RajaRawal111
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
We can just stay on just the power plant for now.ok lets make life simple.
ignore coal plants... ignore NHA for time being and just focus on the plants your are talking about.
i am not claiming they are not efficient, nor i am claiming they are useless. you started your arguement with the word "profitable" and generating money. most of the government sector projects does not qualify to this criteria. for example your institutions such as army, courts, policing, hospitals, educational institutions (excluding private sector where they aim for making profit from every business) are called public services and they are always a burden on govt, that is governments collect taxes to run those institutions
now when you say power generation plant is profitable, i am only trying to explain that it is not. what happens is there are power generation companies or we call them IPPs. they install their plants and sign agreements with govt to sell the produced electricity to govt on a certain market rate. now government buys from those IPPs at a higher rate, and sell them to consumer at a much lower rate (subsidized rate). all those IPPs are profitable because there production is sold under government guarantee and they are profitable, however its a loss for govt to buy expensive ane sell cheaper
now the plants you are talking about have same issue. cost per unit of electricity is far more and it is always subsidized by tax payer. plant is efficient does not mean its producing low cost energy, and specially after post pandemic era when fuel prices sky rocketed and the pkr usd rate is falling with exponential gravity. so despite increasing unit rate for consumer, the prices of those plants are still higher than the average unit cost chared to consumer and these IPPs are not responsible for any line losses.
pakistan stopped planning for dams just because they found it easier to buy fuel from arabs and specially when there are kickbacks so we lost almost 40 years in that era. post ayub khan till musharaf. no dams... and we are now paying the price... but thats not the topic of our argument
what is good about pmln. at least they installed plants, costly, yes but better than having no electricity.
the bad, the long term planning. for example agreeing to high charges with IPPs for longer terms. it should be only a short term solution but having them as long term solution is what destroyed the economy. Dar artificially kept $ low for the very same reason so that cost of energy generation will be kept in control but it destroyed the rest of the economy.
you dont need to agree but i just tried to explain your profitability myth. open to discuss NHA if you want
I have shared the balance sheets of QATPL. It is generating profit from its "fuel feed to Energy out" sequence. The loss Govt is getting is on the overall thermal power sector. The biggest problem on this is our management. Look at the DISCO performance in collecting the bills. Even during the PTI times, Peshawar was one of the worst performers. So are the Sindh DISCOs. The theft of the power and our line losses have to be reduced which is totally Governing and a little bit of Engineering issues.
In the ideal world, there should not be any subsidy given to people al all. If fuel gets expansive then power should get expensive. That is what I say, that is what you are saying and that is what IMF tells us. But we have Opposition Munafiqat when that happens. And that Munafiqat comes from Imran Khan, Noon league and PPP. All are equal in that Munafiqat.
At least you agreed with expansive power than no power - thanks for that
For Dams the is a very high misconception and it has become a buzzword for all of the drawing-room critiques.
I am putting another hard question on you is that "" Please tell me where we can build a major DAM IN PAKISTAN"" Please give me the answer. point out locations.
And see my next post