Should use AI and deep fake Salman - Qasim run behind Cars

[zaheer2003]

Means you don't know.
That is all right. 99.9% Imranis are like you. Riding on a hypothesis of an infinite figure. I want you to admit first that you don't know and there has to be solid number. Then I will help you out with figure.

The hypocracy is this the mother Kalsoom Nawaz said we bought avenfield for kids in 1990's , Party leaders said we kept visiting Mian sanp in apartments from 1990's . Dablu said we bought it in 2006 or so. but nobody gave us money trail to show amount. But yes few local news paper told the amount as

https://www.siasat.pk/threads/penth...-londons-swankiest-addresses-to-amass.632381/

اب تم جیسے لوگ پھر بھی کہتے ہو کہاں ہیں فلیٹ کون سے فلیٹ ؟

جب تم چور کوئی منی ٹریل دو گے تو دیکھیں گے کتنے پیسے کیسے چوری ہوئے ورنہ تو جو لوکل حساب کتاب ہے اسی کو لے کر چلنا ہو گا۔

Penthouse pirates: Sharif family's Avenfield House valued at £32 million​

https://www.brecorder.com/news/4612773

 

[RajaRawal111]

The hypocracy is this the mother Kalsoom Nawaz said we bought avenfield for kids in 1990's , Party leaders said we kept visiting Mian sanp in apartments from 1990's . Dablu said we bought it in 2006 or so. but nobody gave us money trail to show amount. But yes few local news paper told the amount as

https://www.siasat.pk/threads/penth...-londons-swankiest-addresses-to-amass.632381/

اب تم جیسے لوگ پھر بھی کہتے ہو کہاں ہیں فلیٹ کون سے فلیٹ ؟

جب تم چور کوئی منی ٹریل دو گے تو دیکھیں گے کتنے پیسے کیسے چوری ہوئے ورنہ تو جو لوکل حساب کتاب ہے اسی کو لے کر چلنا ہو گا۔

Penthouse pirates: Sharif family's Avenfield House valued at £32 million​

https://www.brecorder.com/news/4612773

I am glad that you brought up the Penthouse Pirates story WHICH IS FACTUALLY CORRECT. Appreciate your research, You brought some figures from different Papers. That proves my point that you had a vague hypothesis. But that is all right. I will take you to the solid corruption figure of Shareefs.
To proceed can I ask you what you know about the NAB-Broadsheet agreement? It is not a stupid Q. It will take us to the point we want to go.
It is getting late for me. I will talk further on it tomorrow.

 

[zaheer2003]

I am glad that you brought up the Penthouse Pirates story WHICH IS FACTUALLY CORRECT. Appreciate your research, You brought some figures from different Papers. That proves my point that you had a vague hypothesis. But that is all right. I will take you to the solid corruption figure of Shareefs.
To proceed can I ask you what you know about the NAB-Broadsheet agreement? It is not a stupid Q. It will take us to the point we want to go.
It is getting late for me. I will talk further on it tomorrow.

I thought now you will bring total wealth information and some money trail for shareef's wealth and tell its all genuine and they also present this in court. So the issue of corruption is not there

 

[RajaRawal111]

I thought now you will bring total wealth information and some money trail for shareef's wealth and tell its all genuine and they also present this in court. So the issue of corruption is not there

Just answer my question please.
We will discuss it further tomorrow.

 

[RajaRawal111]

I thought now you will bring total wealth information and some money trail for shareef's wealth and tell its all genuine and they also present this in court. So the issue of corruption is not there

Okay if you are not replying then, let me go ahead.
There has to be a solid figure on how much corruption Shareefs have done over the years. And this figure came out from the bible of Shareefs corruption which is Panama JIT.
Broadsheet had a contract with NAB that whatever corruption Shareefs have done, Broadsheet will take 20% of this and GOP will be the owner of 80%.
So Broadsheet (after winning the case against GOP) went to the London arbitration court for its share. So, the London Arbitration court had to figure out the net worth of the looting that Shareefs had done. So this figure must be the exact court-accepted figure
No please download the following decisions from Scribd ( you may need a subscription - you can get a trial subscription and cancel it later).

https://www.scribd.com/document/491113979/UK-high-court-decision-in-NAB-vs-Broadsheet-LLC-liability-issues

 

[zaheer2003]

Okay if you are not replying then, let me go ahead.
There has to be a solid figure on how much corruption Shareefs have done over the years. And this figure came out from the bible of Shareefs corruption which is Panama JIT.
Broadsheet had a contract with NAB that whatever corruption Shareefs have done, Broadsheet will take 20% of this and GOP will be the owner of 80%.
So Broadsheet (after winning the case against GOP) went to the London arbitration court for its share. So, the London Arbitration court had to figure out the net worth of the looting that Shareefs had done. So this figure must be the exact court-accepted figure
No please download the following decisions from Scribd ( you may need a subscription - you can get a trial subscription and cancel it later).

