The fact is that Khan has an illegitimate daughter and that is what will cause trouble.
I have no idea how do you ascertain facts! I don't know what are the facts however the following is what is publicly known.
The claim of paternity was made by Sita white when the girl was 4-5 years old and it was denied by the IK.
The California Family Court gave the
default decision because IK/his lawyers refused to cooperate with the proceedings mentioning that the case was ill-motivated and was instigated by his political opponents and she was being used as a political tool. He pled that those ill-motivated proceedings would be used as political propaganda, mud -slinging and character assignation which will mar his professional/commentator cricket career as well. White's case was filed prior to elections in Pakistan.
The court's
default decision was based on non-cooperation of IK, not on any paternity test.
It is a California law that in case of non-cooperation the mother's claim will be accepted with
a limited jurisdiction within California. No child support was awarded in this case.
Site White and Ik had friendship during 1987-88. The child was born in 1991 when she had relation with at least two other men in this period. Her claim was that she, long after their end of friendship, she had requested IK to sire a child with him and the child was the result of this once interaction in 1991 in a hotel room on her request while at the same period she was staying with another man.
The girl has never claimed about her paternity and IK has not interacted with her.
Sita White's case was instigated and proceeded by a lawyer arranged by Nawaz Sharif and was paid by him since she was broke at that time and was into drugs and was living alone in poverty. Sita White belonged to a very rich English family but was completely shunned by her family and she had died penniless.
She was once a close friend of Jemima, IK and Jemima had met through her. Prior to her death in 2004, she requested Jemima to have custody of the girl which Jemima accepted., which happened after her divorce with IK.
These are the publicly known facts - she made a claim and he denied that it happened.
As I know, the girl is living on her own and she can make her decisions. She has not made any claim yet. When she will make a claim in this regard or ask for paternal rights then we may be justified to ascertain facts in this regard. The case was political from the start and Patwaries are concerned about her wellbeing and rights more than her. My question is while she has not raised this issue on her own, on what basis the Pakistanis, especially Patwaris have become her
mamey. If we had some saner mind, we wouldn't had consistently put her at stakes and hurting her for our political gains. Patwaris who have taken her ownership have surely hurt her the most. IK has always refused to make a public comment on the issue for the welfare of the child and that his comments would hurt her whatever are the facts.