Behind the Myth of 3 million : The Truth that Mujib Suppressed

Waseem

Moderator
Staff member
4.1. The MCAs Report:
The MCAs whom Mujib personally assigned to the task of finding the casualty figures of their respective districts apparently went ahead with their task. With the help of their local district, subdivision, thana, and union Awami League party and governmental machineries, the MCAs concerned begun collating the ground level known casualty figures.

As has already been mentioned, for the district of Noakhali, one of the worst war affected districts of Bangladesh, Abdul Muhaimin could gather together a total of less than seven and. a half thousand reported losses of life. These included Razakars who fought to save Pakistan and were mercilessly killed by the armed Mukti Bahinis mainly after the surrender of the Pakistan Army on 16 December 1971. Even taking Noakhali as a representative of all the other 19 districts of Bangladesh, some of which hardly saw any action, the overall loss of life could not have been computed beyond one hundred and twenty-five thousand. [1]

Apparently, Abdul Muhaimin was not alone in coming up with such an unexpectedly disappointing casualty figure. A few others also came up with such unwelcome truths about the loss of life, property and honour. It has been said that once the MCAs concerned started reporting their preliminary findings to Mujib, the Bangladesh Prime Minister lost his trust in the ability of his Constituent Assembly colleagues to provide him with the expected proof of Pakistan Army's genocide. Being disappointed at their inefficiency, he then formed the 12-member strong Inquiry Committee under Abdur Rahim. [2]

4.2. The Inquiry Committee Report:
The Inquiry Committee seemed to have also failed Mujib in giving him the kind of truth he was after. The Government of Bangladesh never said a word about officially receiving the report, which was, as per as the original Gazette notification, due on or before 30 April 1972 or what happened to the Inquiry Committee's work.

On 6 June 1972, William Drummond reported:

"Since the third week of March, when the Inspector General's office in the Bangladesh Home Ministry began its field investigations, there have been about 2,000 complaints from citizens about deaths at the hands of the Pakistan Army have been received." [3]

Later, sources in Bangladesh reported that the draft report showed an overall casualty figure of 56,743. When a copy of this draft report was shown to the Prime Minister,

"he lost his temper and threw it on the floor, saying in angry voice 'I have declared three million dead, and your report could not come up with three score thousand! What report you have prepared? Keep your report to yourself. What I have said once, shall prevail." [4]

4.3. The Claim for Compensation:Seemingly, the claim for compensation from the families of the war victims also did not bring much joy for Mujib and his Government. As has already been mentioned, according to Col. Akbar Hussain's disclosure at the National Assembly of Bangladesh, the number of claimants did not exceed three hundred thousand. But, according to Abdul Muhaimin, the Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, had informed him that,

"Only 72,000 claims were received. Of them relatives of 50,000 victims had been awarded the declared sum of money. There had been many bogus claims, even some from the Razakars, within those 72,000 applications." [5]

Whatever be the actual figure, the 'victims' whose relatives were compensated might not be all victims of the Pakistan Army. A large number of refugees, 1.6 million according to one Awami League journalist [6], died in Indian refugee camps. Those who claimed compensation, also included families of many such dead refugees. Besides, there were also many false claimants.

4.4. The Bengali Heroines:Once the euphoria of 'liberation' started ebbing, the Bengali heroines silently disappeared from the news. One of the later-day myth makers could only report in 1974 that altogether about a hundred of them had been given into marriage at the various centres. [7] How many heroines were housed at such centres, how and when such centres were closed and what happened to the inmates, remained a closely guarded secret up to now. Here too, apparently the hard facts were too embarrassing to be disclosed.

There is little doubt whatever 'hard facts' Mujib had received from his MCAs and the Inquiry Committee, that these did not come any where remotely close to the three million figure raised and by implication made the claim of the alleged systematic killing aimed at genocide look ridiculous. Not surprisingly Mujib and his Government hurriedly placed a firm lid on the hard facts. Led by him, very conveniently they all went crying for the three million dead and three hundred thousand raped and spat venom on the Pakistani Army and their collaborators who, after all, had no chance of replying.

http://www.storyofbangladesh.com/Articles/History/Behind the Myth of 3 million.pdf
 

Waseem

Moderator
Staff member
Mujib's confusion on Bangladeshi deaths

Ian Jack (21 May) mentions the controversy about death figures in Bangladesh's liberation war. On 8 January 1972 I was the first Bangladeshi to meet independence leader Sheikh Mujibur Rahman after his release from Pakistan. He was brought from Heathrow to Claridge's by the Indian high commissioner Apa Bhai Panth, and I arrived there almost immediately.