https://www.scribd.com/document/491113979/UK-high-court-decision-in-NAB-vs-Broadsheet-LLC-liability-issues

This document outlines the arbitration case between Broadsheet LLC and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan alongside the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). This arbitration judgment revolves around a contractual dispute related to an Asset Recovery Agreement (ARA). Key issues addressed include:

1. Termination of Contract: NAB attempted to cancel the contract with Broadsheet, claiming pre-contract misrepresentation and contract breaches. Broadsheet countered, arguing that NAB’s termination itself violated the agreement.
2. Claims and Damages: Broadsheet sought damages for lost income due to the contract’s premature termination, alleging NAB’s breach and demanding compensation.
3. Legal Questions on Assignments and Settlements: The judgment examines if Broadsheet's assignments (transfers of rights) and a separate settlement agreement affect its claims against Pakistan.
4. Tort of Conspiracy: Broadsheet also accused NAB of conspiracy, aiming to economically harm Broadsheet by unlawfully ending the agreement.

In summary, the judgment addresses the liability and breaches under the ARA, along with applicable compensation laws from different jurisdictions, including Isle of Man and Colorado law. This arbitration judgment provides an analysis of each party's claims and defenses within the framework of international arbitration laws.

Nothing about Shareefs their corruption or wealth it contains.

میں پھر دہراتا ہوں شریفوں کے پاس ایک روپیہ بھہ ہو لیکن کیا کسی عدالت میں منی ٹریل دی اس پیسے کی ؟

 

[RajaRawal111]

This document outlines the arbitration case between Broadsheet LLC and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan alongside the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). This arbitration judgment revolves around a contractual dispute related to an Asset Recovery Agreement (ARA). Key issues addressed include:

1. Termination of Contract: NAB attempted to cancel the contract with Broadsheet, claiming pre-contract misrepresentation and contract breaches. Broadsheet countered, arguing that NAB’s termination itself violated the agreement.
2. Claims and Damages: Broadsheet sought damages for lost income due to the contract’s premature termination, alleging NAB’s breach and demanding compensation.
3. Legal Questions on Assignments and Settlements: The judgment examines if Broadsheet's assignments (transfers of rights) and a separate settlement agreement affect its claims against Pakistan.
4. Tort of Conspiracy: Broadsheet also accused NAB of conspiracy, aiming to economically harm Broadsheet by unlawfully ending the agreement.

In summary, the judgment addresses the liability and breaches under the ARA, along with applicable compensation laws from different jurisdictions, including Isle of Man and Colorado law. This arbitration judgment provides an analysis of each party's claims and defenses within the framework of international arbitration laws.

Nothing about Shareefs their corruption or wealth it contains.

میں پھر دہراتا ہوں شریفوں کے پاس ایک روپیہ بھہ ہو لیکن کیا کسی عدالت میں منی ٹریل دی اس پیسے کی ؟

It seems like you just skimmed through the judgment, did not go through it in details. But is is all right. I just wanted you to download it first.
You read the news articles about the broadsheet and NAB. Whatever you wrote above is 100% true, but this was one set behind the Arbitration. Broadsheet won the case against the NAB and GOP. London Court accepted their claims and called them a victim of wrongful contract dismissal. Now NAB and GOP have to pay damages to the Broadsheet "" ACCORDING TO ORIGNAL CONTRACT"".

So the Arbitration court comes into play. It has to decide how much the Broadsheet deserves. So this court has to determine the exact looting Shareefs have done to calculate 20% of this which will be paid to Broadsheet.

Anything that you do not agree with in the above text of mine?

 

[zaheer2003]

It seems like you just skimmed through the judgment, did not go through it in details. But is is all right. I just wanted you to download it first.
You read the news articles about the broadsheet and NAB. Whatever you wrote above is 100% true, but this was one set behind the Arbitration. Broadsheet won the case against the NAB and GOP. London Court accepted their claims and called them a victim of wrongful contract dismissal. Now NAB and GOP have to pay damages to the Broadsheet "" ACCORDING TO ORIGNAL CONTRACT"".

So the Arbitration court comes into play. It has to decide how much the Broadsheet deserves. So this court has to determine the exact looting Shareefs have done to calculate 20% of this which will be paid to Broadsheet.

Anything that you do not agree with in the above text of mine?

Dear you are not reading it even. Its an agreement broke by NAB and now broadsheet asking a compensation on that.

Do you deny these are not Main Sanp family properties ?

 

[RajaRawal111]

Dear you are not reading it even. Its an agreement broke by NAB and now broadsheet asking a compensation on that.

Do you deny these are not Main Sanp family properties ?

