arifkarim
Prime Minister (20k+ posts)
Palestine is not a country. Kashmir is not a country. Their occupation is thus justified as per your logicThere is no occupation of Uyghurs, "Uyghurs" is not a country.
Palestine is not a country. Kashmir is not a country. Their occupation is thus justified as per your logicThere is no occupation of Uyghurs, "Uyghurs" is not a country.
derh footiyey. gand 1940 mein marwa bvethey aur aaj in ki "arifkarim "jagti haiIsrael signed a statement presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) yesterday urging China to allow independent observers access to its western Xinjiang region, where UN experts say nearly a million Uyghurs and other minorities have been unlawfully detained in camps.
The decision, the first of its kind by Israel, came after pressure from US President Joe Biden's administration, Walla news reported.
The joint statement – backed by Australia, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain and the US – cited reports of torture or cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment, forced sterilisation, sexual and gender-based violence and forced separation of children from their parents.
Beijing denies all allegations of abuse of Uyghurs and describes the camps as vocational training facilities to combat religious extremism.
"Credible reports indicate that over a million people have been arbitrarily detained in Xinjiang and that there is widespread surveillance disproportionately targeting Uyghurs and members of other minorities and restrictions on fundamental freedoms and Uyghur culture," the joint statement said.
"We urge China to allow immediate, meaningful and unfettered access to Xinjiang for independent observers, including the High Commissioner," it added.
According to the Walla report, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid decided to accede to a request from the US State Department to back the measure, after a long debate in the Foreign Ministry about possible fallout from the move.
However, Israel, which views China as one of its most important trading partners, did not put out a public statement explaining its backing for the UNHCR call, in an apparent bid to keep a low profile and avoid angering Beijing.
Since 2017, China has carried out massive and systematic abuses against Muslims living in Xinjiang.
China's alleged erosion of religious, cultural and human rights for more than one million ethnic Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang in the last decade has enraged western countries, prompting sanctions against Chinese officials and firms.
Source: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-condemn-china-abuses-against-uyghur-muslims/
In your blind hatred for Jews / IsraelisIn your blind love for Israel
Is it okay for a lion to kill a Buffalo?…… Really Arif?So it's okay for Palestinian police to kill Palestinians?
ExactlyUSA has recognised Golan as part of Israel and Jerusalem as capital of Israel
انسانی حقوق، آزادی، جمہوریت، مساوات کے علمبردار سب سے زیادہ ملوث ہیںیعنی انسانی حقوق کا ڈرامہ صرف مفادات کی سیاست ہے اور ہر ملک اس میں ملوث ہے
US doesn't recognize Tibet as China's terroritory tooOne can read between the fine print as one deems suitable. The crux remains that US does not recognize WB and Gaza as Israeli territory.
But UN does.US doesn't recognize Tibet as China's terroritory too
Palestinians first started in 1964 in JordanNup, it all started in early 2000, when the "exiled Government of East Turkistan" was formed in United States......
US is not the yardstick. Majority of the world is under aegis of UN.US doesn't recognize Tibet as China's terroritory too
Palestine "was" a country. It still is represented in the UN. Kashmir, on the other hand was neither under the rule of India or Pakistan. It had to go either to Pakistan or to India according to Plebiscite or a referendum, just like how Baluchistan, FATA and PATA areas were adjoined to Pakistan.Palestine is not a country. Kashmir is not a country. Their occupation is thus justified as per your logic
Who cares about UN. It is US that mattersBut UN does.
UN can't enforce anything without USUS is not the yardstick. Majority of the world is under aegis of UN.
Nope. It was British Palestine Mandate, not a countryPalestine "was" a country
But the yardstick remains UN, however impotent it may be.UN can't enforce anything without US
UN has passed more resolutions against Israel than any other country. It didn't change anything on the ground. Why? Because One country US is over turning the majority's decision over and over again. UN is useless, toothless international bodyBut the yardstick remains UN, however impotent it may be.
Life is fickle. Low and behold.UN has passed more resolutions against Israel than any other country. It didn't change anything on the ground. Why? Because One country US is over turning the majority's decision over and over again. UN is useless, toothless international body
Problem is UN. It started as international peace keeping body after witnessing the horrors of WW2, but soon turned into a club for protection of interests for 5 permanent member states. This hasn't changed to this dayLife is fickle. Low and behold.