Mujib was puzzled to be addressed as "your excellency" by Mr Panth. He was surprised, almost shocked, when I explained to him that Bangladesh had been liberated and he was elected president in his absence. Apparently he arrived in London under the impression that East Pakistanis had been granted the full regional autonomy for which he had been campaigning. During the day I and others gave him the full picture of the war. I explained that no accurate figure of the casualties was available but our estimate, based on information from various sources, was that up to "three lakh" (300,000) died in the conflict.

To my surprise and horror he told David Frost later that "three millions of my people" were killed by the Pakistanis. Whether he mistranslated "lakh" as "million" or his confused state of mind was responsible I don't know, but many Bangladeshis still believe a figure of three million is unrealistic and incredible.


Serajur Rahman

Retired deputy head, BBC Bengali Service

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/24/mujib-confusion-on-bangladeshi-deaths
 

cefspan

Minister (2k+ posts)
desistore-com_2157_1354934


A A K Niazi was saynig something like this in his book , that even Mujib mutilated the facts ,


but I just thought that the old man was going crazy , so THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

abbasiali

Minister (2k+ posts)
Things went worst in past in East Pakistan, All we know is, we loose one part of Pakistan, and responsible were never held responsible.................unfortunately history is in repeat, our people are still not Pakistani, Hatred is on peak on ethnic level...........most unfortunate part is, our overseas foreign citizens have shown worst behavior then residents...........
 

Unicorn

Banned
desistore-com_2157_1354934


A A K Niazi was saynig something like this in his book , that even Mujib mutilated the facts ,


but I just thought that the old man was going crazy , so THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

One thing that is always held true is that truth is the first causality in a war.
 

Salik

Senator (1k+ posts)
Things went worst in past in East Pakistan, All we know is, we loose one part of Pakistan, and responsible were never held responsible.................unfortunately history is in repeat, our people are still not Pakistani, Hatred is on peak on ethnic level...........most unfortunate part is, our overseas foreign citizens have shown worst behavior then residents...........

You are right.... but it is not only for our overseas brothers... it is an ocean of hatred which is raging in Pakistan... among ethnicities, sects and what not.... and people are simply not ready to tolerate each other...

اور یہ بہت افسوسناك ہے۔۔۔۔

الله رحم فرمائے۔۔۔
 

Night_Hawk

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Things went worst in past in East Pakistan, All we know is, we loose one part of Pakistan, and responsible were never held responsible.................unfortunately history is in repeat, our people are still not Pakistani, Hatred is on peak on ethnic level...........most unfortunate part is, our overseas foreign citizens have shown worst behavior then residents...........

I agree with you, our tolerance level is at its lowest.
We as Pakistani should unite. We can keep our ethnic identity but not the hatred towards each-other. We should be united not divided.
When I read the posts on the forum, it seems like we are talking to our worst enemies and if we were face to face we will kill each-other, WHY.
 

Night_Hawk

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Introduction to Stateless in Bangladesh and Pakistan



The Muslims of the Indian sub-continent demanded and eventually created a country for themselves. Before the British departed, India was partitioned in to two countries. Muslim majority areas became Pakistan and the rest became the present day India. Pakistan consisted of two provinces East Pakistan and West Pakistan, more than a thousand miles apart. After the partition India went through a great turmoil, and a huge transfer of population took place. Millions of Muslims of India moved either to West Pakistan (and are often referred to as “Mohajirs”) or to East Pakistan (and are often referred to as “Biharis”). Although there were many languages among the migrs from India, the majority spoke Urdu.

The new country Pakistan was supposed to have received her share of the assets of undivided India, but she didn’t. Pakistan was poor in every way imaginable, resources, trained personnel and infra-structure. Most of the machinery of government was located in what was now India. Pakistan was mostly agrarian, and economically underdeveloped with almost no industry. At a time like this the founders of the country considered it necessary to direct the new migrs to go to areas of the country where their services could be best utilized. As a consequence a large number of Biharis who worked for the Railway in India proceeded to East Pakistan and those employed with the central government in Delhi and elsewhere in India moved to Karachi.
Top
After the birth of Pakistan, Karachi was chosen as the capital, and Urdu was declared the official national language, the language identified by Muslims of the sub-continent as theirs. However a large segment of population, the Bengalis in East Pakistan were very unhappy with this decision and they made it known. The neglect of the aspirations of the East Pakistanis continued under many governments in Pakistan. The Politicians of East Pakistan spoke to these and many other grievances of the people of East Pakistan and eventually achieved a convincing victory at the ballot box. The Government of Pakistan and West Pakistani politicians were unable to reach necessary compromises with respect to sharing of power which resulted in a civil war.

The Biharis, the Urdu speaking minority of East Pakistan, not only stood for a united Pakistan, they also identified with language and culture of West Pakistan. During March-April 1971 the non-Bengali population mainly Urdu speaking were viciously attacked during which nearly 64,000 were killed and many more injured. Eventually the federal government called in the armed forces to restore law and order, and for a period of time they were successful. Due to recent disturbances the Biharis were also very afraid of the Bengali majority. Toward the end of 1971 the Bengali nationalists with over-whelming support of the local population and Pakistan’s chief rival India managed to militarily beat Pakistan.

