُلْ اَطِيْعُوا اللهَ وَ الرَّسُوْلَ ج فَاِنْ تَوَلَّوْا فَاِنَّ اللهَ لاَ یُحِبُّ الْکٰـفِرِيْنَ

(آل عمران، 3 : 22)

’’آپ فرما دیں کہ اللہ اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کرو پھر اگر وہ روگردانی کریں تو اللہ کافروں کو پسند نہیں کرتا‘

4۔ وَاَطِيْعُوا اللهَ وَالرَّسُوْلَ لَعَلَّکُمْ تُرْحَمُوْنَ

(آل عمران، 3 : 22)

’’اور اللہ کی اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی فرمانبرداری کرتے رہو تاکہ تم پر رحم کیا جائے‘

5۔ وَاِذَا قِيْلَ لَهُمْ تَعَالَوْا اِلٰی مَآ اَنْزَلَ اللهُ وَاِلَی الرَّسُوْلِ رَاَيْتَ الْمُنٰـفِقِيْنَ یَصُدُّوْنَ عَنْکَ صُدُوْدًا

(النساء، 4 : 61)

’’اور جب ان سے کہا جاتا ہے کہ اللہ کے نازل کردہ (قرآن) کی طرف اور رسول( ﷺ ) کی طرف آجاؤ تو آپ منافقوں کو دیکھیں گے کہ وہ آپ (کی طرف رجوع کرنے) سے گریزاں رہتے ہیں‘‘

6۔ وَمَا اَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ رَّسُوْلٍ الِاَّ لِیُطَاعَ بِاذْنِ اللهِ۔

(النساء، 4 : 64)

’’اور ہم نے کوئی پیغمبر نہیں بھیجا مگر اس لئے کہ اللہ کے حکم سے اس کی اطاعت کی جائے۔‘‘

7۔ وَمَنْ یُّطِعِ اللهَ وَ الرَّسُوْلَ فَاُولٰٓئِکَ مَعَ الَّذِيْنَ اَنْعَمَ اللهُ عَلَيْهِمْ مِّنَ النَّبِیّٖنَ وَ الصِّدِّيْقِيْنَ وَ الشُّھَدَآء وَ الصّٰلِحِيْنَ ج وَ حَسُنَ اُولٰٓئِکَ رَفِيْقًا

(النساء، 4 : 69)

’’اور جو کوئی اللہ اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کرے تو یہی لوگ (روزِ قیامت) ان (ہستیوں) کے ساتھ ہوں گے جن پر اللہ نے (خاص) انعام فرمایا ہے جو کہ انبیائ، صدیقین، شہداء اور صالحین ہیں اور یہ بہت اچھے ساتھی ہیںo‘‘

8۔ وَاَطِيْعُوا اللهَ وَاَطِيْعُوا الرَّسُوْلَ وَاحْذَرُوْا ج فَاِنْ تَوَ لَّيْتُمْ فَاعْلَمُوْآ اَنَّمَا عَلٰی رَسُوْلِنَا الْبَلٰغُ الْمُبِيْنُ

(المائده، 5 : 92)

’’اور تم اللہ کی اطاعت کرو اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کرو اور (خدا اور رسول ﷺ کی مخالفت سے) بچتے رہو، پھر اگر تم نے روگردانی کی تو جان لو کہ ہمارے رسول ( ﷺ ) پر صرف (اَحکام کا) واضح طور پر پہنچا دینا ہی ہے (اور وہ یہ فریضہ ادا فرما چکے ہیں)‘

9۔ قُلْ اَطِيْعُوااللهَ وَاَطِيْعُوا الرَّسُوْلَ ج فَاِنْ تَوَلَّوْا فَاِنَّمَا عَلَيْهِ مَا حُمِّلَ وَعَلَيْکُمْ مَّا حُمِّلْتُمْ ط وَاِنْ تُطِيْعُوْهُ تَهْتَدُوْا ط وَمَا عَلَی الرَّسُوْلِ اِلَّا الْبَلٰغُ الْمُبِيْنُ

(النور، 24 : 54)

’’فرما دیجئے : تم اللہ کی اطاعت کرو اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کرو، پھر اگر تم نے (اطاعت) سے رُوگردانی کی تو (جان لو) رسول ( ﷺ ) کے ذمہ وہی کچھ ہے جو ان پر لازم کیا گیا اور تمہارے ذمہ وہ ہے جو تم پر لازم کیا گیا ہے، اور اگر تم ان کی اطاعت کرو گے تو ہدایت پا جائو گے، اور رسول ( ﷺ ) پر (احکام کو) صریحاً پہنچا دینے کے سوا (کچھ لازم) نہیں ہےo‘‘

10۔ یٰٓـاَیُّهَا الَّذِيْنَ اٰمَنُوْٓا اَطِيْعُوا اللهَ وَاَطِيْعُوا الرَّسُوْلَ وَلَا تُبْطِلُوْٓا اَعْمَالَکُمْ

(محمد، 47 : 33)

’’اے ایمان والو! تم اللہ کی اطاعت کیا کرو اور رسول ( ﷺ ) کی اطاعت کیا کرو اور اپنے اعمال برباد مت کرو

11۔ اِنَّ الَّذِيْنَ یُبَایِعُوْنَکَ اِنَّمَا یُبَایِعُوْنَ اللهَ ط یَدُ اللهِ فَوْقَ اَيْدِيْھِمْ ج فَمَنْ نَّکَثَ فَاِنَّمَا یَنْکُثُ عَلٰی نَفْسِهٖ ج وَ مَنْ اَوْفٰی بِمَا عٰـھَدَ عَلَيْهُ اللهَ فَسَیُؤْتِيْهِ اَجْرًا عَظِيْمًا

