Javed Ghamdi, Salman Taseer, Asma Jhangir :: Khuda ka khof karen plz! - Nice Column by Orya Maqbool

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear alihbkable, these videos seem to be work of immature person because they do not make sense.

What seems to me is that mr ghamidi is sharing his views about some issues and he disagrees with some poeple on them in the context the people hold those views or beliefs.

Milaad shareef is a brelavi belief and I love these like celebrations and gatherings. What the problem has been is whether they are essential part of islam or not. The answer is it is lawful to do such things but not essential. Also if people who do these do unlawful things in these gethering then either they should stop them or stop mahafile milaad. This is what ghamidi is saying so where is the problem?

I have been through fights over these things amongst deobandies and brelavies etc. If one want s share something please provide some back ground to things so that they make sense.

regards and all the best.


1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjzABjAaq-s&feature=related
2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B73VlFonMYE&feature=related
3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB2NhfK6BBk&feature=related
4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njnPJVpR4iM&feature=related
5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpZwnlIEABQ&feature=related
6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aob6ssc429c&feature=related
7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGyBHklggXk&feature=related
8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ei2tNNhuI00&feature=related
9 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8hCTlJm80E&feature=related
10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJMsH3Aytls&feature=related
11 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugz-R8Qmxok&feature=related
12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sivUAJaMUk&feature=related
13 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuurGFwEuZg&feature=related
14 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtsjQ1PWUOY&feature=related
15 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKVjuBLvV48&feature=related
 
Last edited:

Bret Hawk

Senator (1k+ posts)
@ Kmanzar

I think it’s a grave miscarriage of justice to deliberately or ignorantly deny the massive contributions of our Muhadiths / Traditionalists to develop the highly acclaimed sciences of Asma ul Rijaal (Intense profiling of the Hadith Narrators), the authenticity of Isnad (Number of narrators in a particular Hadith) and verifications of the Matn (The Text of a Hadith) which was unprecedented in the recorded history of Mankind to this day. You can search for such sort of pedagogical parallel in your beloved western or eastern civilizations, I can safely guarantee you that not even one instance of such profound scholarship you could be able to find in even a solitary unit of an academic discipline.

I agree to you to some extent that many apocryphal and exaggerated line of traditions from the house of Israel (Israiliyat) and from other doubtful sources were indeed incorporated in not only the Hadith manuals but in Tafsir / exegeses and History corpus of Islam as well by some of the narrators according to their own motives but I can assure you that whether it were the giants like Fakhar ud Din Al-Razi or Allama Tabatabaye in the domain of Quranic Tafseer or Imam Abu Hanifah along with his three founders of legal school of thoughts from Sunni stream of Islam and their counterparts in Shi’te’s as well like Imam Muhammad Baqir and Jaffar al Saddiq, Imam Bukhari & Muslim in the academic field of Hadith collections among the Sunnis and Muhammad Yaqub Kulyani in Shi’aism and not to forget the father of modern social sciences Ibn Khaldun in the yards of History and historiography alongwith countless other giant scholars of Islam addressed those challenges perfectly which they faced into the subject areas of their interests.

Believe me the problem does not lie into the authenticity and credibility of Hadith and Fiqh literature rather this issue lies in the heads of those bigots and nemesis of Islam who want to (wilfully and deliberately) create confusion and doubts into the novice minds of the youth in particular in order to make them disillusioned about the sanctity of one of the major sources of Islamic Shariah by attacking its ideological vanguard of those pious personalities / scholars who had devoted their whole lives to revive and establish the academic & empirical frontiers of Islamic sciences. The matter of Blasphemy Law is not different as well and as I’ve noted you in previous thread as well (Gazoomartian’s Thread) that you deliberately ignored couple of my detailed posts there and failed to even addressed even one issue which I’ve highlighted there. You are more than welcome, if you feel the urge and necessity to do so, to revisit that thread once again to clarify some of those points which are apparently bothering you.


 
Last edited:

Cheeko

Minister (2k+ posts)
Dear alihbkable, these videos seem to be work of immature person because they do not make sense.

What seems to me is that mr ghamidi is sharing his views about some issues and he disagrees with some poeple on them in the context the people hold those views or beliefs.

Milaad shareef is a brelavi belief and I love these like celebrations and gatherings. What the problem has been is whether they are essential part of islam or not. The answer is it is lawful to do such things but not essential. Also if people who do these do unlawful things in these gethering then either they should stop them or stop mahafile milaad. This is what ghamidi is saying so where is the problem?

I have been through fights over these things amongst deobandies and brelavies etc. If one want s share something please provide some back ground to things so that they make sense.

regards and all the best.

Milad or Mawlid is not only celebrated by Brelvi but by whole muslim ummah


 

concern_paki

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Meetha Meetha hai Mere MOHAMMED ka naam ...Meetha Meetha hai Mere Ahmed ka naam......Meetha Meetha hai Mere MUSTAFA ka naam.......Meetha Meetha hai Mere AAQAA ka naam.Meetha Meetha hai Mere SYEDDI ka naam.....Meetha Meetha hai Mere MURSHIDI ka naam.......Meetha Meetha hai Mere HABIBI ka naam..........jin pey lakhon croron DAROOD O SALAM ........ Yes if some one sayssomething bad in HIS name (Nauzuballah) our UMMAH will not going to tolerate that ..... WE WILL OPPOSE IT ...
 

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Awan4ever,

So what do you suggest, the Law of Blasphemy should be removed, because you think it is not clear or just?

What should replace it? Nothing, according to the thinking of Asma, sherry and Taseer. People should be free to hurl abuse at our Prophet SAW on the pretext of freedom of Speech, exactly like in the west?

Drunkard like Taseer can say what they like, and druggies like Paracha can write what he likes in Dawn? They should be left alone with their evil?

And lets assume that this law is not there, and people are tried under another law without the death penalty, then what people would do? Who are not found guilty would do? And even those who found guilty would do?

Sherry has introduced the bill in the Parliament, she is dying for her fag and the glass of Sherry, she does not want to be bounded by any norm of civilised behaviour in an Islamic society. She wants freedom, but she does not worry about the death of thousands of innocent Pakistani Muslims by means which are illegal under the international laws. Talk about hypocrisy and lunacy.

Please read my post again and tell me where exactly have I said it should be repealed or that there should be no such law at all?
I have raised some questions that arise from the practice of this law in real life and I just want someone to answer those concerns.
Although I am against what Hina Jilani thinks usually but if you see the programs on TV it seems that even if someone asks for a 'review' of the law in certain specific aspects it is termed as an attempt at repealing the law completely!
That is exactly what you have taken out from my post although I have esked a very specific question regarding the law which in no way violates the spirit of the law in any way.
So please read the question again and answer instead of terming it another attempt at throwing out the law completely!
 

Raaz

(50k+ posts) بابائے فورم
Why not we get the opinion from well renowned scholars and universities on this issue.

Like Jamia Al- Azhar, or Saudi Islamic University.

It is not only Pakistani issue, it is the global Islamic matter. Every muslim country has to deal with this issue .

And the Muslims has to pick a unified view.

This will have lots of benefits and above personal passions and interests.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
@ Kmanzar

I think it’s a grave miscarriage of justice to deliberately or ignorantly deny the massive contributions of our Muhadiths / Traditionalists to develop the highly acclaimed sciences of Asma ul Rijaal (Intense profiling of the Hadith Narrators), the authenticity of Isnad (Number of narrators in a particular Hadith) and verifications of the Matn (The Text of a Hadith) which was unprecedented in the recorded history of Mankind to this day. You can search for such sort of pedagogical parallel in your beloved western or eastern civilizations, I can safely guarantee you that not even one instance of such profound scholarship you could be able to find in even a solitary unit of an academic discipline.

I agree to you some extent that many apocryphal and exaggerated line of traditions from the house of Israel (Israiliyat) and from other doubtful sources were indeed incorporated in not only the Hadith manuals but in Tafsir / exegeses and History corpus of Islam as well by some of the narrators according to their own motives but I can assure you that whether it were the giants like Fakhar ud Din Al-Razi or Allama Tabatabaye in the domain of Quranic Tafseer or Imam Abu Hanifah along with his three founders of legal school of thoughts from Sunni stream of Islam and their counterparts in Shi’te’s as well like Imam Muhammad Baqir and Jaffar al Saddiq, Imam Bukhari & Muslim in the academic field of Hadith collections among the Sunnis and Muhammad Yaqub Kulyani in Shi’aism and not to forget the father of modern social sciences Ibn Khaldun in the yards of History and historiography alongwith countless other giant scholars of Islam addressed those challenges perfectly which they faced into the subject areas of their interests.

