What was case in SC regarding KA Iqama?the Supreme court of pakistan has dismissed his case in iqama. PTI wants to Pull another stunt to help PDM i guess. anyway this will be very good for opposition
What was case in SC regarding KA Iqama?
That case was misdecleration. Now case is about Iqama which Khwaja Asif already admitted. So this case is different than before.On April 26, the IHC had disqualified Khawaja Asif as a member of the parliament under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution for not disclosing his employment in a UAE company as an occupation as well as the monthly salary he was receiving.SC overturns Khawaja Asif's 'disqualification for life', allows him to contest elections
An Islamabad High Court decision had earlier ousted Asif from his seat, handed him a lifetime ban from holding office.www.dawn.com
Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) leader Usman Dar had moved the high court against Asif in 2017. In his petition, he had argued that Asif did not declare his job in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and his salary in the 2013 nomination papers. Asif, however, had contended before the court that he declared AED50,000 as foreign income in papers.
Addressing the argument by Asif's legal team that "since copies of the passport attached with the nomination paper also contained a copy of the 'iqama', therefore there was no misrepresentation or concealment", the IHC judgement says: "Iqama is merely a residence visa issued by the immigration officials. In the instant case, the non-disclosure was that of the employment as an occupation and the salary per month received thereunder."
The judgement also made a reference to the Panama Papers case, saying: "Supreme Court has not disqualified the former prime minister [Nawaz Sharif] merely for holding an ‘Iqama’ but rather his disqualification was due to non-disclosure of assets; holding an ‘Iqama’ cannot be made the basis for attracting Article 62(1)(f)."
Last month, Khawaja Asif had challenged the verdict in the apex court. The counsel for Asif had argued that the April 26 IHC decision was an exception taken against an elected parliamentarian.
In the petition, Asif argued that an inadvertent omission to disclose in his nomination papers, a bank account which represented less than 0.5 per cent of his total assets, particularly when the account lay dormant though it was disclosed in the annual statement of assets and liabilities filed with the Election Commission of Pakistan before the writ was instituted, could not be treated as willful and dishonest concealment.
As per Supreme Court he declared everything in is papers
so whats wrong with having a iqama? alot of PTI leaders have green cards including Ali Zaidi who is bankrupt in USA. and what does NAB have to do with Iqama thats a immigration issue. and has nothing to do with financial. even if it did Supreme court has given him green chit just like they gave imran khanThat case was misdecleration. Now case is about Iqama which Khwaja Asif already admitted. So this case is different than before.
Keep in mind Asif Sahib was defence Minister of Pakistan while being employee of a company which was paying him for not doing any work. For u it's not a big issue?so whats wrong with having a iqama? alot of PTI leaders have green cards including Ali Zaidi who is bankrupt in USA. and what does NAB have to do with Iqama thats a immigration issue. and has nothing to do with financial. even if it did Supreme court has given him green chit just like they gave imran khan
it’s not an issue just like Asim Saleem Bajwa is not an issue for PTI. Just like Imran khan is satisfied with his money trial even though he is not a judge or NAB same way MNS was satisfied when he was PMKeep in mind Asif Sahib was defence Minister of Pakistan while being employee of a company which was paying him for not doing any work. For u it's not a big issue?
He's being called to explain the 15 lakhs per month employment dear.... The investigation will go all the way to his fake employer..so whats wrong with having a iqama? alot of PTI leaders have green cards including Ali Zaidi who is bankrupt in USA. and what does NAB have to do with Iqama thats a immigration issue. and has nothing to do with financial. even if it did Supreme court has given him green chit just like they gave imran khan
i am sure the choosi is in imran khan's mouth as he has no power to investigate Gen Asim Bajwa and matter of fact just because of Gen Asim Bajwa PTI is changing the Laws so NAB does not go after Gen Bajwa.........PTI is sucking really hard i am sure you will tell me at what pressure you are sucking atHe's being called to explain the 15 lakhs per month employment dear.... The investigation will go all the way to his fake employer..
Now find your choosni and suck hard on it.... This guy will be smacked like a flie soon ?
okho tto aapko Kay tension hai janai ddothe Supreme court of pakistan has dismissed his case in iqama. PTI wants to Pull another stunt to help PDM i guess. anyway this will be very good for opposition
He wasn’t acquired in asset beyond means caseso whats wrong with having a iqama? alot of PTI leaders have green cards including Ali Zaidi who is bankrupt in USA. and what does NAB have to do with Iqama thats a immigration issue. and has nothing to do with financial. even if it did Supreme court has given him green chit just like they gave imran khan
Are u saying if a company is paying salary to someone without doing any job is okay for you if that person is on a key post? All we should need to know what kind of services Khawajah Asif was providing to UAE based company?it’s not an issue just like Asim Saleem Bajwa is not an issue for PTI. Just like Imran khan is satisfied with his money trial even though he is not a judge or NAB same way MNS was satisfied when he was PM
also the National security advisor in Pakistan is a US citizen. How clever
I never mentioned IK I mentioned Asim Saleem Bajwa and I also mentioned A US Citizen Moeed Yousaf who is a NSA in Pakistan. And to add to your knowledge Moeed Yousaf is very close to CIA.Are u saying if a company is paying salary to someone without doing any job is okay for you if that person is on a key post? All we should need to know what kind of services Khawajah Asif was providing to UAE based company?
Was IK getting money from a company without giving any services?
If your party thinks Moeed Yousuf and Asim Saleem Bajwa did corruption then why not to approach court just like PTI went to court against NS?×
I never mentioned IK I mentioned Asim Saleem Bajwa and I also mentioned A US Citizen Moeed Yousaf who is a NSA in Pakistan. And to add to your knowledge Moeed Yousaf is very close to CIA.
and said same way Imran khan was satisfied when Asim bajwa told him about his properties MNS is satisfied with Khwaja Asif. Now if you think Khawja Asif should get a case and provide his financials to court. But you think it’s ok for Gen Asim Bajwa not provide the money trial in Court ?
we will but what is your opinion? And this brings me to aik nahi 2 Pakistan there are two set of laws in Pakistan for people. And in Madina ki Riyasat I think PTI should take the initiative. Unless PTI is using religious card and Madina ki Riyasat for VotesIf your party thinks Moeed Yousuf and Asim Saleem Bajwa did corruption then why not to approach court just like PTI went to court against NS?
Sir I can't say anything as not expert but lets assume both Moeed Yousuf and Gen rtd Bajwa are corrupt and are not Punished can we use this reason not to punish other criminals?×
we will but what is your opinion? And this brings me to aik nahi 2 Pakistan there are two set of laws in Pakistan for people. And in Madina ki Riyasat I think PTI should take the initiative. Unless PTI is using religious card and Madina ki Riyasat for Votes