(الفتح، 48 : 10)

’’(اے حبیب!) بے شک جو لوگ آپ سے بیعت کرتے ہیں وہ اللہ ہی سے بیعت کرتے ہیں، ان کے ہاتھوں پر (آپ کے ہاتھ کی صورت میں) اللہ کا ہاتھ ہے۔ پھر جس شخص نے بیعت کو توڑا تو اس کے توڑنے کا وبال اس کی اپنی جان پر ہو گا اور جس نے (اس) بات کو پورا کیا جس (کے پورا کرنے) پر اس نے اللہ سے عہد کیا تھا تو وہ عنقریب اسے بہت بڑا اجر عطا فرمائے گا


وَاَطِيْعُوا اللّٰهَ وَاَطِيْعُوا الرَّسُوْلَ ۚ فَاِنْ تَوَلَّيْتُمْ فَاِنَّمَا عَلٰي رَسُوْلِنَا الْبَلٰغُ الْمُبِيْنُ

اللہ کی اطاعت کرو اور رسول ﷺ کی اطاعت کرو۔ لیکن اگر تم اطاعت سے منہ موڑتے ہو تو ہمارے رسول پر صاف صاف حق پہنچا دینے کے سوا کوئی ذمّہ داری نہیں ہے،

سورہ التغابن ، آیہ ،۱۲)

 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
As received
When we tell people that 'we believe the Quran alone is all we need

They will respond by claiming we have denied the sunna of the messenger because God says "obey God and the messenger" in the Quran

And they claim that 'obey God' refers to the Quran, and 'obey the messenger' with the books of Hadith and Sunna

So they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources.

So let's study the phrase 'obey God and the messenger' from a Quranic point of view

The first Observation: The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger'.

Never does it say 'obey the prophet' or 'obey Muhammad'.

It is always 'obey God and the messenger'
So it is important to understand what the term 'messenger' (Rasool) means.


And why God did not say 'obey the prophet (nabi)'?

Muhammad had two status: The status of NUBUWA (prophethood) And the status of RASOOL (messenger)

The status of NUBUWA - the word NUBUWA means 'high or elevated place'.

This means that God has chosen Muhammad, out of all the humans, to communicate with him certain news, prophecies, etc.

So the status of NUBUWA (prophet) means that a human being is communicating with God.

The status of RASOOL - God tells us the status of RASOOL in the Quran:

(5:67) O messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord. And if you do not, then you have not delivered His message...

We see that God clearly tells us the duty of the messenger is to deliver the message of God

God also says: (24:54) ...there is nothing upon the messenger except the clear delivery...

This teaches us that the sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message to the people

So if God did not give Muhammad the 'message', then he would not be called 'messenger' (Rasool).

So God calls him 'Rasool because Muhammad is carrying the 'message'.

What is this message that Muhammad carried? The messenger himself answers this in the Quran:
(6:19) ...this Quran has been inspired me to deliver it to you and whoever it reaches...


All these verses teach us that the duty of a messenger is to deliver the message.

Muhammad - the messenger - is required to send us the Quran

So when God says "obey the messenger" we are essentially obeying the 'message' itself

Another observation: God says in the Quran (4:80) "Whoever obeys the messenger, has obeyed God..."

This means when we obey the messenger - the message - the Quran, we have in reality obeyed God

All these verses teach us that 'obey God and the messenger' is essentially obeying ONE source - the Quran

Let's assume that the Quran tells us "obey God" without mentioning obeying the messenger. How would we do that?

This would mean that God Himself would have to come to earth and give us the Quran directly

This of course is illogical

This is why we are to 'obey God and the messenger' - because God gave Muhammad 'the message' which makes him a messenger'

And the messenger is required to deliver it to humanity.

So this is what 'obey God and the messenger' means from the Quran.

"Obey God and the messenger" is essentially ONE source - the Quran.

We obey the messenger because he has the 'message'.
 

BeggersForSale

MPA (400+ posts)
As received
When we tell people that 'we believe the Quran alone is all we need

They will respond by claiming we have denied the sunna of the messenger because God says "obey God and the messenger" in the Quran

And they claim that 'obey God' refers to the Quran, and 'obey the messenger' with the books of Hadith and Sunna

So they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources.

So let's study the phrase 'obey God and the messenger' from a Quranic point of view

The first Observation: The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger'.

Never does it say 'obey the prophet' or 'obey Muhammad'.

It is always 'obey God and the messenger'
So it is important to understand what the term 'messenger' (Rasool) means.


And why God did not say 'obey the prophet (nabi)'?

Muhammad had two status: The status of NUBUWA (prophethood) And the status of RASOOL (messenger)

The status of NUBUWA - the word NUBUWA means 'high or elevated place'.

This means that God has chosen Muhammad, out of all the humans, to communicate with him certain news, prophecies, etc.

So the status of NUBUWA (prophet) means that a human being is communicating with God.

The status of RASOOL - God tells us the status of RASOOL in the Quran:

(5:67) O messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord. And if you do not, then you have not delivered His message...

We see that God clearly tells us the duty of the messenger is to deliver the message of God

God also says: (24:54) ...there is nothing upon the messenger except the clear delivery...

This teaches us that the sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message to the people

So if God did not give Muhammad the 'message', then he would not be called 'messenger' (Rasool).

