وزیراعظم اپوزیشن کی سازش کو جلسے میں بے نقاب کریں گے:فصیل جاوید خان

2imran%20khanmailsijalsa.jpg

ملک میں تحریک عدم اعتماد کی گونج ہے،وزیراعظم عمران خان کل وہاڑی کی تحصیل میلسی میں ایک اہم خطاب میں اپوزیشن کی تحریکِ عدم اعتماد کے حوالے سے بڑے انکشافات کریں گے،سینیٹر فیصل جاوید نے ٹوئٹر پر جاری بیان میں بتایا کہ کل وزیراعظم عمران خان وہاڑی میں اہم خطاب کریں گے۔

انہوں نے بتایا کہ عمران خان خطاب میں عوام کے لیے کیے گئے اقدامات سے آگاہ کرنے کے ساتھ ساتھ اپوزیشن کی وزیراعظم کیخلاف گرینڈ سازش کو بے نقاب کریں گے،سینیٹر فیصل جاوید نے یہ بھی کہا کہ تحریک عدم اعتماد کے پیچھے کیا ہے ؟ بڑے انکشافات سامنے آنے والے ہیں،اپوزیشن کو دوبارہ ناکامی کا سامنا کرنا پڑے گا انشاءاللہ۔

https://twitter.com/x/status/1500038214823788544
اپوزیشن کے نزدیک تحریک عدم اعتماد یااجلاس پارلیمنٹ کی محتاج نہیں،اپوزیشن آئندہ چند روز میں وزیر اعظم عمران خان کے خلاف عدم اعتماد کی تحریک قومی اسمبلی میں پیش کرنے پر متفق ہیں۔

پی ڈی ایم سربراہ مولانا فضل الرحمان اور مسلم لیگ نون کے قائد نواز شریف کے درمیان ٹیلی فونک رابطہ بھی ہوا ہے،دونوں رہنماؤں میں تحریک عدم اعتماد سے متعلق مشاورت کی گئی،دونوں رہنماؤں نے تحریک عدم اعتماد کیلیے نمبرز گیم پر اطمینان کا اظہار کیا،فضل الرحمان نے نواز شریف کو آئندہ کے اقدامات سے آگاہ کیا،دونوں رہنماؤں نے حکومت سے جلد قوم کو نجات دلانے پر بھی اتفاق کیا۔

https://twitter.com/x/status/1500136655671463936
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Wake up Pak

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
گر 48 گھنٹوں کے بعد بھی خوشخبری نہ ملی تب آپ نے پیٹ کے ساتھ بمب باندھ کر یہاں سے بنی گالا میں گُھسنا ہے۔

? ???
FM73d1WXEA4B9Zv
 

Husaink

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
وہاڑی میں کیا قرارداد پاکستان پیش ہوی تھی یا اسکندر یونانی کو شکست ہوی تھی جو اتنی اہم تقریر کیلئے چنا گیا ہے؟؟؟
چلو تو خان کو کہہ دیتے ہیں کہ لندن جاکر ویڈیو لنک سے اہم خطاب کرلے کیونکہ پٹواری لندن سے آنے والی وحی پر ہی ایمان لاتے ہیں
 

shujauddin

Minister (2k+ posts)
I hope Imran Khan will not repeat the same mistake done by Bhutto i.e.,
"Stupidly and publicly scolding a super power"​
Live like Ali Die Like Hussain. Bhutto become a legacy for confronting USA. Aaj koi General Zia ko pochta bhee nahi but bhutto's name is still alive!
 

arifkarim

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Aaj koi General Zia ko pochta bhee nahi but bhutto's name is still alive!
General Zia's son didn't sell his father to brainless Sindhi Jiyalas after his death. That's why Zia is dead and Bhutto is still alive, continuing with destruction of Sindh
 

IMIKasbati

Minister (2k+ posts)
Govt should offer 3 times more from the corrupt opposition camp. If opposition can buy parliamentarians from govt side, then govt can also buy them from the opposition camp. It's really not that difficult
IK will never do that because of his very strong sense of accountability in front of Allah.