I have read each and every word of this judgment.
Can you please crack your hard-mold brain a bit and see the facts determined by the Court that do not belong to Pakistan?
I am coming to the same point. The prices of all of these properties.

Let us please look at the court papers rather than your Facebook printouts. -- Can we? -- Please?

 

[zaheer2003]

I have read each and every word of this judgment.
Can you please crack your hard-mold brain a bit and see the facts determined by the Court that do not belong to Pakistan?
I am coming to the same point. The prices of all of these properties.

Let us please look at the court papers rather than your Facebook printouts. -- Can we? -- Please?

So you want to tell me a company lost its old agreement which they did not completed from a decade will tell we found 10 properties of blah blah amount and this is the whole for Mian Sanp family ?


A property agent may invest in 10 properties at a time and when stock gets sold may be he dose have left with no property. The only thing he could have cash. The question is from where he got money to buy those properties and run its business.

Everyone is asking a money trail. Come to this point where is money trail of even Even field property where Mian Sanp again landed last week

 

[RajaRawal111]

So you want to tell me a company lost its old agreement which they did not completed from a decade will tell we found 10 properties of blah blah amount and this is the whole for Mian Sanp family ?


A property agent may invest in 10 properties at a time and when stock gets sold may be he dose have left with no property. The only thing he could have cash. The question is from where he got money to buy those properties and run its business.

Everyone is asking a money trail. Come to this point where is money trail of even Even field property where Mian Sanp again landed last week

No, I don't want to tell you anything extra. I am coming, exactly to the same point that you are asking. Prices of the properties and the money trail Etc. Etc.
I just want you to tell me if you will accept the jurisdiction of the court that talks about the same subject, or if you will accept the jurisdiction of your Facebook.
If Facebook is everything for you then we can stop right here. No need to waste each other's time.

 

[zaheer2003]

No, I don't want to tell you anything extra. I am coming, exactly to the same point that you are asking. Prices of the properties and the money trail Etc. Etc.
I just want you to tell me if you will accept the jurisdiction of the court that talks about the same subject, or if you will accept the jurisdiction of your Facebook.
If Facebook is everything for you then we can stop right here. No need to waste each other's time.

I never posted any facebook material without going after the facts of the post. Why not we need to see what about the facts reported widely. Also accepted by the Dablu Bablu family in a timeline. You come up with text from the court decision what you learned. I will see that

 

[RajaRawal111]

I never posted any facebook material without going after the facts of the post. Why not we need to see what about the facts reported widely. Also accepted by the Dablu Bablu family in a timeline. You come up with text from the court decision what you learned. I will see that

Good news for you is that court figures are ways above the prices you have posted in your pictures. Is that going to make you feel comfortable with court figures?

 

[zaheer2003]

Good news for you is that court figures are ways above the prices you have posted in your pictures. Is that going to make you feel comfortable with court figures?

Go ahead and bring some reasonable thing on table to analyze

 

[RajaRawal111]

Go ahead and bring some reasonable thing on table to analyze

Good Stuff.
So now I assume that you have the judgment in front of you. And you know that this judgment is going to determine the maximum corruption Sharifs have done. And based on this figure the court will determine the money that GOP/NAB is bound to pay to Broadsheet. ((which is 20% of the Shareefs corruption))

And as I said, this figure is way above the sum that you have presented in your posts.

 

[RajaRawal111]

Go ahead and bring some reasonable thing on table to analyze

So - for the proceding of this Arbitration court, The judge of the arbitration court "Sir Anthony Evans" hired an Audit firm (based in Newyork). the name of the auditor firm is Stroz Friedberg. So this is the wording on Para Q5.4 Page-32 of judgment.

Quote. Page-32 Para Q5.4:
Stroz Friedberg was instructed to carry out a ‘forensic audit’ (or ‘inventory’) of the JIT Report. This consisted of identifying potentially recoverable assets of the Sharif Family that were referred to in it and ascribing a valuation to each. This resulted in a list of 76 items of property in three overseas jurisdictions, namely, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the United Kingdom, as well as in Pakistan, with total values that were corrected in the Revised SF Report to take account of Mr. Bezant’s comments on it. The revised total was US$820.8 million.

This figure is ways above your numbers. So according to JIT report there was a total of 820 million US dollars in corruption Shareefs have done (which is close to a billion dollars = 820 billion Rs as today's total.
Did that figure throw you off the chair ??

 

[zaheer2003]

So - for the proceding of this Arbitration court, The judge of the arbitration court "Sir Anthony Evans" hired an Audit firm (based in Newyork). the name of the auditor firm is Stroz Friedberg. So this is the wording on Para Q5.4 Page-32 of judgment.

Quote. Page-32 Para Q5.4:
Stroz Friedberg was instructed to carry out a ‘forensic audit’ (or ‘inventory’) of the JIT Report. This consisted of identifying potentially recoverable assets of the Sharif Family that were referred to in it and ascribing a valuation to each. This resulted in a list of 76 items of property in three overseas jurisdictions, namely, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the United Kingdom, as well as in Pakistan, with total values that were corrected in the Revised SF Report to take account of Mr. Bezant’s comments on it. The revised total was US$820.8 million.

This figure is ways above your numbers. So according to JIT report there was a total of 820 million US dollars in corruption Shareefs have done (which is close to a billion dollars = 820 billion Rs as today's total.
Did that figure throw you off the chair ??

Unfortunately the copy of document i have download from a separate link dose not have the stuff you are sharing although the first few pages are same but i dont know other stuff is not there

 

[RajaRawal111]

Unfortunately the copy of document i have download from a separate link dose not have the stuff you are sharing although the first few pages are same but i dont know other stuff is not there

That is not so good. Please subscribe to Scribd, and Cancel it afterward. One of my friends in Canada helped me get this because I needed it for my work. It is a good resource of documents. This is a 69-page judgment and is still available on this link. I just checked it.

2018 12 17 CIArb Broadsheet Quantum Award | PDF | Damages | Public Law

Broadsheet

www.scribd.com

another source may be the UK court's archives. I am not sure about that.

 

[RajaRawal111]

Unfortunately the copy of document i have download from a separate link dose not have the stuff you are sharing although the first few pages are same but i dont know other stuff is not there

Anyways, while you work on your subscription. I will proceed.
As you saw, Shareef's Corruption much your thoughts. JIT Report in its 9 volumes has dug every hidden wealth of these rascals. Stroz Friedberg (The Auditor) read the complete JIT reports and pulled out all the info from this report about Saudia, UAE, and Pakistan as well. Its only responsibility was to extract the exact worth of Shareef's corruption stated in JIT report.
So they calculated the 20% share of Boradsheet and on the same page of judgement it states the following.

Quote: Page-32
The revised total was US$820.8 million. The third instruction was “to apply the 20% rate due Broadsheet as outlined in the ARA” – a mechanical application of the 20% rate provided four in the ARA clause 4 – which resulted in a total ‘Loss of Revenue’ for Broadsheet of US$164.2 million. The fourth was to establish a ‘borrowing rate of interest’ for each of the 76 items of loss and to apply it from what they considered was the appropriate date. The interest calculation increased the total of ‘Broadsheet’s Entitlement’ to US$304.6 million.

So with 20% + Interest rate + lost revenue, Broadsheet deserved 304.6 million dollars,
This is the amount that GOP/NAB must pay to Broadsheet because Nawaz Shareef has been convicted by a Pakistani court.

Now I will ask you a question. It was Imran Khans Govt at that time
Do you know how much did GOP paid to Broadsheet?

 

[zaheer2003]

Anyways, while you work on your subscription. I will proceed.
As you saw, Shareef's Corruption much your thoughts. JIT Report in its 9 volumes has dug every hidden wealth of these rascals. Stroz Friedberg (The Auditor) read the complete JIT reports and pulled out all the info from this report about Saudia, UAE, and Pakistan as well. Its only responsibility was to extract the exact worth of Shareef's corruption stated in JIT report.
So they calculated the 20% share of Boradsheet and on the same page of judgement it states the following.

Quote: Page-32
The revised total was US$820.8 million. The third instruction was “to apply the 20% rate due Broadsheet as outlined in the ARA” – a mechanical application of the 20% rate provided four in the ARA clause 4 – which resulted in a total ‘Loss of Revenue’ for Broadsheet of US$164.2 million. The fourth was to establish a ‘borrowing rate of interest’ for each of the 76 items of loss and to apply it from what they considered was the appropriate date. The interest calculation increased the total of ‘Broadsheet’s Entitlement’ to US$304.6 million.

So with 20% + Interest rate + lost revenue, Broadsheet deserved 304.6 million dollars,
This is the amount that GOP/NAB must pay to Broadsheet because Nawaz Shareef has been convicted by a Pakistani court.

Now I will ask you a question. It was Imran Khans Govt at that time
Do you know how much did GOP paid to Broadsheet?

Interesting question at the end
Do you know how much did GOP paid to Broadsheet?

when as per you it got established by Broadsheet even that they Shareef's have $820M plus money found yet.

You have concern how much GOP paid to BS (Broadsheet) ?

As a GOP I can raise many question still on BS that they did not finished work completely and properly and payment of commission was liable on recovery of asset to GOP. Yes may be UK court would not accept my claim as GOP due to many officials/institutes kept serving Napak Army under Imran Khan even. Not fighting case properly for the sake of Mian Sanp get his name clear.

Let keep the things till wealth exposed yet and valued by someone which we both agree this amount of $820M is tip of iceburg for Shareef's wealth.

The bigger question is did they provided money trail of anything yet or not