East Pakistan had declared herself the independent state of “Bangladesh” in March 1971 with government in exile in Calcutta. On December 15, 1971, ninty five thousand Pakistani armed forces and other personnel surrendered in Dhaka, and were taken to India. The minority, which cooperated with the Pakistani government, were now considered traitors and were under assault by the Bengali majority for their language and political views. For the protection of this population they were given sanctuary by the International Red Cross in certain areas of the country, which later came to be known as camps. There are still 70 camps in various parts of Bangladesh with a population of more then 250-300,000 people. In the newly liberated Bangladesh thousands of Biharis were killed on the streets, maimed, raped and looted. Their homes and businesses were confiscated. They were fired from their jobs and Bihari students were expelled from schools.
Top
After break-up of Pakistan Mr. Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto hailing from the province of Sindh, became the President of the country and had the responsibility for negotiating release of prisoners and settlement of other outstanding issues such as transfer of population. By this time 535,000 Pakistanis had registered with the International Committee of the Red Cross in Bangladesh and had indicated their preference to move to West Pakistan. However the Pakistani Administration introduced conditions upon who or how many, shall be accepted for repatriation to Pakistan. In the end Pakistan accepted the return of only 173,000 Pakistanis. Introduction of limitations and conditions on the repatriation of this population was not only unconstitutional (according to the constitution of Pakistan) i.e. illegal it was also an abuse of authority and an immoral act by the Pakistani head of state. Mr. Bhutto knew that the extermination of the citizens of his State was in progress in Bangladesh yet he chose to deny responsibility for protection of these citizens of the Pakistan.

These Pakistanis left in Bangladesh became the first group of stateless, because Bangladesh did not accept them as citizens either. Realizing the government of Pakistan was not going to repatriate them, Pakistanis in Bangladesh continued to repatriate themselves and their families by whatever means were available to them. Government of Pakistan issued a presidential ordinance in March 1978 stripping all Pakistanis left in Bangladesh after December 1971 of their nationality, unilaterally, retroactively, arbitrarily and en masse . This ordinance was and is illegal and the sole purpose of the ordinance was to deprive a group of citizens, the common feature of the group being their language, of their basic right as citizens of Pakistan. There are around one hundred thousand Pakistanis who returned without the blessing of the Government of Pakistan, now living in Pakistan who are not recognized as citizens and are denied all amenities of citizenship. This is the second group of stateless. We advocate for restoration of full rights of citizenship for both these groups.

http://www.statelesspeopleinbangladesh.net/introduction_B_P.php
 
Last edited:

Unicorn

Banned
Night Hawk I am not saying that you are lying you might be posting the truth as you
know it.

Pakistan did get its share of assets even though it was not in proportion to the population.

At first India refused to pay because Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir.

Then "Gay Gandhi" went on hunger strike demanding that India pays the agreed upon share of the assets to Pakistan and it was Paid.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/partition1947_01.shtml

Hopes for Pakistan

Strong support for the idea of an independent Pakistan came from large Muslim landowning families in the Punjab and Sindh, who saw it as an opportunity to prosper within a captive market free from competition.
Support also came from the poor peasantry of East Bengal, who saw it as an opportunity to escape from the clutches of moneylenders - often Hindu. Both were to be disappointed. Independent Pakistan inherited India's longest and strategically most problematic borders.

The heartland of support for the Muslim League lay in Uttar Pradesh, which was not included within Pakistan.


At the same time, 90% of the subcontinent's industry, and taxable income base remained in India, including the largest cities of Delhi, Bombay and Calcutta. The economy of Pakistan was chiefly agricultural, and controlled by feudal elites.
Furthermore, at the division of India, Pakistan won a poor share of the colonial government's financial reserves - with 23% of the undivided land mass, it inherited only 17.5% of the former government's financial assets. Once the army had been paid, nothing was left over for the purposes of economic development.
The great advantage enjoyed by the Indian National Congress was that it had worked hard for 40 years to reconcile differences and achieve some cohesion among its leaders. The heartland of support for the Muslim League, however, lay in central north India (Uttar Pradesh) which was not included within Pakistan.
Muslims from this region had to flee westwards and compete with resident populations for access to land and employment, leading to ethnic conflict, especially in Sindh.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/partition1947_01.shtml#top
 

Night-Hawk

Senator (1k+ posts)
Excellent work by none other than a Bengali himself. Very interestingly he also analyzes Pakistani inefficiency to counter those fat lies ;

Curiously, those in Pakistan have remained indolent. There was no
attempt to refute any of the vile accusations, including this very
loathsome charge. Instead, there appeared to be a misplaced hope that
apologetic smile to any and every charge would help in taking the heat
out and once sobriety was restored and goodwill regenerated, the time
would arrive for the truth to come out. Despite its many attractions,
such a stand back posture has helped in perpetuating the falsehood and
possibly retarding the restoration of the brotherly relationship between
the peoples of Pakistan and Bangladesh. [2] For the intention of the
mythmakers was to harbour hatred.
 

Night_Hawk

Siasat.pk - Blogger
Night Hawk I am not saying that you are lying you might be posting the truth as you know it.

[HI]Pakistan did get its share of assets even though it was not in proportion to the population.[/HI]

At first India refused to pay because Pakistan had already invaded Kashmir.

Then "Gay Gandhi" went on hunger strike demanding that India pays the agreed upon share of the assets to Pakistan and it was Paid.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/partition1947_01.shtml

Hopes for Pakistan

Strong support for the idea of an independent Pakistan came from large Muslim landowning families in the Punjab and Sindh, who saw it as an opportunity to prosper within a captive market free from competition.
Support also came from the poor peasantry of East Bengal, who saw it as an opportunity to escape from the clutches of moneylenders - often Hindu. Both were to be disappointed. Independent Pakistan inherited India's longest and strategically most problematic borders.
The heartland of support for the Muslim League lay in Uttar Pradesh, which was not included within Pakistan.

At the same time, 90% of the subcontinent's industry, and taxable income base remained in India, including the largest cities of Delhi, Bombay and Calcutta. The economy of Pakistan was chiefly agricultural, and controlled by feudal elites.
Furthermore, at the division of India, Pakistan won a poor share of the colonial government's financial reserves - with 23% of the undivided land mass, it inherited only 17.5% of the former government's financial assets. Once the army had been paid, nothing was left over for the purposes of economic development.
The great advantage enjoyed by the Indian National Congress was that it had worked hard for 40 years to reconcile differences and achieve some cohesion among its leaders. The heartland of support for the Muslim League, however, lay in central north India (Uttar Pradesh) which was not included within Pakistan.
Muslims from this region had to flee westwards and compete with resident populations for access to land and employment, leading to ethnic conflict, especially in Sindh.

The information is readily available on the net. and I have posted a link in some posts on the same thread.
The history is written or narrated by individuals, the writer's background and beliefs are also projected in narration of the history.
 

Unicorn

Banned
The information is readily available on the net. and I have posted a link in some posts on the same thread.
The history is written or narrated by individuals, the writer's background and beliefs are also projected in narration of the history.

You have not given any link that claims India did not pay the agreed upon share of the treasury give me a link that is at least equally credible then BBC.

Stateless people of Bangladesh (Beharis) who colabrated with Pak army. Please consider giving them some room in Pakistan as the left Bihar looking for better pastures without realizing that the will be stateless oneday.

I know that death of three million is a myth.
 
Last edited:

Night_Hawk

Siasat.pk - Blogger
You have not given any link that claims India did not pay the agreed upon share of the treasury give me a link that is at least equally credible then BBC.

Stateless people of Bangladesh (Beharis) who colabrated with Pak army. Please consider giving them some room in Pakistan as the left Bihar looking for better pastures without realizing that the will be stateless oneday.

I know that death of three million is a myth.

If you would read the whole thread and look for links, you will find it.
You should also read the deception: Nehru Lord Mountbatten and his wife 1947. If you need any links I will be more than happy to provide it.
 

Unicorn

Banned
If you would read the whole thread and look for links, you will find it.
You should also read the deception: Nehru Lord Mountbatten and his wife 1947. If you need any links I will be more than happy to provide it.

I am only looking for specific information will not read the whole article. We all know that Nehru had an affair with Lady Mountbatten. Let me reveal this to you that he also tried to have an affair with Jackie Kennedy but she did not give him time of the day.
 

Star Gazer

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
Excellent work by none other than a Bengali himself. Very interestingly he also analyzes Pakistani inefficiency to counter those fat lies ;

You have to keep in mind who was the leader of pakistan at the time. ZAB government spend more time and energy trying to demoralize the Pakistan armyand nation in the early part of his rule, rather than counter any false allegations.
There were 40,000 Army personel as POWs not 90,000.
Gen. A.A.K. Niazi kept demanding to be court martialled untill his last days but no court martial was done. This perhaps would be the first case of a Gen. asking for a court martial and the PM of the country ignoring him, because an official investigation would bring out too many truths and cause too much trouble for ZAB.
 

Zionist Hindu

Senator (1k+ posts)
I will give the UN reports the most credibility. They were there for a long time.
I always thought It was 3 million or some where close to 3 million. If it is 300,000 than I would correct myself next time. Contra, if you have read UN reports, what is the numbers according to UN report?