So God calls him 'Rasool because Muhammad is carrying the 'message'.

What is this message that Muhammad carried? The messenger himself answers this in the Quran:
(6:19) ...this Quran has been inspired me to deliver it to you and whoever it reaches...


All these verses teach us that the duty of a messenger is to deliver the message.

Muhammad - the messenger - is required to send us the Quran

So when God says "obey the messenger" we are essentially obeying the 'message' itself

Another observation: God says in the Quran (4:80) "Whoever obeys the messenger, has obeyed God..."

This means when we obey the messenger - the message - the Quran, we have in reality obeyed God

All these verses teach us that 'obey God and the messenger' is essentially obeying ONE source - the Quran

Let's assume that the Quran tells us "obey God" without mentioning obeying the messenger. How would we do that?

This would mean that God Himself would have to come to earth and give us the Quran directly

This of course is illogical

This is why we are to 'obey God and the messenger' - because God gave Muhammad 'the message' which makes him a messenger'

And the messenger is required to deliver it to humanity.

So this is what 'obey God and the messenger' means from the Quran.

"Obey God and the messenger" is essentially ONE source - the Quran.


We obey the messenger because he has the 'message'.
We all agree that but you have not even replied to what I have mentioned in my previous posts which are all based on Quran only. Quran says all the time to ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. As I have said, if all the things were written in the Quran as explicit as possible then there was no point ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. There are things that are stated clearly and there are things that are not stated clearly or atleast there meaning sometimes become clear after some event happen just like Firoun body example that I have mentioned. I have given enough examples but you can keep repeating the above what you have mentioned like a parrot but not willing to ponder upon the ayahs that I have mentioned. You need to show that you have some bit of intelligence to participate in a healthy discussion.
 

Niazbrohi

Senator (1k+ posts)
12342294_1068311949866666_1124860502268700017_n-jpg.15031
 

Niazbrohi

Senator (1k+ posts)
خدا سے محبت اور خدا پر ایمان کادعویٰ بالکل بے معنی ہے، اگر زندگی رسول پاک ﷺ کی پیروی اور اتباعِ سنت سے خالی ہے۔ اللہ نے خود رسول اللہ ﷺ کی زبان سے یہ بات صاف صاف کہلائی ہے ’’آپ لوگوں سے کہہ دیجیے کہ اگر تم واقعی اللہ سے محبت رکھتے ہو تو میری پیروی کرو۔‘‘
رسول اللہ ﷺ کی پیروی ہی دراصل اللہ کی اطاعت ہے۔ رسولؐ کی اتباع سے آزاد اللہ کی اطاعت کا اسلام میں کوئی تصور نہیں ہے۔
اللہ تعالیٰ فرماتا ہے: ’’اور ہم نے رسولوں کو صرف اس لیے بھیجا کہ اللہ کے اذن کے تحت ان کی اطاعت کی جائے۔‘‘ (النساء)
یعنی رسولوں کی بعثت کا مقصد اس کے سوا کچھ نہیں کہ ان کی اطاعت کی جائے۔ حقیقت میں مومن وہی ہے جو بے چون و چرا اللہ کے رسول ﷺ کی اطاعت کرے۔ اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد ہے:
’’تو تمہارے رب کی قسم! وہ مومن نہ ہوںگے جب تک ایسا نہ ہو کہ وہ اپنے نزاعات میں تمہیں اپناحکم بنائیں۔ پھر جو فیصلے تم کرو اس کے سلسلے میں اپنے دل میں کوئی تنگی محسوس نہ کریں اور اپنے آپ کو اس کے حوالے کردیں۔‘‘ (النساء)
دنیا و آخرت کی کامیابی کی راہ صرف یہ ہے کہ بے چون و چرا اللہ اور اس کے رسول ﷺ کی اطاعت اختیار کی جائے اور یہی سچے اہلِ ایمان کی روش ہے۔ سورہ نور میں اللہ تعالیٰ ارشاد فرماتا ہے:
’’اہلِ ایمان کا قول، جبکہ انہیں اللہ اور اس کے رسول کی طرف بلایا جائے، اس کے سوا کچھ نہیں ہوتا کہ وہ کہتے ہیں، ہم نے سنا اور اطاعت کی۔ ایسے ہی لوگ فلاح پانے والے ہیں۔ اور جو لوگ اللہ اور اس کے رسول کی اطاعت کریں گے، اللہ سے ڈریں گے اور اس کی نافرمانی سے بچیں گے وہی کامیاب و کامران ہوں گے۔‘‘
خدا اور رسولؐ کی اطاعت کرنے والوں کا شمار انبیا، صدیقین، شہدا اور صالحین کے ساتھ ہوگا۔
اللہ رب العزت کا ارشاد ہے: ’’اور جو خدا اور رسول کی اطاعت کریں گے، وہ ان لوگوں کے ساتھ ہوں گے جن پر اللہ نے انعام کیا ہے۔ یعنی انبیا، صدیقین، شہدا اور صالحین اور اچھے ساتھی ہیں یہ لوگ۔‘‘ (النساء)
اس کے برعکس جو اللہ اور اس کے رسول کی اطاعت کے لیے تیار نہ ہوں، وہ اللہ کے یہاں مومن شمار نہ ہوں گے۔ خواہ وہ ایمان کا کتنا ہی دعویٰ کریں۔
اللہ تعالیٰ کا ارشاد ہے: ’’اور جو کہتے ہیں کہ ہم اللہ پر اور رسول پر ایمان لائے اور ہم نے اطاعت کی، پھر ان میں کا ایک گروہ اس کے بعد (اطاعت سے) پھر جاتا ہے ایسے لوگ مومن نہیں ہیں۔‘‘ (نور)
حضرت ابوہریرہؓ بیان کرتے ہیں کہ رسول اللہ ﷺ نے فرمایا: ’’میری امت کے سب لوگ جنت میں داخل ہوں گے بجز اس شخص کے جو انکار کردے (صحابہ نے) عرض کیا۔ انکار کون کرتا ہے؟ فرمایا: جس نے میری اطاعت کی وہ جنت میں جائے گا اور جس نے میری نافرمانی کی۔ بے شک اس نے انکار کیا۔‘‘ (بخاری)
عملی زندگی میں رسولؐ کی دانستہ نافرمانی کرنا اور آپؐ کے اتباع سے گریز کرنا فی الحقیقت آپؐ کا انکار کرنا ہے۔ اور رسولؐ کے نافرمان اور منکر کا ٹھکانا جنت نہیں جہنم ہے۔
رسول پر ایمان لانے کا تقاضا ہے کہ آدمی اپنی خواہش، اپنے ارادہ اور اپنے قلبی رجحانات کو رسول کی لائی ہوئی ہدایت کے تابع کردے، قرآن مجید کے ہاتھ میں اپنی خواہش کی لگام دے دے۔ اگر کوئی ایسا نہ کرے تورسول پر ایمان لانے کے کوئی معنیٰ نہیں۔
رسول اللہ ﷺ نے ارشاد فرمایا کہ تم میں سے کوئی شخص (مطلوبہ درجہ کا) مومن نہیں ہوسکتا جب تک کہ میں اس کی نگاہ میں اس کے باپ، اس کے بیٹے اور سارے انسانوں سے زیادہ محبوب نہ ہوجاؤں۔ (بخاری و مسلم، انسؓ)
 