Believe me the problem does not lie into the authenticity and credibility of Hadith and Fiqh literature rather this issue lies in the heads of those bigots and nemesis of Islam who want to (wilfully and deliberately) create confusion and doubts into the novice minds of the youth in particular in order to make them disillusioned about the sanctity of one of the major sources of Islamic Shariah by attacking its ideological vanguard of those pious personalities / scholars who had devoted their whole lives to revive and establish the academic & empirical frontiers of Islamic sciences. The matter of Blasphemy Law is not different as well and as I’ve noted you in previous thread as well (Gazoomartian’s Thread) that you deliberately ignored couple of my detailed posts there and failed to even addressed even one issue which I’ve highlighted there. You are more than welcome, if you feel the urge and necessity to do so, to revisit that thread once again to clarify some of those points which are apparently bothering you.

Dear Bret Hawk, a huge majority of muslims do not deny authenticity of ahadith as the 2ndary source of information on islam.

Unlike the quran the hadith collections have three stages to pass.

1)They must have isnaad ie chains of narrators ie who is reporting on whose authority. This was ensured by the collecters of the hadith themselves.

2)These narrators must be known and must be thiqqa ie there should not be any proof against them that they were ever caught lying and deceiving or were prone to forgetfulness orwere of bad character. This is where ulema of ismal alrijal come into it whop wrote various books on this subject.

3)The final test is of matan ie the text of the report. This is again an independent field of knowledge called aljera waltadeel= scrutiny or cross examination of the text.

Just as people who collected hadith are called muhaddisoon the ulema of jera are called naqidoon.

Just like there are rules for tafseer of thge quran for acceptance of tafseer so there are rules for hadith for acceptence of any particular hadith.

http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/Tafseer/Ulum/Denffor6.html#Principles

1)The most important is the first rule ie interpretation of the quran by the quran.

2)Once the quran has been satisfactorily interpreted by collecting all related verses regarding a subject matter without any contradiction then if need be related authenitc ahadith can be used to further clarify things as the need may dictate.

The mistake most people make is, they ignore the collection of all of the related verses in the quran about a subject matter in one place and instead take a verse or two and start throwing in so called ahadith and opinions of so many past people that the actual meaning becomes burried underneath everything piled up on that.

Many mufassiroon have made this mistake ie it is as if universal. This is what led to sectism amongst muslims right from the beginning and the result was the event that took place in karbala, iraq ie the killing of the prophet's family. Killing of muslims by muslims started with death of uthman the 3rd caliph of islam.

So almost all muslim scholars of tafseer ignored the proper way of interpretation of the quran and today, we mostly have tafaseer that were written without due care and the purpose of proper understanding of islam as it is in the quran. Lots of so called hadith were not only invented by hypocrites from amongst jews who turned muslims for their own reasons but also many hadith were forged by muslims themselves to legitimise rules of ruling elite amongst muslims ie tribal warfare started.

For example, in sunni hadith books the contribution of ahlal bait-household of the propeht is not much at all despite the fact that household of the prophet knew the prophet the most. If a person is known properly to anyone it is his own family. Yet most of the hadith are narrated by people like abu huraira, who in comparison to ali, fatima, hassan and husain is not as knowledgeable person because he only spent less than a few years with prophet. He was also lashed by umar for his inappropriate conduct.

There like things raise suspicions regarding hadith collection by sunnies. Also hadith books are collected by nonarabs eg bukhari from bukhara persia.

This is why sunni ahadith are not that trustable and likewise the shia collections. However many of the ahadith are agreed upon as well between them.

This made situation difficult but rules do help to try and minimise forgeries and therefore when one uses hadith for detailing the quran one needs to be very very careful. It is better to rely on the quran and commonsense when one tries to test ahadith for their truth value regarding a subject matter.

Just like no such interpretation is accepted valid as introduces contradictions within the quran so no ahadith are valid that contradict the quran no matter how authentic they may be due to their chains of narrators.

So any interpretaion of the quran is invalid that contradict self evident facts or causes contradictions within the quranic text.

Muslims scholars also made a serious mistake in accepting a rule that tafseer bil rai=personal opinin based interpretation is invalid.

This contradicts the rule of interpretation of the quran by the quran. Becauase whenever there appear contradictions between the verses of the quran, the personal opinion is the only one, one has to try and show how the verses may fit together ie one needs an explanation that goes in between to bridge the gap.

What they should have said was that personal opinions are only valid if they remove the contradictions because the personal opinions are then backed by their end result.

Likewise many made the mistake of accepting the rule that the quran must be understood through the hadith the while they accepted that no haith is valid that is against the quran.

It is possible that some did this deliberately to please their pay masters ie the ruling elite etc and the rest followed them blindly thinking they are godly people so they cannot be wrong. We have same problem today in front of our eyes that many people seem to respect their so called ulema more than god and prophet. No wonder that quran tells us this is what jews and christians used to do. It is sad to see people not gaining knowledge themselves nor using their brains. Nonetheless truth cannot be concealed no matter what.


regards and all the best.
 
Last edited:

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
define:
Secularism and secular state please

Dear Abdul allah, secular means something to do with this world and secularism means the ideology that goes beyond tribal and religious ties to unite people on common ground in a piece of land under a single government. If you want me to acknowledge other meanings than I do but those meanings are nonsense in my view because they make no sense whatsoever. The reason because secularim is needed for cooperation between people regardless what they believe or to which tribe they belong.

Look at it this way, humans are not independent beings becaue they did not come to this world on their own. They are then brought up by their parents and extended family and tribe or tribes and within an already existing belief system eg muslims, hindus, atheists, jews, christians etc etc. As we all live in mixed communities in various pieces of land or countries so there arises the need to live with each other and cooperate with each out side the normal relationships that we are used to. Therefore different people come together on basis of common worldly goals or interests. This idea of unity is called secularism.

This is not new rather if we look back in makkah prophet came from hashmi branch of quraishi tribe. He was protected by them as their member. This was purely on the basis of kith and kin relationship. Then the message of the prophet was accepted by people belonging to different tribes so there came about unity on basis of reliigion. Now there were two kinds of relationships between people that united them ie tribal as well as religious. However when the prophet moved to madinah. There were people of other tribes as well as of other religions so to form a unity some idea had to be adopted. Hence came about what is called pact of madinah. This united all people of madina regardless of their tribes and religions on basis of some common grounds. So it is obvious that secularism helps a society be pluralist as regard worldly matters of common interest.

Liewise we have situation today in all countries in the world that we have people of various tribes and of various beliefs all living in the same piece of land under the very same government. This is secularism and pluralistic societies. The idea that secualrism is anti religion is not a valid explanation of the term in my view thought that is the dictionary definition but it seems senseless to me. Usa and france are both based on separation between church and state idea but are known as secular yet there are many religous people living in them practicing their religions freely.

Of course, if you want to disagree that is your right and if you have any other explanation that may also be valid because terms many a time have various defintions and so does secularism.

regards and all the best.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXlM2srLjAE&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5QAfOIklMo&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHb6hWrtYCc&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJXc2YM9_E&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGo4ZMOyACI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d60lidCKHA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XYlOigEVqU&feature=related
 
Last edited:

Bret Hawk

Senator (1k+ posts)
Many mufassiroon have made this mistake ie it is as if universal. This is what led to sectism amongst muslims right from the beginning and the result was the event that took place in karbala, iraq ie the killing of the prophet's family. Killing of muslims by muslims started with death of uthman the 3rd caliph of islam.

So almost all muslim scholars of tafseer ignored the proper way of interpretation of the quran and today, we mostly have tafaseer that were written without due care and the purpose of proper understanding of islam as it is in the quran. Lots of so called hadith were not only invented by hypocrites from amongst jews who turned muslims for their own reasons but also many hadith were forged by muslims themselves to legitimise rules of ruling elite amongst muslims ie tribal warfare started.

For example, in sunni hadith books the contribution of ahlal bait-household of the propeht is not much at all despite the fact that household of the prophet knew the prophet the most. If a person is known properly to anyone it is his own family. Yet most of the hadith are narrated by people like abu huraira, who in comparison to ali, fatima, hassan and husain is not as knowledgeable person because he only spent less than a few years with prophet. He was also lashed by umar for his inappropriate conduct.

There like things raise suspicions regarding hadith collection by sunnies. Also hadith books are collected by nonarabs eg bukhari from bukhara persia.

This is why sunni ahadith are not that trustable and likewise the shia collections. However many of the ahadith are agreed upon as well between them.

This made situation difficult but rules do help to try and minimise forgeries and therefore when one uses hadith for detailing the quran one needs to be very very careful. It is better to rely on the quran and commonsense when one tries to test ahadith for their truth value regarding a subject matter.

Just like no such interpretation is accepted valid as introduces contradictions within the quran so no ahadith are valid that contradict the quran no matter how authentic they may be due to their chains of narrators.

So any interpretaion of the quran is invalid that contradict self evident facts or causes contradictions within the quranic text.

Muslims scholars also made a serious mistake in accepting a rule that tafseer bil rai=personal opinin based interpretation is invalid.

This contradicts the rule of interpretation of the quran by the quran. Becauase whenever there appear contradictions between the verses of the quran, the personal opinion is the only one, one has to try and show how the verses may fit together ie one needs an explanation that goes in between to bridge the gap.

What they should have said was that personal opinions are only valid if they remove the contradictions because the personal opinions are then backed by their end result.

Likewise many made the mistake of accepting the rule that the quran must be understood through the hadith the while they accepted that no haith is valid that is against the quran.

It is possible that some did this deliberately to please their pay masters ie the ruling elite etc and the rest followed them blindly thinking they are godly people so they cannot be wrong. We have same problem today in front of our eyes that many people seem to respect their so called ulema more than god and prophet. No wonder that quran tells us this is what jews and christians used to do. It is sad to see people not gaining knowledge themselves nor using their brains. Nonetheless truth cannot be concealed no matter what.


regards and all the best.

Dear Mughal

The major chunk of your reply has nothing new to add in this debate of the credibility and authenticity of Hadith literature as compiled by its collectors about a thousand years ago. You’ve mentioned about the fabrications and spurious inclusion of some questionable material in Hadith collections but tactfully ignored the glossing and Sharahs (Critical commentary of Traditions by the Hadith Critics) of every single narration in almost every Hadith compilation be it Sahih Sitta or other Hadith compendiums of different Imams and Hadith Doctors? I’m amazed that how come you haven’t come across those critical explications and analysis of Sharihs of Hadiths like Ibn Hajjar Al Askalani, Imam Behaqi and Al Ainee for instance where they even sift through the weak traditions from Bukhari & Muslim Hadith collections as well on the basis of its Isnad and Textual contents of those weak Hadiths.

Secondly I’ve my own share of reservations about your defence of Tafseer of Quran bil Rai (Exegeses of Quran through personal reasoning)? As per your own logic presented in your post the legal, ethical, ritualistic and dogmatic matters and injunctions of Holy Quran will be first evaluated through the reasoning and wordings of Quran itself and then with the authentic Sunnah of Holy Prophet pbuh on a given matter? In the explicit and implicit absence of the rulings and guidelines of the above mentioned primary sources would you again prefer and appreciate that practise of interpretation of Quran through one’s own reasoning? Do you know the implications and warnings of Almighty Himself for the perpetrators of this daring crime? Some Salaf Saliheen and Mujadidin of Islam even hold the Ijma and and Qiyas of Sahaba and Imams of Sunni legal schools to be binding and imperative for the later generations of Muslims as well? For some only the rulings of Quran & Sunnah are binding for the later generations of Ummah and on very rare occasions and matters of disputes of novice nature one could use the interpretation of Quran & Hadith with his own reasoning, then again with strict criterion of scholarship and equally restrictive framework of that reasoning has also been delineated in the corpus of Legal compendiums of influential Faqihs and Mujtahidin of Islam.

Without fulfilling those strict criterions of scholarship and then the practical supervision under the trained Mujtahidin for a period of time one can not be able to produce his reasoning and interpretation of those limited matters of Quran & Sunnah which are not fully explained and extrapolated by the above mentioned primordial sources. Not any Tom, Dick, Harry & Marry by just cramming and quoting the dictionaries of Qamus & Lisaan ul Arab can perform this highly complex task as it has been perceived by some headless charlatans of this age which are freely roaming nowadays on different forums of media and society.
 
Last edited:

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear Mughal

The major chunk of your reply has nothing new to this debate of the credibility and authenticity of Hadith literature as compiled by its collectors about thousand years ago. You’ve mentioned about the fabrications and spurious inclusion of some spurious material in Hadith collections but tactfully ignored the glossing and Sharahs (Critical commentary of Traditions by the Hadith Critics) of every single narration in almost every Hadith compilation be it Sahih Sitta or other Hadith compendiums of different Imams and Hadith Doctors? I’m amazed that how come you haven’t come across those critical explications and analysis of Sharihs of Hadiths like Ibn Hajjar Al Askalani, Imam Behaqi and Al Ainee where they even sift through the weak traditions from Bukhari & Muslim Hadith collections as well on the basis of its Isnad and Textual contents of those weak Hadiths.

Secondly I’ve my own share of reservations about your defence of Tafseer of Quran bil Rai (Exegeses of Quran through personal reasoning)? As per your own logic presented in your post the legal, ethical, ritualistic and dogmatic matters and injunctions of Holy Quran will be first evaluated through the reasoning and wordings of Quran itself and then with the authentic Sunnah of Holy Prophet pbuh on a given matter? In the explicit and implicit absence of the rulings and guidelines of the above mentioned primary sources would you again prefer and appreciate that practise of interpretation of Quran through one’s own reasoning? Do you know the implications and warnings of Almighty Himself for the perpetrators of this daring crime? Some Salaf Saliheen and Mujadidin of Islam even hold the Ijma and and Qiyas of Sahaba and Imams of Sunni legal schools to be binding and imperative for the later generations of Muslims as well? For some only the rulings of Quran & Sunnah are binding for the later generations of Ummah and on very rare occasions and matters of disputes of novice nature one could use the interpretation of Quran & Hadith with his own reasoning, then again with strict criterion of scholarship and equally restrictive framework of that reasoning has also been delineated in the corpus of Legal compendiums of influential Faqihs and Mujtahidin of Islam.

Without fulfilling those strict criterions of scholarship and then the practical supervision under the trained Mujtahidin for a period of time one can be able to produce his reasoning and interpretation of those limited matters of Quran & Sunnah which are not fully explained and extrapolated by the above mentioned primordial sources. Not any Tom, Dick, Harry & Marry by just cramming and quoting the dictionaries of Qamus & Lisaan ul Arab can perform this highly complex task as it has been perceived by some headless charlatans of this age which are freely roaming nowadays on different forums of media and society.

Thank you dear Bret Hawk for participating in the discussion and for making the effort.

We both agree that hadith are sencondary source on islam.

We also agree that there are problems with ahadith but they can be overcome using various ideas.

The point you differed about is legitimacy of reasoning and opnions when interpreting the quran.

You are right that according to general rule sunni islam is based on quran, hadith, qiyaas/analogy and ijma=consensus.

Similarly shia islam is based on the quran, hadith and sayings of all twelve imaams and again qiyas and ijma of mujtahideen.

The difference again is on the fact that who we follow and why or how far.

Let me try and explain reasoning first. A human only has a brain and five senses and the rest is all information one get to the brain which is a processing unit that makes decision.

So no matter whatever the information, it is impossible for human brain not to process it the same way it does under its normal functionality. It is therefore bound to make decision on the decision that it receives from some one else on the same matter. You are doing that right now ie you are judgeing whether what I am saying is right or wrong from your stand point.

Likewise when we read the quran and all that which others tell us about it we ourselves become the judge to see whehter it makes sense or not. If we think that it is ok we accept it otherwise we reject it. So ultimately you will agree that it is our own very reasoning that we follow not what other say no matter how qualified a person is in any decipline or field. We only use information by other to see whether they make sense or not. So when we try to see they make sense or not we are actually using our own brains and reasoning.

So peronal reasoning cannot be disputed nor can be over ridden no matter what. So ultimately we believe and do what we ourselves think is right not what others tell us is right. So as far as the brain is concerned no matter what all is mere information waiting for our decisions.

So whether we make our own decision from start to finish about something or gather information about desicions made by others, it is all just information on which we base our own decision by our own reasoning. So if we ultimately rest only and only on our own reasoning to base our decision on then how can anyone say that perosnal decisin making is wrong? It is only wrong if it could be proven wrong by evidence not because it is reasoned by oneself.

So if we take a point of discussion on the quran and interpret the quran ourselves then why will it be wrong just because we are reasoning it ourselves? The only reason is other better reasons against our reasoning of which we may not be aware at the time of decision making. But then no human being is all perfect, we all fall well short of knowing a lot of things in life and therefore can make mistakes.

So you see dear friend, it is not wrong to offer perosnal opinions but to hold on to wrong opinion if you become aware of better reason. So loong as there is no better reason than what you thoink is right then holding on to that is fine even if you happen to be wrong in actual fact.

As children people are told things like tooth fairy etc and children keep believing that till they find out that it was all a funny joke and not really true. So it is ok to believe and do what suits one till one knows better. So knowing better is important not not knowing or holding onto wrong things despite knowing otherwise.

So it is clear that people who think it is wrong to try and make sense of the quran all by themselves are wrong on two basis a)because the human barin makes its own decisions based on its own reasons and b)because such a rule defeats the first principle of interpration of the quran by the quran. If you use other things to interpret the quran than your own brain then you have mixed the quranic information with other information so what is the point of having the quran? Mixing the clear information with something that may not be clear is wrong in my view because it will not let you see what the quran means by itself.

Soofy poetry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5tcm1J0NV4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJbUt2MuKXk&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1hWOQxaPvE&feature=fvw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5C3JKJgDXM

regards and all the best.
 
Last edited:

kmanzar

Voter (50+ posts)
@ Kmanzar

I think it’s a grave miscarriage of justice to deliberately or ignorantly deny the massive contributions of our Muhadiths / Traditionalists to develop the highly acclaimed sciences of Asma ul Rijaal (Intense profiling of the Hadith Narrators), the authenticity of Isnad (Number of narrators in a particular Hadith) and verifications of the Matn (The Text of a Hadith) which was unprecedented in the recorded history of Mankind to this day. You can search for such sort of pedagogical parallel in your beloved western or eastern civilizations, I can safely guarantee you that not even one instance of such profound scholarship you could be able to find in even a solitary unit of an academic discipline.

I agree to you to some extent that many apocryphal and exaggerated line of traditions from the house of Israel (Israiliyat) and from other doubtful sources were indeed incorporated in not only the Hadith manuals but in Tafsir / exegeses and History corpus of Islam as well by some of the narrators according to their own motives but I can assure you that whether it were the giants like Fakhar ud Din Al-Razi or Allama Tabatabaye in the domain of Quranic Tafseer or Imam Abu Hanifah along with his three founders of legal school of thoughts from Sunni stream of Islam and their counterparts in Shi’te’s as well like Imam Muhammad Baqir and Jaffar al Saddiq, Imam Bukhari & Muslim in the academic field of Hadith collections among the Sunnis and Muhammad Yaqub Kulyani in Shi’aism and not to forget the father of modern social sciences Ibn Khaldun in the yards of History and historiography alongwith countless other giant scholars of Islam addressed those challenges perfectly which they faced into the subject areas of their interests.

Believe me the problem does not lie into the authenticity and credibility of Hadith and Fiqh literature rather this issue lies in the heads of those bigots and nemesis of Islam who want to (wilfully and deliberately) create confusion and doubts into the novice minds of the youth in particular in order to make them disillusioned about the sanctity of one of the major sources of Islamic Shariah by attacking its ideological vanguard of those pious personalities / scholars who had devoted their whole lives to revive and establish the academic & empirical frontiers of Islamic sciences. The matter of Blasphemy Law is not different as well and as I’ve noted you in previous thread as well (Gazoomartian’s Thread) that you deliberately ignored couple of my detailed posts there and failed to even addressed even one issue which I’ve highlighted there. You are more than welcome, if you feel the urge and necessity to do so, to revisit that thread once again to clarify some of those points which are apparently bothering you.

It’s usual (particularly in field of religion) that some matters achieve a level of legitimacy in a way that thinking and passing judgments on such matters becomes out of question (although there won’t be any reason of legitimacy except that those matters were never argued or challenged for ages), and whenever any intellectual tries to argue on such matters with rationale and wisdom, receives a huge resistance from the radical elements of the society with a very common charge, that is, ‘that argument was never heard from any of our ancestors, who had much more wisdom and vision, how dare that somebody can have any different opinion’ and so. Many Islamic thinkers of all times continuously faced similar sort of allegations, whenever they presented anything different from a common understanding of religion among society.

There is no single doubt on the marvelous efforts done by all the great Muslim scholars you mentioned. Their work was a masterpiece of that time, but even they never claimed that they are producing an unchallengeable work, after all they were human beings, and their work was a pure human effort (not a divine work). If some scholar later on draws some other opinion based on his research should not be condemned but to be analysed with cool head

Anyhow, let’s assume for a minute that the work produced by those great scholars of past is 100% perfect and all those modern scholars (including Sir Syed, Allama Iqbal, Farahi, Islahi, Pervez, Ghamidi etc) were agents of evil forces with some kind of hidden agenda, still some facts need to be clarified: -


Quran was written, compiled and arranged (in current order) before Prophet (SAW) left this world. He (SAW) devised a flawless mechanism (definitely under the divine guidance) to safe holy Quran for the rest of time, established a team for that purpose for writing down the revelations and that was not a one way mechanism. He (SAW) used to check them back whatever they did write. Did Prophet (SAW) establish a similar sort of mechanism for preserving any other important thing? Answer is no. Then why such other things became an ‘essential / unquestionable’ part of our belief? It requires a long debate, shortage of space is here.


Quran is complete, its all content was collected under a divine mechanism, there was not a chance that even a single important word (required to be included in the Quran) got missed. But that is not with the case of Hadith collection. Nobody have claim for collecting each and every single saying of Prophet (SAW). Matter of fact is that Ahadiths were collected in ‘by-chance’ manner (means, ahadith collectors might missed so many important ahadith, those never got chance to came into their eyes)


There were no sections/divisions among Muslims during the time of compilation of Quran. But unfortunately, during the compilation of Ahadith (around 250-300 AH and so), Islam was divided into different sects, and school of thoughts within sects. Since Ahadith collectors were also belonged to some specific sect, naturally their acceptance and rejection of any hadith was also inspired by their individual thoughts (some examples can be provided on demand).


Every statement of Quran sits within a context, because Quran comes within a single unit, not true in case of majority of Ahadith.


And lots of so many things can be mentioned on the level of authenticity and authority among Quran and Hadith. But I will also want to clear that the sole purpose of this whole discussion is not to disregard or reject any important attribute of Islam, but just it's a try to have a better understanding of some basic elements of Islam, so that we know their level and put them accordingly to level of their worth and authority whenever discussing any law based on Islamic principles.

Regards
 
Last edited:

abeypk

Citizen
Dear Friends,

As far as I believe, Javaid gamdi itself spoke to media and said that in islam there are two ways one could be sentenced to death,

1- If some one has committed murder
2- If some one is responsible for a deed that caused FASAD within humen beings.

If someone said something about our beloved PROPHET PBUH, it directly or indirectly causes FASAD among a society, as muslims will get ignited and frustrated naturally if they will hear somtihng disgraceful about Our Beloved Prophet PBUH. This can cause series of killings and murders within our community.

Secondly what ever those idiots and western paid so called humen rights activists or scholors say, doesn't matter if they change law or not, People won't follow them. One who loves Prophet PBUH will do what he can to stop this nonsence. It is our DUTY.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear friends, no sensible person can deny contributions of any human being who did something good for the humanity but not everybody has contributed to the same level so it is not right to give some people more respect than others just for sake of it. Keeping all in their proper place is the right way.

Likewise contributions of mufassireen, muhaddiseen, shariheen etc etc are appreciated.

If we look around we see people travelling to visit places where such people are buried pay homage if you like. Why poeple go to prophet's grave or graves of saints? Because people know what they have done for them when they were alive. Good people always command respect alive or dead.

One can see people respect their parents and elders and anyone else who they think is worth the respect. We are emotional beings so all this comes naturally. All this goies to show good poeple win hearts and minds of other human beings. They work for better world.

regards and all the best.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear Friends,

As far as I believe, Javaid gamdi itself spoke to media and said that in islam there are two ways one could be sentenced to death,

1- If some one has committed murder
2- If some one is responsible for a deed that caused FASAD within humen beings.

If someone said something about our beloved PROPHET PBUH, it directly or indirectly causes FASAD among a society, as muslims will get ignited and frustrated naturally if they will hear somtihng disgraceful about Our Beloved Prophet PBUH. This can cause series of killings and murders within our community.

Secondly what ever those idiots and western paid so called humen rights activists or scholors say, doesn't matter if they change law or not, People won't follow them. One who loves Prophet PBUH will do what he can to stop this nonsence. It is our DUTY.

Dear abeypk, I can understand what you are saying but will advise against anger getting better of you. Where there is love there cannot be hate. The prophet was a very forgiving man and never answered aggression with aggression unless he was physically forced into reaction. So long as there was any chance he forgave because his mission necessitated that he should that. So if anyone loves the prophet then the least he should do is help his mission not go about making situation worse by reacting to other peoples' stupidities.

I am against blasphemy law and am of the opinion that it is against what the prophet stood for. A good man does not need protection of law because he is here for the good of humnanity. If some one swears at him it is due to that person's ignorance about what he stands for and the best we can do is help the person remove that ignorance. Once one becomes aware of the truth one will become ashamed of oneself. It is not right to kill people for their beliefs, ignorance and stupidity.

Let us not listen to silly mullahs who have portayed the prophet in bad light because of which there are many who are throwing abuse at islam , quran and the prophet. It is better if try and put our own house in order first.

I am talking about child marriages, stoning to death or application iof islamic punishments in the wrong ways by muslims like taleban, saudi arabia, iran etc. All this has presented us to the outside world as barbarian and animals eg before the nonmuslim world so how can we just blame them when the real problem is with people from amongst ourselves.

Our corrupt religious and political leaders just try to divert our attention from themselves by bringing to our attention things that do not really need our attention the way they put them to us.

These laws that ruling people bring are merely for controlling the poeple for their own ends not for protecting the poor and the weak.

regards and all the best.
 
Last edited:

awan4ever

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear Friends,

As far as I believe, Javaid gamdi itself spoke to media and said that in islam there are two ways one could be sentenced to death,

1- If some one has committed murder
2- If some one is responsible for a deed that caused FASAD within humen beings.

If someone said something about our beloved PROPHET PBUH, it directly or indirectly causes FASAD among a society, as muslims will get ignited and frustrated naturally if they will hear somtihng disgraceful about Our Beloved Prophet PBUH. This can cause series of killings and murders within our community.

Secondly what ever those idiots and western paid so called humen rights activists or scholors say, doesn't matter if they change law or not, People won't follow them. One who loves Prophet PBUH will do what he can to stop this nonsence. It is our DUTY.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/85412/blasphemy-case-masjid-imam-offers-reward-to-kill-aasia/

This is the real fasaad.
 

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Islam according to various scholars of islam from different groups.

Kia Khoon raizi band ho Sakti hai

http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthre...a-Ludhyanwi-Kia-Khoon-raizi-band-ho-Sakti-hai

Shia and Sunni Unity *MUST WATCH* 1/5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0YFV1Z7ASQ&feature=related

IZHAR-E-HAQEEQAT



Status of Hadeeth 01



Status of Hadith in Islam Epsd II (1/4)



Hudud Ordinance & Rajem ke saza - 1



Taqleed (1)


Islam main Qanoon-e-Talaq (1 of 8)



Pakistan 6 Halala Nikah's of a Mosque Imam's wife


halaala

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APVNOo5pVg8

Sunni vs Deobandi. 1 / 20 ''Qabar par Azan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAjo7yOQL6o

SHIA VS SUNNI MUNAZRA 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeeH4r4-Jks

MUNAZRA SHIA VS SUNNI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOGUzHz5h0o&feature=related

What I make of islam

http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?50607-Pakistan-religion-secularism-amp-tribalism&


Dear brothers and sisters, please remember one thing islam is against sectarianism

003.102 YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Fear Allah as He should be feared, and die not except in a state of Islam.

003.103 YUSUFALI: And hold fast, all together, by the rope which Allah (stretches out for you), and be not divided among yourselves; and remember with gratitude Allah's favour on you; for ye were enemies and He joined your hearts in love, so that by His Grace, ye became brethren; and ye were on the brink of the pit of Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus doth Allah make His Signs clear to you: That ye may be guided.

013.011 YUSUFALI: .......... Allah does not change a people's lot unless they change what is in their hearts. But when (once) Allah willeth a people's punishment, there can be no turning it back, nor will they find, besides Him, any to protect.

006.159 YUSUFALI: As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did.

010.057 YUSUFALI: O mankind! there hath come to you a direction from your Lord and a healing for the (diseases) in your hearts,- and for those who believe, a guidance and a Mercy.

These like verses in the quran leave us no room to be sectarians.

As for discussing matters relating religion or anything else for that matter. The first thing you all must realise is that you yourself are the judge or decision maker of whatever you believe or do.

Let me try and explain it a little. A human being is just a brain and senses. The brain gets all its information fropm its senses and senses get information from the environment within which we interact. The brain is just a logical processing unit that under normal functionality makes decision based on information it gets on the basis of the best reason it has to arrive at the decision.

No mawlana can force you to believe one thing or the other it is you who decide all the time. Other peoples' decisions are their own just like your decision is your own. All that happens is that you look at what others say and then form an opinion yourself based on your own reasoning as to which side in your opinion is right or wrong.

We have the first or fundamental rule of tafseer based on this principle ie the quran must be interpreted by itself first and foremost. Just think about it what it means.

It means that you read the quran, you understand the quran in sense of its words and meaning and then set verses on the same topic or issue or point through out the quran together and see that there is no contradiction in them. If there is a contradiction then you need to go back and use other meanings of the words in the verses and see if that removes any contradiction. If that does then your understadning of the quran is perfect ie it cannot be challenged.

Remember, the quran is a clear and a relaible text so don't try to understand it through less reliable or unreliable sources as the first thing.

The quran wants you to look at it yourself, why? because others can lead you in the direction against the quran. So one must educate one self reasonably so that one could judge the quran for oneself.

Tafseer of the quran by the quran is about understanding the quran youself, if you try and understand the quran through others then that is not going to be as relaible because the quran has warned us that there are bad people out there who claim to be mullahs who mislead others for their own ends. Jewish and christian bad mullahs are talked about in the quran.

Only if one understands the quran properly that ahadith will make sense. Remember tafseer by way hadith is only subordinate to the quranic tafseer by the quran.


Please read my thread pakistan, tribalism, islam and secularism and see what islam means or how it works.

Once we know that then talaaq and halaalah will make sense in its own context as the quran puts it.

Islam divides peoples' beliefs and practices into various parts in various contexts.

For example, some beliefs and practices are social (ie they involve or effect others beyond oneself) others personal (that do not concern others or effect others). However, there are also beliefs and actions that are both ie some beliefs and actions in some respect are social the while in other respects they are private. This is vitally important point to remember. To see whether a belief or practice or action is really private or social, we can see if it only effects ourselves or others as well beyond ourselves. Where effect is limited to ourselves that is private or personal but where effects is also on others in any way in that way that matter is social or governmental.

The other point to remember is that there are laws in any society to keep people organised because a society is an organisation of people workind together as a unit. The laws are there to keep the society running smoothly and people must know the laws so that they know what their duties are and what is unlawful so that they do not do illegal things because that will damage the society or totally destroy it. If there is no society, there is no law. The law is only there because some people want to live as a unit ie a family, a tribe, a country etc hence the need for local national and international regulations and laws etc. When people live as a unit there have to be some rules so that each and every person in that unit lives by them so that the society or unit continues its existence smoothly.

Likewise there are laws regarding marriage and divorce. These laws are very important part of a society. Islam tells us for state purposes how to get marriage and how to divorce, why? Because the state has to ensure that each person is given the rights and responsibilities or duties for proper interaction so that there is no trouble between people and if there is then there is some way of dealing with it so that society does not fall apart.

It will be a very disorganised way of life if any man ran arround with any woman. The children result from that will have no proper parenting as no one will be responsible for them and so humans will be living like animals and suffer unnecessary. In order to prevent such things happening laws became necessary and so people are held responsible for each other. The law of marriage and divorce is related to inheritence or legacy, child custody etc etc.

This is why unless a person has the knowledge of these things it will not make sense to him what the law of marriage and divorce is all about.

The quran is very clear about marriage.

1)The age of marriage.

004.006 YUSUFALI: Make trial of orphans until they reach the age of marriage; if then ye find sound judgment in them, release their property to them; but consume it not wastefully, nor in haste against their growing up. If the guardian is well-off, Let him claim no remuneration, but if he is poor, let him have for himself what is just and reasonable. When ye release their property to them, take witnesses in their presence: But all-sufficient is Allah in taking account.

This verse tells us that there is definite the age of marriage ie just like age when you can drive a car. Also there are conditions that people getting married must have sense of responsibiltiy and have the circumstances that they can raise a good family under normal circumstances and situations. Just as you can have your driving licence at an age you get the marriage licence but you must learn all that is related to marriage before you get married so that you do not end up killing each other.

004.019 YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Ye are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should ye treat them with harshness, that ye may Take away part of the dower ye have given them,-except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary live with them on a footing of kindness and equity. If ye take a dislike to them it may be that ye dislike a thing, and Allah brings about through it a great deal of good.

This verse forbids marriage against will ie in islam child marriages are not allowed and nor are forced mariiages as far as the quran is concerned.

I explained the proper way to understand the quran before I started this because others wise people may have jumped to wrong conclusions about islam the way the quran explains it.

Here I have proven beyond a shadow of doubt that all the ahadith reports are false that tell us that the prophet married ayesha when she was 6 years old. Mullahs are to blame for bad reputation of islam but I shall leave that just now. Just accept the fact that not everything mullahs tell us as islam is in fact islam. This is why there are so many sects because we have been very irresponsible ourselves for getting our islam from others without thinking it through properly in light of the quran.

There is not a thing that is islam and it is not clarified fully by the quran. Even though mullahs tell us various thing even regarding marriage and divorce the quran is very clear to those who understand the context of the quran and the reality of the situation in this regard in the real world.

002.229 YUSUFALI: A divorce is only permissible twice: after that, the parties should either hold Together on equitable terms, or separate with kindness. It is not lawful for you, (Men), to take back any of your gifts (from your wives), except when both parties fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allah. If ye (judges) do indeed fear that they would be unable to keep the limits ordained by Allah, there is no blame on either of them if she give something for her freedom. These are the limits ordained by Allah; so do not transgress them if any do transgress the limits ordained by Allah, such persons wrong (Themselves as well as others).


Let us see the context of divorce. It is very damaging if any society allowed anyone to marry and divorce at will. The society will become totally disorganised and a jungle. It is very important to register marriage with the state authorites, local , national or international. Why? So that others know you are man and wife and so you know your rights and responsibilities with respect each other and with respect to others parties eg people or governments etc and their rights and responsibilities with respect to you as man and wife. If you have any kids, relevant people also need to know that as well for the same reasons. If your son goes missing or your wife goes missing the only way you will be given attention is if you have a claim as a related person. If your brother is killed by some one, others will recognise your rights and responsibilty and you will know theirs. This is why human relationships must be known in the eyes of the law and its enforcers if anything is related in any way to others or effects others.

If we do not organise our soicieties according to some sort of rules then people will do as they please because there is no agreed way of life between them to stop them from doing anything for any reason. Likewise as people must inform authorities about their marriages they must do the same regarding their divorce. But they must not make marriage and divorce a child's play because this will totally destroy family structure which makes people a tribe that is necessary for living a reasonably good life. If poeple organise and work together they can achieve a lot whereas disorganised people cannot be free of infights over each and everything, having no time to make progress and so the only way is destruction or life worse than animals in the jungle. As men will try and take women and properties of others there will be a lot of killing for example. This shows not only you need to have laws but also the laws you have must be implemented properly.

To stop all damaging or destructive things islam shows people the way to do things in a civilised way. According to the quran a man is only allowed to divorce his same wife twice in his life time and he is also allowed to remarry her if she so wishes. The question is, why islam allows divorce? Islam allows divorce because a human can make mistakes and so one is given two chances to be able to make oneself sensible, so if one fails then one is not likely to be sensible in future either, so the permanent separation is ordered before these people do each other and the wider society some serious damage that all regret.

The point is, the quran first of all tells people, don't marry till you know what is involved in this and only marry if you think that you can be good husband and wife ie you have what it takes to be a good married couple. So if the people involvbed took this first step right then it is unlikely that they will ever go for divorce. However life is full of surprises and wisdom some times fails even the very wise, so divorce is a way out for people who may have become unhappy with each other for whatever the reasons. It is therefore better that they separate sensibly than live in misery. Once people separate wisely they may never need to get back together again but again separation may work on them and they may feel that their decision for divorce was not the wise one so they have two such chances to go with whatever they think is right for them.

If they change their mind within the idda then there is no need for remarriage but if they go beyond the time limit then they can remarry to be together again at any later time. This idda period is for two reasons. One that if woman is pregnant then she becomes known for that so that child responsibility could become clear for the father of that child and the state and two, so that the state is informed of this divorce but ssupends it till it is clear that people are really divorcing. Once divorce becomes permanent then state must be informed and the same needs to be done for birth of any child.

The state needs to know these things because the state has to issue licences, confirmations and verifications for the people so that wherever they may be, they do not have any problems. People travelling from one place to another need papers to prove things eg they are man and wife or the children with them are their own or the things they have are their own etc etc etc. So mullahs who have no sense how things work in the real world have messed up islam as much as they could and so there is no point people fighting over it but see if we can make sense of all this and sort it out.

The divorce with words has nothing to do with islam, it is about real process of divorce under the state law just like marriage and birth registration, divorce also needs to be properly witnessed and registered and people must carry the proof with them so that if need to be they could produce it. If a man and woman are travelling with each other and people catch them and accuse them of illegal sexual relationship what will be their way out? Or if a man and a woman are found together and they tell us they are married couple, how can we prove that they are not? If a woman marries a man, how do we know she is not already married? If she divorced, how do we know that if she has nothing to prove it with so that she could marry again? So one can see marriage and divorce is not a private matter and it cannot be. Any one taking it that way is out of his mind. This is why the need for witnesses for marriage and divorce or the official papers which could prove their relationship etc etc. You need proof to prove something belongs to you, your word is not enough under some circumstances.


002.282 YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! When ye deal with each other, in transactions involving future obligations in a fixed period of time, reduce them to writing Let a scribe write down faithfully as between the parties: let not the scribe refuse to write: as Allah Has taught him, so let him write. Let him who incurs the liability dictate, but let him fear His Lord Allah, and not diminish aught of what he owes. If they party liable is mentally deficient, or weak, or unable Himself to dictate, Let his guardian dictate faithfully, and get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her. The witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (For evidence). Disdain not to reduce to writing (your contract) for a future period, whether it be small or big: it is juster in the sight of Allah.........

As for mullahs, many of them are paid by their masters to issue fatwas according to wishes of their pay masters. So a powerful and wealthy person who has paedophilic tendencies, can make such mullahs to justify paedophilia and so ignorant from then on think that is islam and so on.

This argument proves that the mawlanas in the videos are right to some degree but not totally. They too failed to realise the proper legal and social context of divorce. Disregarding state in legal matters is silly and wrong because islam does not override state laws and social conventions or tribal customs rather it reinforces them provided they are just and fair and are for the benefit of the unit of humanity.

Halaala mullahs need to educate themselves so that they could see their own mistake. Their whole understanding of islam in this regards is totally cut off from the reality. They are only and only thinking about sex as an issue, which it is not. This is issue of social unit ie family. How this unit should come into existence and how it should continue and if unfortunately it cannot then how to limit the damage to people involved and the wider society is the point.

Just as mullahs are wrong about paedophilia and call it islam so they are wrong about purpose of halaala ie if a woman married some one else properly legally after proper legal divorce and then he divorces her again properly legally and then if exhusband and exwife come togther again proper legal way then that mariage is fine.

The quran forbidds lusting ie any man running after just any woman. This is in fact sign of sexually suppressed society where people are forcefully made to do things against their will for whatever reason. If you do not like anyone to force you to breath in things you do not like to breath in, if you do like anyone to force you to drink things you do not like to drink, if you do not like anyone to force you to eat things you do not like to eat then why should poeple let anyone force them to marry anyone against their will? What you do not like you do not like and no one can force anyone to like something because this is a natural process. So muslims must learn and know what is wrong and fight against ills in the name of islam in their societies so that the muslim world becomes a better world.

The ignorant mullahs are opening the door for protitution in the name of islam by way of halaala ie a bad man can agree with a like minded woman that we will work together as man and wife to make money. I will sell you to different men in the name of halaala this way we will not be caught for the offence of protitution. This could prove very damaging for society if not destructive. Also mullah halaala forces women to develop taste for sex with different men and that in itself is very dangerous for family unit. Having a well thought out marriage and divorce is different from mullahs sense of marriage and divorce. It is not fault of woman if man divorces her the mullah way so why put her through something that is not even her fault?

regards and all the best.
 
Last edited:

such bolo

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Bismillah

I think basic point and issue is that whether a Saheeh Hadeeth (sayings, actions and approval to an action) has got any authority in Islam or not? and if a Hadeeth is proved as saheeh (according to its chain) then how it should be treated?

Simplest answer to that is that for last 1300 years or so there has not been any dispute among muslim scholar and muslims in general over Saheeh Hadeeth being authority in Islam....No muslim scholar has ever claimed in the whole history of Islam that Quran is the only source in Islam neither Quran itself has ever claimed so. (Yes some confused minded socalled modern educated SUBCONTINENT BASED chunks like Ghulam Ahmed Pervaiz, Allama Mushraqi, Aslam Jairaj Puri and Gamdi etc of last 50 years has claimed differently)

Rather there are 100s of examples from Quran which are enough to prove that Quran needs its explanation through Its messanger. (which is Hadeeth). And one of the basic responsibility of Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaiahi wasallam) and all messanger in general was to READ the book and TEACH the book....

Allah says in Quran Sorah Juma verse no: 2

He it is Who sent among the unlettered ones a Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among themselves, reciting to them His Verses, purifying them (from the filth of disbelief and polytheism), and teaching them the Book and Al-Hikmah . And verily, they had been before in manifest error.

1) My question is that is there any difference between reading the book and teaching the book???
2) My question is that reading verses means Reading Quran, so the Quran is in our hands...where are the teachings?
3) Whenever the Huq/truth perished and the possibility to find the truth faded Almighty Allah sent his messangers...Its well established that Prophet Muhammad (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) is the final and last messanger and no messanger or prophet to come, then logically it is established that the READING and TEACHING would there be till the domesday to find the truth...and alhamdulillah they are.
4) does Quran describes everything in detail? for example if Quran says that you must pray...Does Quran also says that how to pray?, if Quran says that to perform Hujj....Does Quran also tell us how to perform Hujj. etc etc.


I would ask my muslim brothers and sisters to please consult authentic Ulemas/scholars who are well versed in this topic..inshaAllah you will find the truth and the truth is that Hadeeth is as preserved as Quran...Hadeeth is also reveleation like Quran....method and ways to preserve both the sources were different but if hadeeth is established as saheeh then its hukum can not be different then a hukum in Quran as both are revealetion and we can not differentiate between two revealation or Ahkam (commands) of one diety (Allah subhanwutaallah).

WASSALAM
 
Last edited:

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Dear such bolo, thank you very much for your participation.

I do not think anyone here can disagrees that tafseer and hadith and seerah, sharah and fiqh, history books are very useful because without them we will be lost. Thanks to these books we have all the information even today about islam.

The problem is using that information ie how we sort it out in a sensible way that it all comes together like a jigsaw. This is where rules have been invented to categorise the information so that we do not reject what is ok according to the set criterion but at the same time do not accept which does not meet the criterion because that is thought of as below the standard.

If your point is that all hadith which have complete isnaad are authentic then no one will agree because that is just the very first step in the criterion. The second step is scrutiny of or cross examination of people who have been reporting these ahadith. This again is a totally agreed by both sunni and shia sects. The third criterion is scrutiny of hadith texts and this too is MUTAFIQQUN ALAIH.

There is no dispute between any major muslim sect over this criterion from amongst sunnies or shias.

However there is a vast dispute as to which reports is actually sahee according to the stated criterion.

Let me explain the first criterion for understanding ie categories of hadith on basis of isnaad.

These could be problems with the chain of reports like a reporter may be missing from the top end or bottom end or from the middle. This means the chain is defective in some way so the chain is not sahee=complete/perfect ie some one is missing from the chain. In all sahee books of hadith all ahadith are saheee according to first criterion save those whos chains are stated by the collectors themselves defective. This is why we call them sihaa sitta. Not because their reports are by blameless people or that they are free of other kind of defects, because that work is done by another type of scholars ie aaima asmaa alrijaal.

These people took upon themselves to find out who is who and what sort of person that person was ie character wise and memory wise. If they found any proof about anyone that that reporters was a liar or inventer of ahadith or was forgetful then due to these like defects the ahadith in the sahee books were categorized on this basis as well. So we have false and weak reports even in the books that are called books of sahee ahadith like bukhari or muslim etc.

Then came along another kind of schoars who categorised ahdith on the basis of textual scrutiny. Imaams of jira wa tadeel who cross examine the texts of the hadith books and then wrote what they found out in their own works. So today when you see scholars debating issues and some produce some hadith and the other side comes out saying this hadith is zaeef=weak or mozoo=false etc etc.

Even if any hadith is found to be sound in the past, it does not necessarily mean that it will fit in with new information that comes about on daily basis. That is because humanity is discovering new facts each and every day about which the past generations of scholar were not aware and they could not be so they could not make their decision about them. So the scrutiny of past information continues with time and does not stop. This is why IJTIHAAD has to be continued by the people with wisdom and knowledge of both scriptures and the world in whioch we live. People ignorant of one or the other part of knowl;edge will only mislead us.

However, people learn from each other by discussing and debating things between them, because you come up with an idea then that idea raises another idea in my mind and so on and so forth this interaction increases our knowledge. I am learning thing from people here as they are learning from me thuis we are all trying to help each other towards better understadning of things and so there is nothing wrong with discussing things as far as we can. Not doing this is definitely bad because we remain ignorant of things and our knowledge remains at the level we stop learning.

The authentic information we have we must learn to put it together the best way we can and whoever puts all this information together more sensibly will be the one who is really helping us move forward with confidence and is the wisest person amongst us and we should respect such people without puttiing them into pigeon holes.

I am explaining some things on the following thread if you have time, it will be very kind of you to have a look.

http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?50607-Pakistan-religion-secularism-amp-tribalism&

Thanks again, regards and all the best.
 
Last edited:

Mughal1

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
[FONT=&quot]What is sunnah?[/FONT]


The quran states;

003.031YUSUFALI: Say: "If ye do love Allah, Follow me: Allah will love you and forgive you your sins: For Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."

033.021YUSUFALI: Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.

068.004YUSUFALI: And thou (standest) on an exalted standard of character.

As far as I know, most muslims take these like verses to mean living exactly like the prophet as he lived in his own time in his own place.

There this sense of sunnah is very obvious when we see them wearing clothes like the prophet, growing beard like him. Not only that they claim they have each and every detail about the prophet as to how he sat, how he stood, how he walked, talked, ate, slept, awoke, travelled, communicated etc etc etc.

The question is, is this really how the quran wants us to follow the prophet or is there a better purpose to our lives than this that the quran wants us to serve?


Well, let me try and explain;

No two people are alike even the identical twins. All humans are different from each other biologically as well as psychologically and cannot be the very same even if they wanted to be the same. All the quranic prophets were different from each other as individuals and their situations and circumstances were also different. So one has to ask, was there anything common between all the prophets? The answer is yes, they all had a common purpose assigned to their lives. What was that purpose? To live as allah told them to live ie the way of life that pleased allah was their common purpose and therefore that was, is and will always remain the purpose of all human beings for ever.

Otherwise It is not possible for anyone to follow anyone so closely day and night and to pay attention to each and every word and deed or movement of anyone. Nor it is possible for anyone to convey such amount of information about anyone to anyone. Because each and every person has his/her own life to live, so people need time to themselves to recharge or rest and also to earn their livelihood etc etc.

If we look at the life of the prophets as their stories are told in the quran, none of these prophets lived like their father adam nor they behaved exactly like him or had that much information about him. They did not even live like each other rather all lived in their own time just like the rest of people of their own time and just like we live today in our own time. They wore similar clothes, lived in similar dwellings and did all they had to do just like everyone else. The only difference was that they did not do things god forbid them to do and they did what god bound them to do as their duty. The rest was up to themselves to do as it suited themselves according to their own situations and circumstances, time and place.

What it means is that if our prophet came today instead of back in 7th century then he would have lived like good people of today not like people of arabia back in 7th century. He would not have travelled by camel for example, nor would use weapons of those times if it came to fighting wars. The quran tells us how adam and his wife used leaves to cover themselves. David and solomon lived as it suited their time like kings.

All these points prove beyond a shadow of doubt that following the prophet does not mean doing things liike him. Using miswak is not sunah, travelling by camel is not sunnah and likewise a lot more of other things. The prophet comes for a reason or purpose as set by god. That purpose is to guide human beings as to how to live their lives properly. The common principles they were told are just the same ie raise good families because families make tribes and tribes can come together on basis of common beliefs that help them live as a single family. Living like a good family helps people establish and accomplish much more because infighting damages the family if not destroys it altogether. Working together, caring for each other and sharing things with each other has many advantages. In short the prophets came to teach people how to establish this unity amongst people based on social justice and fair play so that there is peace on the earth for people to cooperate for progress of humanity and its prosperity.

Allah did not send his message for dividing people on basis of what they believe but for uniting them as one people so that they do what is good for themselves in here at least if not for the next world as well. Islam is more about this world than about god. Because islam is not a belief system but a way of life. It talks more about how people should interact with each other than praising allah. Faith in one god and good works is the fundamental teaching of islam. Good works are fundamentally about how people behave towards each other and what they do for each other in the name of god and humanity.

This is why the quran sets the standard that live your lives like your prophets ie behave towards each other and do for each other as good people should. Be helpful for each other like brothers and sister in worldly life. Take care of each other fully ie attend to each others needs and lawful desires thereby help each other towards happiness and thank god for guiding you to this kind of way of life. This is islam and this is following the prophets. Just imitating the prophet is mere acting and does not produce the intended results. Doing things like prophet is what is meant by following the prophet ie trying to teach people the best way of life and then help them achieve it.

One can see that in the bible the prophets did the same ie jesus said take your cross and follow me ie attend to purpose of life like I do. Struggle for social justice and fair play on this earth. This is what jihad is all about, it is not about killing or subduing infidels. Because the quran states, look after your parents with full responsibility as a child even if they are nonmuslims and tell you to be one 31/14-15 also 60/8-9 etc.

So following prophet is all about supporting their cause not doing things that waste your time instead by diverting your time and resources to no purpose. If we try to live like prophet in wrong sense, we will be going backwards in time and that is not what is needed to help this world to be a better place. To make this world a better place a lot more hard work is needed so that we could find ways of removing ignorance, poverty and disease etc as much as we can. By infighting over the right length of beard or designs of clothes we are not going to get anywhere. A leader needs his follower to follow him in helping to establish what he intends to establish oraccomplish ie his objective. If the soldiers instead of fighting in the war started to look at the king to see how long was his beard or what is length of his pajamas etc etc the war will be lost.

This should be enough to show that word sunnah means following the prophet in his objectives not in his each and every move. So it is necessary for us to find out what he wanted to establish or accomplish in his life and see if there is any way we can help him in his cause. It is not only achievement of the objective that is important but also to keep it established so that things remain in order.

I am not against following the prophet because then there is no islam. The propherts are the best examples and the quran is clear on that;

004.064 YUSUFALI: We sent not a messenger, but to be obeyed, in accordance with the will of Allah. If they had only, when they were unjust to themselves, come unto thee and asked Allah's forgiveness, and the Messenger had asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allah indeed Oft-returning, Most Merciful.

004.065 YUSUFALI: But no, by the Lord, they can have no (real) Faith, until they make thee judge in all disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against Thy decisions, but accept them with the fullest conviction.

004.069 YUSUFALI: All who obey Allah and the messenger are in the company of those on whom is the Grace of Allah,- of the prophets (who teach), the sincere (lovers of Truth), the witnesses (who testify), and the Righteous (who do good): Ah! what a beautiful fellowship!

04.080 YUSUFALI: He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah: But if any turn away, We have not sent thee to watch over their (evil deeds).

Now here is the definition of what is sunnah.

004.125 YUSUFALI: Who can be better in religion than one who submits his whole self to Allah, does good, and follows the way of Abraham the true in Faith? For Allah did take Abraham for a friend.

004.085 YUSUFALI: Whoever recommends and helps a good cause becomes a partner therein: And whoever recommends and helps an evil cause, shares in its burden: And Allah hath power over all things.

004.026 YUSUFALI: Allah doth wish to make clear to you and to show you the ordinances of those before you; and (He doth wish to) turn to you (In Mercy): And Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.

These like many many verses tell us that sunnah is all about following the god sent way of life ie islam as all people have been following as shown by his messengers.

Let me try and explain this a bit. Islam is aqqaid=beliefs and amaal=deeds. Now deeds are of two kinds a)rules of conduct in ptivate and in society ie interaction between people b)rules for ritualism in private and in society. Any act that has no effect on others is private and any act that has any effect in any respect on others is public or social in that respect.

Allah will forgive all sins save disbelief. This is made clear. However any sin that is not against allah alone needs forgiveness of the person also against whom the sin is committed.

It is a bigger sin to do wrong against other people than any sin one does against allah himself save disbelief.

This is the context in which people need to see where they stand. If your neighbour is hungry and you are not doing anything to feed him, your ritualism is useless.

002.177 YUSUFALI: It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces Towards east or West; but it is righteousness- to believe in Allah and the Last Day, and the Angels, and the Book, and the Messengers; to spend of your substance, out of love for Him, for your kin, for orphans, for the needy, for the wayfarer, for those who ask, and for the ransom of slaves; to be steadfast in prayer, and practice regular charity; to fulfil the contracts which ye have made; and to be firm and patient, in pain (or suffering) and adversity, and throughout all periods of panic. Such are the people of truth, the Allah-fearing.

Please do not get me wrong I do not mean that having beared is wrong but do not fight over these things and forget the bigger picture. If you do that then whatever you do is wrong because you are doing it out of its proper context.

You see in islam things are not just there but that they have a special place in islamic set up. If you do them out of place then whole thing becomes sensless. Let me explain. Let say you are praying. If you do all you need to do in prayer but not do them in right order or right way then any molavi sahib will tell you your prayer is not good. I mean you did every thing a person must do in prayer but all you did was just did them as you did them disregaring how they should have been done.

Likewise if we change the priority order of things in islam eg make ritualism more important than interaction then the whole purpose of islam is lost. You can sit home and pray all day and night but you will agree that this is not what islam is all about because it will not serve or fulfil the objective of islam.

Likewise allah sent prophets to be helped by their followers to make this world a better place for humanity. Tell me if the world will become a better place for all of us all by itself. Allah has made this world so that it is based on the principle of cause and effect.

013.011 YUSUFALI: For each (such person) there are (angels) in succession, before and behind him: They guard him by command of Allah. Allah does not change a people's lot unless they change what is in their hearts. But when (once) Allah willeth a people's punishment, there can be no turning it back, nor will they find, besides Him, any to protect.

057.025 YUSUFALI: We sent aforetime our messengers with Clear Signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance (of Right and Wrong), that men may stand forth in justice; and We sent down Iron, in which is (material for) mighty war, as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who it is that will help, Unseen, Him and His messengers: For Allah is Full of Strength, Exalted in Might (and able to enforce His Will).

061.011 YUSUFALI: That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew!

061.013
YUSUFALI: And another (favour will He bestow,) which ye do love,- help from Allah and a speedy victory. So give the Glad Tidings to the Believers.

061.014 YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Be ye helpers of Allah: As said Jesus the son of Mary to the Disciples, "Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?" Said the disciples, "We are Allah's helpers!" then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a portion disbelieved: But We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.

These like verses leave no room for doubt as to what is purpose of allah for sending prophets with his message ie so that their followers learn that message properly then teach it to other people so that all together estabisl what is good for all people because this gives them peace between themselves so that they could concentrate on helping each other towards a good life on this earth in the hope of hereafter for those who believe in hereafter.

So the major thing is to get people to join in struggle for the good of all ie muslims and nonmuslims. If a king sends his general with soldiers to fight the war then soldiers need to follow his orders in that respect and not do other things that may result in defeat. Likewise allah sent his messengers so that we obey them for the purpose that allah has chosen for all of us as a people and not go our own ways in different directions leaving the messenger on his own.

I hope this explains the point I am trying to explain but I will also request others to help because different people have different ways of explaining things that may help us understand better.

The message of the quran is good for all regardless they believe in allah or not but as human beings they can never find a better way of life than islam because it quarrantees success for all people in this life but also for here after for those who wish to believe that as well but there is no compulsion in islam on matters related to hearts and minds. It is unlikely though that if people see a better life becaue of islam in this world that they will not be convinced that it has something good for them in hereafter as well.