Thanks at least for getting and accepting my point on how she cannot contest any elections.
^^^ As for this, you put too much credence in your paid tattoo inJustice Ather. The verdict was so blatantly outside the law of the land that even the Supreme Court was forced to do a virtual chitrol of inJustice Ather. They virtually gave a big boot up his backside " Banda ban ja oye " after which he started to deny bails.
"The five-page written judgement, penned by Chief Justice-designate Asif Saeed Khosa, while detailing the reasons for dismissal of NAB’s appeal has
also pointed out several flaws in the IHC judgement for suspension of the Sharifs’ sentences. “Instead of adhering to the guidelines issued and recommendations made by the SC in an earlier case regarding shorter formats of orders to be passed in matters of bail, the high court had issued a 41-page judgement while deciding the Sharif’s bail petitions,” the verdict noted.
According to the judgement,
it is a settled principle of law that while deciding an application for bail or the suspension of sentence, the merits of the case are not commented upon in detail. “However, the IHC in its impugned judgement had not only undertaken a detailed assessment of the merits of the case but had also recorded some categorical conclusions regarding the same,” it said.
“Besides, the Sharifs’ writ petitions for suspension of their sentences were taken up at a time when their main appeals challenging the accountability court’s verdict in the Avenfield case had already been fixed for hearing. This is in contrast to judicial norms,” the judgement said. “Because sentences are usually suspended considering that a convict may not be kept in custody till his appeal is fixed for hearing,” it added. Citing previous cases, the written verdict says that the SC has clarified that in cases under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999,
a high court may exercise its constitutional jurisdiction to grant bail only in extraordinary circumstances and in cases of extreme hardship. “But in the cases concerning the Sharifs, no such extraordinary circumstance or hardship had been referred to by the IHC in its judgement,” it said."
So pretty obvious Nawazoo Tattoo IHC just like Lohar High Court went out of its way, clearly overstepping judicial norms to show what big darbaris of the Sharifs they are
https://dailytimes.com.pk/345173/sc...ismissal-of-nab-appeal-against-sharifs-bails/
Even blatant critic of IK and PTI Rauf Klasra called it a charge sheet against IHC by the Supreme Court and if inJustice Ather had any dignity he would resign after hearing the supreme courts remarks
Yeah so don't get your hopes up too high, after the drubbing SC gave IHC, it is behaving but if inJustice Ather Nawaz Tattoo decides once again to take off his clothes in public to show loyalty to his master. The Supreme Court will strike it down at the very first appeal hearing.