Neuron

Citizen
As received
When we tell people that 'we believe the Quran alone is all we need

They will respond by claiming we have denied the sunna of the messenger because God says "obey God and the messenger" in the Quran

And they claim that 'obey God' refers to the Quran, and 'obey the messenger' with the books of Hadith and Sunna

So they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources.

So let's study the phrase 'obey God and the messenger' from a Quranic point of view

The first Observation: The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger'.

Never does it say 'obey the prophet' or 'obey Muhammad'.

It is always 'obey God and the messenger'
So it is important to understand what the term 'messenger' (Rasool) means.


And why God did not say 'obey the prophet (nabi)'?

Muhammad had two status: The status of NUBUWA (prophethood) And the status of RASOOL (messenger)

The status of NUBUWA - the word NUBUWA means 'high or elevated place'.

This means that God has chosen Muhammad, out of all the humans, to communicate with him certain news, prophecies, etc.

So the status of NUBUWA (prophet) means that a human being is communicating with God.

The status of RASOOL - God tells us the status of RASOOL in the Quran:

(5:67) O messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord. And if you do not, then you have not delivered His message...

We see that God clearly tells us the duty of the messenger is to deliver the message of God

God also says: (24:54) ...there is nothing upon the messenger except the clear delivery...

This teaches us that the sole duty of the messenger is to deliver the message to the people

So if God did not give Muhammad the 'message', then he would not be called 'messenger' (Rasool).

So God calls him 'Rasool because Muhammad is carrying the 'message'.

What is this message that Muhammad carried? The messenger himself answers this in the Quran:
(6:19) ...this Quran has been inspired me to deliver it to you and whoever it reaches...


All these verses teach us that the duty of a messenger is to deliver the message.

Muhammad - the messenger - is required to send us the Quran

So when God says "obey the messenger" we are essentially obeying the 'message' itself

Another observation: God says in the Quran (4:80) "Whoever obeys the messenger, has obeyed God..."

This means when we obey the messenger - the message - the Quran, we have in reality obeyed God

All these verses teach us that 'obey God and the messenger' is essentially obeying ONE source - the Quran

Let's assume that the Quran tells us "obey God" without mentioning obeying the messenger. How would we do that?

This would mean that God Himself would have to come to earth and give us the Quran directly

This of course is illogical

This is why we are to 'obey God and the messenger' - because God gave Muhammad 'the message' which makes him a messenger'

And the messenger is required to deliver it to humanity.

So this is what 'obey God and the messenger' means from the Quran.

"Obey God and the messenger" is essentially ONE source - the Quran.


We obey the messenger because he has the 'message'.


It is unfortunate that some people equate "questioning riwaayaat composed by human beings" to "dis-obeying the Prophet PBUH".
Why do we insist upon placing any text above the Quran - ٱلْفُرْقَانِ The Criterion.
Why do muslims blindly believe in riwaayaat and then justify them above Quran?

A brother posted in this thread that Allah SWT did not mention dajjal because he will commit the worst form of Shirk (saying that dajjal is the lord), So Allah SWT doesn't even want to mention him. That brother should read how Allah SWT mentions pharoah
79:24

فَقَالَ أَنَا رَبُّكُمُ الْأَعْلَىٰ​

‘Thus he said, I am your supreme lord,’


In any case, we should stick to our Deen. As per Quran, Allah will NOT ask anyone if they blindly believed in riwaayaat OR dajjal OR mehdi.

On the other hand, We should pay attention to the following - what a painful sight it would be when our Prophet PBUH complains to Allah SWT:

25:30
وَقَالَ ٱلرَّسُولُ يَٰرَبِّ إِنَّ قَوْمِى ٱتَّخَذُوا۟ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانَ مَهْجُورًا

The Messenger has cried, “O my Lord! Indeed My people have taken this Quran utterly abandoned."
اور رسول کہے گا کہ پروردگار، میری قوم کے لوگوں نے اِس قرآن کو بالکل نظر انداز کر دیا تھا


May Allah forgive us and take us in His Immense Mercy.
 
Last edited:

BeggersForSale

MPA (400+ posts)
To be fair, I also don't believe in Taqleed and I don't consider myself Hanfi, Malki, Shafai etc. but only consider myself a Muslim. At the same time I dont put hadiths over Quran. But it has nothing to do with whether you reject all the hadiths or not. The main issue that those who only consider Quran as the source of the deen and rejects all the hadiths, they need to realize few things.

First, all the main/basic beliefs (عقائد) or foundation for the deen can only come from Quran. We cannot use a hadith without its support from Quran for basic/main beliefs. This also include beliefs of all the unseen. So, anyone who is deriving a belief from a hadith without its proper support from Quran, cannot be accepted as something that if you don't believe then you are out of the deen. That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs, although I have mentioned in my previous posts some indirect hints of Quran for the second coming of Jesus and Dajjal. But since those are not clear cut right now (just like Ayahs of Firoun body presevation that was unclear till the 1900s century), so if someone does not understand they still be consider Muslims. However, if someone don't believe in the day of judgement, then he is out of Islam.

Secondly, there are serious consequences of out right denying all the hadiths as follows:

1. From Quran, we get commandments of different religious activities such as salah, fasting, hajj, nikah, etc. and many more but Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths. If you deny all the hadiths, then how are you going to get information about how to perform those activities? Or you will just come up with your own actions for these activities. E.g. just come up with your own actions that you would do to perform salah?

2. Secondly, the only true source of the life events of our prophet PBUH (and his sunnah) are authentic hadiths. If you outright deny all the hadiths, how can you determine, when the prophet was born, at what age his mother died, at what age he became a prophet, when did he performed hijrah, when ghazwa-e-badr, ahud, etc happen and what happen in those ghazwaats? What other events happened in the life of the prophet? By denying hadiths, you are depriving yourself and your children from all the authentic knowledge of the life events of the prophet PBUH and his companions. After denying the hadiths, the life event of the prophet PBUH will merely become a story and after sometime all stories are bound to corrupt (change/alter). Hence, this big treasure of knowledge will eventually be lost. Then Islam will become merely a story and all the proof of authenticity of Islam will be lost, making people easily believe that Quran is nothing but a set of random verses. The reason why we believe that Quran is authentic is because it was something told to us by the prophet Muhammad PBUH (Allah used prophet as a vessel to transfer this knowledge to us but at the end these are words coming out of his mouth) and we consider Muhammad PBUH to be someone who was Sadiq and Ameen based on his documented life events (which are hadiths) and thus consider Quran to be words of Allah swt because the prophet told us that Quran is the words of Allah swt.

Thus, we don't deny all the hadiths but at the same time we don't consider all the hadiths to be authentic. There is a science of how to determine the authenticity of hadiths and many people have worked on it. In the end, the basic concepts about using hadiths are:
- a hadith cannot be the only source of the basic beliefs in Islam. All the main beliefs of Islam come from Quran.
- we only consider a hadith if it does not goes against Quran. If a hadith goes against Quran, we don't consider that hadith.

I hope people who outright deny all the hadiths, would participate in a healthy debate (based on logic) and will reply to the points that I have mentioned instead of just copy/pasting some verses of the Quran saying:

- The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger' - because you cannot conclude that it means you only consider Quran and outright deny all the hadiths. You gave an stupid argument that 'they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources' however it actually does not mean following two different sources because we always obtain the basic/main beliefs of Islam from Quran and all the main commandments from Quran and hadith is only used for explanation. So, the root source of Islam is Quran and hadiths provide merely explanations.

- 5:99 The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺. And Allah ˹fully˺ knows what you reveal and what you conceal. - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths.

-16:89 We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths. If you say that it is mentioned here that Quran is explanation of all things then can you elaborate what does it mean by Quran being "explanation of all things"? Because then if you consider "all things" as literally all the things then it will become very easy to prove Quran wrong, because you will find explanation of many things missing in Quran. So, for this you need to actually understand what "explanation of all things" mean. My explanation is here if you go and read the context (i.e. ayahs before and after) you will come to a conclusion that here Quran is claiming about explaining all things of the unseen.
 

Bebabacha

Senator (1k+ posts)
ملا حافظ عاطف کے مطابق گھوڑا حلال ہے. گھوڑا حلال ہے تو گدھا اور خچر بھی حلال ہوا. وقت کی ضرورت ہے عوام کو بتایا جائے تاکہ خوراک کی کمی کی شکار عوام کو کچھ راحت مل سکے
Mula sb ne bilkul theek farmaya hai..
 

Neuron

Citizen
To be fair, I also don't believe in Taqleed and I don't consider myself Hanfi, Malki, Shafai etc. but only consider myself a Muslim. At the same time I dont put hadiths over Quran. But it has nothing to do with whether you reject all the hadiths or not. The main issue that those who only consider Quran as the source of the deen and rejects all the hadiths, they need to realize few things.

