Citizen X
(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

Just watch for a minute from 12:40 onwards.
"I find a problem with someone manufacturing lies, fabrications, dramatizations and mythologies with Jesus Christ, specially when Jesus Christ himself had nothing to do himself with the evidence that they used."
Now this is problem with the hypocrisy of the sectarian Muslims, because if you simply replace the word Jesus Christ with Prophet Muhammad and what do you have? The holy books of the sectarians, the hadith. BUT this preacher will not use the same logic and arguments he is using, and rightfully so against the Christian bible for his own holy books from where he takes his mazhab from. In fact he will defend them tooth and nail and destroy his own arguments to save them. Hypocrite much?
Its a great lecture and if anybody has the time, go watch the entire 2 hr thing, even before I watched this I had the very same thoughts on how today Islam is nothing but a cheap copy of Christianity, how people came after a century of Jesus passing came and changed the entire religion of Isa Ibn Maryam, how 3 centuries later books by unknow authors were mutually agreed upon and added to the bible, what is know today as the new testament. And have mentioned here many times here before too.
That if it wasn't for Allah's protection, men exactly like this Khalid Yasin would have added hadith to the Quran. Where we would have the old Quran and the new Quran, just like the bible does today.
So think when we are not willing to accept the bible because of manufactured lies, fabrications, dramatizations and mythologies with Jesus Christ, specially when Jesus Christ himself had nothing to do with the evidence that they used. Then why do we accept the hadith when it is nothing but manufactured lies, fabrications, dramatizations and mythologies with Prophet Muhammad, specially when Prophet Muhammad himself had nothing with the evidence that they used.
If you accept the hadith, then you must accept the bible as it is today because both of them stand on the very same foundations, and if you don't accept either one of them, then you can't accept both of the either.