And that is reason why he never use the traditional political methods to win such battles. He tries to fo the right things and leaves the result to Allah.

May Allah help him always....Aameen
 

shujauddin

Minister (2k+ posts)
No, he became a legacy for destroying industrialization of Pakistan
As always, u fail to see the big picture. Teacher Tells Arif that cows give milk, arif will fail once again to understand the utility of cow and will Object, No Sir , cow does shit !

Arif kareem grow up yaar !
 

Eyeaan

Chief Minister (5k+ posts)
I hope Imran Khan will not repeat the same mistake done by Bhutto i.e.,
"Stupidly and publicly scolding a super power"
Bhutto's was a publicity stints - primarily to recruit the left elements his local constituency whom he had abandoned and persecuted during his rule. general public also love macho images and conspiracies
I know a bit directly from people who were involved about that "letter waving" shenanigan and about his earlier his speech on the floor, and I may pen somewhere that tale.

Anyway Luis Wolpert has partially addressed Bhutto's blame game, in his biography, with documents from pak archives - what he was telling to Americans , to Russians , to Arabs and Shah, and how he was manipulating sections the opposition leaders Bhutto was a big liar or maybe over-smart.
The issue of US involvement was also researched and published by Khalid Hassan, Bhutto's secretary and a hardcore Bhutto loyalist - please find it - in short there is no evidence or hint of US involvement in any document. Henry Kissinger has also explained his alleged comment on occasions. I've personally searched into US released documents and other sources to look for US involvement but there is no evidence on paper than than PPP claims. Similarly, General Tirimizi's claim in his book is mere fluff and speculation.

At present ,there are somewhat reliable rumors about involvement of media groups with some "democracy- promoting " organizations to get targets. But that's all besides the point, Since Zia's time a section of PPP and several semi-political groups are writer have been openly raised and funded by western funds (which in, fact funneled by CIA?). that's the state of affairs in open since decades. Permanent Mil-civ schism is the highmark of western policy and their agents to influence policies. State department and US military have played part to keep keep politician and forces at bay, and that is documented. Under pmik, they have witness failure of their long used tactics. What is the validity of current rumors. maybe, matters not much. Dirty money isn't the issue in todays politics, and today, besides west. local politicians, domestic elite groups and businessmen in banking/financial sectors are after blood since sometime. But I'm hopeful that this strike on Pak state will fail for a better future.... man proposes, god disposes!
 

Dr Adam

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Bhutto's was a publicity stints - primarily to recruit the left elements his local constituency whom he had abandoned and persecuted during his rule. general public also love macho images and conspiracies
I know a bit directly from people who were involved about that "letter waving" shenanigan and about his earlier his speech on the floor, and I may pen somewhere that tale.

Anyway Luis Wolpert has partially addressed Bhutto's blame game, in his biography, with documents from pak archives - what he was telling to Americans , to Russians , to Arabs and Shah, and how he was manipulating sections the opposition leaders Bhutto was a big liar or maybe over-smart.
The issue of US involvement was also researched and published by Khalid Hassan, Bhutto's secretary and a hardcore Bhutto loyalist - please find it - in short there is no evidence or hint of US involvement in any document. Henry Kissinger has also explained his alleged comment on occasions. I've personally searched into US released documents and other sources to look for US involvement but there is no evidence on paper than than PPP claims. Similarly, General Tirimizi's claim in his book is mere fluff and speculation.