First, all the main/basic beliefs (عقائد) or foundation for the deen can only come from Quran. We cannot use a hadith without its support from Quran for basic/main beliefs. This also include beliefs of all the unseen. So, anyone who is deriving a belief from a hadith without its proper support from Quran, cannot be accepted as something that if you don't believe then you are out of the deen. That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs, although I have mentioned in my previous posts some indirect hints of Quran for the second coming of Jesus and Dajjal. But since those are not clear cut right now (just like Ayahs of Firoun body presevation that was unclear till the 1900s century), so if someone does not understand they still be consider Muslims. However, if someone don't believe in the day of judgement, then he is out of Islam.

Secondly, there are serious consequences of out right denying all the hadiths as follows:

1. From Quran, we get commandments of different religious activities such as salah, fasting, hajj, nikah, etc. and many more but Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths. If you deny all the hadiths, then how are you going to get information about how to perform those activities? Or you will just come up with your own actions for these activities. E.g. just come up with your own actions that you would do to perform salah?

2. Secondly, the only true source of the life events of our prophet PBUH (and his sunnah) are authentic hadiths. If you outright deny all the hadiths, how can you determine, when the prophet was born, at what age his mother died, at what age he became a prophet, when did he performed hijrah, when ghazwa-e-badr, ahud, etc happen and what happen in those ghazwaats? What other events happened in the life of the prophet? By denying hadiths, you are depriving yourself and your children from all the authentic knowledge of the life events of the prophet PBUH and his companions. After denying the hadiths, the life event of the prophet PBUH will merely become a story and after sometime all stories are bound to corrupt (change/alter). Hence, this big treasure of knowledge will eventually be lost. Then Islam will become merely a story and all the proof of authenticity of Islam will be lost, making people easily believe that Quran is nothing but a set of random verses. The reason why we believe that Quran is authentic is because it was something told to us by the prophet Muhammad PBUH (Allah used prophet as a vessel to transfer this knowledge to us but at the end these are words coming out of his mouth) and we consider Muhammad PBUH to be someone who was Sadiq and Ameen based on his documented life events (which are hadiths) and thus consider Quran to be words of Allah swt because the prophet told us that Quran is the words of Allah swt.

Thus, we don't deny all the hadiths but at the same time we don't consider all the hadiths to be authentic. There is a science of how to determine the authenticity of hadiths and many people have worked on it. In the end, the basic concepts about using hadiths are:
- a hadith cannot be the only source of the basic beliefs in Islam. All the main beliefs of Islam come from Quran.
- we only consider a hadith if it does not goes against Quran. If a hadith goes against Quran, we don't consider that hadith.

I hope people who outright deny all the hadiths, would participate in a healthy debate (based on logic) and will reply to the points that I have mentioned instead of just copy/pasting some verses of the Quran saying:

- The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger' - because you cannot conclude that it means you only consider Quran and outright deny all the hadiths. You gave an stupid argument that 'they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources' however it actually does not mean following two different sources because we always obtain the basic/main beliefs of Islam from Quran and all the main commandments from Quran and hadith is only used for explanation. So, the root source of Islam is Quran and hadiths provide merely explanations.

- 5:99 The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺. And Allah ˹fully˺ knows what you reveal and what you conceal. - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths.

-16:89 We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths. If you say that it is mentioned here that Quran is explanation of all things then can you elaborate what does it mean by Quran being "explanation of all things"? Because then if you consider "all things" as literally all the things then it will become very easy to prove Quran wrong, because you will find explanation of many things missing in Quran. So, for this you need to actually understand what "explanation of all things" mean. My explanation is here if you go and read the context (i.e. ayahs before and after) you will come to a conclusion that here Quran is claiming about explaining all things of the unseen.


AoA Brother:

That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs

No human has the right to declare another human non-Muslim or Jannati or Jahannami. That is for Allah SWT.

Quran doesnt not mention dajjal, mehdi, second coming of jesus etc as basic/main OR non-basic/non-main/secondary beliefs. Allah SWT has repeatedly told us in Quran what He will ask about and how HE will judge us.

Riwaayaat are snippets of conversations "attributed" to our Prophet PBUH - that were recorded many decades after the demise of our Prophet PBUH. They are for sure a valuable historic record. But riwaayaat do not add AND do not take away anything from the deen of Allah SWT. As valuable as they might be, Quran's authenticity does not depend upon Riwaayaat. On the other hand the improper placement of "historical record" and "riwaayaat" has caused a lot of trouble among muslims over centuries.

Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths.

The source of Sunnah is not riwaayaat or akhbaar-e-ahaad! Sunnah is the set of actions that has been prescribed as part of Deen and propgated en-masse in the muslim community. I have not known anyone in my limited life, that had to open a book of riwaayaat to know how to perform Salah, or Fast, or perform Hajj.

Morever, Islamic law/shariah has been recorded in the books of Fiqh - not in riwaayaat!

Alhamdulillah we still have Quran with us, lets follow it and supplicate to Allah that He takes us in his immense Mercy!
 
Last edited:

BeggersForSale

MPA (400+ posts)
AoA Brother:



No human has the right to declare another human non-Muslim or Jannati or Jahannami. That is for Allah SWT.

Quran doesnt not mention dajjal, mehdi, second coming of jesus etc as basic/main OR non-basic/non-main/secondary beliefs. Allah SWT has repeatedly told us in Quran what He will ask about and how HE will judge us.

Riwaayaat are snippets of conversations "attributed" to our Prophet PBUH - that were recorded many decades after the demise of our Prophet PBUH. They are for sure a valuable historic record. But riwaayaat do not add AND do not take away anything from the deen of Allah SWT. As valuable as they might be, Quran's authenticity does not depend upon Riwaayaat. On the other hand the improper placement of "historical record" and "riwaayaat" has caused a lot of trouble among muslims over centuries.



