The Biggest Loser of Pakistan

chiller

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
And who's brainchild was creation of Britain? Italy? Spain? USA? France? UAE?
Only in Pakistan you will hear and actually believe in such non-sense.
Countries might be created independently but they are prone to be infiltrated pretty easily so to speak.

Infiltration is kind of a soft coup in which adversary looks more like an ally and still controls major policies of a country that benefits the adversary. Infiltration is done by various methods like threat to life, bribery or by education.

Most important one is an education because schools, colleges and universities are kind of their madrasas. Why, because these institutions only teaches an established opinion and does not allow an independent thought. Keeping a gripe on an education allows to raise people with like mind who are easier to control, will built their ideology on what being taught and to lead. So when people come from their madrasa who will be running the country, will run it to the ideology of madrasa not founding ideology. On paper state is independent and in reality state is occupied. Just look at politicians education or who they got influenced by most and you will know who they really are. Just look at education in general, which country exports it, who writes the books and which country influence it and you will know who controls your country.

In my opinion, Pakistan is one of those countries who are still under soft coup of royal family. Why, just open any news channel website you will see articles about royal family. Just recently, they broadcast the royal coronation on TV like it's some sort of our national event. The constitution is influenced by Britain and so on many laws date back to east India.

Keep in mind, that even USA is not the USA that fore-fathers founded.
 

chiller

Politcal Worker (100+ posts)
What a crock of nonsense! If this was true, the brits could have easily split India into a dozen little countries along racial, religious and linguistic lines. They would have given the Sikhs their Khalistan, Bengalis their Bangladesh. The Hyderabad's the monarchy of Hyderabad etc etc etc.

What Jinnah wanted was a country for Muslims not a Muslim country. A big difference between the two. Unfortunately he did not live long enough to carry this out completely as it was immediately hijacked by the army and then the army embolded the mullahs and corrupt puppets and we are in the mess we are in today.

What is most bitter is if the generation of our fathers had risen up against the atrocities of the Army in 1971 and reacted as we have today, we would be in a much better place today.

They just quietly drank the Kool aid and went on about their way
British would never wanted the prosperity in Asia at least. If they made such calls as you suggest than i think non of us would have migrated to make ours lives better. We wouldn't have conflicts in this region and then how would they benefit without selling weapons or having monopoly of banking system and so forth.

Look how our fine talented people go abroad, built foreign nations and then some are kept by nationalizing. Just look at gulf countries built by us Asians. Look at Canada, USA or Europe how many Asians settled their and now are there nationals.
 

Back
Top