Dear unicorn, you are not asking the real questions but probabaly you never thought about them.
1) Gandhi did not run for any office but people who can move masses can put people in offices and he put nehru in office. Any proof he opposed him? No but there is support for him from Gandhi.
2)ruling elite of india is master of masses and hindu religious leaders are highly respected by masses, true or fale? True. No prrof against it.
3)Are you telling me elections are free and fair in any country that is based on principle of secular democracy and capitalist or free market economy? It is game between powerful and wealthy.
4)Nehru was backed by powerful and wealthy elite of india, can you deny it? How many poor people are in india and what are seat ratio of poor people in indian national parliament or provincial state assemblies?
5)Some times tokenism pays and we are never that sure of people's backers and their reasons.
6) and 7)yes muslims masses were moved by those whose interest it served and the proof is that the very ideology according to which pakistan was created is thrown out by the very same ruling elite and their mullahs. Ask muslims here if they know much about it. Had they accepted the following of leadership then pakistan could not be taken over by people who took over pakistan and masses did not react against it.
8)Britain and allies. It is because you accepted their political and economic system. You only follow the ways of others if you like it or you are made to do it. If you are not very young then you should know how politics works locally, nationally and internationally. Can you see muslim world in turmoil? This is international politics.
If a people like muslims have been set in tumoil do you think that hindus would fair any better?
Please look into concept of two nation theory and see what happened and who caused all the trouble and why? That is what messed up everything for all of us. Gandhi and nehru did not see the foresight that iqbal and jinnah were showing in all this struggle. Had they then they would not have acted the way they did and cause needless bloodshed. Muslims were not at war with hindus but hindus were.
As for muslims it was like a son separates from his family for the betterment and family instead of supporting the son to give him a better start, starts fighting with him. It does not show much forethought by hindu leaders of the time.
There was no design from muslim side to start a war with hindus for independence otherwise muslims would have prepared better and fought there way through instead of being killed the way they were. It was all due to misinformation and disinformation spread by hindu leaders about islam and muslims and particularly about creation of pakistan which caused mistrust and distrust and suspicion between people for no reason at all.
Muslims were just reacting to situations other were creating for them. Had hindu leadership been sensible things could have been great for both parties. They instead joined their head with the british who took advantage of this situation and messed up things for us using our own people against us and that is what they are doing even today.
Think about it what was going on between USA and USSR and why? So why the same would not apply to any country in the world ie you are either with us or against us. So hindus leaders decided to go along and muslims leaders decided to get away from all this but their masses fell back in to the very same trap their leader saved them from whereas hindu leaders led their own people into that trap.
Hopefully these facts will make people think things in different light.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPGA4HNaSZY&feature=related
regards and all the best.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI85_LzbaQM&feature=related
Last edited:
