Yaar kahan se sochte ho. Rationality has nothing to do with science, generally. Logical inference does.
Rational is the state or quality of a human being to contemplate and agree to reason. Rational is bound by the five senses and one's experience. Logical inference is deterministic and conclusive through step based mathematical approaches.
And you can't hold a rational position and then ask for scientific evidence which is logical. On the contrary, a scientific position will require logical or deterministic evidence.
Another case of your intellectual dishonesty.
Plus abhi to types of evidence pe baat nahin hui and the limitations of science that the scientists themselves accept.
I dont have a religion. Lack of belief in God or religions is not a religion.
And I dont really care about cateogiries like Atheism or Scientism, I have very clear positions.
I dont believe in any Gods or religions because there is no evidence to support them.
On science, I dont believe on anything that does not have enough evidence supporting it.
@ Mr Sansdaan
Who gave you the credentials to qualify scientific evidence in the sense that it is enough or not? Basic Research Methodology to aati nahin hai. Bhai evidence qualify bhi karte hain ab.
Honestly I have never heard the word scientism before and I do not think I believe in it.
I don't really care what you think, as your level of accurate and precise thinking is very much so lacking. I respond to you to set the record straight for people who read this thread. Basic definitions are wrong on your part. I am very disappointed at your knowledge level. All evidence from this thread points to that you are a Pseudo-Intellectual who throws words around and does not have the faintest idea of what they actually mean. "Science is knowledge." ? ? ?
My position is this: Its irrational to believe in anything that we cannot justify without evidence. Whether it is Santa Clause, Tooth Fairy or Gods. If you have a problem with my position then attack my position, not the strawmen that you create.
I am attacking your position. Your position is irrational and illogical at the same time according to the definitions of Rational and Logic i had shared.
You cannot hold a rational position and ask for scientific evidence. That's logically and rationally incorrect. Go back to the definitions if you need further clarification. You can hold a logical position because of mathematical determination and ask for contrary or corroborative scientific evidence to validate your position in an argument or discourse.
Ab evidence ki types bhi samjhani paregi definitions se. Go study scientific evidence classifications vs non - scientific evidence classifications.
History, Philosophy, Law, Ethics, Linguistics, Language and Religion. Also Meaning of Life, Human Condition, Ways of Human Interaction, Cultures and Morality, all are considered para-sciences or non-sciences.
This means the scientific method cannot be applied to them.
Aap ke Harris standard ke evidence gaya tail lene.
Your position should be: "I don't believe in God not as a Rational, but as a logic that I would like to be provided scientific proof or evidence for existence of God. If you are provided scientific evidence, that would be called confirmatory or corroborative evidence.
Non-science is not to be confused with Pseudo-Science.
An example of semi-science or interdependent science is Archeology because it borrows from both the natural sciences and history which is a non-science.
www.merriam-webster.com