The source of Sunnah is not riwaayaat or akhbaar-e-ahaad! Sunnah is the set of actions that has been prescribed as part of Deen and propgated en-masse in the muslim community. I have not known anyone in my limited life, that had to open a book of riwaayaat to know how to perform Salah, or Fast, or perform Hajj.

Morever, Islamic law/shariah has been recorded in the books of Fiqh - not in riwaayaat!

Alhamdulillah we still have Quran with us, lets follow it and supplicate to Allah that He takes us in his immense Mercy!
Wa'Salam Brother.

There is a difference between hadiths and riwaayats, I hope you understand. In short hadiths are not just saying of the prophets PBUH but also the actions that the prophet did and some of his companions saw him doing and then told others. So don't mix them to denounce hadiths. Riwaayats are those that you will find in books like Al-Muhannad ala al-Mufannad or Kashf al-Mahjub, stories of the buzurgs. However, based on them you cannot denounce hadiths. I have already mentioned there is a science of determining the authenticity of hadiths and based on that different hadiths are categorized authentic, sahih, ahsan, etc.

You mentioned Islamic law/shariah has been recorded in the books of Fiqh? Do you mind telling me when the first fiqh book was written? And how the writer of the fiqh book came to conclusion about details of different activities if not all of those details were present in Quran?

Also you mentioned that source of sunnah is not hadith but the information that is propagated en-masse by actions. Then I would argue that is how it was propagated as hadiths in the beginning until they are formally recorded in forms of books. What actually was happening a person inform about some event or saying of the prophet that he heard from person A, who heard from person B, and so on till the chain reaches the Prophet PBUH. This is as similar as what you are claiming the sunnah was spread because the person A mentioned I heard person B saying that he heard person C, and so on that prophet PBUH was praying salah in this manner. This is nothing but hadiths. And the books of hadiths are just recorded form of hadiths in the form of texts that was collected first time around 150H formally in the form of a single book. However, those hadiths were still present in different forms before.

Anyway I have mentioned already the relation of hadiths with Quran and how should we treat hadiths in my previous response.
 

karachiwala

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
To be fair, I also don't believe in Taqleed and I don't consider myself Hanfi, Malki, Shafai etc. but only consider myself a Muslim. At the same time I dont put hadiths over Quran. But it has nothing to do with whether you reject all the hadiths or not. The main issue that those who only consider Quran as the source of the deen and rejects all the hadiths, they need to realize few things.

First, all the main/basic beliefs (عقائد) or foundation for the deen can only come from Quran. We cannot use a hadith without its support from Quran for basic/main beliefs. This also include beliefs of all the unseen. So, anyone who is deriving a belief from a hadith without its proper support from Quran, cannot be accepted as something that if you don't believe then you are out of the deen. That is why who don't believe in Dajjal or Mehdi or second coming of Jesus, cannot be declared non-Muslim because these are not the basic/main beliefs, although I have mentioned in my previous posts some indirect hints of Quran for the second coming of Jesus and Dajjal. But since those are not clear cut right now (just like Ayahs of Firoun body presevation that was unclear till the 1900s century), so if someone does not understand they still be consider Muslims. However, if someone don't believe in the day of judgement, then he is out of Islam.

Secondly, there are serious consequences of out right denying all the hadiths as follows:

1. From Quran, we get commandments of different religious activities such as salah, fasting, hajj, nikah, etc. and many more but Quran does not mention the details like prerequisites for each activity and about how to perform those activities. This knowledge only comes from Sunnah which now exists in the form of hadiths. If you deny all the hadiths, then how are you going to get information about how to perform those activities? Or you will just come up with your own actions for these activities. E.g. just come up with your own actions that you would do to perform salah?

2. Secondly, the only true source of the life events of our prophet PBUH (and his sunnah) are authentic hadiths. If you outright deny all the hadiths, how can you determine, when the prophet was born, at what age his mother died, at what age he became a prophet, when did he performed hijrah, when ghazwa-e-badr, ahud, etc happen and what happen in those ghazwaats? What other events happened in the life of the prophet? By denying hadiths, you are depriving yourself and your children from all the authentic knowledge of the life events of the prophet PBUH and his companions. After denying the hadiths, the life event of the prophet PBUH will merely become a story and after sometime all stories are bound to corrupt (change/alter). Hence, this big treasure of knowledge will eventually be lost. Then Islam will become merely a story and all the proof of authenticity of Islam will be lost, making people easily believe that Quran is nothing but a set of random verses. The reason why we believe that Quran is authentic is because it was something told to us by the prophet Muhammad PBUH (Allah used prophet as a vessel to transfer this knowledge to us but at the end these are words coming out of his mouth) and we consider Muhammad PBUH to be someone who was Sadiq and Ameen based on his documented life events (which are hadiths) and thus consider Quran to be words of Allah swt because the prophet told us that Quran is the words of Allah swt.

Thus, we don't deny all the hadiths but at the same time we don't consider all the hadiths to be authentic. There is a science of how to determine the authenticity of hadiths and many people have worked on it. In the end, the basic concepts about using hadiths are:
- a hadith cannot be the only source of the basic beliefs in Islam. All the main beliefs of Islam come from Quran.
- we only consider a hadith if it does not goes against Quran. If a hadith goes against Quran, we don't consider that hadith.

