UKPakistani
Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
So then Nawaz should only resign after corruption is proven against him, right?
Proof first, resignation after? Right?
Yes. Nawaz resigns on Panama.
But so does IK for hiring illegal money ATMs.
Case closed.
But if IK stays for hiring illegal money ATM1 and ATM2, then Nawaz also stays.
So, if you wanted to do clean politics, then your leader should have hired clean money people. Otherwise you just allow corruption to go on as always.
A question for you then
In the UK, when many Parliamentarians were found guilty of fiddling their expenses and were punished
They were from ALL political parties............
Should the leaders of the Conservatives, Liberal Party and Labour have all resigned for having got them to Parliament ?
Another
The PM of Iceland resigns............. Surely then ALL his party should resign from Parliament, for electing him as their head.......
A Spanish Cabinet Minister resigns because of Panama, should the PM also go because he chose him as Minister............
and then the WHOLE Party because they chose a leader who chose a corrupt Minister
PLEASE
Do provide a LOGICAL response, not a PMLN style one......
Last edited: