I am not obligated to answer your question the way you want . I already said what needed to be said and you can't even reply back . As far as the the trash you and other of youthias put out doesn't surprise me, I always here to help you speak the truth .You failed to answer a straight forward question related to your previous factual inaccuracy. If you cant answer dont bother to respond with your garbage.
Because if you dont have an answer you run like a CHICKEN! typical NOOTHIAI am not obligated to answer your question the way you want . I already said what needed to be said and you can't even reply back . As far as the the trash you and other of youthias put out doesn't surprise me, I always here to help you speak the truth .
What is the answer of a typical propaganda plow ?Because if you dont have an answer you run like a CHICKEN! typical NOOTHIA
Factually you are wrong! (AGAIN) Was Pakistan ASIAN Tiger in 2017? Was Lahore Paris in 2017?What is the answer of a typical propaganda plow ?
You won't be able to defend what you are out to defend . The only good aspect of the ruling is good Governance. The only defense they had was to attack others . Their performance of last 3 and a half year is a pathetic run . Bringing the GDP to negative and below zero first time in Pakistan history . The dollar was out of control. and lost more than 40 % of the value in last 3 years . The economy was left in a shamble. A bus load of lotas were all over the place in Government. What are you trying to ask ? A repetitive nonsense of infants .....
Don't be an idiot who can't shrug off attacking others but never see himself in the mirror.
Its a fucked up outdated criteria you are using to defend your logicFactually you are wrong! (AGAIN) Was Pakistan ASIAN Tiger in 2017? Was Lahore Paris in 2017?
Pakistan was DEBT free in 2017???
If the answer is NO. then you already lost your point.
PPP PMLN and FAUJI's are responsible for last 70 years, IK for 3.
now prove me wrong with your "SPECIAL BIASED" logic.
I know when I see one . You are just putting shoe right inside of your mouth . Go back and check to tell me if enough ass kissing of the stupid decision was not done in your first post .It Wasn't me who brought the moral factor into the debate, while defending funds from another evil in the same breath. Look into the mirror if you wanna see an idiot for real.
I know when I see one . You are just putting shoe right inside of your mouth . Go back and check to tell me if enough ass kissing of the stupid decision was not done in your first post .
You heard it right . Russia is an enemy of Pakistan . It has all the support help breaking your country and duly given to Indian and still has no remorse for disaster of 71 .Instead of personal attacks answer the question please.
Wasn't it you who tried to give it a moral spin and said that it wasn't morally right to get something from Russia? And that also when you were advocating for taking funds from a 10 times more morally corrupt country?
You heard it right . Russia is an enemy of Pakistan . It has all the support help breaking your country and duly given to Indian and still has no remorse for disaster of 71 .
On the other hand , Ukraine is a Sovereign country and has every right to get help from the world. Even when the American attacked Iraq ,Afghanistan and other countries , I stood for those countries and raised my voice.
It is not that Russian are ready to give you the discounted Oil, however, having your PM in front of the world screen standing with aggressive invading country's president was a terrible diplomatic posture, to say the least .
As far as getting the funds from IMF , its business as usual. Every country seek help to strengthened their economy , the most recent example is BD.
No one is advocating begging for money to America. No one is advocating begging even to friendly countries. Getting the IMF help on a loan is a standardized method for the countries to fix their economies. Greece is just going through a lot of changes and able to over the economy crisis and IMF program helped them come out of of the recession .There are no permanent enemies or friends in international relations. They helped India break us, we with the help of US broke them. Nations throughout the history has fought each other but were close allies in other times.
As for the moral aspect, you could have been right only if you had this as your universal principle and not be selective about it. According to such a principle if taking from Russia was bad because they invaded a country, then begging from USA was 10 times worse because invading countries is a routine for them.
No one is advocating begging for money to America. No one is advocating begging even to friendly countries. Getting the IMF help on a loan is a standardized method for the countries to fix their economies. Greece is just going through a lot of changes and able to over the economy crisis and IMF program helped them come out of of the recession .
So, stop twisting what I said . As a principled country and the one which has also been the victim of aggression, Pakistan should always stand with the sovereignty and the rights of the people and not flip flop depending on the direction of the wind .
Didn't you complain that IMF, European countries and other financial institutions won't extend their help to Pakistan now because of Russia?
Do you think IMF agreed to the funds without the US?
COAS's phone call to American administration is useless. The IMF has its own terms and policies , Even though USA is main and major contributor of the funds, its doesn't intervene in their policy making based on financial conditions ..To whom our Army chief begged for playing it's role in releasing the funds? If not then how it is not wrong to get benefit from this evil sow when it is wrong from another?
Where did I say that ? I hope you are reading right .
They still not agreed to extend their money . Their conditions are stiffened up, not softened.
COAS's phone call to American administration is useless. The IMF has its own terms and policies , Even though USA is main and major contributor of the funds, its doesn't intervene in their policy making based on financial conditions ..