At present ,there are somewhat reliable rumors about involvement of media groups with some "democracy- promoting " organizations to get targets. But that's all besides the point, Since Zia's time a section of PPP and several semi-political groups are writer have been openly raised and funded by western funds (which in, fact funneled by CIA?). that's the state of affairs in open since decades. Permanent Mil-civ schism is the highmark of western policy and their agents to influence policies. State department and US military have played part to keep keep politician and forces at bay, and that is documented. Under pmik, they have witness failure of their long used tactics. What is the validity of current rumors. maybe, matters not much. Dirty money isn't the issue in todays politics, and today, besides west. local politicians, domestic elite groups and businessmen in banking/financial sectors are after blood since sometime. But I'm hopeful that this strike on Pak state will fail for a better future.... man proposes, god disposes!

But I'm hopeful that this strike on Pak state will fail for a better future.... man proposes, God disposes!

INSHA-ALLAH.
 

arifkarim

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
As always, u fail to see the big picture. Teacher Tells Arif that cows give milk, arif will fail once again to understand the utility of cow and will Object, No Sir , cow does shit !

Arif kareem grow up yaar !
Grow up yourself. Nations do not progress with great leaders but with good policies. Compared with Bhutto; Hitler, Stalin, Mao were a lot greater leaders and yet they left their nations in ruins when dead. Bhutto hailing from a feudal background came in power with one mission in mind to destroy the new industrialist class that evolved during Ayub years and that got powerful enough to challenge the feudal dogs like him in future. Therefore with a stroke of a pen he forced nationalized perfectly fine, profit making business enterprises. Original industrialists were left penny less after this forced take over / day light robbery of 22 biggest industrial families of Pakistan. Today even a slightist harsh move by the govt against big and powerful is challenged in court. But in Bhutto's days this forced nationalization wasn't challenged anywhere as it came from civilian martial law administrator's pen. There was and still is no justification for nationalization. Pakistan's industry never recovered after his policy disaster
 

LeanMean2

Senator (1k+ posts)
Grow up yourself. Nations do not progress with great leaders but with good policies. Compared with Bhutto; Hitler, Stalin, Mao were a lot greater leaders and yet they left their nations in ruins when dead. Bhutto hailing from a feudal background came in power with one mission in mind to destroy the new industrialist class that evolved during Ayub years and that got powerful enough to challenge the feudal dogs like him in future. Therefore with a stroke of a pen he forced nationalized perfectly fine, profit making business enterprises. Original industrialists were left penny less after this forced take over / day light robbery of 22 biggest industrial families of Pakistan. Today even a slightist harsh move by the govt against big and powerful is challenged in court. But in Bhutto's days this forced nationalization wasn't challenged anywhere as it came from civilian martial law administrator's pen. There was and still is no justification for nationalization. Pakistan's industry never recovered after his policy disaster
No one is denying that, but Bhutto had the courage and leadership skills that are unparalleled to this day. Can't comprehend both of them at the same time, Qatari?
 

shujauddin

Minister (2k+ posts)
Grow up yourself. Nations do not progress with great leaders but with good policies. Compared with Bhutto; Hitler, Stalin, Mao were a lot greater leaders and yet they left their nations in ruins when dead. Bhutto hailing from a feudal background came in power with one mission in mind to destroy the new industrialist class that evolved during Ayub years and that got powerful enough to challenge the feudal dogs like him in future. Therefore with a stroke of a pen he forced nationalized perfectly fine, profit making business enterprises. Original industrialists were left penny less after this forced take over / day light robbery of 22 biggest industrial families of Pakistan. Today even a slightist harsh move by the govt against big and powerful is challenged in court. But in Bhutto's days this forced nationalization wasn't challenged anywhere as it came from civilian martial law administrator's pen. There was and still is no justification for nationalization. Pakistan's industry never recovered after his policy disaster
bhosree nationalization vs privatization is a different topic and not related to the discussion. We are not talking about economy here. Your brain is one sided.
 

arifkarim

Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
No one is denying that, but Bhutto had the courage and leadership skills that are unparalleled to this day. Can't comprehend both of them at the same time, Qatari?
You call forced nationalization leadership? Which other country in the world has done that? Countries usually go to privatization to improve their economies. Bhutto went in opposite direction Khotay Patwari