I hope people who outright deny all the hadiths, would participate in a healthy debate (based on logic) and will reply to the points that I have mentioned instead of just copy/pasting some verses of the Quran saying:

- The Quran always says 'obey God and the messenger' - because you cannot conclude that it means you only consider Quran and outright deny all the hadiths. You gave an stupid argument that 'they believe 'obey God and the messenger' is to follow two different sources' however it actually does not mean following two different sources because we always obtain the basic/main beliefs of Islam from Quran and all the main commandments from Quran and hadith is only used for explanation. So, the root source of Islam is Quran and hadiths provide merely explanations.

- 5:99 The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺. And Allah ˹fully˺ knows what you reveal and what you conceal. - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths.

-16:89 We have revealed to you the Book, as an explanation of all things, and guidance, and mercy, and good news for those who submit - Again you cannot conclude that it is ok to outright deny all the hadiths. If you say that it is mentioned here that Quran is explanation of all things then can you elaborate what does it mean by Quran being "explanation of all things"? Because then if you consider "all things" as literally all the things then it will become very easy to prove Quran wrong, because you will find explanation of many things missing in Quran. So, for this you need to actually understand what "explanation of all things" mean. My explanation is here if you go and read the context (i.e. ayahs before and after) you will come to a conclusion that here Quran is claiming about explaining all things of the unseen.
well one of their beliefs is that ata'at of The Holy Prophet is not necessary as he is no longer amongst us. I have asked this question a hundred times but never received an answer if they could prove anything and I mean any thing who our Prophet SAW was? They have no answer. Quran asks you to make Wudu and specifies all the arkaan but they have no idea for what? because anything they cannot prove they outright deny that it a requirement just like namaz and other ibadaat
 

karachiwala

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
منکرین حدیث کے عقائد
”قرآن کریم میں جہاں اللہ و رسول کا ذکر آیا ہے، اس سے مراد مرکز نظامِ حکومت ہے“
”رسول کو قطعاً یہ حق نہیں کہ لوگوں سے اپنی اطاعت کرائے“
”رسول کی اطاعت نہیں، کیونکہ وہ زندہ نہیں“
”ختم نبوت“ سے مراد یہ ہے کہ اب دنیا میں انقلاب شخصیتوں کے ہاتھوں نہیں، بلکہ تصورات کے ذریعہ رونما ہواکرے گا۔ اب سلسلہ ٴ نبوت ختم ہوگیا ہے، اسکے معنی یہ ہیں کہ اب انسانوں کو اپنے معاملات کے فیصلے آپ کرنے ہوں گے الخ“
”اور آج جو اسلام دنیا میں مروج ہے وہ زمانہ قبل از قرآن کا مذہب ہو تو ہو، قرآنی دین سے اس کا کوئی واسطہ نہیں الخ“
”بہرحال مرنے کے بعد کی جنت اور جہنم مقامات نہیں، انسانی ذات کی کیفیات ہیں لہزا کوی جنت نہیں کوئ دوزخ نہیں۔
”ملائکہ سے مراد وہ نفسیاتی محرکات ہیں جو انسانی قلوب میں اثرات مرتب کرتے ہیں، ملائکہ کے آدم کے سامنے جھکنے سے مراد یہ ہے کہ یہ قوتیں جنہیں انسان مسخر کرسکتا ہے، انہیں انسان کے سامنے جھکاہوا رہنا چاہئے الخ“۔
”واقعہ ٴ اسراء“ اگر یہ خواب کا نہیں تو یہ حضور کی شبِ ہجرت کا بیان ہے، اس طرح مسجد اقصیٰ سے مراد مدینہ کی مسجد نبوی ہوگی جسے آپ نے وہاں جاکر تعمیر فرمایا“
”اب ہماری صلاة وہی ہے جومذہب میں پوجا پاٹ یا ایشور بھگتی کہلاتی ہے، روزے وہی ہیں جنہیں مذہب میں برت کہتے ہیں، زکوٰة وہی شے ہے جسے مذہب دان خیرات کرکے پکارتا ہے، ہمارا حج مذہب کی یا تراہے، آپ نے دیکھا کہ کس طرح دین (نظام زندگی) یکسر مذہب بن کررہ گیا، ان امور کو نہ افادیت سے کچھ تعلق ہے نہ عقل وبصیرت سے کچھ واسطہ الخ“۔
”قرآن کریم نے نماز پڑھنے کے لئے نہیں کہا بلکہ قیامِ صلاة یعنی نماز کے نظام کے قیام کا حکم دیا ہے، عجم میں مجوسیوں کے ہاں پرستش کی رسم کو نماز کہا جاتا تھا، لہذا صلاة کی جگہ نماز نے لے لی الخ“
”حج عالم اسلامی کی بین الملی کانفرنس کا نام ہے، اس کانفرنس میں شرکت کرنے والوں کے خورد ونوش کے لئے جانور ذبح کرنے کا ذکر قرآن میں ہے الخ“
اس کے علاوہ بھی بہت سے نادر اقوال ہیں غلام پرویز کے
 

Wake up Pak

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
We all agree that but you have not even replied to what I have mentioned in my previous posts which are all based on Quran only. Quran says all the time to ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. As I have said, if all the things were written in the Quran as explicit as possible then there was no point ponder upon the ayahs of Quran. There are things that are stated clearly and there are things that are not stated clearly or atleast there meaning sometimes become clear after some event happen just like Firoun body example that I have mentioned. I have given enough examples but you can keep repeating the above what you have mentioned like a parrot but not willing to ponder upon the ayahs that I have mentioned. You need to show that you have some bit of intelligence to participate in a healthy discussion.
Your posts make no sense whatsoever. Before you start writing nonsense, you should study the fundamentals of the religion of Islam.
 

Back
Top